Processed: Re: Processed: block 618325 with 618748
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unblock 618325 with 618748 Bug #618325 [src:qtwebkit] qtwebkit: FTBFS on armel: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed] Was blocked by: 618748 Removed blocking bug(s) of 618325: 618748 > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 618325: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618325 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130126313823595.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#618325: Processed: block 618325 with 618748
unblock 618325 with 618748 kthxbye On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 21:42:04 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > > block 618325 with 618748 > Bug #618325 [src:qtwebkit] qtwebkit: FTBFS on armel: ld terminated with > signal 9 [Killed] > Was not blocked by any bugs. > Added blocking bug(s) of 618325: 618748 NAK. The qtwebkit build also OOMs on archs using gcc 4.4. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110327215344.gy3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Processed: block 618325 with 618748
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 618325 with 618748 Bug #618325 [src:qtwebkit] qtwebkit: FTBFS on armel: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed] Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 618325: 618748 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 618325: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618325 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130126192919928.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: reopening 618325
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 618325
Bug #618325 {Done: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers }
[src:qtwebkit] qtwebkit: FTBFS on armel: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed]
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
618325: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618325
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13012579548359.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: increasing severity of this bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 618637 grave Bug #618637 [kppp] kppp does not work after upgrade from Lenny to Squeeze Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 618637: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618637 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130125460929756.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: contribution to koffice packaging
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:36:56PM +0100, Adrien wrote: > Hi, > > I have been using Debian, KDE and Koffice for a few years now. I recently > saw that the maintainers of Koffice are looking for help : > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541691 > > So I am offering my help, as I am using kword, kpresenter and sometimes > krita, and I like these softwares :-) I posted an answer to the wnpp bug : > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541691 > > I am motivated to contribute and to learn, but I have never done any > packaging work before, and my only contributions to Debian are on french > translations. I have some knowledge in programming (C, C++, ruby, cmake, > git…), sys admin and I have (quickly) read the webpages concerning the > development in Debian: > http://www.debian.org/devel/ > > I am not very busy for now, so I can spend some of my spare time for this > project. > > I don't know very well on which points you need help, how you are organized > and how to start. > Maybe I can begin with bugs triage or simple tasks? > > Please let me know how you would like me to contribute! Hi Adrien, I am sorry I did not answer you before, I do not read this list very often. As you might know, koffice is not going to be around a lot of time longer in Debian and it is going to be replaced by Calligra. If you want to help, a needed task is looking at all the pending bugs and: - checking what are fixed in Calligra (action: mark them with a user-tag) - what bugs do not apply anymore (action: close them) - what bugs should be forwarded to upstream.(action you forward them to kde bugzilla [1] [2] [1] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/usertags.html (e.g. usertag fixed-calligra) [2] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/btslink.html http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/kde-bugzilla-survival-guide.html If you want to take a look at calligra packages, there is a repo with a ver minimal packaging at: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-kde/kde-std/calligra.git;a=summary that makes a big calligra.deb. Note, that only can be used to test calligra without corrupting your system. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110327141836.ga19...@ekaia.org
Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}
Modestas Vainius wrote:
>>> + [...] The following Phonon
>>> + backend packages seem to be available for this system at the moment:
>>
>> As long as we can trust the detection (what does this depend on?)
>
> phonon-backends provide 'phonon-backend' virtual package.
Yes, and I don't see any non-free or i386-only or experimental
candidates - you're guaranteed a reliable list, with only the
"recommended" package ever likely to vary. That's why I went on to
take out the phrasing about needing to "detect" the ones that "seem to
be available for this system at the moment".
>> To restore full Phonon multimedia capabilities, install one of the
>> Phonon back-end packages which are currently available for this system:
>
> phonon-backend-null is a backend as well. I would like to see the word "real"
> in this sentence.
My patch had "no real Phonon back-end" earlier, but okay, it wouldn't
hurt to add it here too. Or maybe one of the two mentions should make
it more explicit that it's "unreal" in the sense of being a "dummy".
Oh, and I notice I missed a s/backend/back-end/, and I said "Qt
multimedia framework for KDE" when everywhere else it's "Qt 4" and
desktop-neutral (does the version number matter? Are we ever
expecting to see a Qt 5?):
_Description: Missing back-end for Phonon
Applications using Phonon (the Qt 4 multimedia framework) will produce
no audio or video output, because only a dummy Phonon back-end is
installed on this system. This is typically an unintended configuration.
.
To restore full Phonon multimedia capabilities, install one of the real
Phonon back-end packages which are currently available for this system:
.
${recommended_backend} (recommended)${other_backends}
>> s/behaviour/behavior/
>
> Are we using American English in Debian?
You're under no obligation to fake the accent, we've just chosen
standardization rather than standardisation for these reviews...
[PS:]
> E: phonon: description-starts-with-package-name
I'm not sure why it's worse to *start* with the packagename than just
to redundantly *include* it within the description (personally I'm
more annoyed by all those package synopses that just describe package
foo as "The GNU version of foo"). But yes, maybe we should consider
changing all of them to something more purely descriptive like "Qt 4
multimedia framework". I'll put that in my new patch too.
Note that this version changes libphononexperimental-dev's description
from
development files for the Phonon-Experimental library
to
Qt 4 multimedia framework - experimental development files
This may be distorting things too far - is there a better way of
accommodating the Phonon-Experimental library within this format?
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
Template: phonon-backend-null/isnt_functional_title
Type: title
_Description: Warning: Phonon is not functional
Template: phonon-backend-null/isnt_functional
Type: note
#flag:comment:4
# Translators: do not translate variable names
# only translate "(recommended)" (the one in parenthesis)
_Description: Missing back-end for Phonon
Applications using Phonon (the Qt 4 multimedia framework) will produce
no audio or video output, because only a dummy Phonon back-end is
installed on this system. This is typically an unintended configuration.
.
To restore full Phonon multimedia capabilities, install one of the real
Phonon back-end packages which are currently available for this system:
.
${recommended_backend} (recommended)${other_backends}
Source: phonon
Section: sound
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers
Uploaders: Modestas Vainius , Fathi Boudra
Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.51), debhelper (>= 7.4.13), cmake (>= 2.6.2),
pkg-kde-tools (>= 0.11), dpkg-dev (>= 1.15.5), automoc, libglib2.0-dev,
libpulse-dev (>= 0.9.21), libqt4-dev (>= 4.5)
Standards-Version: 3.9.1
Homepage: http://phonon.kde.org/
Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-kde/kde-req/phonon.git
Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/pkg-kde/kde-req/phonon.git
Package: phonon
Architecture: all
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libphonon4 (>= ${source:Version}),
${phonon:Recommended-Backend} | phonon-backend
Suggests: ${phonon:Recommended-Backend}, phonon-backend-gstreamer,
phonon-backend-xine, phonon-backend-mplayer
Description: Qt 4 multimedia framework - metapackage
Phonon is the Qt 4 multimedia API, which provides a task-oriented abstraction
layer for capturing, mixing, processing, and playing audio and video content.
.
This metapackage ensures that the system has a working Phonon configuration
installed (the core library and at least one back-end).
Package: libphonon-dev
Architecture: any
Section: libdevel
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libphonon4 (= ${binary:Version}),
${sameVersionDep:libqt4-dev:libphonon4}, phonon-backend-null | phonon
Description: Qt 4 multimedia framework - development files
Phonon is th
phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental
Accepted: libphonon-dev_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb to main/p/phonon/libphonon-dev_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb libphonon4_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb to main/p/phonon/libphonon4_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb libphononexperimental-dev_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb to main/p/phonon/libphononexperimental-dev_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb libphononexperimental4_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb to main/p/phonon/libphononexperimental4_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb phonon-backend-null_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_all.deb to main/p/phonon/phonon-backend-null_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_all.deb phonon-dbg_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb to main/p/phonon/phonon-dbg_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1.debian.tar.gz to main/p/phonon/phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1.debian.tar.gz phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1.dsc to main/p/phonon/phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1.dsc phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_all.deb to main/p/phonon/phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_all.deb phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0.orig.tar.bz2 to main/p/phonon/phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0.orig.tar.bz2 Override entries for your package: libphonon-dev_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb - optional libdevel libphonon4_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb - optional libs libphononexperimental-dev_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb - optional libdevel libphononexperimental4_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb - optional libs phonon-backend-null_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_all.deb - optional sound phonon-dbg_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb - extra debug phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1.dsc - source sound phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_all.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q3n4a-0006lg...@franck.debian.org
Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}
Quoting Modestas Vainius (mo...@debian.org): > > s/behaviour/behavior/ > > Are we using American English in Debian? In Debian overall, here's no such high consistency. However, in Smith reviews, we settled for en_US spelling, yes (the rationale being that it appeared to be used more often than en_GB). (funnily, most reviewers are British citizens..:-)) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processing of phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.changes
phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1.dsc phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0.orig.tar.bz2 phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1.debian.tar.gz phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_all.deb libphonon-dev_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb libphonon4_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb libphononexperimental-dev_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb libphononexperimental4_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb phonon-backend-null_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_all.deb phonon-dbg_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q3mln-0001yx...@franck.debian.org
Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}
Hello, by the way, I get: E: phonon: description-starts-with-package-name with the latest (2 mails above) control. -- Modestas Vainius signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}
Hello, On antradienis 22 Kovas 2011 14:02:37 Justin B Rye wrote: > > + If you wish to restore full Phonon multimedia capabilities, you > > + should install a real Phonon backend. The following Phonon > > + backend packages seem to be available for this system at the moment: > As long as we can trust the detection (what does this depend on?) phonon-backends provide 'phonon-backend' virtual package. > we > could rely on the colon to imply most of this: > > To restore full Phonon multimedia capabilities, install one of the > Phonon back-end packages which are currently available for this system: phonon-backend-null is a backend as well. I would like to see the word "real" in this sentence. > [...] > > > This package does not provide any real Phonon backend. It can be used to > > disable Phonon audio/video capabilities. Please note that Phonon > > behaviour with this package installed has not been well tested. > > s/behaviour/behavior/ Are we using American English in Debian? -- Modestas Vainius signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: eigen3 packages
Hi, all I have done some changes on eigen3 package. Plese, have a look at [1]. I would appreciate any comments and suggestions. Thanks [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-kde/krap/eigen3.git Anton On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Anton Gladky wrote: > Thanks! > > Anton > > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Ana Guerrero wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:05:45PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: >>> Ana, >>> I have requested to join. >>> >> >> Added, there is a git repo for eigen3 at: >> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-kde/krap/eigen3.git >> >> Other people from the team will probably polish some stuff, >> in case of doubts or when you do not know why something was done, >> feel free to ask in the IRC channel! >> >> Welcome! >> Ana >> > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimeataq6pfestr8wtwhxhibg0zabj8y0x1cq...@mail.gmail.com
