Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for
I have fixed all the lintian errors, can you please review it. On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:12 PM Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hey, > > On 22/09/19 10:12 pm, Manas Kashyap wrote: > > Sorry for that initially , i kept it in experimental, as its a > > dependency of gitlab and it might break gitlab , so i kept it in > > experimental . > > Please fix that. > While at it, please fix the homepage URL in d/control, too. > Lintian logs: https://paste.debian.net/1102037/ > Please fix them as well :) > > > Best, > Utkarsh > > >
Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for
On Sun, 22 Sep, 2019 at 22:12, Manas Kashyap wrote: Sorry for that initially , i kept it in experimental, as its a dependency of gitlab and it might break gitlab , so i kept it in experimental . Hi Manas, You need to stop guessing and think about things. Why do you think it will break gitlab? You have to give your reasoning for such a choice as experimental is not the default choice. Thanks Praveen
Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for
Hey, On 22/09/19 10:12 pm, Manas Kashyap wrote: > Sorry for that initially , i kept it in experimental, as its a > dependency of gitlab and it might break gitlab , so i kept it in > experimental . Please fix that. While at it, please fix the homepage URL in d/control, too. Lintian logs: https://paste.debian.net/1102037/ Please fix them as well :) Best, Utkarsh signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for
Sorry for that initially , i kept it in experimental, as its a dependency of gitlab and it might break gitlab , so i kept it in experimental .
Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for
Hey, On 22/09/19 8:12 pm, Manas Kashyap wrote: > Hola everyone, > > I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem default-value-for. The > package was tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also > lintian-clean. I've > pushed the package to the personal forked salsa repo > https://salsa.debian.org/Manas-kashyap-guest/ruby-default-value-for > > > This package is dependency for gitlab and hence are required for completing > the packaging. > > Requesting you to please review and lemme know if everything is okay then i > can push the changes to the ruby-team repo and then it can be uploaded Why to experimental? Best, Utkarsh signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for
Hi, Balu, Can you also add more lines to extended description. I usually mention the location of README.md when I can't write more description. I have updated the alioth repo after mentioning the location of README.md. But when I tried installing the deb file generated, I found out that the README.md file gets stored in /usr/share/doc/ruby-default-value-for/README.md.gz . Why did it become a .gz file when it shuold've been a .md file? -- Regards, Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in Freedom is never easily won, but once established, freedom lasts, spreads and chokes out tyranny. - Trent Lott signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for
On Tuesday 11 November 2014 07:42 PM, Balasankar C wrote: Can you also add more lines to extended description. I usually mention the location of README.md when I can't write more description. I have updated the alioth repo after mentioning the location of README.md. But when I tried installing the deb file generated, I found out that the README.md file gets stored in /usr/share/doc/ruby-default-value-for/README.md.gz . Why did it become a .gz file when it shuold've been a .md file? May be its added now to gem2deb or dh, it used to installed without gz earlier. May be to save disc space. Uploaded. Thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for
On Friday 07 November 2014 07:46 PM, Balasankar C wrote: Updated the git repo for this package with modifications suggested by Cédric Boutillier on another package (ruby-version-sorter). The changes are * Starting short description with lowercase letter * Changing Testsuite to autopkgtest-pkg-ruby Balu, Can you also add more lines to extended description. I usually mention the location of README.md when I can't write more description. team, README.md mentiones the gem is signed using a gpg key and lintian says we could make watch file verify signatures. Is there a way we could use this information? may be gemwatch could use this information when its available to authenticate. Would it be a good idea for gemwatch to sign generated tarballs? Thanks Praveen signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for
Updated the git repo for this package with modifications suggested by Cédric Boutillier on another package (ruby-version-sorter). The changes are * Starting short description with lowercase letter * Changing Testsuite to autopkgtest-pkg-ruby -- Regards, Balasankar C http://balasankarc.in Freedom is never easily won, but once established, freedom lasts, spreads and chokes out tyranny. - Trent Lott signature.asc Description: Digital signature
