Re: status of s390 for jessie and later

[Aurelien Jarno]

Hi,

On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 11:40:44AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
 Hi,
 
 the architecture status page for Wheezy[1] mentioned that it would be
 the last release if s390x comes in.  As Wheezy was release with the
 s390x support, should we now look at removing s390 from both jessie and sid?
 

That was indeed the plan, and I think the s390x release of Wheezy
actually reached the goal of being able to replace s390. Unless someone
comes with very good arguments in the next days, I think it's the way to
go.

That said it would be good to get the feedback from other people
involved in the s390 port first though.

Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

status of s390 for jessie and later

[Ansgar Burchardt]

Hi,

the architecture status page for Wheezy[1] mentioned that it would be
the last release if s390x comes in.  As Wheezy was release with the
s390x support, should we now look at removing s390 from both jessie and sid?

Ansgar

  [1] http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html#s390-upstream


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/518a1d9c.4060...@debian.org