Bug#534897: capisuite: specify ${python_libdir}/dist-packages in 040_python26.diff

2009-11-28 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 06:01:53PM -0700, Nick Ellery wrote:
 Package: capisuite
 
 Hi,
 
 In debian/patches/040_python26.diff, dist-packages should be directly
 specified rather than used $pythondir and $pyexecdir, as shown in the
 patch below.

Hi,
I'm not sure this is needed anymore, python-support takes care of linking
cs_helpers.py to the correct directory, IMO the bug can be closed.

filippo
-- 
Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net - 0x6B79D401

If only God would give me some clear sign! Like making a large deposit
in my name in a Swiss bank.
-- Woody Allen



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#485569: libhk-classes-dev: python 2.4/2.5 dependency

2009-11-28 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 09:55:44AM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
 Package: libhk-classes-dev
 Version: 0.8.3-4
 Severity: normal
 
 
 Hi,
 
 libhk-classes-* packages depend on python2.4.  Would it be possible te
 have them depend on python2.5 ?

they got rebuilt against python2.5 (and they will be recompiled against 2.6 once
it hits unstable) so I think this bug doesn't apply anymore, what do you think?

thanks,
filippo
-- 
Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net - 0x6B79D401

Machines take me by surprise with great frequency.
-- Alan Turing



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#557642: libiphone-dev: please package new upstream version (0.9.4)

2009-11-27 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:20:05AM -0600, Julien Lavergne wrote:
 Yes, it's my plan. But before, there are 2 packages to upgrade before 
 libiphone. In fact, there are 4 packages for the entire stack (libplist, 
 usbmuxd, libiphone, ifuse). Also, if you want music synchronization, you need 
 also a snaphsot of libgpod developpement.

I guess you intend to adopt the package(s) in the stack as well?
That would be great!

cheers,
filippo
-- 
Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net - 0x6B79D401

Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.
Happy is he who understands the causes of things.
-- Virgil



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#449265: varkon: Examples fail to copy

2009-06-26 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 10:21:21AM -0500, Mark Whitis wrote:
  varkon
 The directory where varkon stores the project information does not exist.
 /home/whitis/varkon/pid
 Shall I create it? [Y|n] y
 The directory where varkon stores the application data does not exist.
 /home/whitis/varkon/app
 Shall I create it? [Y|n] y
 It seems that you are running VARKON for the first time.
 Shall I copy the examples to your VARKON directory? [Y|n] y
 Omitting $project due to missing PID file
 ls: *.PID: No such file or directory

Hi,
I'm preparing a QA upload of varkon, examples projects don't seem to be shipped
anymore (at least not in 1.18B) so I'm tempted to disable the installation at
least for this upload.

filippo
--
Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net - 0x6B79D401

I get mail, therefore I am.
-- Dilbert



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#534603: move to section fonts

2009-06-25 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
Package: ttf-bpg-georgian-fonts
Version: 0.4
Severity: minor

as per subject, move to section fonts

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29.4 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#534602: move to section fonts

2009-06-25 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
Package: gw-fonts-ttf
Version: 1.0-3
Severity: minor

as per subject, move to section fonts

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29.4 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#533418: gw-fonts-ttf: remove fc-cache call

2009-06-17 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
Package: gw-fonts-ttf
Version: 1.0-3
Severity: normal

Hi,
as per http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/06/msg00429.html the
call to fc-cache should be removed.

I'm filing this bug for tracking only, probably will do a qa upload in
the next days.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#533419: ttf-bpg-georgian-fonts: remove fc-cache call

2009-06-17 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
Package: ttf-bpg-georgian-fonts
Version: 0.4
Severity: normal

Hi,
as per http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/06/msg00429.html the
call to fc-cache should be removed.

Arne: I'm CCing you as you are the owner of #459903 but the maintainer is set to
QA so you might be intesterested in having this bug filed.

thanks,
filippo

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#514770: vim-latexsuite: use gv instead of ghostview

2009-02-10 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
Package: vim-latexsuite
Version: 20060325-5
Severity: normal

Hi,
in /usr/share/vim/addons/ftplugin/latex-suite/texrc it is selected
ghostview in 

TexLet g:Tex_ViewRule_ps = 'ghostview'

though AFAICT it is not provided under that name by gv, switching to use
gv seems appropriate

thanks,
filippo

-- Package-specific info:
Vim related packages installed on this system:
 - vim-latexsuite
 - vim-runtime


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.28 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages vim-latexsuite depends on:
ii  python   2.5.2-3 An interactive high-level object-o
ii  vim  2:7.2.079-1 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor
ii  vim-common   2:7.2.079-1 Vi IMproved - Common files
ii  vim-gnome [vim-python]   2:7.2.079-1 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor -

Versions of packages vim-latexsuite recommends:
ii  tetex-bin  2007.dfsg.1-5 TeX Live: teTeX transitional packa
ii  texlive-base-bin   2007.dfsg.2-4 TeX Live: Essential binaries
ii  vim-addon-manager  0.4   manager of addons for the Vim edit

Versions of packages vim-latexsuite suggests:
ii  acroread [pdf-viewer]  8.1.3-0.0 Adobe Acrobat Reader: Portable Doc
ii  evince [postscript-viewer] 2.24.2-1  Document (postscript, pdf) viewer
ii  ghostscript [postscript-vi 8.63.dfsg.1-2 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF
ii  gv [postscript-viewer] 1:3.6.6.90-1  PostScript and PDF viewer for X
ii  xpdf   3.02-1.4  Portable Document Format (PDF) sui
ii  xpdf-reader [pdf-viewer]   3.02-1.4  Portable Document Format (PDF) sui

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#496411: #496411: nothing was fixed at all

2008-11-29 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 11:15:17AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
 On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:50:25AM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
  On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 07:59:28PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 02:23:13AM +0100, Jiri Palecek wrote:
I believe you have read the reason why this bug was closed. If you 
disagree,
please reply to this message by Thijs Kinkhorst:
   
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=17;mbox=yes;bug=496411
I confirm the README.Debian is present.
   But not in the affected binary package.
  Indeed, is there an ETA for this bug? At least for the unstable (i.e. with
  maintainer QA) version.
  
  FWIW as the fix looks trivial I think it is worth keeping the package.
 
 I disagree. I doubt that the version in unstable/testing is useful for
 anyone, and if it is, it is still available in etch anyway.
 So I would go for removing it from testing.

Fair enough, given also the low popcon

filippo
--
Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net
PGP key: 0x6B79D401
random quote follows:

The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it.
-- Oscar Wilde


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#496411: #496411: nothing was fixed at all

2008-11-27 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 07:59:28PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
  On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 02:23:13AM +0100, Jiri Palecek wrote:
  Hello,
 
  On Thursday 20 November 2008 03:25:41 Raphael Geissert wrote:
   I have found all of the reported issues in BOTH versions marked as fixed.
   Please stop blindly closing this report and *do verify* everything is
   fixed.
 
  I believe you have read the reason why this bug was closed. If you 
  disagree,
  please reply to this message by Thijs Kinkhorst:
 
  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=17;mbox=yes;bug=496411
 
  I confirm the README.Debian is present.
 
 But not in the affected binary package.

Indeed, is there an ETA for this bug? At least for the unstable (i.e. with
maintainer QA) version.

FWIW as the fix looks trivial I think it is worth keeping the package.

filippo
--
Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net
PGP key: 0x6B79D401
random quote follows:

Recursion is the root of computation since it trades description for time.
-- Alan Perlis


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#435993: htdig: crontest failure lockfile-create: command not found

2007-08-04 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
Package: htdig
Version: 1:3.2.0b6-3.1
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: cron-qa-20070804

Hi,
it seems that htdig cron files are giving output when the package itself is 
removed
(REMOVE) or its dependencies (AUTOREMOVE).

log available at:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/collab-qa/crontest/2007-08-04/logs/htdig_1:3.2.0b6-3.1_sid.cronlog?op=file

reported below:
AUTOREMOVE CRON.DAILY [] ['/etc/cron.daily/htdig: line 3: lockfile-create: 
command not found\n']

you should check that lockfile-create is there


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]