Bug#979343: sddm: general protection fault in libQt5Qml.so.5.15.2
Control: tag -1 unreproducible moreinfo Hi! On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 at 13:54, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Hello Bernhard, > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 02:25:12PM +0100, Bernhard Übelacker wrote: > > do you still see these messages in your logging? > > Yes. > > > If yes could you maybe add the surrounding logging > > of one such fault? E.g. by something like this: > > journalctl | grep "traps:" -C20 > > As soon as it appears (last time was yesterday). The weird things here are that it does not always happens and so far we have only seen your bug report. May I suggest you to check the binary with debsums? debsums libqt5qml5 If that is ok then I would run memtest to check the RAM. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Processed: Re: Bug#979343: sddm: general protection fault in libQt5Qml.so.5.15.2
Processing control commands: > tag -1 unreproducible moreinfo Bug #979343 [sddm] sddm: general protection fault in libQt5Qml.so.5.15.2 Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo. -- 979343: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979343 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#979343: sddm: general protection fault in libQt5Qml.so.5.15.2
Hello Helge, do you still see these messages in your logging? If yes could you maybe add the surrounding logging of one such fault? E.g. by something like this: journalctl | grep "traps:" -C20 Kind regards, Bernhard
Bug#979343: sddm: general protection fault in libQt5Qml.so.5.15.2
Hello Helge, do you still see these messages in your logging? If yes could you maybe add the surrounding logging of one such fault? E.g. by something like this: journalctl | grep "traps:" -C20 Kind regards, Bernhard
Bug#979343: sddm: general protection fault in libQt5Qml.so.5.15.2
Hello Bernhard, On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 02:25:12PM +0100, Bernhard Übelacker wrote: > do you still see these messages in your logging? Yes. > If yes could you maybe add the surrounding logging > of one such fault? E.g. by something like this: > journalctl | grep "traps:" -C20 As soon as it appears (last time was yesterday). Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#970478: marked as done (ERROR: Renderer process crashed when using qtwebengine backend.)
Your message dated Wed, 17 Mar 2021 12:18:56 +0300 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#970478: ERROR: Renderer process crashed when using qtwebengine backend. has caused the Debian Bug report #970478, regarding ERROR: Renderer process crashed when using qtwebengine backend. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 970478: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970478 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: qutebrowser-qtwebengine Version: 1.13.1-1 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: ze...@riseup.net Dear Maintainer, Trying to open sites using qtwebengine backend results in: "ERROR: Renderer process crashed". Hitting the "Try again" button or reloading does not resolve the issue. Launching from terminal with: $ qutebrowser --backend webkit makes the browser work again. I have cleared cache, config and reinstalled qutebrowser. Checking dmesg, the only relevant message is: [ +23.172585] traps: QtWebEngineProc[14326] trap invalid opcode ip:7f84ed8f928f sp:7ffc29e4afd0 error:0 in libQt5WebEngineCore.so.5.14.2[7f84e9b9c000+5a63000] -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.8.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages qutebrowser-qtwebengine depends on: ii libqt5webenginecore5 5.14.2+dfsg1-5 ii python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine 5.15.0-1+b1 ii qutebrowser1.13.1-1 qutebrowser-qtwebengine recommends no packages. qutebrowser-qtwebengine suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 5.15.2+dfsg-1 On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:51:21PM -0300, felipe wrote: > It worked without incidents on my 2 machines, so it was fixed for me. Thanks for the confirmation! Closing. -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
