Re: RFS : ruby-email-validator/1.4.0-1 ITP #743306
Hi again, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:31:19PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: Hi Aurélien, I had a look at your package. I have just a small comment: please remove the line starting with a # just after the Depends: field. Those are metadata extracted by gem2deb for your information, but should not appear in the final package. another detail: this package build-depends but should not depend on ruby-activemodel. Only tests use it. Please remove it from the dependencies. Cheers, Cédric signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: mini_portile dependency in nokogiri gemspec
On Tuesday 06 May 2014 02:08 PM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: Hi Praveen, No objections, go ahead ;) Cédric Uploaded! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
DONE: ruby-ipaddress, roodi; left: ruby-dbi, ruby-re2
Hi David, On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 12:24:27PM +0200, David Suárez wrote: HI, I prepared a new Debian version of the following packages: - ruby-ipaddress: uploaded. Just bumped the Standards-Version to 3.9.5. - ruby-dbi (fix FTBFS): * Add patch to fix raise method lookup (Closes: #746081) About ruby-dbi: - could you please put a little more verbose description to your patch? - please forward them upstream and put a link in their header - could you also add a debian/ruby-dbi.doc-base file for doc-base registration of the HTML documentation? - I pushed the tarball in the pristine-tar branch, as it was missing. And new upstream version of: - roodi Uploaded. I bumped the year for the upstream entry in the copyright file. - ruby.re2 Not looked at it yet. Cheers, Cédric signature.asc Description: Digital signature
help with font-awesome-rails tests
Hi, Can anyone help with font-awesome-rails tests? It has a dummy rails app which is trying to get fonts via assets, but can't. Someone who knows rails asset pipeline might be able to find the missing pieces. Package is in our git repo. Thanks Praveen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5368d844.5030...@onenetbeyond.org
Re: ruby-sqlite3 FTBFS
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 10:57:37AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 05:00:58PM +0200, David Suárez wrote: Hi, El Domingo, 4 de mayo de 2014 16:06:50 Christian Hofstaedtler escribió: Upstream said something about LE vs. BE: https://github.com/sparklemotion/sqlite3-ruby/issues/128 If you look at s390x build log: Expected: foo Actual: \u6600\u6F00\u6F00 and then, reverse the bytes on each unicode codepoint like; \u0066\u006F\u006F you get: foo I currently don't have the time to look into this any deeper, so this is a call for help. Maybe something like: ++ test_encoding.rb - db = SQLite3::Database.new(':memory:'.encode('UTF-16LE')) + utf16 = ([1].pack(I) == [1].pack(N)) ? UTF-16BE : UTF-16LE + db = SQLite3::Database.new(':memory:'.encode(utf16)) ++statement.c if (UTF16_LE_P(value) || UTF16_BE_P(value)) { But I'm unable to test it on my i386 machine :) I tested these changes on s390x and they don't fix the problem :-( After some extra modifications I got it to work and I am uploading a fixed package. Thanks! -- Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: ruby-sqlite3 FTBFS
* Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org [140506 22:48]: On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 10:57:37AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 05:00:58PM +0200, David Suárez wrote: El Domingo, 4 de mayo de 2014 16:06:50 Christian Hofstaedtler escribió: Upstream said something about LE vs. BE: https://github.com/sparklemotion/sqlite3-ruby/issues/128 Maybe something like: ++ test_encoding.rb - db = SQLite3::Database.new(':memory:'.encode('UTF-16LE')) + utf16 = ([1].pack(I) == [1].pack(N)) ? UTF-16BE : UTF-16LE + db = SQLite3::Database.new(':memory:'.encode(utf16)) ++statement.c if (UTF16_LE_P(value) || UTF16_BE_P(value)) { But I'm unable to test it on my i386 machine :) I tested these changes on s390x and they don't fix the problem :-( After some extra modifications I got it to work and I am uploading a fixed package. Thanks! Great to hear! Please also report anything you find upstream. Thanks a lot, -- ,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler z...@debian.org : :' : Debian Developer `. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03 `- pgpFpqKp0wk9V.pgp Description: PGP signature