Bug#806861: libidl: upgrade libidl-2-0_0.8.14-3_amd64.deb and "Errors were encountered while processing"

2015-12-02 Thread Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
Package: libidl
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

When I dist-upgrade my distro, I got the following error :
/
dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libidl-2-0_0.8.14-3_amd64.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libIDL-2.so.0.0.0', which is 
also in package libidl0:amd64 0.8.14-1
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.19-22) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libidl-2-0_0.8.14-3_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
/
And dpkg --configure -a reports the following messages:
//
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of python-pyorbit:
 python-pyorbit depends on libidl-2-0 (>= 0.8.14); however:
  Package libidl-2-0:amd64 is not installed.

dpkg: error processing package python-pyorbit (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of liborbit2:amd64:
 liborbit2:amd64 depends on libidl-2-0 (>= 0.8.14); however:
  Package libidl-2-0:amd64 is not installed.

dpkg: error processing package liborbit2:amd64 (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Errors were encountered while processing:
 python-pyorbit
 liborbit2:amd64
//

--Best Regards


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.1.6 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)



Processed: Re: Bug#806021: ekg2: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No such file or directory)

2015-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 src:ekg2
Bug #806021 [ftp.debian.org] ekg2: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A 
(No such file or directory)
Bug reassigned from package 'ftp.debian.org' to 'src:ekg2'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #806021 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #806021 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
806021: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=806021
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#806021: ekg2: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No such file or directory)

2015-12-02 Thread Santiago Vila

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:23:54PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 src:ekg2
> 
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 17:24:06 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> 
> > This is fixed in 1:0.4~pre+20120506.1-11 (which I uploaded).
> > 
> > It's sitting in the NEW queue waiting for some kind ftpmaster to
> > process it (even if it does not contain any new package).
> > 
> > It went to NEW because of Bug#798413.
> > 
> > So, since this is more a bug in ftp.debian.org than a bug in ekg2,
> > I'm reassigning.
> > 
> A package being in NEW is not an ftp.d.o bug.

Ok, but the package should not be in NEW to begin with.

This is explained in Bug#798413.

I wonder why ftpmaster decided to process "fte" recently and not "ekg2".
Both packages arrived at NEW for exacfly the same kafkaesque reason
(FTBFS in the Arch: all autobuilder).



Bug#796588: marked as done (adjtimex: Has init script in runlevel S but no matching service file)

2015-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Dec 2015 23:18:51 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#796588: fixed in adjtimex 1.29-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #796588,
regarding adjtimex: Has init script in runlevel S but no matching service file
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
796588: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796588
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: adjtimex
Severity: important
User: pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: init-rcs-service

Hi,

Your package adjtimex has an initscript that is enabled in runlevel
S, but it does not provide a corresponding systemd service unit.

Systemd generates units for all sysv init scripts that do not have a
corresponding systemd unit. By default, it sets
DefaultDependencies=yes, which means they get ordered after early
boot has finished.

The problem is that to preserve the runlevel S semantics, systemd in
debian is currently[1] ordering all S services Before=sysinit.target.
This target is particularly early in the boot sequence, which means
that it is most of the time too strict. In turn, this means it is
fairly easy to end up with dependency cycles. For an example, see bug
[763315]. Do note that the cycle still exists with sysvinit, it is
just that systemd complains more loudly.

Please add a systemd unit for the given service with the appropriate
dependencies, which most of the time will be less strict than
Before=sysinit.target. In other cases, the script is simply not
applicable in systemd, in which case the package should ship a
symlink to /dev/null as /lib/systemd/system/.service.

We have prepared a transition wiki page[2] explaining the issue in
more detail, and outlining some general guidance. Please refer to it
as it will have useful information.

If you have any other doubts, feel free to ask in
pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-- 

[1] 
http://sources.debian.net/src/systemd/222-2/debian/patches/Add-support-for-rcS.d-init-scripts-to-the-sysv-gener.patch/
[763315] https://bugs.debian.org/763315
[2] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-systemd/rcSMigration
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: adjtimex
Source-Version: 1.29-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
adjtimex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 796...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roger Shimizu  (supplier of updated adjtimex package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 01:04:06 +0900
Source: adjtimex
Binary: adjtimex
Architecture: source
Version: 1.29-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Roger Shimizu 
Changed-By: Roger Shimizu 
Description:
 adjtimex   - kernel time variables configuration utility
Closes: 636404 796588
Changes:
 adjtimex (1.29-6) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New maintainer (Closes: #636404).
   * debian/adjtimex.service: add systemd service (Closes: #796588).
   * debian/dirs: add new path for systemd service
   * debian/control: limit "Architecture" to linux-any
   * debian/patches/:
 - change the patching order to follow 01->02->03
 - 03-remove-a-few-unused-variable-to-avoid-gcc-warnings.patch:
   remove a few unused variables to avoid gcc warnings.
   * debian/watch: update to use real upstream's URL
   * remove unnecessary debian/dirs file
Checksums-Sha1:
 d406416262d46feef8b7ea4af168f0b466f198e2 1842 adjtimex_1.29-6.dsc
 fccc61c761dcc6a2a7bc5e5ffc2547543b255a7c 27036 adjtimex_1.29-6.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 64394af973264ddf37ead14c41a09a33f06264eb4f942f56d3599f7717f70b00 1842 
adjtimex_1.29-6.dsc
 2c011dbebe1c96933c358195f7eceb389047b18451e9321d285aac6a6bee9786 27036 
adjtimex_1.29-6.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 5a77dac93ec0f363035ef069e5ec1532 1842 admin optional adjtimex_1.29-6.dsc
 0249e22e7e0f795571d10dacd86ca792 27036 admin optional 
adjtimex_1.29-6.debian.tar.xz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWX3tlAAoJEKO6uuJAjdbPfcEP+wUNWDoqdDq57EenyOSGplqV
5c4f8WmdeI2MHe//uU1Pb4F4l7I8UgZJb5Q/F1fIWEtHNYiFhiVH4MAEOnSNXlbx

Bug#806921: document rendered as a big mess

2015-12-02 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
Package: abiword
Version: 3.0.1-4+b1
Severity: wishlist

Have a look how
https://www.immigration.gov.tw/public/MMO/imm/%E5%B1%85%E4%BD%8F%E8%87%BA%E7%81%A3%E5%9C%B0%E5%8D%80%E4%B9%8B%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91%E5%8F%97%E6%AD%A7%E8%A6%96%E7%94%B3%E8%A8%B4%E5%AF%A9%E8%AD%B0.doc
is rendered. A big mess.



cl-mcclim is marked for autoremoval from testing

2015-12-02 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
cl-mcclim 0.9.6.dfsg.cvs20100315-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 
2016-01-08

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
806246: cmucl: FTBFS (missing build-depends)