Re: Bibliography and File Management

2009-03-15 Thread David Schryer
Give Zotero a try.  It has adequate (but not perfect) BibTeX output which
can be cleaned up in jabref easily.  Collecting, annotating, and organizing
the database is made easy with tags and associations, and it captures the
pdf directly from the host site and includes DOI, ISSN, ISBN, and loads of
other info.  You can also associate any arbitrary file, note, link, to all
records, so it is easy to include many layers of info in one database.  The
new collaborative features seem to work, but I have yet to test them in a
serious multi-user environment yet.  Even though this sounds like
advertising, I am just a user who has tried loads of other tools over many
years and like this one.

The only slight downside is it slows down firefox on some sites, so I only
use it when I am collecting references.

Happy reading,
David


On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Alastair McKinstry 
alastair.mckins...@sceal.ie wrote:


 On 14 Mar 2009, at 23:28, Bryan Bishop wrote:

  On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Benda Xu hero...@gmail.com wrote:

 I have downloaded a lot of papers from the journals for reading and
 reference. Although I tried to develop a naming scheme to organize the
 file (mostly PDF format), I run into chaos these days: I forget which is
 which before actually open the files one by one.


 Yes, I run in to this problem as well. I go on reading sprees of
 hundreds of papers. Recently it was something like 200 papers and 150
 MB re: microfluidics. BibTeX is nice, but not always a given. Google
 Scholar allows you to export citations as you find paper search
 results- perhaps it would be possible to write a userscript/javascript
 hack that would automatically download the BibTeX citation as you
 download a file? This way, you always keep track of information per
 download. This is a hack, not a real solution, of course.


 Another program to include (is it in squeeze?) is calibre. I use an ebook
 reader to read many papers and books;
 it keeps its own metadata and book / paper sets: the pdfs are kept in a
 filestystem (fine); some synchronisation of
 the metadata and papers with a bibtex, etc. citation list would be good.

 Another point: DOIs. Most (?) papers these days are labelled with a unique
 DOI (see dx.doi.org) . This could be used
 as a pointer to the paper(s) and for labelling caches.

  - Bryan
 http://heybryan.org/
 1 512 203 0507


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org


 Regards,
 Alastair

 --
 Alastair McKinstry  , alast...@sceal.ie http://blog.sceal.ie

 Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world
 is either a madman or an economist - Kenneth Boulter, Economist.





 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: Bug#361418: Debian menu and the Apps/Science section

2006-05-16 Thread david schryer

The cool thing about this is that nothing would ever get moved to adifferent branch of the menus, so as the menu changed, it would still
be easy to find the app one is searching for. The length/depth of thebranch would just change to keep the aspect ratio reasonable.Maybe this is just crazy, but what does everyone think?

If it is well thought out and not buggy, then it would be a very cool
menu indeed. One problem that might arise is if a program, for
instance, is classified as physics by the menu, but the user has
classified the program in their head as chemistry before the menu
subdivides and thus has trouble finding it. Of course, if they
use the program frequently they would not be using the menu at all, so
this is a small point.


Re: alternatives to gnuplot ?

2006-04-08 Thread david schryer
so you got python + eclipse + pyx as shipped with Debian and only what

you had to install is pydev, is that correct?
Almost. Pydev can be installed directly from eclipse using its add-in manager, check out:
http://www.fabioz.com/pydev/manual_101_root.html
In addition, I had to install pyx in a Non Debian way because
it defaults to having TeTeX as a dependency and I use texlive which is
a more complete and flexible TeX installation. You can retrieve
the .deb for texlive directly from CTAN:
deb http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ pool/deb-src http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ pool/
>From my experience texlive is better for a single user install and
others have said that TeTeX is better for a multi-user server, but that
might change in the future as texlive is more modular so can be
installed as a working TeX installation with custom abilities and a
smaller footprint.
did anyone track down why really pydev is not in Debian yet? I aman emacs guy but I might consider proper IDE...
There is#316731: ITP: pydev -- eclipse plugin for python developmentPackage: wnpp; Severity: wishlist; Reported by: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 278 days old.

If you are seriously interested in getting away from emacs, try out Leo
(also hard to google). It is a very very useful program that I
use for EVERYTHING. It literally changed the way I compute. 
You can download it from: (also not in Debian) http://sourceforge.net/projects/leo/
Or check out its homepage: http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/front.html. Which includes testimonials such as: 

I think you're really showing what open source can do and your current
trajectory puts you on track to kick Emacs into the dustbin of
computing history. -- Dan Winkler

As a Debian USER (read weak programmer), I am not trying to advertise this program, only share what really works.