Bug#268107: kdvi: Overly verbose KAction warning
Package: kdvi Version: 4:3.2.2-1 Severity: minor kdvi outputs the following warning to the shell on execution: kdecore (KAction): WARNING: KAction::insertKAccel( kaccel = 0x80671f0 ): KAccel object already contains an action name "help_whats_this" This warning does not impede basic functionality. My guess is that the code performs some small violation with respect to KAction, and the community has come to expect this warning on execution. If this is the case, then I believe the code really should be patched to remove "expected/false" errors. If not, then perhaps there's geniunely a conflict worth noting. However, it seems to involve the "Help: What's This" function, which has never worked for kdvi (for me, at least). Basically, it's just an annoying systemic warning message. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages kdvi depends on: ii kdelibs4 4:3.2.3-2 KDE core libraries ii kviewshell 4:3.2.2-1 KDE generic framework for viewer a ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-6Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc62.3.2.ds1-13GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-5 client library to control the FAM ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.2 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:3.4.1-4sarge1 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-7 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt3:3.2.3-4 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-6sarge1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1.1-5 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information
kdepim override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): knode_3.3.0-1_i386.deb: package says section is news, override says net. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
kdepim_3.3.0-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kdepim-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kdepim-doc-html_3.3.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-doc-html_3.3.0-1_all.deb kdepim-doc_3.3.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-doc_3.3.0-1_all.deb kdepim-kfile-plugins_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-kfile-plugins_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kdepim-kio-plugins_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-kio-plugins_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kdepim-wizards_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-wizards_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kdepim_3.3.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim_3.3.0-1.diff.gz kdepim_3.3.0-1.dsc to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim_3.3.0-1.dsc kdepim_3.3.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim_3.3.0-1_all.deb kdepim_3.3.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim_3.3.0.orig.tar.gz kitchensync_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kitchensync_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kleopatra_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kleopatra_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kmail_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kmail_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kmailcvt_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kmailcvt_3.3.0-1_i386.deb knode_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/knode_3.3.0-1_i386.deb knotes_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/knotes_3.3.0-1_i386.deb konsolekalendar_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/konsolekalendar_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kontact_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kontact_3.3.0-1_i386.deb korganizer_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/korganizer_3.3.0-1_i386.deb korn_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/korn_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kpilot_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kpilot_3.3.0-1_i386.deb ksync_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/ksync_3.3.0-1_i386.deb ktnef_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/ktnef_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkcal2-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/libkcal2-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkcal2_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/libkcal2_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkdenetwork2_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/libkdenetwork2_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkdepim1_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/libkdepim1_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkgantt0-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/libkgantt0-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkgantt0_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/libkgantt0_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkleopatra0-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/libkleopatra0-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkleopatra0_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/libkleopatra0_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkpimexchange1-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/libkpimexchange1-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkpimexchange1_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/libkpimexchange1_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkpimidentities1_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/libkpimidentities1_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libksieve0-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/libksieve0-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libksieve0_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/libksieve0_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libmimelib1-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/libmimelib1-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libmimelib1_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/libmimelib1_3.3.0-1_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 209672 209689 209862 209997 210088 210094 254643 264825 266311 266603 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#264825: marked as done (kdepim: Please add German translation of the debconf templates)
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#264825: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2004 15:14:37 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 10 08:14:37 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from imap.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BuYKj-0004ls-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 08:14:37 -0700 Received: (qmail 32225 invoked by uid 65534); 10 Aug 2004 15:14:03 - Received: from dialin-212-144-018-221.arcor-ip.net (EHLO dialin-212-144-018-221.arcor-ip.net) (212.144.18.221) by mail.gmx.net (mp006) with SMTP; 10 Aug 2004 17:14:03 +0200 X-Authenticated: #16353863 From: Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kdepim: Please add German translation of the debconf templates Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:02:09 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_yNOGBxyz2EgWycq" Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --Boundary-00=_yNOGBxyz2EgWycq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: kdepim Severity: wishlist tags: l10n, patch Hello, Please find the attached de.po file, which is the German translation of the debconf templates. Could you add this file to the debian/po/ directory of this package? Please let me know, if a template will be changed, I will update the translation immediately. Regards, Erik -- www.ErikSchanze.de * Bitte keine HTML-Mails! No HTML mails, please! Maillimit: 1 MB * * Linux-Info-Tag in Dresden, am 30. Oktober 2004 * Info: http://www.linux-info-tag.de * --Boundary-00=_yNOGBxyz2EgWycq Content-Type: application/x-gettext; name="de.po" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="de.po" # #Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext #documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to #this format, e.g. by running: # info -n '(gettext)PO Files' # info -n '(gettext)Header Entry' #Some information specific to po-debconf are available at #/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans # or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans# #Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files. # Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2004. # msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: jpilot_0.99.7-7_de\n" "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2004-04-26 22:44-0500\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2004-08-09 18:31+0200\n" "Last-Translator: Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "Language-Team: German \n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUTF-8\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" "X-Generator: KBabel 1.3.1\n" "Plural-Forms: nplurals=3D2; plural=3D(n !=3D 1);\n" #. Type: select #. choices #: ../kpilot.templates:3 msgid "None, ttyS0, ttyS1, ttyS2, ttyS3, ircomm0, ttyUSB0, ttyUSB1" msgstr "kein, ttyS0, ttyS1, ttyS2, ttyS3, ircomm0, ttyUSB0, ttyUSB1" #. Type: select #. description #: ../kpilot.templates:4 msgid "Which communication port to use with the Palm?" msgstr "Welchen Anschluss f=C3=BCr den Palm benutzen?" #. Type: select #. description #: ../kpilot.templates:4 msgid "" "A symbolic file /dev/pilot may be created to the port use to talk to the " "Palm." msgstr "" "Ein symbolischer Link /dev/pilot sollte angelegt werden, der auf den " "Anschluss zeigt, der f=C3=BCr den Datenaustausch mit dem Palm benutzt wird= =2E" #. Type: select #. description #: ../kpilot.templates:4 msgid "" "ttyS? are the four serial ports, ircomm0 is the IrDA (infra red) port, " "ttyUSB? are the USB ports." msgstr "" "ttyS? sind die seriellen Anschl=C3=BCsse (COM ?), ircomm0 ist der IrDA-(In= frarot)-" "Anschluss, ttyUSB? sind die USB-Anschl=C3=BCsse." #. Type: select #. description #: ../kpilot.templates:4 msgid "" "To ease the use of the Palm connected to the port i
Bug#254643: marked as done (When will the "Export to nokia mobile phone" support be compiled back in to kaddressbook?)
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#254643: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2004 03:38:17 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 15 20:38:17 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ausmtp02.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.187] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BaRFh-0003YA-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:38:17 -0700 Received: from sd0208e0 (d23rh904.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.202]) by ausmtp02.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5G3bFc5083538 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:37:15 +1000 Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (haven.au.ibm.com [9.190.164.82]) by sd0208e0 (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id i5G3cT5g073944 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:38:29 +1000 Received: from kgo (kgo.ozlabs.ibm.com [10.61.2.74]) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B7DB17DDC; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:37:40 +1000 (EST) Received: by kgo (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:37:40 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Keith Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: When will the "Export to nokia mobile phone" support be compiled back in to kaddressbook? X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:37:40 +1000 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kaddressbook Version: 4:3.2.2-2 Severity: wishlist Hi, I was just wondering when we can expect "Export to nokia mobile phone" support to compiled back in the the unstable kaddressbook? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages kaddressbook depends on: ii kdelibs4 4:3.2.3-2 KDE core libraries ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-5 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-5client library to control the FAM ii libgcc1 1:3.3.4-1 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg62 6b-9 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkdepim14:3.2.2-2 KDE PIM library ii libpcre3 4.5-1.1Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libpng12-01.2.5.0-6 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.2.3-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++51:3.3.4-1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxpm4 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X pixmap library ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7X Rendering Extension client libra ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.1.1-3compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 254643-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2004 02:53:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 25 19:53:02 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0ANq-0001Kk-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:53:02 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0AIE-0002PO-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400 From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#254643: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -
Bug#209997: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#209997: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 22:14:00 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 17:13:58 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wotb-0006Nm-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:15:27 -0500
Received: (qmail 4689 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:15:26 -
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:15:26 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: kpilot
Version: 4:3.1.2-1
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
---
Received: (at 209997-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2004 02:53:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 25 19:53:10 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C0ANy-0001Mn-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:53:10 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C0AIE-0002PI-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#209997: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4
Source: kdepim
Source-Version: 4:3.3.0-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kdepim, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kdepim-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepi
Bug#209672: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#209672: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 20:30:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 15:14:51 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wot0-0006Gs-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:14:50 -0500
Received: (qmail 4127 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:14:49 -
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:14:49 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: kdepim-kfile-plugins
Version: 4:3.1.2-1
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
---
Received: (at 209672-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2004 02:53:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 25 19:53:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C0ANx-0001Mb-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:53:09 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C0AIE-0002PC-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#209672: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Source: kdepim
Source-Version: 4:3.3.0-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kdepim, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kdepim-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-de
Bug#209689: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#209689: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 20:31:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 15:31:24 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wosz-0006GF-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:14:49 -0500
Received: (qmail 4098 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:14:47 -
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:14:47 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: kdepim-dev
Version: 4:3.1.2-1
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
---
Received: (at 209689-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2004 02:53:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 25 19:53:06 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C0ANt-0001M4-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:53:06 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C0AIE-0002PE-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#209689: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: kdepim
Source-Version: 4:3.3.0-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kdepim, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kdepim-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/k
Bug#209862: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#209862: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 21:38:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 16:38:27 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wosX-0006AA-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:14:21 -0500
Received: (qmail 3704 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:14:20 -
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:14:20 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: kaddressbook
Version: 4:3.1.2-1
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
---
Received: (at 209862-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2004 02:53:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 25 19:53:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C0ANt-0001Ls-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:53:05 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C0AIE-0002PG-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#209862: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Source: kdepim
Source-Version: 4:3.3.0-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kdepim, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kdepim-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k
Bug#210088: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#210088: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 22:34:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 17:34:33 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wosY-0006AJ-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:14:22 -0500
Received: (qmail 3731 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:14:21 -
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:14:21 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: kalarm
Version: 4:3.1.2-1
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
---
Received: (at 210088-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2004 02:53:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 25 19:53:04 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C0ANs-0001L9-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:53:04 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C0AIE-0002PK-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#210088: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5
Source: kdepim
Source-Version: 4:3.3.0-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kdepim, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kdepim-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepi
Bug#210094: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#210094: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 22:35:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 17:35:03 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wotV-0006N7-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:15:22 -0500
Received: (qmail 4632 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:15:20 -
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:15:20 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: knotes
Version: 4:3.1.3-1
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
---
Received: (at 210094-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2004 02:53:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 25 19:53:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C0ANr-0001Kw-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:53:03 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C0AIE-0002PM-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#210094: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6
Source: kdepim
Source-Version: 4:3.3.0-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kdepim, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kdepim-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepi
Bug#266311: marked as done (kpilot: includes files also in the korganizer package)
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#266311: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2004 13:43:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 17 06:43:04 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 84-120-66-205.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.205] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bx4Ey-0006GG-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 06:43:04 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Bx4Ex-0003xK-4n for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:43:03 +0200 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:43:03 +0200 From: Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: kpilot: includes files also in the korganizer package Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Reportbug-Version: 2.64 X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040810i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kpilot Version: 4:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Justification: Policy 6.5.4 the kpilot package contains the files: ./usr/share/pixmaps/korganizer-16.xpm ./usr/share/pixmaps/korganizer.xpm which are also present in the korganizer package of the same version. filing bug against kpilot assuming those files really belong to korganizer. -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 Love in your heart wasn't put there to stay. Love isn't love 'til you give it away. -- Oscar Hammerstein II --- Received: (at 266311-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2004 02:53:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 25 19:53:11 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0ANz-0001N0-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:53:11 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0AIE-0002PS-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400 From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#266311: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9 Source: kdepim Source-Version: 4:3.3.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kdepim, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kdepim-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kdepim-doc-html_3.3.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-doc-html_3.3.0-1_all.deb kdepim-doc_3.3.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-doc_3.3.0-1_all.deb kdepim-kfile-plugins_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-kfile-plugins_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kdepim-kio-plugins_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-kio-plugins_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kdepim-wizards_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim-wizards_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kdepim_3.3.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim_3.3.0-1.diff.gz kdepim_3.3.0-1.dsc to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim_3.3.0-1.dsc kdepim_3.3.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim_3.3.0-1_all.deb kdepim_3.3.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kdepim/kdepim_3.3.0.orig.tar.gz kitchensync_3.3.0-1_i386.deb to p
Bug#266603: marked as done (kmail package in experimental shoud have a recommend on kdepim-kio-plugins)
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#266603: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2004 12:04:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 18 05:04:55 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BxPBX-0005Qo-00; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 05:04:55 -0700 Received: from amaretto.inria.fr (amaretto.inria.fr [128.93.8.127]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7IC4NmL009303; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:04:23 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: kmail package in experimental shoud have a recommend on kdepim-kio-plugins X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:04:23 +0200 X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 412345C7.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kmail Version: 4:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 Severity: normal Tags: experimental since without the package, imap in kmail will not work (with an error saying that newimap or sth like that cannot be runned) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (995, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1-ck1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages kmail depends on: ii kdebase-kio-plugins 4:3.3.0-1 KDE I/O Slaves ii kdelibs4 4:3.3.0-1 KDE core libraries ii libc62.3.2.ds1-16GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.1-5 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libkcal2 4:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 KDE calendaring library ii libkdenetwork2 4:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 KDE Network library ii libkdepim1 4:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 KDE PIM library ii libkleopatra04:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 KDE GnuPG interface libraries ii libkpimidentities1 4:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 KDE PIM user identity information ii libksieve0 4:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 KDE mail/news message filtering li ii libmimelib1 4:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 KDE mime library ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-7 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.3-2 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii perl 5.8.4-2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1.1-5 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 266603-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2004 02:53:12 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 25 19:53:12 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0AO0-0001NN-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:53:12 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0AIE-0002PU-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400 From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#266603: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS
Bug#266653: marked as done (kmail: Missing dependency on kdepim-kio-plugins)
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#266603: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2004 15:34:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 18 08:34:51 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gatekeeper.excelhustler.com (gatekeeper.elmer.external.excelhustler.com) [68.99.114.105] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BxSSh-0007BZ-00; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 08:34:51 -0700 Received: from chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (unknown [192.168.0.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com", Issuer "excelhustler.com" (not verified)) by gatekeeper.elmer.external.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2589EC8D33; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:34:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BC7C8D2C; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:34:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com ([192.168.0.12]) by localhost (chatterbox [192.168.0.12]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id 07539-02; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:34:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wile.internal.excelhustler.com (wile.internal.excelhustler.com [192.168.1.34]) by chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1145CC8CF6; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:34:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: by wile.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 03C922C031; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:34:19 -0500 (CDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: kmail: Missing dependency on kdepim-kio-plugins X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:34:19 -0500 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at excelhustler.com Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kmail Version: 4:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 Severity: important kmail lacks a dependency on kdepim-kio-plugins. Without that package, important things like IMAP don't work. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages kmail depends on: ii kdebase-kio-plugins 4:3.3.0-1 KDE I/O Slaves ii kdelibs4 4:3.3.0-1 KDE core libraries ii libc62.3.2.ds1-16GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.1-5 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libkcal2 4:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 KDE calendaring library ii libkdenetwork2 4:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 KDE Network library ii libkdepim1 4:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 KDE PIM library ii libkleopatra04:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 KDE GnuPG interface libraries ii libkpimidentities1 4:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 KDE PIM user identity information ii libksieve0 4:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 KDE mail/news message filtering li ii libmimelib1 4:3.2.92+3.3.0rc1-1 KDE mime library ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-7 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.3-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii perl 5.8.4-2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1.1-5 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 266603-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 200
Processing of kdepim_3.3.0-1_i386.changes
kdepim_3.3.0-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kdepim_3.3.0-1.dsc kdepim_3.3.0.orig.tar.gz kdepim_3.3.0-1.diff.gz kdepim_3.3.0-1_all.deb kdepim-doc_3.3.0-1_all.deb kdepim-doc-html_3.3.0-1_all.deb kdepim-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kdepim-kfile-plugins_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kdepim-kio-plugins_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kdepim-wizards_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kitchensync_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kleopatra_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kmail_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kmailcvt_3.3.0-1_i386.deb knode_3.3.0-1_i386.deb knotes_3.3.0-1_i386.deb konsolekalendar_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kontact_3.3.0-1_i386.deb korganizer_3.3.0-1_i386.deb korn_3.3.0-1_i386.deb kpilot_3.3.0-1_i386.deb ksync_3.3.0-1_i386.deb ktnef_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkcal2_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkcal2-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkdenetwork2_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkdepim1_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkgantt0_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkgantt0-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkleopatra0_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkleopatra0-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkpimexchange1_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkpimexchange1-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libkpimidentities1_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libksieve0_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libksieve0-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libmimelib1_3.3.0-1_i386.deb libmimelib1-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
kdenonbeta/akregator/debian
CVS commit by habouzit: opml doenst exist anymore M +0 -1 akregator.install 1.5 --- kdenonbeta/akregator/debian/akregator.install #1.4:1.5 @@ -7,5 +7,4 @@ debian/tmp/usr/share/applnk/Internet/akregator.desktop debian/tmp/usr/share/services/akregator_part.desktop -debian/tmp/usr/share/apps/akregator/kde.opml debian/tmp/usr/share/apps/akregatorpart/welcome.html debian/tmp/usr/share/icons/*/*/*/*.png
kdenonbeta/akregator/debian
CVS commit by habouzit: debian thinkgs for beta6 M +3 -2 changelog 1.26 M +2 -2 copyright 1.4 --- kdenonbeta/akregator/debian/changelog #1.25:1.26 @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ -akregator (1.0-beta5-3) unstable; urgency=low +akregator (1.0-beta6-1) unstable; urgency=low * Add debian/watch file. + * New upstream, feeds are now autosaved (closes: #262144). - -- Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:14:36 +0200 + -- Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:15:27 +0200 akregator (1.0-beta5-2) unstable; urgency=low --- kdenonbeta/akregator/debian/copyright #1.3:1.4 @@ -12,6 +12,6 @@ Copyright (c) 2004 Gary Cramblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Copyright (c) 2004 Sashmit Bhaduri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Copyright (c) 2004 Stanislav Karchebny -Copyright (c) 2004 Teemu Rytilahti +Copyright (c) 2004 Stanislav Karchebny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +Copyright (c) 2004 Teemu Rytilahti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General Public
Bug#268036: kdm doesn't work with libpam-ldap
Package: kdm Version: 4:3.3.0-1 kdm does not allow login for ldap users. I tried using the stock /etc/pam.d/kdm configuration without modification, and that has not worked. I've got the appropriate pam_ldap.so entries in my /etc/pam.d/common-* files to allow ldap authentication, and ldap authentication appears to work with everything (ssh, login, xdm) but kdm. I noticed the /etc/pam.d/kdm file was slightly different from the /etc/pam.d/xdm file, so I changed the kdm file to be identical, to no avail. Kdm appears to succesfully authenticate, but the ldap users window manager never starts. After you input username/password, the login screen disappears, and it looks like the X server restarts, and a second or two later I'm back at the kdm login. Local users from /etc/passwd have no problems logging in under kdm. If I have xdm running as the graphical login manager, it has no problem logging in ldap users. I get no logging as to what might be the problem in /var/log/auth.log, /var/log/kdm.log, /var/log/XFree86.log, and nothings in the users ~/.xsession-errors file. Thanks. -Don
Bug#268016: [CAN-2004-0746] Konqueror Cross-Domain Cookie Injection
Hi. > Tags: security upstream sarge Since tiff4 has (just) now moved into sarge, either calc or I will be uploading fixes for this (and the other recently announced KDE security issues) to testing-proposed-updates, hopefully tomorrow. Ben.
Bug#268016: [CAN-2004-0746] Konqueror Cross-Domain Cookie Injection
Package: konqueror Version: 3.2.3-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream sarge Web sites operating under the affected domains can set HTTP cookies in such a way that the Konqueror web browser will send them to all other web sites operating under the same domain. A malicious website can use this as part of a session fixation attack. See e.g. http://www.acros.si/papers/session_fixation.pdf Affected are all country specific secondary top level domains that use more than 2 characters in the secondary part of the domain name and that use a secondary part other than com, net, mil, org, gov, edu or int. Examples of affected domains are .ltd.uk, .plc.uk and .firm.in KDE versions up to KDE 3.2.3 inclusive. KDE 3.3 is not affected. There is 3.2.3-1 in sid for some architectures, but they will probably replaced soon by 3.3.0-1 which is said to be not vulnerable. Regards, Joey -- There are lies, statistics and benchmarks. Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
Bug#265473: KDE 3.3
I don't have the probleme anymore with 3.3 now. IMO, the bug should be closed. Regards, Gonéri
Bug#267970: dependcy problem: kdelibs4 depends on libopenexr0
Package: kdelibs4 Version: 4:3.3.0 Hi all, When updating my unstable system I get the following message: "kdelibs4: Hängt ab: libopenexr0 (>= 1.1.1), welches ein virtuelles Paket ist." Trying to install libopenexr0 gives the following message: Kein Kandidat für »libopenexr0« gefunden. Because this is my first bugreport, please give me a feedback if anything is wrong. Thanks, Arno
Bug#266760: Two "me too"s, and some supplementary information
Hello, I have observed this bug on two different i386 Debian "unstable" systems, one a new HP system where Xfree86 uses the Intel "i810" driver, the other one a rather old Dell system using the "ati" driver. The systems are quite dead in both cases; they respond to "ping", but neither "ssh" nor "telnet" access is possible. The bug behaves exactly as the submitter (Anthony Labarre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) describes, except that I haven't had the bug for a very long time - I never observed it until the upload of KDE 3.3 to "unstable". Furthermore - and this may be very important - I never observed the bug on an unmodified "unstable" system. Only after the "Xsession" hack to the problems with KDE 3.3 and "tcsh" - as described in bug 265895 - got installed did I see the bug. Then it was completely reproducible - happens every time I log out. To get a stable (!) "unstable" system with KDE 3.3, no freezing problem at logout and no problems with "tcsh" I instead implement the solution to the "tcsh" problem described in bug 266814. Hope this all helps - KDE 3.3 is a great system. -- Peder Chr. Nørgaard Senior System Developer, M. Sc. Ericsson Telebit A/S tel: +45 30 91 84 31 Skanderborgvej 232 fax: +45 89 38 51 01 DK-8260 Viby J, Denmark e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (old e-mail 2000-2003: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) (old e-mail 1992-2000: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Bug#265865: kdm: News about this bug (ssh-agent not launched anymore)?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le Mercredi 25 Août 2004 08:40, Christian Perrier a écrit : > Any news about this bug? Plans for fixing, recommendations for > workaround (mine was picking the file from the 3.2.2 release of kdm > and replacing Xsession with it) > > I had hard times trying to figure out why the hell my ssh-agent did > not start anymore : I'm not a Xsession thing guru and the change was > pretty hard to find > > This change, with /etc/kde3/kdm/Xsession doing things on its own is > not only likely to break the use of ssh-agent, but also breaks the use > of all scripts in /etc/X11/Xsession.d which is, as far as I can figure > out, a kind of common place for Debian packages to put their own > Xsession things Hi Christian, I've found a fix (per user). Just create a '.xprofile' file in your homedir which source XFree86's Xsession file. - - ~/.xprofile --- source /etc/X11/Xsession - - AFAIK, this bug is in the todo list for next upload of KDE 3.3.0. But, IMO, maintainers try to get a last KDE 3.2.3 upload (with security fix) before a new upload of KDE 3.3.0. Hope this help, D. - -- Damien Raude-Morvan - DrazziB GPG : 0x337C7EBB WWW : www.drazzib.com ICQ : 68119943 TEL : (+33) 06 08 80 36 98 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBLGpU927daDN8frsRAlHyAJ4gRJVB9yLxT9uCEtJf/f7b7BCSaACgoDBZ qKyRyj1H5CT2und7h5auNRk= =WDzd -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#267232: kaddressbook: Does not start, even though GUI appears
tags 267232 sid thanks This bug does indeed appear to be specific to sid. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#265865: kdm: News about this bug (ssh-agent not launched anymore)?
Any news about this bug? Plans for fixing, recommendations for workaround (mine was picking the file from the 3.2.2 release of kdm and replacing Xsession with it) I had hard times trying to figure out why the hell my ssh-agent did not start anymore : I'm not a Xsession thing guru and the change was pretty hard to find This change, with /etc/kde3/kdm/Xsession doing things on its own is not only likely to break the use of ssh-agent, but also breaks the use of all scripts in /etc/X11/Xsession.d which is, as far as I can figure out, a kind of common place for Debian packages to put their own Xsession things --
Processed: Re: kaddressbook: Does not start, even though GUI appears
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 267232 sid Bug#267232: kaddressbook: Does not start, even though GUI appears There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
