Bug#498829: dict-devil does not contain any entries
Package: dict-devil Version: 1.0-9 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This package does not contain any dictionary entries. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.20.3-bytemark-uml-2 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages dict-devil depends on: ii dictd [dict-server] 1.10.11.dfsg-2 Dictionary Server dict-devil recommends no packages. dict-devil suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Noah Slater, http://bytesexual.org/nslater -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#498829: dict-devil does not contain any entries
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 498829 + patch Bug#498829: dict-devil does not contain any entries There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#498829: dict-devil does not contain any entries
tags 498829 + patch thanks On 2008-09-13 17:17 +0200, Noah Slater wrote: Package: dict-devil Version: 1.0-9 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This package does not contain any dictionary entries. Indeed. I built the package and got this log: , | [...] | fakeroot debian/rules binary | test -f devils.txt -a -f debian/rules | test -f stamp-build || /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules build | rm -rf debian/tmp* | debian/devil2dict ./devils.txt | dictfmt -c5 --headword-separator , --without-headword -u http://wiretap.area.com/Gopher/Library/Classic/devils.txt -s The Devil's Dictionary (1881-1906) devil | /bin/sh: debian/devil2dict: Permission denied | [...] ` Ouch. Making debian/devil2dict executable fixes this, here is a debdiff: --8---cut here---start-8--- diff -u dict-devil-1.0/debian/rules dict-devil-1.0/debian/rules --- dict-devil-1.0/debian/rules +++ dict-devil-1.0/debian/rules @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ stamp-build: # Builds the binary package. $(checkdir) + chmod a+x debian/devil2dict touch stamp-build clean: diff -u dict-devil-1.0/debian/changelog dict-devil-1.0/debian/changelog --- dict-devil-1.0/debian/changelog +++ dict-devil-1.0/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +dict-devil (1.0-10) unstable; urgency=medium + + * QA Upload. + * Make debian/devil2dict executable to get some content into +the binary package (Closes: #498829). + + -- Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:17:27 +0200 + dict-devil (1.0-9) unstable; urgency=low * QA Upload --8---cut here---end---8--- Regards, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#498829: dict-devil does not contain any entries
Thanks for this! This package is orphened though, what can we do about that? I would like to see a new upload with your patch. Best, -- Noah Slater, http://bytesexual.org/nslater -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#498829: dict-devil does not contain any entries
On 2008-09-13 23:03 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: I can do an upload tomorrow, seeing that I did the last upload. (I suspect it was broken before that, though) The previous maintainer apparently had built the package with debian/devil2dict being executable, so the bug did only show up after a rebuild (dpkg-source taking away the execute bit). Thus, the bug is also in the previous version, but it's only serious there, not grave. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#498829: dict-devil does not contain any entries
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 06:06:32PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: Thanks for this! This package is orphened though, what can we do about that? I would like to see a new upload with your patch. I can do an upload tomorrow, seeing that I did the last upload. (I suspect it was broken before that, though) Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
