Re: Bug#984468: Pre-approval for uploading KDE Apps 20.12.3

[Ivo De Decker]

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 09:37:25AM +0100, Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
> For the sake of clarity / completeness the source packages for which I’m 
> requesting an unblock are:
> 
>   elisa-player/20.12.3-1
>   gwenview/4:20.12.3-1
>   juk/4:20.12.3-1
>   kdeconnect/20.12.3-1
>   kde-spectacle/20.12.3-1
>   konsole/4:20.12.3-1
>   kpmcore/20.12.3-1
>   krdc/4:20.12.3-1
>   marble/4:20.12.3-1
>   okular/4:20.12.3-1
>   palapeli/4:20.12.3-1

All unblocked.

Thanks,

Ivo

Bug#983018: qdbus: Needs package downgrade from Buster to Bullseye (missing epoch in transitional package)

[Ivo De Decker]

clone -1 -2
reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
retitle -2 dak: version checks for binaries not enforced when binary changes 
from any to all
severity -2 normal
tags -2 - pending

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 09:08:46AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> on one system I wondered why qdbus is still on Qt4. Then I noticed that
> the version of the Qt4 qdbus package from Buster is higher (!) than the
> version of the Qt5 qdbus package in Bullseye:
> 
> $ apt-cache policy qdbus
> qdbus:
>   Installed: 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1
>   Candidate: 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1
>   Version table:
>  *** 4:4.8.7+dfsg-20 100
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>  5.15.2-3 990
> 900 https://debian.ethz.ch/debian bullseye/main i386 Packages

The current situation:

qdbus  | 5.15.2-3 | testing  | all
qdbus  | 5.15.2-3 | unstable | all
qdbus  | 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-3+deb8u1 | oldoldstable | amd64, 
armel, armhf, i386
qdbus  | 4:4.8.7+dfsg-11  | oldstable| amd64, 
arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
qdbus  | 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1  | stable   | amd64, 
arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x

Normally, version checks should prevent an upload to unstable of a binary that
has a lower version than in stable or testing. However, this is checked per
architecture, and it seems the check wasn't done because the binary changed
from arch: any to arch: all at the same time. This case should probably be
checked in dak as well (obviously also for arch: all to arch: any).

Cloning the bug to track the issue in dak.

Cheers,

Ivo

Bug#929882: khelpcenter: please add conflict with dhelp and the KDE packages on debian buster

[Ivo De Decker]

Control: severity -1 important

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 09:43:17PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi khelpcenter maintainers,
> 
> On Sat, 01 Jun 2019 21:30:41 +0200 pnd23  wrote:
> > KDE packages install their documentation files in /usr/share/doc/HTML on 
> > buster
> > (in debian 8 this was: /usr/share/doc/kde/HTML). The "dhelp" package erases
> > this folder when it rebuilds its index. The KHelpcenter documentation gets
> > erased this way.
> 
> This bug got cloned to khelpcenter to make sure that you change your
> package to conflict with the unfixed version of dhelp, to prevent the
> above issue from happening. I expect that dhelp may be removed from
> buster, but if the package isn't removed from the users system, the
> issue may still occur.

As dhelp isn't in buster, and the version in bullseye is fixed, I'm
downgrading this bug. However, adding a conflict (or breaks) against the old
(broken) version of dhelp might still be a good thing, so I'm leaving this bug
open.

Thanks,

Ivo

Bug#917711: Bug triaged and submitted upstream

[Ivo De Decker]

Control: tags -1 patch pending

Hi Giovanni,

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 02:12:29PM +0100, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> I triaged and submitted upstream this bug:
> 
>   https://github.com/steveire/grantlee/issues/51
> 
> The upstream bug contains my current understanding of the bug and asks
> for help on how to proceed, because I am not really sure on what is the
> best way forward.
> 
> I hope this helps fixing the bug!

It seems upstream came to the same conclusion as you. This patch was committed
upstream:

https://github.com/steveire/grantlee/commit/3cb4bd24e127b7f55d463d934cad27f8c07c4406

I uploaded an NMU based on that patch. Debdiff attached.

Cheers,

Ivo

diff -Nru grantlee5-5.1.0/debian/changelog grantlee5-5.1.0/debian/changelog
--- grantlee5-5.1.0/debian/changelog2016-10-24 09:35:52.0 +
+++ grantlee5-5.1.0/debian/changelog2019-04-15 14:53:13.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+grantlee5 (5.1.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Add patch datatime-fractional.diff to fix FTBFS (Closes: #917711)
+
+ -- Ivo De Decker   Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:53:13 +
+
 grantlee5 (5.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   [ Helmut Grohne ]
diff -Nru grantlee5-5.1.0/debian/patches/datatime-fractional.diff 
grantlee5-5.1.0/debian/patches/datatime-fractional.diff
--- grantlee5-5.1.0/debian/patches/datatime-fractional.diff 1970-01-01 
00:00:00.0 +
+++ grantlee5-5.1.0/debian/patches/datatime-fractional.diff 2019-04-15 
14:53:13.0 +
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+See
+https://github.com/steveire/grantlee/commit/3cb4bd24e127b7f55d463d934cad27f8c07c4406
+https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917711
+
+--- a/templates/defaultfilters/datetime.cpp
 b/templates/defaultfilters/datetime.cpp
+@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
+ {
+   Q_UNUSED(autoescape)
+   auto d = QDateTime::fromString(getSafeString(input),
+- QStringLiteral("-MM-ddThh:mm:ss"));
++ QStringLiteral("-MM-ddThh:mm:ss.zzz"));
+ 
+   auto argString = getSafeString(argument);
+ 
diff -Nru grantlee5-5.1.0/debian/patches/series 
grantlee5-5.1.0/debian/patches/series
--- grantlee5-5.1.0/debian/patches/series   2016-10-24 09:35:52.0 
+
+++ grantlee5-5.1.0/debian/patches/series   2019-04-15 14:53:13.0 
+
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 variantIsTrue-float-fix.diff
+datatime-fractional.diff

Bug#915319: kde-runtime FTBFS with samba 4.9

[Ivo De Decker]

Hi Giovanni,

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 07:10:40PM +0100, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> I did some further diagnosis on this bug: the reason why CMake fails to
> discover libsmbclient is because CMake tries to compile a little program
> including libsmbclient.h using -std=c90, which is insufficient for
> libsmbclient.h. However libsmbclient.h works with more recent C
> standards, like the GCC default -std=gnu11.
> 
> The attached patch should fix the problem. I can NMU if this is ok for
> you. Probably it is not the cleanest solution ever (if would be better
> to fix CMake files from kdelibs5-dev), but it seems to work.

I would suggest you upload this NMU. If this isn't the right fix, it can
always be reverted.

Thanks,

Ivo

Bug#899128: kdepim: Limit CVE-2017-17689 (EFAIL) even more for kmail

[Ivo De Decker]

Hi,

On 04/09/2019 09:19 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:


The tracker for CVE-2017-17689 doesn't list anything related to kdepim or
src:meta-kde for buster. Is the issue fixed in the binary kdepim (produced
by src:meta-kde) in buster? If so, that should probably be stated explicitly
in the tracker.


For buster the affected code is in src:kf5-messagelib and fixed in 4:18.08.1-1

In stretch the affected code is in src:kdepim

In Buster the binary package kdepim is now built out of src:meta-kde, but that
was never affected. That's we don't track src:meta-kde at all in
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-17689

Does that clarify?


Yes. I (incorrectly) assumed that the offending code had been in 
meta-kde in buster at some point. As that's not the case, there is 
nothing left to fix for buster.


Thanks for the clarification.

Ivo

Bug#899128: kdepim: Limit CVE-2017-17689 (EFAIL) even more for kmail

[Ivo De Decker]

Hi Salvatore,

On 4/8/19 10:59 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:

Control: reassign -1 src:kdepim
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 11:36:10AM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:

Hi,

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 07:18:06PM +0200, Sandro Knauß wrote:

I now created a debdiff for kdepim. The patch depdends on the new symbol that
was added in new messageviewer (see #899127).


Does this bug still affect buster/sid? From the bug log and the tracker for
CVE-2017-17689, it look like kmail in buster/sid is not affected, but it would
be good if someone could confirm that.


I think the tracking problem was hiere that #899128 is associated with
src:meta-kde, but it should be src:kdepim (#899128) and respectively
kf5-messagelib was #899127. The issue was fixed in the kf5-messagelib
in version 4:18.08.1-1. In stretch src:kdepim was a source package,
whilst in buster kdepim is a binary package produced by kde-meta, but
the issue lies there in src:kf5-messagelib.


The tracker for CVE-2017-17689 doesn't list anything related to kdepim 
or src:meta-kde for buster. Is the issue fixed in the binary kdepim 
(produced by src:meta-kde) in buster? If so, that should probably be 
stated explicitly in the tracker.


The reassign means that the BTS thinks this issue doesn't affect buster 
anymore. I'm assuming that's correct.


Thanks,

Ivo

Bug#899128: kdepim: Limit CVE-2017-17689 (EFAIL) even more for kmail

[Ivo De Decker]

Hi,

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 07:18:06PM +0200, Sandro Knauß wrote:
> I now created a debdiff for kdepim. The patch depdends on the new symbol that 
> was added in new messageviewer (see #899127).

Does this bug still affect buster/sid? From the bug log and the tracker for
CVE-2017-17689, it look like kmail in buster/sid is not affected, but it would
be good if someone could confirm that.

Thanks,

Ivo

Bug#784479: Bug#876905: qtwebkit should not be release with buster

[Ivo De Decker]

Control: tags -1 buster-ignore

On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 10:39:25PM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:30:44PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Sure, if the release team agrees with that approach, the canonical way to do
> > that would be to tag the bug as "buster-ignore".
> 
> OK, tagging 876905 ("qtwebkit should not be released with buster") and 784477
> ("[kde-runtime] Qt4's WebKit removal").

Also tagging #784479.

Ivo

Bug#784477: Bug#876905: qtwebkit should not be release with buster

[Ivo De Decker]

Control: tags -1 buster-ignore

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:30:44PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Sure, if the release team agrees with that approach, the canonical way to do
> that would be to tag the bug as "buster-ignore".

OK, tagging 876905 ("qtwebkit should not be released with buster") and 784477
("[kde-runtime] Qt4's WebKit removal").

Thanks,

Ivo

Bug#910873: calligra: FTBFS with poppler 0.69.0-1

[Ivo De Decker]

Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 ftbfs

Hi,

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 05:51:06PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Source: calligra
> Version: 1:3.1.0+dfsg-3
> Severity: important
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Your package fails to build against poppler 0.69, currently in experimental.
> In some cases there are patches in Ubuntu, the PTS has links.

The new poppler is in unstable, so this happens on the buildds now. Raising
severity.

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=calligra&suite=sid

> For the memCheck errors, you can just patch out those calls, those were
> noops anyway as we didn't build with DEBUG_MEM, see
> 
> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/commit/?id=c362ab1b97f20c5b73b3bad8d52015f679178748
> 
> I intend to update our poppler soon as there are some security fixes
> in the newer versions. I'd appreciate if you can take a look at this
> and apply any necessary fixes.

Cheers,

Ivo

Bug#784479: [kde4libs] Qt4's WebKit removal

[Ivo De Decker]

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:59:58PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer 
wrote:
> Control: tag -1 patch
> 
> There is patch available for this at  packages.git/tree/trunk/kdelibs-no-kdewebkit.patch?h=packages/kdelibs>
> 
> We might want to wait for the last tandem of KF5 apps though.

Is there anything still blocking this?

kde-runtime (#784477) seems to have a patch and libkdegames-kde4 (#875015) is
no longer in testing.

Cheers,

Ivo

Bug#752698: qtdeclarative-opensource-src: FTBFS on mipsel

[Ivo De Decker]

Control: tags -1 pending

Hi Lisandro,

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 04:17:12PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer 
wrote:
> > It looks like the symbols file needs to be fixed for mipsel.
> 
> Yes, but I'm holding on updating it because this week we should have a new 
> upstream release and we already have 5.3.0 in testing.

That's fine, thanks!

> Of course if this is stopping something else just ping me and I'll fix it.

Cheers,

Ivo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140625193121.ga27...@ugent.be

Bug#752698: qtdeclarative-opensource-src: FTBFS on mipsel

[Ivo De Decker]

package: qtdeclarative-opensource-src
version: 5.3.0-10
severity: serious

Hi,

It looks like the symbols file needs to be fixed for mipsel.

Cheers,

Ivo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140625183858.ga26...@ugent.be

Bug#696961: qt4-x11: parallel build disabled on non-ia64 archs

[Ivo De Decker]

package: qt4-x11
version: 4.8.2+dfsg-5
severity: whishlist

Hi,

It seems that during the debugging of the ia64 ftbfs, the parallel build on
other architectures got lost.

In 4.8.2+dfsg-5, the change below was added (and not reverted later on). This
should not have happened (the parallel build was only enabled on non-ia64
anyway). So on buildd's that enable parallel build, the build is a lot slower
since 4.8.2+dfsg-5. This can probably be reverted.

diff -Nru qt4-x11-4.8.2+dfsg/debian/rules qt4-x11-4.8.2+dfsg/debian/rules
--- qt4-x11-4.8.2+dfsg/debian/rules 2012-08-18 21:35:58.0 +0200
+++ qt4-x11-4.8.2+dfsg/debian/rules 2012-12-16 18:48:43.0 +0100
@@ -85,12 +85,8 @@
   endif
 endif
 
-ifneq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ia64)
-   extra_dh_opts += --parallel
-endif
-
 %:
-   dh $@ $(extra_dh_opts) --with pkgkde_symbolshelper
+   dh $@ --with pkgkde_symbolshelper
 
 override_dh_auto_configure:
# Test broken hppa kernel with glibc >= 2.5


Cheers,

Ivo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121229232245.ga20...@ugent.be

Bug#696141: kdenetwork: FTBFS: moc: .../kopete/protocols/sms/gsmlibprefs.h: No such file

[Ivo De Decker]

Control: tags -1 unreproducible
Control: severity -1 important

Hi Thorsten,

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 08:29:22AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> kdenetwork fails to build, apparently looking for a file which it
> generated a few lines above, according to the attached build log.

I tried on amd64 with pbuilder in wheezy and sid, and manually in a clean
sid chroot (running debian/rules build-arch ; debian/rules binary-arch). Those
3 runs finished without failures.

Can you think of a way to reproduce this on a release arch?

I'm downgrading the bug because m68k is not a release arch.

Cheers,

Ivo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121224233411.ga2...@ugent.be

Bug#659155: Status of kdeadmin 4:4.8.4-2 (bug 659155)?

[Ivo De Decker]

Control: tag -1 patch

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 04:29:14PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer 
wrote:
> A *very simple* fix for this is pending. It will simply show the user a text 
> telling him/her that it needs to be in the lp/lpadmin group in order to use 
> this tool.

Hi Lisandro,

What's the status of this?

As the fix is in the git repo, I'm tagging this bug 'patch'.
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-kde/kde-sc/kdeadmin.git;a=commitdiff;h=8e3d9c6bce2d89b2fba793ea26a2a5e394ad92ff

Cheers,

Ivo


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121121213549.ga7...@ugent.be