Bug#770369: bug fix for i386

2017-01-29 Thread narf

Hello,

I have the same problem on debian jessie in i386 architecture.
When will the fixed version (ß-9-6-4) are available i386?

regards
Andy



Bug#770369: bug fix for i386

2017-01-29 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sun, 29 Jan 2017, narf wrote:

> I have the same problem on debian jessie in i386 architecture.
> When will the fixed version (ß-9-6-4) are available i386?

Normally we would have to wait for the next stable to happen, but since
this bug makes the package not to work at all, I'll make an upload for
stable-proposed-updates.

BTW: I don't use Eterm myself. Can you compile the version in unstable
under jessie and confirm that it also fixes the 100% CPU problem
reported here?

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547363
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737491

Thanks.



Bug#770369: bug fix for i386

2017-05-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 07:12:58PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
>...
> BTW: I don't use Eterm myself. Can you compile the version in unstable
> under jessie and confirm that it also fixes the 100% CPU problem
> reported here?
>...

What happened with this?
Should I prepare a package for jessie-pu?

> Thanks.

Thanks
Adrian

-- 

   "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
   "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
   Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed



Bug#770369: bug fix for i386

2017-05-12 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 07:38:30PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 07:12:58PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >...
> > BTW: I don't use Eterm myself. Can you compile the version in unstable
> > under jessie and confirm that it also fixes the 100% CPU problem
> > reported here?
> >...
> 
> What happened with this?
> Should I prepare a package for jessie-pu?

I forgot. Yes, please, feel free.

Thanks.