[bts-link] source package ksystemlog

2020-05-28 Thread debian-bts-link
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package ksystemlog
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
# https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
#

user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org

# remote status report for #889919 (http://bugs.debian.org/889919)
# Bug title: ksystemlog: SIGSEGV in QAction::setEnabled
#  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409375
#  * remote status changed: CONFIRMED -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
#  * closed upstream
tags 889919 + fixed-upstream
usertags 889919 - status-CONFIRMED
usertags 889919 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

thanks



Processed: [bts-link] source package ksystemlog

2020-05-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package ksystemlog
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org (was 
debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #889919 (http://bugs.debian.org/889919)
> # Bug title: ksystemlog: SIGSEGV in QAction::setEnabled
> #  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409375
> #  * remote status changed: CONFIRMED -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 889919 + fixed-upstream
Bug #889919 [ksystemlog] ksystemlog: SIGSEGV in QAction::setEnabled
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 889919 - status-CONFIRMED
Usertags were: status-CONFIRMED.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 889919 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
889919: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=889919
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#961731: sddm: Please remove Recommends: haveged

2020-05-28 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Package: sddm
Version: 0.18.1-1
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

your package currently Recommends: haveged. On modern kernels, so
whatever will ship in bulleye, the kernel will provide enough entropy,
so there should be no need for haveged, except in exceptional
situations.

Please remove the Recommends: haveged.

Thanks,
Chris



Processed: Re: Bug#958479: qmake passes unsupported -isystem to gcc

2020-05-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> forwarded -1 https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/302175
Bug #958479 [qt5-qmake] qmake passes unsupported -isystem to gcc
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/302175'.

-- 
958479: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958479
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#958479: qmake passes unsupported -isystem to gcc

2020-05-28 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Control: forwarded -1 https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/302175

Hi Helmut,

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 09:35:10PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I looked and the process is waaay to beyond what I can do. I'm not up to
> consenting to a 10-page TOS for a 5-line patch. Sorry.
>
> The 5-page CLA doesn't make this any better. Not a friendly project to
> contribute to.

OK, that is understandable.

> Your suggestion to explicitly license it under BSD seems much more
> reasonable to me. Let's do that. However, given that I find you much
> more trustworthy than QT upstream, I think that there is an even simpler
> option: Please treat the patch I sent to this bug as yours. You may
> claim authorship. I think legally that means I transfer whatever
> copyright I may have on this particular patch to you after licensing it
> under BSD.

I have now submitted this patch to Gerrit, see forwarded link. Let's see
what upstream thinks about it.

Also I simplified the unixmake2.cpp part of the patch a bit. The logic
should stay the same as in your patch.

--
Dmitry Shachnev


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Nicholas D Steeves] Re: KDEPIM 20.04 and KDE Frameworks 5.70 coming to unstable now

2020-05-28 Thread Sandro Knauß
Hey,

> Also replying to debian-qt-kde, in case some team members are not
> following debian-kde.

this list is for bugreports only. If you want to reach the Maintainer team you 
need to use the pkg-kde-t...@alioth-lists.debian.net.

hefee

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.