salsa.d.o/ruby-team: please bump my access level
Dear team, I would like to change the settings of some of the packages I'm maintaining, ruby-mail-gpg for example, to modify the location of the GitLab CI config. However, currently, I'm unable to do so, due to my "Developer" level. Accordingly, could someone bump this please? "Maintainer" should be appropriate. Thanks in advance, cheers, Georg signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Introduction and request for help packaging a ruby app
Hi, On 19-07-16 01:15:42, Gabriel Filion wrote: > I'm somewhat new to debian packaging, although I'm currently already > co-maintaining the smokeping package, and I would like to create a new > debian package for a ruby app (or rather plugin?): > vagrant-librarian-puppet > > I already have an ITP for it: #924285 > > I've also already used gem2deb to start things up and managed to get > the package to a functional state (it's installed on my laptop). > > I'm wondering if packaging this under the ruby team makes sense with > folks already in the team, and if so I think I would need some help to > place things around correctly in the git repos, and then maybe make > sure that I don't forget bits of details, if someone would be willing > to help. > > I'm LeLutin on irc, and I'll start hanging out in the team channel. So > you can reach me out here on the list, or on irc. Welcome to the team, and thanks for your work. If you have any specific questions, need help and/or review, I'm happy to help. Cheers, Georg signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS:- ruby-batch-loader newer upstream version
Hey Manas, On 7/18/19 5:47 PM, Manas Kashyap wrote: > Hi, > > The following packages are ready to be uploaded > Could you please sponsor them? > > ruby-batch-loader newer upstream version to > experimental https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-batch-loader/ > The package was tested on both gbp and sbuild. They're also lintian-clean. > > Thank you! Few things to note 1. There is no tag upstream/1.4.1+dfsg.1, which makes gbp buildpackage fail on `gbp:error: upstream/1.4.1+dfsg.1 is not a valid treeish` 2. There are few lintian warnings that I think can be corrected without much effort. I recommend fixing them too, from a QA perspective at least. Regards Balu
Re: RFS:- ruby-batch-loader newer upstream version
Hi, On 7/21/19 12:05 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On 2019, ജൂലൈ 21 11:26:43 AM IST, Manas Kashyap > wrote: >> Sorry for the double entries in changelog , >> I didn't noticed it , >> and for experimental release , i am doing it experimental release as >> its a >> dependency of gitlab , and for safety measure that it doesnt break the >> package currently in unstable , so i am releasing it in experimental. > > Since it is only a minor update of stable library (assuming server) unstable > should be fine. > >> I have edited the changelog , please see it to. >> > > Since my laptop is broken, I hope someone in the team can upload it. > I'll take a look. Regards Balu
Re: RFS:- ruby-batch-loader newer upstream version
On 2019, ജൂലൈ 21 11:26:43 AM IST, Manas Kashyap wrote: >Sorry for the double entries in changelog , >I didn't noticed it , >and for experimental release , i am doing it experimental release as >its a >dependency of gitlab , and for safety measure that it doesnt break the >package currently in unstable , so i am releasing it in experimental. Since it is only a minor update of stable library (assuming server) unstable should be fine. >I have edited the changelog , please see it to. > Since my laptop is broken, I hope someone in the team can upload it. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
