RFS: ruby-gettext
Hi team! Please upload ruby-gettext 3.2.2-2, it fixes #840789 among other changes.
Re: RFS: ruby-gettext
Please don't upload, I want to fix another issue. On 11/3/16, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi team! > > Please upload ruby-gettext 3.2.2-2, it fixes #840789 among other changes. >
RFS: ruby-gettext, ruby-tzinfo
Hello! I've packaged new upstream versions of ruby-gettext and ruby-tzinfo. Please, upload them. (ruby-tzinfo should not break rails, it doesn't have incompatible api changes). Thanks in advance. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAAB-Kc=FQz9cP3rx6gv+y=U7oPVvWn-PWQ=tyft4c3n+ktl...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: ruby-gettext, ruby-tzinfo
Hi, On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:04:23PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > Hello! > I've packaged new upstream versions of ruby-gettext and ruby-tzinfo. > Please, upload them. (ruby-tzinfo should not break rails, it doesn't > have incompatible api changes). Thanks in advance. It is too late for Jessie. My opinion is that new versions should go to experimental, so that we can fix possible RC bugs in unstable. Cheers, Cédric signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFS: ruby-gettext, ruby-raindrops, ruby-tzinfo
Hi team, I've pushed new upstream packages for ruby-gettext, ruby-raindrops and ruby-tzinfo. Please review and upload them. Actually ruby-tzinfo 1.2.2 lives in git from fall but there were concerns that it may break rails, I think it's a very time to check this :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAAB-KcmMkNasRB613HZnBxCfK3EwTNEwA=3qekygatid3xv...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: ruby-gettext, ruby-raindrops, ruby-tzinfo
* Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> [150701 17:16]: > Hi team, > > I've pushed new upstream packages for ruby-gettext, ruby-raindrops and > ruby-tzinfo. Please review and upload them. I've uploaded ruby-raindrops and ruby-kgio, but haven't found time for the others. Sorry. C. -- ,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler : :' : Debian Developer `. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03 `- pgpLEP7EOm05L.pgp Description: PGP signature
RFS: ruby-gettext, ruby-solve, ruby-mixlib-archive, test-kitchen
Hi team! Kindly reminding that I've pushed the following packages for review and upload. * ruby-gettext (updated to the latest upstream version) * ruby-solve (like above) * ruby-mixlib-archive (a new package, dependency for berkshelf ITP) * test-kitchen (a new package) Thanks in advance.
Re: RFS: ruby-gettext, ruby-solve, ruby-mixlib-archive, test-kitchen
On 8/15/16, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi team! > > Kindly reminding that I've pushed the following packages for review and > upload. Reminding again :) > * ruby-gettext (updated to the latest upstream version) > * ruby-solve (like above) > * ruby-mixlib-archive (a new package, dependency for berkshelf ITP) Maybe I should embed this gem to berkshelf as it looks like hack :) > * test-kitchen (a new package) > > Thanks in advance.
Re: RFS: ruby-gettext, ruby-solve, ruby-mixlib-archive, test-kitchen
Hi Hleb, On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:52:10PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > Hi team! > > Kindly reminding that I've pushed the following packages for review and > upload. > > * ruby-gettext (updated to the latest upstream version) > * ruby-solve (like above) > * ruby-mixlib-archive (a new package, dependency for berkshelf ITP) uploaded these three > * test-kitchen (a new package) judging by the amount of patches, this seems to be a reasonably problematic package! :-o lib/vendor/hash_recursive_merge.rb is not properly namespaced. it is also under a different license than the rest of the package; this needs to be mentioned in dbeian/copyright debian/copyright is missing entries for at least these copyright holders:: lib/vendor/hash_recursive_merge.rb:11:# Copyright:: 2007-2008 The Authors lib/kitchen/provisioner/shell.rb:5:# Copyright (C) 2013, Chris Lundquist lib/kitchen/command/exec.rb:5:# Copyright (C) 2014, HiganWorks LLC lib/kitchen/provisioner/chef_apply.rb:5:# Copyright (C) 2015, HiganWorks LLC lib/kitchen/verifier/shell.rb:5:# Copyright (C) 2015, HiganWorks LLC spec/kitchen/provisioner/chef_apply_spec.rb:5:# Copyright (C) 2015, HiganWorks LLC spec/kitchen/verifier/shell_spec.rb:5:# Copyright (C) 2015, HiganWorks LLC lib/kitchen/driver/proxy.rb:5:# Copyright:: Copyright (c) 2013 Opscode, Inc. spec/kitchen/transport_spec.rb:5:# Copyright (C) 2014, Matt Wrock spec/kitchen/transport/winrm_spec.rb:5:# Copyright (C) 2014, Matt Wrock spec/kitchen/provisioner/chef/policyfile_spec.rb:5:# Copyright (C) 2016, Noah Kantrowitz lib/kitchen/transport/base.rb:6:# Copyright (C) 2014, Salim Afiune lib/kitchen/transport/dummy.rb:5:# Copyright (C) 2013, Salim Afiune lib/kitchen/transport.rb:5:# Copyright (C) 2014, Salim Afiune lib/kitchen/transport/winrm.rb:7:# Copyright (C) 2014, Salim Afiune debian/rules has some commented boilerplate. Also, it would be nice to enable dependency resolution during the build. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: ruby-gettext, ruby-solve, ruby-mixlib-archive, test-kitchen
On 8/27/16, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > uploaded these three Thanks! >> * test-kitchen (a new package) > > judging by the amount of patches, this seems to be a reasonably problematic > package! :-o > > lib/vendor/hash_recursive_merge.rb is not properly namespaced. it is also > under > a different license than the rest of the package; this needs to be mentioned > in dbeian/copyright One more patch to be done :) > debian/copyright is missing entries for at least these copyright > holders:: ... > lib/kitchen/driver/proxy.rb:5:# Copyright:: Copyright (c) 2013 Opscode, > Inc. Opscode, Inc. is Chef Software, Inc. now. should I use old or new name? > debian/rules has some commented boilerplate. Also, it would be nice to > enable dependency resolution during the build. will do.
Re: RFS: ruby-gettext, ruby-solve, ruby-mixlib-archive, test-kitchen
On 8/28/16, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> * test-kitchen (a new package) >> lib/vendor/hash_recursive_merge.rb is not properly namespaced. it is also >> under >> a different license than the rest of the package; this needs to be >> mentioned in dbeian/copyright >> debian/copyright is missing entries for at least these copyright >> holders:: > ... >> debian/rules has some commented boilerplate. Also, it would be nice to >> enable dependency resolution during the build. I've pushed changes for your notices, please review.
Re: RFS: ruby-gettext, ruby-solve, ruby-mixlib-archive, test-kitchen
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 07:11:24PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > On 8/28/16, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> * test-kitchen (a new package) > > >> lib/vendor/hash_recursive_merge.rb is not properly namespaced. it is also > >> under > >> a different license than the rest of the package; this needs to be > >> mentioned in dbeian/copyright > > >> debian/copyright is missing entries for at least these copyright > >> holders:: > > ... > > >> debian/rules has some commented boilerplate. Also, it would be nice to > >> enable dependency resolution during the build. > > I've pushed changes for your notices, please review. uploaded. I have made 1 commit on top (93fab5c) to bump debhelper compat level and use https in Vcs-Git. I hope you have plans to push a good part of those patches upstream. ;-) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: ruby-gettext, ruby-solve, ruby-mixlib-archive, test-kitchen
On 8/30/16, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > uploaded. I have made 1 commit on top (93fab5c) to bump debhelper > compat level and use https in Vcs-Git. Thank you! > I hope you have plans to push a good part of those patches upstream. ;-) They are very debian-specific, maybe I can drop some of them with --gem-install layout, but I prefer to have data in /usr/share.
