Re: How do I get the box-drawing characters to look right for Debian Installer? (SOLVED)
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 01:45:19PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2013-06-30 13:58:35 +0200 (+0200), Philipp Kern wrote: > [...] > > convmv helps if you're dealing with wrongly encoded files. > Wrongly encoded fileNAMEs perhaps, but for wrongly encoded file > CONTENT you want iconv instead. Yeah, I'm sorry. When on the console one usually has to deal with filenames, while file encodings are handled by the editor. (Unless one uses cat, of course.) Kind regards Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130630232247.GA12095@localhost
Re: Current and upcoming toolchain changes for jessie
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:48:39PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 02:51:43PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > GCC 4.8 is now the default on all x86 architectures, and on all ARM > > architectures (the latter confirmed by the Debian ARM porters). Please change the default for s390 and s390x to 4.8. Bastian -- Warp 7 -- It's a law we can live with. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2013070100.ga12...@mail.waldi.eu.org
Re: status of s390 toolchain maintenance
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:35:29PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 11:42:44AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Is this change coordinated with Bastian? > > I have not been contacted by Aurelian. I've not seen anything on this > matter from him. > I did discuss that with Philipp Kern, but obviously I forgot to add you in the loop, sorry about that. I have therefore reverted the changes in the SVN. That said I think s390/s390x should not lag too long behind other architectures, as it usually create subtle bugs, and it's better to discover (and fix) toolchain issues early in a release cycle than late. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130701213849.ga29...@hall.aurel32.net
Re: status of s390 toolchain maintenance
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 11:42:44AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Is this change coordinated with Bastian? I have not been contacted by Aurelian. I've not seen anything on this matter from him. Bastian -- A Vulcan can no sooner be disloyal than he can exist without breathing. -- Kirk, "The Menagerie", stardate 3012.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130701193528.ga11...@mail.waldi.eu.org
status of s390 toolchain maintenance
Hi, yesterday Aurelian Jarno did switch the GCC default to 4.8 in the VCS. However I don't see him in the Debian GCC maintainer list as GCC port maintainer. In the past I only did see s390 contributions and s390 related bug triage from Bastian Blank. Is this change coordinated with Bastian? Please could both of you add the relevant information to the README.Debian (or send me patch), if you are actively involved in GCC maintenance on s390(x)? Also I note that the list of s390 porters on [1] talks in the past tense. Please could you update this list to the list of *current* s390 porters? Plus there is no ports page for s390x at all. I think it would be worthwhile to document who cares about the s390x port, or point to the s390 page if that is the right thing to do. Thanks, Matthias [1] http://www.debian.org/ports/s390/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51d14f14.7080...@debian.org
