Bug#405965: Appreciations.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Raúl Sánchez Siles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Zak: > > Thank you very much for following this bug. With the information you > provided I have several appreciations. > > First of all, is that I'm also not sure KDE supports working without the lo > interface up. It's likely it not. In any case, I don't think not bringing lo > up is not a good idea, neither for KDE nor the rest of the system. So please, > could you try to reproduce the problem having previously upped the lo > interface? I haven't seen the sources, but I am most sure that KDE needs the lo interface. I had a problem with my system some years ago, and some KDE dev told me that it was necesary. Anyway, perhaps we should ask some KDE dev :-/ Regards, Lisandro. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Bug#405965: Appreciations.
Hello Zak: Thank you very much for following this bug. With the information you provided I have several appreciations. First of all, is that I'm also not sure KDE supports working without the lo interface up. It's likely it not. In any case, I don't think not bringing lo up is not a good idea, neither for KDE nor the rest of the system. So please, could you try to reproduce the problem having previously upped the lo interface? After this is said, you also say that unstable version doesn't suffer this bug, right? So if you say this we can consider the bug solved, no matter the status of testing version, since, unstable version will be the one deployed finally on Lenny. I'll wait for your answer, but I think we can clearly close this bug. Thanks a lot. -- Raúl Sánchez Siles ->Proud Debian user<- Linux registered user #416098 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
