Re: Rebuilding Wheezy kernel

2012-11-29 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi,

sorry for the late answer. I marked it as »to-do« and forgot about it.
(Also I hoped that somebody else would answer.)

On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 02:33:55PM -0600, Dave Jones wrote:
 fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_s390x_none_s390x
 
 wakeup_source_unregister module: vmlinux,
 version: 0x7c778579, export: EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
 make[1]: *** [debian/stamps/build_s390x_none_s390x_plain] Error 1
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/linux-3.2.23'
 make: *** [binary-arch_s390x_none_s390x_real] Error 2
 root@debian:~/linux-3.2.23#
 
 Where might I find the build log that would expound on what's really
 wrong here?

The reason for this is that Debian kernel builds check that no symbols
unexpectedly appear or disappear. If that happens modules that were
compiled against a given kernel version would break. That's the -4- in
3.2.0-4-s390x. This is increased when symbols are incompatible and
modules need to be rebuilt.

It might work to comment out the following line in »debian/rules.real«:
python debian/bin/buildcheck.py $(DIR) $(ARCH) $(FEATURESET) $(FLAVOUR)

Then probably rules.gen needs to be regenerated.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Rebuilding Wheezy kernel

2012-11-07 Thread Dave Jones
Hello, everyone.

On 11/06/2012 03:52 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
 On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 03:19:05PM -0600, Dave Jones wrote:
 1) If I install the libncurses5-dev package and use the
 instructions found in Chapter 4, Section 5 of the Debian Linux
 Kernel Handbook (i.e., the make menuconfig, make clean, make
 deb-pkg steps), the kernel built is for the s390 architecture and
 not the s390x one.
 
 What does «dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH» say?
 

It says:
root@debian:~/linux-3.2.23# dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH
s390x

 4) Why is the kernel build process for s390x different than the
 one documented in the Handbook?
 
 «Because the handbook is outdated» would be my guess.
 

OK, that's a good answer.:-)

Now another problem has arisenfollowing the method that Philipp
outlines in earlier notes, I am getting the following error message in
the build modules step of:

fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_s390x_none_s390x

wakeup_source_unregister module: vmlinux,
version: 0x7c778579, export: EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
make[1]: *** [debian/stamps/build_s390x_none_s390x_plain] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/linux-3.2.23'
make: *** [binary-arch_s390x_none_s390x_real] Error 2
root@debian:~/linux-3.2.23#

Where might I find the build log that would expound on what's really
wrong here?

Thanks and have a good one, too.

DJ
 Kind regards Philipp Kern
 

-- 
Dave Jones
V/Soft Software
www.vsoft-software.com
Houston, TX
281.578.7544


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/509ac5b3.9050...@vsoft-software.com



Rebuilding Wheezy kernel

2012-11-05 Thread Dave Jones
Hi, folks.

With the aid of Jonathan's and Philipp's excellent instructions I was
able to rebuild the Debian Wheezy 3.2 kernel with the NSS feature enabled.

As I have begun to experiment with building the kernel, I have found the
following issues with the Debian process

1) If I install the libncurses5-dev package and use the instructions
found in Chapter 4, Section 5 of the Debian Linux Kernel Handbook (i.e.,
the make menuconfig, make clean, make deb-pkg steps), the kernel built
is for the s390 architecture and not the s390x one.

2) If I use the make menuconfig command instead of the two
scripts/config commands shown below, then the next fakeroot make -f
debian/rules.gen binary-arch_s390x_none_s390x command fails with an
error. That is the following sequence does not work:

cd linux-3.2.23
fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen setup_s390x_none_s390x
make menuconfig
fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen  binary-arch_s390x_none_s390x

3) Since it appears that I can not use the make menuconfig process to
update the kernel configuration file, where might I find a list of all
acceptable options for the scripts/config --enable command

4) Why is the kernel build process for s390x different than the one
documented in the Handbook?

Thanks again for the help, and have a good one, too.

DJ
On 10/25/2012 05:17 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 08:45:25PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
 Dave Jones wrote:
 Can the wheezy s390x kernel be saved as an NSS? If so, how?
 Based on [1], it looks like the answer is currently no, based on the
 following line in the kernel config file:

  # CONFIG_SHARED_KERNEL is not set

 The description of that option says

  Select this option, if you want to share the text segment of the
  Linux kernel between different VM guests. This reduces memory
  usage with lots of guests but greatly increases kernel size.

 You can build a custom kernel using that option if you wish.  It works
 like this[2]:

  $ apt-get source linux
  # apt-get install build-essential fakeroot
  # apt-get build-dep linux
  $ cd linux-version
  $ fakeroot debian/rules source
  $ fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen setup_s390_none_s390x
 
 as we're talking about s390x here that would be setup_s390x_none_s390x.
 
  $ cd debian/build/build_s390_none_s390x
 
 Same here.
 
  $ scripts/config --disable DEBUG_INFO
  $ scripts/config --enable SHARED_KERNEL
 
 That's «../source_none/scripts/config».
 
  $ cd ../../..
  $ fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_s390_none_s390x
 
 And again s390x_none_s390x instead of s390_none_s390x.
 
 I just did the recompilation. AFAICS the kernel size is indeed increased quite
 a bit. We currently have:
 
 -rw-r--r-- root/root   6303232 2012-10-22 15:36 ./boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-4-s390x
 
 With SHARED_KERNEL on and DEBUG_INFO off as above:
 
 -rw-r--r-- root/root   7945728 2012-10-25 21:53 ./boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-4-s390x
 
 So a NSS shareable kernel is 1.26 times larger than a plain one. And I fear
 that the additional bits cannot be discarded at runtime neither, but I cannot
 test this right now.
 
 Interestingly enough the kernel is already in its plain form 2.23 times bigger
 than an amd64 build of vmlinuz-3.2.0-3-amd64.
 
 Kind regards
 Philipp Kern
 
 [1] http://www.vm.ibm.com/linux/linuxnss.html
 [2] http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html
 

-- 
Dave Jones
V/Soft Software
www.vsoft-software.com
Houston, TX
281.578.7544


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50982d49.1000...@vsoft-software.com