Re: Qt4 in the context of OpenSSL 1.0 removal

[Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer]

On jueves, 21 de septiembre de 2017 21:32:34 -03 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
wrote:
> On 2017-08-26 16:44:34 [-0300], Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > Hi! src:qt4-x11 is not listed in the transition but it's definitely using
> > libssl (although trough dllopen).
> 
> It is. The other qt-related bugs are:
> #828522 [i|  |♔] [src:qt4-x11] qt4-x11: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Just this one, the others are Qt5 and should be sorted out hopefully in Qt 
5.10.

[snip]
> 
> why silently? I would assume that if the SSL class is not availble that
> it won't compile or won't provide a connection at all (say khtml works
> only http then).

Because developers. Yes, the API will certainly complain, but one can not 
assume that every developer will take that complain seriously.
 
> > b) We remove Qt4 aling all their rdeps.
> > 
> > Ideally (b) should happen before we release Buster, but I do realize it
> > *will be complicated*. (a) Would be a wonderful way towards achieving (a)
> > actually.
> That qgis looks interresting. Do you want me to look at it or do prefer
> to use a) as motivation to get people to move to qt5?

It really depends on when the OpenSSL 1.0 removal will really take place. If 
it's by january 2018 then we are fine because:

- Maintainers will be forced to move or remove packages, with enough time to 
make their packages re enter the archive is possible.

- Users will still be able to use the needed apps through stable (even if they 
use testing).



-- 
En los momentos de crisis, la imaginación es mas importante que el
conocimiento.
 Albert Einstein

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Qt4 in the context of OpenSSL 1.0 removal

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

On 2017-08-26 16:44:34 [-0300], Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Hi! src:qt4-x11 is not listed in the transition but it's definitely using 
> libssl (although trough dllopen).

It is. The other qt-related bugs are:
#828522 [i|  |♔] [src:qt4-x11] qt4-x11: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
#859671 [i|  |♔] [qtbase-opensource-src] qtbase-opensource-src: Please migrate 
to openssl1.1 in Buster
#859673 [i|  |♔] [qtwebsockets-opensource-src] qtwebsockets-opensource-src: 
Please migrate to openssl1.1 in Buster

I see those bugs listed as blocker of this bug.

> We have tried a patch proposed in #828522 but sadly whe where hit with:
> 
> 
> 
> At this point we are back at stage 0, either:
> 
> a) We remove SSL support letting lots of apps fail or silently use 
> unencrypted 
> connections.

why silently? I would assume that if the SSL class is not availble that
it won't compile or won't provide a connection at all (say khtml works
only http then).

> b) We remove Qt4 aling all their rdeps.
> 
> Ideally (b) should happen before we release Buster, but I do realize it *will 
> be complicated*. (a) Would be a wonderful way towards achieving (a) actually.

That qgis looks interresting. Do you want me to look at it or do prefer
to use a) as motivation to get people to move to qt5?

Sebastian

Re: Qt4 in the context of OpenSSL 1.0 removal

[Diederik de Haas]

On zaterdag 26 augustus 2017 16:44:34 CEST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer 
wrote:
> a) We remove SSL support letting lots of apps fail or silently use
> unencrypted  connections.

silently use unencrypted connections sound REALLY bad.
Either do it very *loudly* or let apps fail.

My 0.02


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Qt4/5 library name extensions

[Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer]

On Friday 28 November 2014 07:26:25 Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> Hello list
> 
> I am wondering if any of you has some good advice on name extensions for
> libraries for both Qt4 and Qt5.
> 
> In Debian I see the QtGui (and more) are named libQtGui for qt4 and
> libQt5Gui for qt5.
> Is this Debian specific or based on any recommendations?
> 
> There is an ongoing discussion about the Qwt library here:
> http://sourceforge.net/p/qwt/mailman/qwt-interest/?viewmonth=201411&style=th
> readed
> 
> and I will be very happy if there is a consensus that can be applied by
> upstream and accepted by most Linux distributions. I hope there is one and I
> have just missed it :)

Hi Gudjon! I barely missed the mail.

The naming scheme comes from upstream. But it is indeed based on 
recommendations, as you need to keep a proper soname.

I quickly glanced over Rex Dieter's mails, and the suggestions seems sane 
enough.

Qt5Qwt is not bad, but may be like stepping over Qt's upstream's toes.

Kinds regards, Lisandro.

-- 
"No es el crecimiento de la tecnología lo que excluye, sino la
protección sistemática de los derechos de uso de la misma,
lo cual se puede aplicar al arte."
  David Cuartielles

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Processed: Re: qt4-designer: Menus displayed in a false position on the secondary screen

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 708925 normal
Bug #708925 [qt4-designer] qt4-designer: Menus displayed in a false position on 
the secondary screen
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
> tag 708925 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #708925 [qt4-designer] qt4-designer: Menus displayed in a false position on 
the secondary screen
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
708925: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708925
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.138023742814315.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Re: qt4-x11: keyboard shortcuts don't work in multi-language mode

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags 719064 + patch
Bug #719064 [src:qt4-x11] qt4-x11: keyboard shortcuts don't work in 
multi-language mode
Added tag(s) patch.

-- 
719064: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719064
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b719064.13780657368105.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Re: qt4-x11: keyboard shortcuts don't work in multi-language mode

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags 719064 + upstream
Bug #719064 [src:qt4-x11] qt4-x11: keyboard shortcuts don't work in 
multi-language mode
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded 719064 https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-32908
Bug #719064 [src:qt4-x11] qt4-x11: keyboard shortcuts don't work in 
multi-language mode
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-32908'.

-- 
719064: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719064
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b719064.137708373023966.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Re: qt4-x11: Conflict due to different package version while update

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 685378 src:qt4-x11 4:4.8.2-2
Bug #685378 [dpkg] dpkg: multiarch: Conflict due to different package version 
while update
Bug reassigned from package 'dpkg' to 'src:qt4-x11'.
No longer marked as found in versions dpkg/1.16.8.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #685378 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #685378 [src:qt4-x11] dpkg: multiarch: Conflict due to different package 
version while update
Marked as found in versions qt4-x11/4:4.8.2-2.
> forcemerge 684556 685378
Bug #684556 {Done: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer } 
[src:qt4-x11] src:qt4-x11: multiarch build broken
Bug #684678 {Done: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer } 
[src:qt4-x11] libqt4-dbus: multiarch problem with several packages on amd64
Bug #684688 {Done: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer } 
[src:qt4-x11] libqt4-core: Multiarch conflicts prevent installation
Bug #684867 {Done: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer } 
[src:qt4-x11] qt4-x11: binNMU affects qt4-x11 co-installability
Bug #685378 [src:qt4-x11] dpkg: multiarch: Conflict due to different package 
version while update
Marked Bug as done
The source qt4-x11 and version 4:4.8.2+dfsg-1 do not appear to match any binary 
packages
Marked as fixed in versions qt4-x11/4:4.8.2+dfsg-1.
The source qt4-x11 and version 4:4.8.2-2+b1 do not appear to match any binary 
packages
Marked as found in versions qt4-x11/4:4.8.2-2+b1.
Bug #684678 {Done: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer } 
[src:qt4-x11] libqt4-dbus: multiarch problem with several packages on amd64
Bug #684688 {Done: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer } 
[src:qt4-x11] libqt4-core: Multiarch conflicts prevent installation
Bug #684867 {Done: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer } 
[src:qt4-x11] qt4-x11: binNMU affects qt4-x11 co-installability
Merged 684556 684678 684688 684867 685378
> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
684556: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684556
684678: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684678
684688: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684688
684867: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684867
685378: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685378
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134547943615465.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Re: qt4-designer segmentation fault

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 561741 + moreinfo
Bug #561741 [qt4-designer] qt4-designer segmentation fault
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
561741: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561741
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130727842112306.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Re: qt4-x11: sh4: FTBFS: ./../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/arch/qatomic_generic.h:197: error: invalid conversion from 'const void*' to 'void*'

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 623281 + pending
Bug #623281 [src:qt4-x11] qt4-x11: sh4: FTBFS: 
./../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/arch/qatomic_generic.h:197: error: 
invalid conversion from 'const void*' to 'void*'
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
623281: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623281
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130397630525679.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Re: [qt4-doc] Doc formatting looks broken (no css used)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 606073 + upstream
Bug #606073 [qt4-dev-tools] assistant: doc formatting looks broken (no css used)
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded 606073 http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-13608
Bug #606073 [qt4-dev-tools] assistant: doc formatting looks broken (no css used)
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-13608'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
606073: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606073
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129170449813015.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Re: qt4-x11_4.7.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Scott Kitterman]

"Debian FTP Masters"  wrote:

>
>
>
>Reject Reasons:
>libqt4-dev: lintian output: 'package-contains-ancient-file
>usr/include/qt4/QtCore/QtConfig 1970-01-01', automatically rejected
>package.
>libqt4-dev_4.7.1-1_amd64.deb: has 1 file(s) with a time stamp too
>ancient (e.g. usr/include/qt4/QtCore/QtConfig [Thu Jan  1 00:00:00
>1970]).
>
We have a patch for this in Ubuntu. I'll dig it out and mail it later today if 
no one beats me to it.

Scott K


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/51dfd963-a130-4a61-a978-59d31c07a...@email.android.com

Processed: Re: qt4-x11-4.4.3 fails to create packages on debian/lenny using debian/rules binary

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 599814 + moreinfo
Bug #599814 [qt4-x11] qt4-x11-4.4.3 fails to create packages on debian/lenny 
using debian/rules binary
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
599814: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599814
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12899321698598.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Re: [qt4-designer] Hand crafted ui file crash (core dump)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 507123 + moreinfo
Bug #507123 [qt4-designer] [qt4-designer] Hand crafted ui file crash (core dump)
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
507123: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507123
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12890941685116.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Re: qt4-x11 update in testing

[George Kiagiadakis]

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Lukasz Szotek  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any hope for migration qt4-x11 4:4.6.3-2 (or 4:4.6.3-3) to testing 
> from sid?
> Version 4:4.6.3-1 has very ugly bug in Webkit with flash-plugin and it hasn't 
> been fixed for almost 4 months.

Yes, 4:4.6.3-3 is coming to testing, according to:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/qt4-x11.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=p1lnaqehgwolq07_kcjw4f_uoyhlf=bhmr...@mail.gmail.com

Re: qt4-x11 unblock request

[Julien Cristau]

On Sun, Oct  3, 2010 at 16:31:18 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

> [cc:ing the qt maintainers]
> 
> On Sat, Oct  2, 2010 at 00:43:44 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct  1, 2010 at 23:43:17 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > 
> > > qt4-x11/4:4.6.3-2 -> CVE-2010-2621
> > 
> > Moves a file from libqt4-dev to libqt4-dbus, needs a Replaces.  Looks ok
> > otherwise.
> > 
4:4.6.3-3 unblocked.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: qt4-x11_4.7.0~beta1+git3839+e720c26-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Fathi Boudra]

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
 wrote:
> Sorry if we missed that the previous times, when qt hit NEW, but appearently 
> it
> contains quite some files licensed under a BSD-style license.  We must list
> these in our copyright file, and if possible also the copyright holders.

I would have preferred you accept the package and
submit an RC bug as Qt in testing/unstable/experimental are affected.

Cheers,

Fathi


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin3kckxwwa-ylislbrbdj1wazr1jaawllcvj...@mail.gmail.com

Processed: Re: qt4-x11: many webkit vulnerabilities

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 561760 important
Bug #561760 [qt4-x11] qt4-x11: many webkit vulnerabilities
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127187971030833.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Re: Qt4 Backport for Debian Etch

[Fathi Boudra]

Hi,

> Would you mind to provide (and maintain) one for www.backports.org?

yes. i have started to work on Qt 4.3.2-1 for Sid. This version will be 
backported.

cheers,

Fathi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 368883
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 368883 patch
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone 368883 -1
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Bug 368883 cloned as bug 369642.

> reassign -1 g++-4.0
Bug#369642: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Bug reassigned from package `qt4-x11' to `g++-4.0'.

> severity -1 important
Bug#369642: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Severity set to `important' from `serious'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: QT4: need confirmation on debug version

[Brian Nelson]

Christian Welzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I'm currently developing an application on qt4 and wondered why qt doesnt
> complain about not existing signals/slots during connect().
> After trying to compile the stuff myself i discovered this:
[...]
> As you can see the build process does not compile the debug version on its own
> but only links the objects of the release-version into the debug-version.
>
> Because release version is compliled with QT_NO_DEBUG even the debug version
> does not through errors.
>
> I used the 4.0.1-5 patch on qt-x11 4.0.1 from trolltech website.
>
> Please confirm this behavoir and fix it in the next upload.

I think this is due to this upstream bug:

  http://www.trolltech.com/developer/tasktracker.html?method=entry&id=90812

It's scheduled to be fixed in 4.1.1.

-- 
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Qt4 Designer How to Edit *.ui.h file?

[Wathavy]

> Fortunately the developers at Trolltech came to
< likewise >..
> Qt4's documentation explains how to treat uic
> generated classes now:
> 
> http://doc.trolltech.com/4.0/porting4-designer.html
Thank you for your reply, Kevin.
I'm going to look into them.

> > Would anyone tell me how I can implement
> > *::init(){ }
> > and all that ?
> 
> You no longer have to, you can now use easier
> methods.
Woo! Is that right!
I would be happy to hear it.

Thank you again.
Bye.
Wathavy.

--
Know more about Breast Cancer
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/pinkribbon/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Qt4 Designer How to Edit *.ui.h file?

[Kevin Krammer]

On Friday 30 September 2005 09:22, Wathavy wrote:
> Hi
>
> Qt3.3.3 designer let us edit *.ui.h file which has
> following header explanation ;

[snip]

> Now, I cannot do the same when I make dialog with
> Qt4 designer.

Fortunately the developers at Trolltech came to their senses and removed the 
ui.h hack.
Unfortunately some of the developers new to Qt3 used it instead of properly 
subclassing the widget generated by uic.

Qt4's documentation explains how to treat uic generated classes now:

http://doc.trolltech.com/4.0/porting4-designer.html

> Would anyone tell me how I can implement
> *::init(){ }
> and all that ?

You no longer have to, you can now use easier methods.

Cheers,
Kevin


pgpk8CLioBfSN.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Qt4: libqjpeg.so

[Brian Nelson]

vincenzo pisani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hi,
> first of all thanks for your great work.
> Now go to the question.
> I'm try to using the new Qt4.
> If compiling it by myself with:
>
> ./configure -system-libjpeg -.  
> or 
> without -system-libjpeg
>
> i can found in plugin directory
>
> imageformats/libjpeg.so
>
> but if i install your qt4 package this file can not be
> found in any location.

Hmm, that might be a bug in the Debian packages.

> I read somewhere that in Qt4, jpeg support is only  by plugin and it
> use "system libjpeg" or "libjpeg bundled with Qt". Is true?

I seem to recall Trolltech dropping compiled-in jpeg support late in the
Qt4 development cycle, but I might not have updated the packages to
include it as a plugin.

Did you try using the Qt4 packages with jpeg images?  If you did and it
did not work, please file a bug.

-- 
Society is never going to make any progress until we all learn to
pretend to like each other.

Re: Qt4

[Brian Nelson]

On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 11:20:09PM +0300, Mattias Nordstrom wrote:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
> > I have some debs of 4.0.0 built but I need to test them.  I think
> > they're kinda broken because some stuff has moved around and changed
> > since beta2.  Hopefully I'll have something usable and ready to upload
> > later on today.
> 
> Ok, sounds great!
> 
> Are they replacing the Qt3 libraries or can they be easily and safely
> run in parallel?

As long as Qt3 doesn't use alternatives (see #306879), they can't be
installed in parallel...

-- 
Society is never going to make any progress until we all learn to
pretend to like each other.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Qt4

[Yann Dirson]

I have just installed the currently-available qt4b2 packages, and have
a couple of remarks.  Maybe those points have already been addressed
in the upcoming 4.0.0 packages, but who knows.

- libqt4-gui and qt4-dev-tools depend on libqt4-debug.  It is strange
(and annoying, given the size of that package)

- running qmake (eg. on fbx-playlist[1]) fails with "Unable to find a
Qt configuration.", and strace reveals it is looking for qt.conf in
various places.  Surely the packages should provide a default one in
/etc.


[1] available from a tarball inside
ftp://ftp.free.fr/pub/freeplayer/freeplayer-linux-20050701.tgz

Best regards,
-- 
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
|  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
 http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Qt4

[Mattias Nordstrom]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Brian Nelson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 02:09:02PM -0400, Josh Metzler wrote:
> 
>>On Monday 04 July 2005 09:04 am, Mattias Nordstrom wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>Is there an easy way to install Qt4 on Debian in parallell with Qt3?
>>>Does anyone provide experimental packages that wouldn't replace the
>>>default Qt installation (Qt3)?
>>
>>Brian Nelson filed an ITP (bug #306694, CCed) for qt4 a while ago, and has 
>>experimental packages up at http://people.debian.org/~pyro/experimental/ , 
>>but they seem to still be debs of beta2.
>>
>>Any progress on the ITP now that qt4 has been released?
> 
> 
> I have some debs of 4.0.0 built but I need to test them.  I think
> they're kinda broken because some stuff has moved around and changed
> since beta2.  Hopefully I'll have something usable and ready to upload
> later on today.
> 

Ok, sounds great!

Are they replacing the Qt3 libraries or can they be easily and safely
run in parallel?

- --
Mattias Nordstrom
CTO
Realnode Oy

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.realnode.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCyZn5wKTxHeBrP5cRAsUDAJ9SuyvSOYCCyI6JorcvIEXEMNUfswCeMyB7
s2wkkR7kv8HJbF2U0RPfxyU=
=Fkg2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Qt4

[Brian Nelson]

On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 02:09:02PM -0400, Josh Metzler wrote:
> On Monday 04 July 2005 09:04 am, Mattias Nordstrom wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there an easy way to install Qt4 on Debian in parallell with Qt3?
> > Does anyone provide experimental packages that wouldn't replace the
> > default Qt installation (Qt3)?
> 
> Brian Nelson filed an ITP (bug #306694, CCed) for qt4 a while ago, and has 
> experimental packages up at http://people.debian.org/~pyro/experimental/ , 
> but they seem to still be debs of beta2.
> 
> Any progress on the ITP now that qt4 has been released?

I have some debs of 4.0.0 built but I need to test them.  I think
they're kinda broken because some stuff has moved around and changed
since beta2.  Hopefully I'll have something usable and ready to upload
later on today.

-- 
Society is never going to make any progress until we all learn to
pretend to like each other.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Qt4

[Josh Metzler]

On Monday 04 July 2005 09:04 am, Mattias Nordstrom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there an easy way to install Qt4 on Debian in parallell with Qt3?
> Does anyone provide experimental packages that wouldn't replace the
> default Qt installation (Qt3)?

Brian Nelson filed an ITP (bug #306694, CCed) for qt4 a while ago, and has 
experimental packages up at http://people.debian.org/~pyro/experimental/ , 
but they seem to still be debs of beta2.

Any progress on the ITP now that qt4 has been released?

Josh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]