Processed: submitter 588080

2010-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 submitter 588080 t...@mbox.net.ru
Bug #588080 [kde-standard] kde-standard should not depend on dragonplayer
Changed Bug submitter to 't...@mbox.net.ru' from 'Alexander Gerasiov 
g...@debian.org'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
588080: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588080
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127832365510392.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#588080: kde-standard should not depend on dragonplayer

2010-07-05 Thread Modestas Vainius
severity 588080 wishlist
thanks

Hello,

On sekmadienis 04 Liepa 2010 20:44:42 Alexander Gerasiov wrote:
 Package: kde-standard
 Severity: normal
 
 Hi there.
 
 I dislike dragonplayer, because is sucks. I undestand that kde-multimedia
 should depend on it and could not to use kde-multimedia metapackage. But I
 found that since last update kde-standard also depends on dragonplayer.
 This makes me pain. It installs to system and kde use it by default
 instead of my lovely mplayer. But kde itself could work without
 dragonplayer fine. This is just one of it's multimedia packages. Please,
 please, please remove this crappy dependence.

dragonplayer is a default KDE SC media player. Until KDE SC has something 
better to offer, I don't see a good alternative. kde-standard package cannot 
come without media player these days.

You can set preferred player via file type associations in System Settings.

-- 
Modestas Vainius modes...@vainius.eu


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Processed: Re: Bug#588080: kde-standard should not depend on dragonplayer

2010-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 588080 wishlist
Bug #588080 [kde-standard] kde-standard should not depend on dragonplayer
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
588080: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588080
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127832587028424.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#582953: kmail deleted all non-local incoming mail settings on upgrade

2010-07-05 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello,

btw, is your $HOME on ext4 or XFS?

-- 
Modestas Vainius modes...@vainius.eu


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#588080: kde-standard should not depend on dragonplayer

2010-07-05 Thread Alexander GQ Gerasiov
Mon, 5 Jul 2010 13:30:27 +0300
Modestas Vainius modes...@vainius.eu wrote:

 severity 588080 wishlist
 thanks
 
 Hello,
 
 On sekmadienis 04 Liepa 2010 20:44:42 Alexander Gerasiov wrote:
  Package: kde-standard
  Severity: normal
  
  Hi there.
  
  I dislike dragonplayer, because is sucks. I undestand that
  kde-multimedia should depend on it and could not to use
  kde-multimedia metapackage. But I found that since last update
  kde-standard also depends on dragonplayer. This makes me pain. It
  installs to system and kde use it by default instead of my lovely
  mplayer. But kde itself could work without dragonplayer fine. This
  is just one of it's multimedia packages. Please, please, please
  remove this crappy dependence.
 
 dragonplayer is a default KDE SC media player.
Sure. kde-multimedia depends on it and this is enough.

 Until KDE SC has
 something better to offer, I don't see a good alternative.
 kde-standard package cannot come without media player these days.
Which functionality would be broken in kde-base if there will be no
mediaplayer? If there will be another mediaplayer (mplayer, totem)?

In case if kde-base really need mediaplayer:
Should is depend on it or just recommend?
Is it possible to use a dependency with alternatives?


 You can set preferred player via file type associations in System
 Settings.
Sure, but 
1. this is not system-wide (may be there are system-wide settings
somewhere, I'm not really interested in)
2. this is annoing to turn it off for every file type 
3. why user need to have dragonplayer installed if he use another
   player
 


-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander GQ Gerasiov

 Contacts:
 e-mail:g...@cs.msu.su Jabber:  g...@jabber.ru
 Homepage:  http://gq.net.ru ICQ: 7272757
 PGP fingerprint: 04B5 9D90 DF7C C2AB CD49  BAEA CA87 E9E8 2AAC 33F1



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100705152752.026fc...@desktopvm.lvknet



Bug#588080: kde-standard should not depend on dragonplayer

2010-07-05 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello,

On pirmadienis 05 Liepa 2010 14:27:52 Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
 Sure. kde-multimedia depends on it and this is enough.
 
  Until KDE SC has
  something better to offer, I don't see a good alternative.
  kde-standard package cannot come without media player these days.
 
 Which functionality would be broken in kde-base if there will be no
 mediaplayer? If there will be another mediaplayer (mplayer, totem)?

kde-standard is a metapackage which pulls a standard set of packages which 
most KDE users would find useful (in our opinion). We think that a media 
player is mandatory nowadays. If you hate particular software, remove kde-
standard (which is just a metapackage) and you'll be able to get rid of the 
dragonplayer. We do not aim nor can adhere to everybody's personal wishes.

You can also choose from kde-minimal alike kde-plasma-desktop and kde-plasma-
netbook but they are really minimal.

 In case if kde-base really need mediaplayer:
 Should is depend on it or just recommend?
 Is it possible to use a dependency with alternatives?

People have Recommends disabled so a media player is Depends. In fact, I could 
agree with sane alternative Depends. The problem is that there is no other 
official KDE SC media player.

-- 
Modestas Vainius modes...@vainius.eu


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#587502: kdevelop: Regression. Too many resources is used while doing background jobs.

2010-07-05 Thread Fathi Boudra
Hi,

Is your cmake based project available somewhere ?
try to remove ~/.kdevduchain directory and test if it's better.

Cheers,

Fathi



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin_kbgslh4x7jc6rsmypvceevuokwhcdtfr8...@mail.gmail.com



Processed: tagging 585716

2010-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 585716 + pending
Bug #585716 [kdebase-workspace-bin] kdebase-workspace-bin: File conflict with 
ksplash (/usr/bin/ksplashsimple)
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
585716: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585716
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127833201216870.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



qt-assistant-compat_4.6.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2010-07-05 Thread Archive Administrator



Reject Reasons:
libqtassistantclient4_4.6.3-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy 
already in the archive.
libqtassistantclient4_4.6.3-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy 
already in the archive.
qt-assistant-compat_4.6.3-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already 
in the archive.
qt-assistant-compat_4.6.3-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already 
in the archive.
libqtassistantclient-dev_4.6.3-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy 
already in the archive.
libqtassistantclient-dev_4.6.3-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy 
already in the archive.



===

Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ovlw9-0007md...@franck.debian.org



qtmobility_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2010-07-05 Thread Archive Administrator



Reject Reasons:
libqtsysteminfo1_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in 
the archive.
libqtsysteminfo1_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in 
the archive.
libqtversit1_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in the 
archive.
libqtversit1_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in the 
archive.
libqtcontacts1_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in 
the archive.
libqtcontacts1_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in 
the archive.
libqtsensors1_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in the 
archive.
libqtsensors1_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in the 
archive.
libqtpublishsubscribe1_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy 
already in the archive.
libqtpublishsubscribe1_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy 
already in the archive.
qtmobility-dev_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in 
the archive.
qtmobility-dev_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in 
the archive.
qtmobility-examples_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already 
in the archive.
qtmobility-examples_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already 
in the archive.
libqtbearer1_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in the 
archive.
libqtbearer1_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in the 
archive.
libdeclarative-serviceframework_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing 
copy already in the archive.
libdeclarative-serviceframework_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing 
copy already in the archive.
libdeclarative-publishsubscribe_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing 
copy already in the archive.
libdeclarative-publishsubscribe_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing 
copy already in the archive.
qtmobility-dbg_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in 
the archive.
qtmobility-dbg_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in 
the archive.
libqtlocation1_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in 
the archive.
libqtlocation1_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in 
the archive.
libqtserviceframework1_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy 
already in the archive.
libqtserviceframework1_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing copy 
already in the archive.



===

Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ovlwo-0007ni...@franck.debian.org



phonon-backend-vlc_0.0.1~git1+1b1ce593-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2010-07-05 Thread Archive Administrator



Reject Reasons:
phonon-backend-vlc-dbg_0.0.1~git1+1b1ce593-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite 
existing copy already in the archive.
phonon-backend-vlc-dbg_0.0.1~git1+1b1ce593-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite 
existing copy already in the archive.
phonon-backend-vlc_0.0.1~git1+1b1ce593-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing 
copy already in the archive.
phonon-backend-vlc_0.0.1~git1+1b1ce593-1_amd64.deb: can not overwrite existing 
copy already in the archive.



===

Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ovlwk-0007nf...@franck.debian.org



Bug#587502: kdevelop: Regression. Too many resources is used while doing background jobs.

2010-07-05 Thread Andriy Beregovenko
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:59:08PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
  Is your cmake based project available somewhere ?
  try to remove ~/.kdevduchain directory and test if it's better.
 remove also ~/.kde/share/config/kdeveloprc (or rename to kdeveloprc.backup)
 

I'm sorry, i had mistake. Mistake about sym-links. I made rash assumption.
But problem is still actual.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100705140050.gb5...@img.jet.kiev.ua



Bug#587502: kdevelop: Regression. Too many resources is used while doing background jobs.

2010-07-05 Thread Andriy Beregovenko
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:59:08PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
  Is your cmake based project available somewhere ?
  try to remove ~/.kdevduchain directory and test if it's better.
 remove also ~/.kde/share/config/kdeveloprc (or rename to kdeveloprc.backup)
 
 

Using your recomendation I remove that dir and config. But this is not help.
While next background job is starting i had the same problem.

Project is available, this is rtmpd.com - OpenSource project.
When I import clean project(just svn'ed) in kdevelop4 all is fine. Project
indexing(via background job) pass successful.After this i run cmake .  make
(on builders/cmake directory) next background job leads to eating memory
and hard CPU usage. I think this happend cause project generate several 
sym-lynks
to upper directories - got several loops of scanning.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100705135223.ga5...@img.jet.kiev.ua



Bug#582953: kmail deleted all non-local incoming mail settings on upgrade

2010-07-05 Thread Juha Jäykkä
On Monday 05 Jul 2010 12:26:42 Modestas Vainius wrote:
 Hello,
 
 btw, is your $HOME on ext4 or XFS?

XFS

-- 
 ---
| Juha Jäykkä, ju...@iki.fi |
| http://www.maths.leeds.ac.uk/~juhaj   |
 ---


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#587502: kdevelop: Regression. Too many resources is used while doing background jobs.

2010-07-05 Thread Fathi Boudra
 Using your recomendation I remove that dir and config. But this is not help.
 While next background job is starting i had the same problem.

 Project is available, this is rtmpd.com - OpenSource project.
 When I import clean project(just svn'ed) in kdevelop4 all is fine. Project
 indexing(via background job) pass successful.After this i run cmake .  
 make
 (on builders/cmake directory) next background job leads to eating memory
 and hard CPU usage. I think this happend cause project generate several 
 sym-lynks
 to upper directories - got several loops of scanning.

I'm not able to reproduce so far.
Maybe there's a difference on the way the project is created.
Could you send the exact step you do and your kdevelop project file ?

my steps:
 - get crtmpserver 0.1 branch (r1421)
 - run kdevelop
 - project
 - open/import project...
 - select crtmpserver/builders/cmake/CMakeLists.txt
 - set project name to crtmpserver
 - set build directory to crtmpserver/build
 - ok
 - project
 - build all projects
 - it fails to build on vmtests
 - close project
 - close kdevelop
 - run kdevelop
 - project
 - open recent
 - select crtmpserver project



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikqjnbp5rx2ycccfx9dcbod-9x2uqtozzcfi...@mail.gmail.com



Processed: severity of 587502 is important

2010-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 587502 important
Bug #587502 [kdevelop] kdevelop: Regression. Too many resources is used while 
doing background jobs.
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
587502: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587502
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127834939513500.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: [bts-link] source package kdepim

2010-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 #
 # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdepim
 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
 #
 user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org (was 
bts-link-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org).
 # remote status report for #577528 (http://bugs.debian.org/577528)
 #  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234188
 #  * remote status changed: UNCONFIRMED - RESOLVED
 #  * remote resolution changed: (?) - UPSTREAM
 #  * closed upstream
 tags 577528 + fixed-upstream
Bug #577528 [akregator] akregator: The rss feed at http://habrahabr.ru/rss/ 
became unusable.
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
 usertags 577528 - status-UNCONFIRMED
Bug#577528: akregator: The rss feed at http://habrahabr.ru/rss/ became unusable.
Usertags were: status-UNCONFIRMED.
Usertags are now: .
 usertags 577528 + status-RESOLVED resolution-UPSTREAM
Bug#577528: akregator: The rss feed at http://habrahabr.ru/rss/ became unusable.
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-UPSTREAM.
 # remote status report for #583566 (http://bugs.debian.org/583566)
 #  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=236538
 #  * remote status changed: REOPENED - RESOLVED
 #  * remote resolution changed: (?) - FIXED
 #  * closed upstream
 tags 583566 + fixed-upstream
Bug #583566 [kontact] kontact - after upgrade to KDE4.4 akonadi doesn't work
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
 usertags 583566 - status-REOPENED
Bug#583566: kontact - after upgrade to KDE4.4 akonadi doesn't work
Usertags were: status-REOPENED.
Usertags are now: .
 usertags 583566 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
Bug#583566: kontact - after upgrade to KDE4.4 akonadi doesn't work
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
583566: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583566
577528: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577528
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127837299528360.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



[bts-link] source package kdepim

2010-07-05 Thread bts-link-upstream
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdepim
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

# remote status report for #577528 (http://bugs.debian.org/577528)
#  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234188
#  * remote status changed: UNCONFIRMED - RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) - UPSTREAM
#  * closed upstream
tags 577528 + fixed-upstream
usertags 577528 - status-UNCONFIRMED
usertags 577528 + status-RESOLVED resolution-UPSTREAM

# remote status report for #583566 (http://bugs.debian.org/583566)
#  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=236538
#  * remote status changed: REOPENED - RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) - FIXED
#  * closed upstream
tags 583566 + fixed-upstream
usertags 583566 - status-REOPENED
usertags 583566 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

thanks


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100705233630.11490.35369.btsl...@merkel.debian.org



Bug#588192: systemsettings: no user list in default (non-themed) login screen.

2010-07-05 Thread Alexandros Prekates
Package: systemsettings
Version: 4:4.4.4-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream

Althought  i choose user list  in systemsettings-advanced-loginScreen , with no
theme , nevertheless a user list wont appear.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=el_GR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=el_GR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages systemsettings depends on:
ii  kdebase-runtime   4:4.4.4-1  runtime components from the offici
ii  libc6 2.11.1-3   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libfontconfig12.8.0-2.1  generic font configuration library
ii  libkdecore5   4:4.4.4-2  the KDE Platform Core Library
ii  libkdeui5 4:4.4.4-2  the KDE Platform User Interface Li
ii  libkhtml5 4:4.4.4-2  the KHTML Web Content Rendering En
ii  libkio5   4:4.4.4-2  the Network-enabled File Managemen
ii  libknewstuff2-4   4:4.4.4-2  the Get Hot New Stuff v2 Library
ii  libknewstuff3-4   4:4.4.4-2  the Get Hot New Stuff v3 Library
ii  libkutils44:4.4.4-2  various utility classes for the KD
ii  libplasma34:4.4.4-2  the Plasma Library for the KDE Pla
ii  libqt4-dbus   4:4.6.3-1  Qt 4 D-Bus module
ii  libqt4-xml4:4.6.3-1  Qt 4 XML module
ii  libqtcore44:4.6.3-1  Qt 4 core module
ii  libqtgui4 4:4.6.3-1  Qt 4 GUI module
ii  libstdc++64.4.4-5The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6  2:1.3.3-3  X11 client-side library

systemsettings recommends no packages.

systemsettings suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100706034932.5927.92146.report...@localhost