Re: KDE_3_1_BRANCH: kdelibs/debian/patches
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:34:52PM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote: > On Monday 06 October 2003 07:57, Chris Cheney wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:40:27AM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote: > > > On Monday 06 October 2003 03:42, Chris Cheney wrote: > > > > CVS commit by ccheney: > > > > > > > > debian specific patches are for now being maintained outside of cvs > > > > > > > > > > > > Rkdelibs.dirs.diff 1.2.2.1 > > > > Rxlibs-pic.diff 1.1.2.1 > > > > > > ?!? What is going on ? How can we build packages for debian then if we > > > don't even know where the patches are ?!? > > > > > > Ralf > > > > The patches are in kdelibs_3.1.4-2.diff.gz I didn't really see the > > point of including them in cvs since they will for the most part need to > > be regenerated for each release. > > I think it is wrong to keep the KDE CVS and the official debian diff's out of > sync. What's the point of this list and working together if everyone starts > removing necessary patches to do clean builds ? How can they be kept in sync? Any change to the cvs would likely break the patches. The patches are only in sync for the specific checkout they were done against, Some of the minor patches might work across checkouts but the bigger ones will not. Chris signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: KDE_3_1_BRANCH: kdelibs/debian/patches
On Monday 06 October 2003 07:57, Chris Cheney wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:40:27AM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote: > > On Monday 06 October 2003 03:42, Chris Cheney wrote: > > > CVS commit by ccheney: > > > > > > debian specific patches are for now being maintained outside of cvs > > > > > > > > > Rkdelibs.dirs.diff 1.2.2.1 > > > Rxlibs-pic.diff 1.1.2.1 > > > > ?!? What is going on ? How can we build packages for debian then if we > > don't even know where the patches are ?!? > > > > Ralf > > The patches are in kdelibs_3.1.4-2.diff.gz I didn't really see the > point of including them in cvs since they will for the most part need to > be regenerated for each release. I think it is wrong to keep the KDE CVS and the official debian diff's out of sync. What's the point of this list and working together if everyone starts removing necessary patches to do clean builds ? Ralf > > For kdelibs I have: > > 109053 2003-10-05 18:30 01_kdelibs_branch.diff.uu > 290447 2003-10-05 01:30 02_autotools_update.diff >459 2003-10-05 01:30 03_am_maintainer_mode.diff >698 2003-10-05 01:30 04_xlibs_pic.diff >993 2003-10-05 15:04 05_kstandarddirs.diff >439 2003-10-05 01:30 06_pedantic-errors.diff > > By the way the branch diff's are generated using diff -Nrua so they can > include binary only changes like image updates so when they include > binary data they need to be uuencoded. I've decided to just uuencode all > the branch diffs so I won't have to verify if it contains binary data. > > Chris -- We're not a company, we just produce better code at less costs. Ralf Nolden [EMAIL PROTECTED] The K Desktop Environment The KDevelop Project http://www.kde.org http://www.kdevelop.org
Re: KDE_3_1_BRANCH: kdelibs/debian/patches
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:40:27AM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote: > On Monday 06 October 2003 03:42, Chris Cheney wrote: > > CVS commit by ccheney: > > > > debian specific patches are for now being maintained outside of cvs > > > > > > Rkdelibs.dirs.diff 1.2.2.1 > > Rxlibs-pic.diff 1.1.2.1 > > ?!? What is going on ? How can we build packages for debian then if we don't > even know where the patches are ?!? > > Ralf The patches are in kdelibs_3.1.4-2.diff.gz I didn't really see the point of including them in cvs since they will for the most part need to be regenerated for each release. For kdelibs I have: 109053 2003-10-05 18:30 01_kdelibs_branch.diff.uu 290447 2003-10-05 01:30 02_autotools_update.diff 459 2003-10-05 01:30 03_am_maintainer_mode.diff 698 2003-10-05 01:30 04_xlibs_pic.diff 993 2003-10-05 15:04 05_kstandarddirs.diff 439 2003-10-05 01:30 06_pedantic-errors.diff By the way the branch diff's are generated using diff -Nrua so they can include binary only changes like image updates so when they include binary data they need to be uuencoded. I've decided to just uuencode all the branch diffs so I won't have to verify if it contains binary data. Chris signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: KDE_3_1_BRANCH: kdelibs/debian/patches
On Monday 06 October 2003 03:42, Chris Cheney wrote: > CVS commit by ccheney: > > debian specific patches are for now being maintained outside of cvs > > > Rkdelibs.dirs.diff 1.2.2.1 > Rxlibs-pic.diff 1.1.2.1 ?!? What is going on ? How can we build packages for debian then if we don't even know where the patches are ?!? Ralf -- We're not a company, we just produce better code at less costs. Ralf Nolden [EMAIL PROTECTED] The K Desktop Environment The KDevelop Project http://www.kde.org http://www.kdevelop.org
