qtav is marked for autoremoval from testing

2022-07-13 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
qtav 1.13.0+ds-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-07-22

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1004628: qtav: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0
 https://bugs.debian.org/1004628



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl



pyside2 is marked for autoremoval from testing

2022-07-13 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
pyside2 5.15.2-2.3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-07-22

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1010747: shiboken2: Unusable with current python version
 https://bugs.debian.org/1010747
1013881: libpyside2-py3-5.15: unstable soname?
 https://bugs.debian.org/1013881



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl



akonadi-calendar_22.04.3-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2022-07-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:kalendarac is NEW.
binary:kalendarac is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
 or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports



Processing of akonadi-calendar_22.04.3-1_amd64.changes

2022-07-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
akonadi-calendar_22.04.3-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  akonadi-calendar_22.04.3-1.dsc
  akonadi-calendar_22.04.3.orig.tar.xz
  akonadi-calendar_22.04.3.orig.tar.xz.asc
  akonadi-calendar_22.04.3-1.debian.tar.xz
  akonadi-calendar_22.04.3-1_amd64.buildinfo
  kalendarac-dbgsym_22.04.3-1_amd64.deb
  kalendarac_22.04.3-1_amd64.deb
  libkf5akonadicalendar-data_22.04.3-1_all.deb
  libkf5akonadicalendar-dev_22.04.3-1_amd64.deb
  libkf5akonadicalendar5abi1-dbgsym_22.04.3-1_amd64.deb
  libkf5akonadicalendar5abi1_22.04.3-1_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)



Bug#1013896: qtbase-opensource-src: Use KDE Qt as upstream instead of qt.io

2022-07-13 Thread Hillel Lubman
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 21:02:02 +0300 Dmitry Shachnev 
wrote:
>
> I expect users to complain if something doesn't work.
>
> Also note that now we get releases from Qt every couple of months, so
sooner
> or later we will get most of the patches this way (and it will be easier
to
> deal with the remaining ones).
>

Eventually yeah, but it can be a long while because a bunch of these
patches are
backports from Qt 6 by the KDE team and upstream Qt doesn't bother to
backport
to 5.x.

Shmerl.


Bug#1013896: qtbase-opensource-src: Use KDE Qt as upstream instead of qt.io

2022-07-13 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 04:22:01PM -0400, Shmerl wrote:
> I know Wayland Qt patches are critical for stable Plasma experience,
> but I'm not an expert on all of these.

Wayland patches are applied, as I said.

> May be some communication between upstream KDE developers and Debian
> team would be good here? Expecting users to know what patches are important
> isn't a very reliable method.

I expect users to complain if something doesn't work.

Also note that now we get releases from Qt every couple of months, so sooner
or later we will get most of the patches this way (and it will be easier to
deal with the remaining ones).

--
Dmitry Shachnev


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature