Bug#464700: closed by Ana Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#464700: konqueror: segfault in Save As download dialog)

2008-03-24 Thread Marcus Better
Ana Guerrero wrote:
 1. How am I supposed to know it was an upstream bug?
 
 1. I consider you more clueful about this stuff that an average user 

Thank you for the trust in my competence, but it's not so easy to see if
a segfault is an upstream bug or some packaging issue like a library
incompatibility. (I did forward it upstream anyway, but that report
hasn't been confirmed.)

 and it is already reported against KDE 3's konqueror.
 Then why don't you merge it?

 Yeah, could have done it, but in the same line, why you did not update that 
 bug report then?

Because I was busy. Anyway, I think we can agree that the correct action
for duplicate reports is to merge, not to close.

Regards,

Marcus




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#464700: closed by Ana Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#464700: konqueror: segfault in Save As download dialog)

2008-03-23 Thread Marcus Better
Ana Guerrero wrote:
 Yes, please do not report upstream bugs against debian BTS for KDE 4.

1. How am I supposed to know it was an upstream bug?

2. If you know it's an upstream bug, why are you not tagging it upstream
and adding a forwarding address so that people can track it?

 I'm closing this bug since this package is not meant to go to a stable release

That is interesting. I am not aware that maintainers can opt out of the
regular bug handling tasks.

 and it is already reported against KDE 3's konqueror.

Then why don't you merge it?

Regards,

Marcus



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#464700: closed by Ana Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#464700: konqueror: segfault in Save As download dialog)

2008-03-23 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 09:16:44PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
 Ana Guerrero wrote:
  Yes, please do not report upstream bugs against debian BTS for KDE 4.
 
 1. How am I supposed to know it was an upstream bug?

1. I consider you more clueful about this stuff that an average user 
(you are in a NM, arent you?)

2. Why then you reported it KDE's bugzilla?


  I'm closing this bug since this package is not meant to go to a stable 
  release
 
 That is interesting. I am not aware that maintainers can opt out of the
 regular bug handling tasks.


EPARSE :?

  and it is already reported against KDE 3's konqueror.
 
 Then why don't you merge it?
 

Yeah, could have done it, but in the same line, why you did not update that 
bug report then?
(I assume you checked filed bug reports before file yours).

Ana



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]