Re: Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2008-01-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 10/01/08 at 10:49 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:39:30PM +, DDPOMail robot wrote:
> > Dear Debian QA Group,
> > 
> > The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
> > you maintain in Debian:
> 
> I'm not sure it's worth sending this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; by
> definition packages maintained by the QA Group need attention. :-)

After a quick poll on IRC, it seems that there isn't really consensus
that I should add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the list of addresses that
are excluded. The summary of the issues is still interesting,
even if there are lots of issues.

So, unless someone has a really strong opinion that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
shouldn't receive those mails, I'm going to leave things as is. (it's
only a monthly mail - when I don't forget to send it)
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2008-01-10 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:39:30PM +, DDPOMail robot wrote:
> Dear Debian QA Group,
> 
> The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
> you maintain in Debian:

I'm not sure it's worth sending this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; by
definition packages maintained by the QA Group need attention. :-)

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]