Bug#894494: singular: FTBFS: coeffs_test fails on arm*, mips* and s390x architecture
Package: singular Version: 1:4.0.3-p3+ds-5 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: FTBFS It appears that coeffs_test fails on most of official architectures: the issue was reported to upstream: https://github.com/Singular/Sources/issues/862 Thanks, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Stretch* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.12.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages singular depends on: ii singular-data 1:4.0.3-p3+ds-5 ii singular-modules 1:4.0.3-p3+ds-5 ii singular-ui 1:4.0.3-p3+ds-5 singular recommends no packages. singular suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Accepted singular 1:4.1.1-p1+ds-1 (source) into experimental
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 11:20:12 + Source: singular Binary: singular libsingular4 libsingular4-dev libsingular4-dev-common singular-modules singular-data singular-ui singular-ui-emacs singular-ui-xterm singular-doc singular-dev-doc Architecture: source Version: 1:4.1.1-p1+ds-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers Changed-By: Jerome Benoit Description: libsingular4 - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- library pa libsingular4-dev - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- developmen libsingular4-dev-common - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- common dev singular - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations singular-data - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- shared dat singular-dev-doc - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- developer singular-doc - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- user docum singular-modules - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- module pac singular-ui - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- console us singular-ui-emacs - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- emacs user singular-ui-xterm - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- xterm user Changes: singular (1:4.1.1-p1+ds-1) experimental; urgency=medium . * New upstream version. * Debianization: - debian/copyright: - Format field, secure; - copyright year tuples, refresh; - Files-Excluded field, update; - debian/control: - debhelper, bump to 11; - Standards Version, bump to 4.1.3 (no change); - Vcs-* fields, migrate to Salsa; - debian/rules: - get-orig-source target, compression option, move to d/watch ; - debian/patches/*: - d/p/debianization-4ti2.patch , obsoleted by upstream; - update; - debian/watch: - compression option, add. Checksums-Sha1: 7a737c36e6037ae23d324b547f54d3a7e6ff924d 3564 singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1.dsc d0766a159a82c2466d0c34035f53ee12aa301678 10521012 singular_4.1.1-p1+ds.orig.tar.xz ce3c27b142261c16ed3ac805c8676f6725c8c480 21552 singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1.debian.tar.xz 4ab68f032f6deafaa3e5a7542b80126c33956267 9266 singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1_source.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 43e7f47bbe846e5667b0a9ab555db314b0aeb531fd9ab3c33f23f70d7f7c363c 3564 singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1.dsc b6ae3d884aa4c4039195e26c71a80033785603037064e9bb7a27e2dd775b560e 10521012 singular_4.1.1-p1+ds.orig.tar.xz 8f6c1a4c0eb449d0bea943af8ce99dbe913f8e6e593520e6116e574c823ec004 21552 singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1.debian.tar.xz a1770b31247b57adbc8631281cdaa52237d41402347ff5c06560355619a0391f 9266 singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1_source.buildinfo Files: 23b3835fcc1087cd87a61e8c01fcf939 3564 math optional singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1.dsc 3d88031880ab6712060d448cdfff3f9b 10521012 math optional singular_4.1.1-p1+ds.orig.tar.xz 3e89be8ed3f9237c1790757780bb51da 21552 math optional singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1.debian.tar.xz f3838072c88202e1df3fbb356c818899 9266 math optional singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1_source.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQRJBAEBCgAzFiEEriiuFXEN/x2H5adiP5IZpn82xosFAlq+H0EVHGNhbGN1bHVz QHJlem96ZXIubmV0AAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLwI4gALa6xz64nr7QrKw3V62kb5VjJPff 4i7NPNpqEBPXfJ/ccKYv0GqcqK7rD+/e/+fl6IRP/BJKxrcYdauc5iRTyBvkKFai nA0hHZ1bHQne3VyLH75BdMy4TigWMydC2S3meKfQ7UYh95NlIv2ax9RLW14vmR0R kxvbzAKYmzZVcu+BZnZmWtZdJMfHyVFJLDdpruIcTQmH0NIcqXyI7K5FC70Tn5TP 96GHoVjo8QCfoL04dTVvS60sRsElAFgt3PIVSR1CzB+aft8AE0RwoE/rJBWDmkho j/D9hD0GVM84dHyPCx4k6y2/fEiw2X1La7awqTZ/U7T3Rt08J87z8thvfolP6WRC oVWTtmFOxD0NpDJ8hdG6Ct58WMLQqgLrr32D5YzeSyZB0KGkAD331EktFjAwIzMt c3Ctg/IN2rIU2dw/1Q6gh9JAg7xmQDjtmZyRPBDOSA1bhkFPPyTNgp7ZiT8mEvKK B1P3FenPJu074Yg5dtW0r3UZHDkXFKzNWwSfj2ok2ORN18UFC+yEcdPLDzlXpm0T lKOD/SAzviSFVP6eCU64VLqE45SArdI0owDuW3Yh1YtvFrODTSQfdWlA9GD8/240 aZfphSN49rj4rKiPgMdVsDcELnaO8+t0tT4R4K+e6YZSxDnUomMk3ZHT6ID1BBh7 UwRKKOwLSyj7LWBfw9ZMebdwy48K7wyJh25GlRbeXurjDpgVqrPew5tszh+o6xmc hR9vKHnkqGBi833Qo9s2oEQNQXxxJjIoWctipUCaMFtlyMuErp1xUUEyW0yr+IRF H1LAzb9raXgXWzceLFPk5Xcu/HGANxbXgwymjpsu9osRtYBd7YABkQ+0Zo9lKUNp zG150o1WTaUrqn3TK9tjfNa4NzJPwAFRFNnECm8vj+wVVpy/JEnxiSkiz31kInNq MvAblegC0Ok1yUWu/9Q4Yi3gwTZFiFhp14ciLrE1vl1wRoN1cVqu1nJa63gLixng W/sVZqnKMSTH0ARiE6GbcyfrUB1+q8p1lX6oTkrCSWm0iadj+JL3WbwEmL7Zb8p8 JKe2d11NvfHcwywgH294I9JpACxvdv2eIy+5aeU3cqfUl0Gi3DY/0bzAb0f/tstL llk/ImpLvYOckRQ81KLWii5r8eRecyM35pQpT/hAQABBAjZmAYc1noy7Te4EBm2g yHQr6FSG7S08O9kzWX2wBIHKt/GeGxcZrW7ufXiLlp3l6CaXM0We/TRfDWfWQFnm P4wbN6K8PqXlk5Lb87aIlaZCpm2YlTGMCgru3NTIbXASiApAdjr8pTkfHi5nQN58 Tvjq5Xow8vBDbZellBFaXpIEGp4vqHvv6ucBXDcDi52gZlqUV5cpdqoKG8s= =RxvW -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Accepted gmp-ecm 7.0.4+ds-2 (source) into unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:44:30 + Source: gmp-ecm Binary: gmp-ecm libecm1 libecm1-dev libecm1-dev-common libecm-dev Architecture: source Version: 7.0.4+ds-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers Changed-By: Jerome Benoit Description: gmp-ecm- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method libecm-dev - dummy package libecm1- factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method -- lib libecm1-dev - factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method -- libdev libecm1-dev-common - factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method -- header Closes: 892396 Changes: gmp-ecm (7.0.4+ds-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Debianization: - debian/copyright: - copyright year tuples, update; - Format field, secure; - debian/control: - debhelper, bump to 11 (basic update); - Standards Version, bump to 4.1.3 (no change); - Homepage field, secure; - cleanup; - debian/rules: - debhelper, bump to 11: - link-doc policy, extra docs now within libecm1-dev ; - basic update; - gcc-6 build, neutralize (Closes: #892396); - get-orig-source target, compression option migrate to d/watch; - debian/watch: - compression option, migrate from d/rules. Checksums-Sha1: 40e150f00e9b670af38944fad64eec4e57bba8fb 3030 gmp-ecm_7.0.4+ds-2.dsc faf953f3800e32d7a0270e3392418a318d2b8d2a 10628 gmp-ecm_7.0.4+ds-2.debian.tar.xz 60f218147c331c8aff5d0ad42fd6096599211ebc 6373 gmp-ecm_7.0.4+ds-2_source.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: ecadcf6d8d24c98d479b9b288651627153b5157b84948887b301cf97767e905e 3030 gmp-ecm_7.0.4+ds-2.dsc ec844bc3d053e07f1b143d90468ee153403dc824a5b5df2c3661aa0d0dc68732 10628 gmp-ecm_7.0.4+ds-2.debian.tar.xz a7089918ca4cb337f52a57b5a3559dc5b9f8e20bc30721df327b69f499a13061 6373 gmp-ecm_7.0.4+ds-2_source.buildinfo Files: 5ce67cf2ccef65745cd7603a241bc59c 3030 math optional gmp-ecm_7.0.4+ds-2.dsc 27e3164cc6b98a6b85595d6bd4748887 10628 math optional gmp-ecm_7.0.4+ds-2.debian.tar.xz 80895ea23fe06374075daeaccd85174f 6373 math optional gmp-ecm_7.0.4+ds-2_source.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQRJBAEBCgAzFiEEriiuFXEN/x2H5adiP5IZpn82xosFAlqia6gVHGNhbGN1bHVz QHJlem96ZXIubmV0AAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLmQogANHhdgLPZD67ZJzuafv5VBmupMs4 I0GHPIwwQVrMuOj3pQJjBbCFY0OXmD3/mzO3bHJBWMssJ0XPwBvYwCoVsDhAo/U7 fJar7K8XN2w4dt+CeoYF7ymxZNkb84G7H2YTvi0YoGBHejIni3+D3E0ElUjlYcb6 i+i1aBxuvkA+1ITbCfO1fOVH+gGHB+8nC/ZcmY9UfHvxRJDF0nycA9BFTFYZEGgT 4U4vjWJ2PNYLnjJ1k8oyJptK37p7Pd4B/OvaSv9pSVe+5xx7gUNXWwMSCpd5pTWv Ibu+VpFPy5yDQopjxr7oUk4uKFnCH/+bVMCO8o1xw3RYE1hnLG0th7h4NopBw6O3 N0cLzYAIAUQ0RLA3zZ+cwSJpMiabFviH31eGhtffRSSWQDnqWOvKxa4zVF0JYkuF 5LqQocsR/EL5vTB4GFCth0hKeyZhohOiI6SvenjvzHqJBCvfwTwPy8NzAoWfvt3u 8LvUTBYHCzZnvW2XmWPghC2+Lm4UOda/SAPnsVtQik4PiAVtdOKB1wASc/x/9ZAb kCEbUaVhaShAmY6cE7Jt08scLo4U62ONvhisOHiWLkNPlDVV0e+gS4liKMcKZTYH rzwreAGHDjR2zZaN/cWq1x2U0zOvhJA9uLQbcEuu5MDo02lkn6mKH+YV3Rg09m0L oQ1HRzPubXLCnCZ4Jjvb7aMk3ZzOe1ygHZJBJKbiw/4C8D8zVDESG4iNAMfMQSgS YnHXJ7XYZ00J7lnLmPa8igoutcqaA+XbHFklb1hMG3/X1B0uK9EsyfzrHsd7BsTM Emv5Kx1UJDr5rZVf52DLaLsz1/fJoAr4QEI1Z7ZoCW9t23QN275GwCbOzKICBTuY TRRZJTXJwv+KuXR6yWmU2PiuvHaZh4PN9gbT5K34mVu7iZ/6aUa2Ft9M80vEtMUK 1PytdtgbD1/DHraYKTWX8Gw2aZv/aFaFO1eVvbDkL0PtazOqktOaddJxIp8xDPjq CR/1k2s+TVpKwnrcJUGJFdUKQvDh18//N0UacjhqkEFKksuj6UoxFaYIXws2lop6 YglpCuR/KBL/hrqqeeqKAeBNzbar5uv13Zy3XJ0BVOGOGM7z+gZLNwWc4Qjz8ZED RytBYHIcdbmyl77tCENR9Qa/RH438FxXS6tBGfeYgY8vndy3T5s0aDEgMjR4SIje 0TVG5BFLxL6G6KnMMJohDM5EdOJLrRM5n6HhSrNG3BZCS8qMsAZX8Md49x+MYzSh 4XyFHa9SCS0k1EiDEMQV0npeqiZluzTGTke9WTlhL6KZ0H2mD8WqNW8xD2YsSMN9 dThJnqL5JeyIkDL/vz5CrdXUQO3P4TjUhzr24ws47E9qyYUZdK6To6QMOWc= =mLF8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#888560: mpfi dependencies inconsistency
Hello Tobias, thanks for the hint. I have just upload a corrected version. Jerome On 27/01/18 17:19, Tobias Hansen wrote: > On 01/27/2018 01:41 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> Hello Vincent, thanks for your bugreport. >> >> >> >> On 27/01/18 06:31, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >>> Package: src:mpfi >>> Version: 1.5.3+ds-1 >>> Severity: serious >>> Justification: Policy 7.2 >>> >>> The current libmpfi-dev version is 1.5.3+ds-1+b1, which has: >>> >>> Depends: libmpfi0 (= 1.5.3+ds-1+b1), libmpfi-dev-common (= 1.5.3+ds-1), >>> libmpfr-dev, libgmp-dev >>> >>> but libmpfi-dev-common 1.5.3+ds-1 has: >>> >>> Recommends: libmpfi-dev (= 1.5.3+ds-1) >>> >>> This is inconsistent. >> This true. >> >> Do you have any idea from where comes the +b1 ? >> >> Thanks, >> Jerome > > Hi, > > the +b1 was appended to the binary version for the rebuild against libmpfr6. > This is a matter of using (=${binary:Version}) vs. (=${source:Version}) in > debian/control. > > Best, > Tobias > -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#888560: mpfi dependencies inconsistency
Hello Vincent, thanks for your bugreport. On 27/01/18 06:31, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Package: src:mpfi > Version: 1.5.3+ds-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 7.2 > > The current libmpfi-dev version is 1.5.3+ds-1+b1, which has: > > Depends: libmpfi0 (= 1.5.3+ds-1+b1), libmpfi-dev-common (= 1.5.3+ds-1), > libmpfr-dev, libgmp-dev > > but libmpfi-dev-common 1.5.3+ds-1 has: > > Recommends: libmpfi-dev (= 1.5.3+ds-1) > > This is inconsistent. This true. Do you have any idea from where comes the +b1 ? Thanks, Jerome > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: buster/sid > APT prefers unstable-debug > APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, > 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 4.14.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=POSIX > (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > LSM: AppArmor: enabled > > libmpfi-dev-common depends on no packages. > > Versions of packages libmpfi-dev-common recommends: > ii libmpfi-dev 1.5.3+ds-1 > > libmpfi-dev-common suggests no packages. > > -- no debconf information > -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#881869: FTBFS: recipe for target 'test-/5x5PF.diff' failed
Dear Aaron M. Ucko, thanks for your report. I have already filled an issue about it: https://github.com/Normaliz/Normaliz/issues/161 I hope it will be fixed quickly. Cheers, Jerome -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: Bug#881678: primesieve: FTBFS: __atomic_fetch_add_8 undefined
Hi, thanks for your report. On 14/11/17 05:19, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Source: primesieve > Version: 6.2+ds-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: upstream > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > > Builds of primesieve for armel, mips, mipsel, and the non-release > architectures m68k, powerpc, powerpcspe, and sh4 have started failing: > > libprimesieve.so.8.2.0: undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_add_8' > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > On these architectures, you should be able to find this symbol in > libatomic. I'd suggest linking with -Wl,--as-needed -latomic > everywhere so that you don't have to special-case any platforms or get > formal dependencies on libatomic on the platforms that don't need it > here. > > Could you please take a look? I have already discussed this matter with the upstream maintainer. He was kind enough to react quickly: he released a version which fixes the bugs observed on the 32bits arch and the atomic bugs. I scheduled to package it next Friday (my next spare time dedicated to Debian). Cheers, Jerome > > Thanks! > > -- > Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) > http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu > -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#877210: normaliz FTBFS on i386/armhf: Some error in the normaliz input data detected: Error while reading grading (a 1x2 matrix) !
Hello Folks, it appears that the latest version also shows up issues on i386 arch. An issue ticket has been emitted: https://github.com/Normaliz/Normaliz/issues/156 . Thanks, Jerome -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: primesieve needs new maintainer?!
Hello All, and Kim, primesieve does need a new maintainer: I will work on it soon: it is the second package to refresh on my top list. I have first to deals with normaliz on which depends SageMath. Thanks for your patience, Jerome On 06/11/17 12:53, Kim Walisch wrote: > Hi, > > I am the author of the primesieve C/C++ library (math tool for finding > prime numbers). The version offered by Debian is 5.7.2 (15 months > old) while the most recent version is 6.2. I would be happy if the > primesieve package in Debian was updated to the latest version. > > Up until now Jerome BENOIT was primesieve's maintainer but he > told me about 6 months ago that he is very busy due to a new job > and my last contact attempt 9 days ago failed. > > As mentioned before primesieve is a C/C++ based library which now > uses cmake as its build system. I have also created the GitHub repo > https://github.com/kimwalisch/primesieve-debian which contains the > code required to package primesieve-6.2 for debian. So there is only > little work required to package primesieve-6.2. > > Please get in touch with me if you are willing to take over primesieve > maintainership. > > Best regards, > Kim -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#877210: normaliz FTBFS on i386/armhf: Some error in the normaliz input data detected: Error while reading grading (a 1x2 matrix) !
Dear bunk, thanks for your report. I have just realized that d/watch is obsolete and that normaliz has evolved a lot since the last packaging. I am on my way to package the latest version (3.4.0). So, let see what will happen with this new version. Thanks, Jerome -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#872561: sollya: FTBFS on armhf arch
Package: sollya Version: 6.0+ds-2 Severity: important Dear All, it appears that Sollya failed two library tests at build time on the armhf architecture. Thanks, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Stretch* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.9.30-0211-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages sollya depends on: ii libc6 2.24-11+deb9u1 ii libfplll2 5.0.3-1 ii libgmp102:6.1.2+dfsg-1 ii libmpfi01.5.1+ds-4 ii libmpfr43.1.5-1 ii libsollya6 6.0+ds-1 ii libstdc++6 6.3.0-18 ii libxml2 2.9.4+dfsg1-2.2 Versions of packages sollya recommends: ii gnuplot 5.0.5+dfsg1-6+deb9u1 ii rlwrap 0.42-3 Versions of packages sollya suggests: ii libsollya-dev 6.0+ds-1 ii sollya-doc 6.0+ds-1 -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: request to package: graph-tool
Hi, it looks as a very good idea, indeed . On 10/08/17 08:13, Alexandre Hannud Abdo wrote: > Ni! > > Hello Debian science maintainers, > > I am quite new to Debian packaging, but I'd like to help see the graph- > tool[1] scientific library packaged for Debian. > > [1] http://graph-tool.skewed.de/ > > The main developper of the package already provides his own repo[2], > which I checked and as far as I understand it seems to be done in the > proper manner, providing a source package and using 3.0 (quilt). > > [2] http://downloads.skewed.de/apt/ Where is the source Debian ball ? > > There seem to be a few things missing, such as some fields in the > debian/copyright file, an obnoxious name in the author fields there - > "root" - even though his email is correct and his name does show up in > other places, a choice of 'python' for section instead of 'science' in > debian/control, and default README.{debian,source}. Also, as it's > currently found in his own repo, he lists himself as maintainer. > > Can you please let me know if this is good enough for you to move > forward with it, or if there is any work in which I could help out? > Such as, for example, fixing the aforementioned missing details. Have you already created and/maintained any Debian package ? > > I commit myself to work with him to provide whatever is most convenient > for you to package it, now and in the foreseeable future. You may first fill either an RFP [1] or ITP [2], then act accordingly. Thanks, Jerome [1] https://wiki.debian.org/RFP [2] https://wiki.debian.org/ITP > > Thank you so much, and cheers from Debconf (: > > ale > .~ยด > > -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#870698: libfplll-dev: FPLLL_DEFAULT_STRATEGY[|_PATH] must be encoded in /u/i/fplll/fplll_config.h
Package: libfplll-dev Version: 5.1.0-2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer. It appeares that the strategies default path and file is set up via the macros FPLLL_DEFAULT_STRATEGY[_PATH|] in fplll/Makefile.am . This set up affect fplll only at building time via the fplll/defs.h header which distributed within libfplll-dev . Therefrom, any software built against libfplll3 will have as strategies default path and file the default ones set up in fplll/defs.h , namely, an empty string. The best option may be to set the macro in the fplll/config_fplll.h which is distributed and included by fplll/def.h . Accordingly, it is an upstream issue. Best whishes, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Stretch* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.9.30-0211-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages libfplll-dev depends on: ii libfplll35.1.0-2 ii libgmp-dev 2:6.1.2+dfsg-1 ii libmpfr-dev 3.1.5-1 libfplll-dev recommends no packages. libfplll-dev suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#863919: Acknowledgement (sympow segfaults with basic input)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Ximin, thanks for your report. Do you meant that the issue happens on Stretch ? I ask because I thought it happens on experimental and because the CI test does not currently fail. Thanks, Jerome On 02/06/17 14:34, Ximin Luo wrote: > BTW the stretch release date is soon: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/05/msg2.html > > The deadline for fixing this is June 9th and you'll need to file an unblock > request, asking them to reduce the default migration time of 10 days. > > I'm not sure if this bug warrants raising the severity to grave, but please > do that if appropriate. > > X > - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJZMWLvAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLzKcgAIbaY2alYqcF06036CrluaRU rl4cMLa+9vPXwetoiZzeU8Abhl17zZohJOro48a7SsmfrXRU3G5sARoXww9NTCbm 5cPH2oyijZxrLIe3lgp92fL+dDgDCbMOBgkDIAQa2H9hvFa1YhNhyQqOIfpW2/1i ubZJiRRb9N1fJ5+CZQD//3FFDIX64gC/kt7Tah1E1Yq5e7pHnEWeLTB+TSJrGJEs T0WCQ+8kVMvIfjWiyOhsmdRyryqSbXnrK93rmb2nvXqUcaTF+zWT9NoP+jRgfs4e jNTggACPPGd04wccT/0PHELH9qQ1lNM0x4yFYumwPcrf51TD3jT/XeuDawABYuR7 Q7reWy89Ab0gkMXki0epKDwkSe2NgTQPSoKv0m3Rud7Cd2M+hnuIyl/91VeHQeXy o5kDLxsvE4eMdfpZGhiKZ2jp1J7KFhx0hQxVxQYgCXl7BWCUDbZ9XAREKvKx9Zpn acO1Fz9Sg210xHyet0HyjnpqF3We9wWIdMgWm0D4r/1Uxp5fGWyG58O39QSaZwKe NfIeMCn0rOr4OP/bkkPS4Skl40RYxdvOyOxrUZ/m0oJfi79hC5ffCJVnWFIZKpeb kLi0OIJUuF8qrvNAila8AdlpG4q/GYdpJimXiOr6RZav4QACIfh/gdea+vXc3JD9 ghq6F5R/kGBbWsqEuSfi+hUxPm5P41lWAhcDLXXR6JNDVLFmUUXqx6BM+wcs6rrJ kiUSmthzXO4ysrq19DlJd5iUPSHYmI0Nzr5vhG/Nm55dveOcWs2q8EbHPo1rFDvA yUQxb0Z9JHfTX4Qd8YOCg+WHl7cEK4bP7nA2/s3LK9vmC/Qy8bFkgOcXAoNrosGb JkrNXywZn9vP8/RdtV8PGVQKOwhmWJcMmvkqffWJckmJWj6AfGoqepDWxJMKSwBM Z3PWlaW/lPLqt1l5csw0jue2rfrX4fNJKVBRfm28zFRBHdSzV8FtEgFS5nPcVs0e 6wtqWNcbnlXLePuaQbBSd+xtgqDG2+mtbWwR/9FSU7zcc72PVFt3BSz5F9A+dIJl uyDgkb06laSkfAfzGlbC5G/J8fMK0nyMOfla2NOa224o7nB8/mQXZlWzaBTbdwdF QoDVMnc1sys4nayKETTD6kyhrDnPxoFjUF0zkERjncmjs2Bqf2HdgLqN32DDXvVW jdICM7iuQOeG1Xrj4x7gWtkDufLhCH1NuPcbypojV8Etur6j5ESf2ZTaRF6NowxR 1j6f6YaaocAGwwmWW88NJ2qCDgf1ber72VeL7q2babwzc4LgDCsbXnYSMYUNs9Q7 kbu2DbI5yT6EYJNkRwB0mDjnF0MA8YshmPtsijYvquOAY7aItoGv2gRaiBQ9XwU= =0Msq -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#860664: primesieve: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test: make -j64 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, unfortunately I cannot reproduce the issue on the Debian porter barriere. I am on my way to ask to the uptream maintainer. Thanks, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJY+wh4AAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLSsAf/3+6IEoFEFJwG2aqE2VKv2Z8 71sm1lmWkbmfRiCfo94OoGaanAH+jnEMIVuoc53WVhUVKv+eILh1lWV98EB1iaJ8 DhAPTqpWsadtqknvfdGDtVRwuLZTZMcPowODW2RoH9NQ52EEMhRNjnC3UipBONth q6f4Qx28edJPQMm5Vuz4hg1Zo05LeKVa3h1ARdonKqIFeP/ZnMKDESXODipCfWVp eRnxVzXfwsbhQ+QdJBljpOobNviKpiD6xn8UhSQsy3hIifJsRKrleZbAgOrOTUrJ S/kSDqBQBMn+JPx4qcdvlewETnovalQwnr3q7Pf+FSzIudw3vL6nyaeE8oR3Vct0 2PYx/QN6mXsMYc0C7HRf1RC416NKxVxdt8MEbyJ7eKst1Qn9f6aywbPAEdC+jbEw yywaAPLZ/vkzz4163aD5h3yZFl7v57kQpZsC70YjntYt3TwZZ67UoUKxl825lu3e 7aWrYVsn4iMiY88wv0u5C9+ovNHmWkEXbfvFfc1i4FMF8qNgBAJHKxolkYDtXtMn i1LU1T/fg9BO24nczoP9GdwowTnW7A2iQXzd2RH4aGORwfrvuqyXCTVEEDofFEXm XYL8Zk/aAgLe4R/YmUVNtQ9cBMdKjaXszVkw2CZx3EFnAX/dTOEPm11rlys1LSmw gS3OIX9orJAGAOu6NWsIvUQlNaiLg7Bs2/7K3jB2U+5NL+8AcMqWJd+Lx1lEkTvA A40oOhfgqdGcP5DIKCxa42NahPJmUym+TeVa5oSh8r3KJlT409AD4L1kObWBn7vf ePYtoF9o3qM2tzYDMXPP8EMMBHaw2uc7bvOU715KwJQEzPBnOtZW5bCocIZgMtr9 CFH+3M87kVbaqaCWciJ+DQAAanXiiJP1tr6QTGsgQqU0+1tBWf6i6KA48iPmvaFA F5KKP+4of2v7HfR7OwtTT/mRlb7UqT23RowzPgIrodzz1w8ce6mwCjrOslQxVyM8 zjeo2tI0mqrFqCS3VpPTdZpt4HV5GpX8hkyld1ObtOm1nBSJX3pG8g2xXfYNOuWl tNW4YdbX5Iwll/iQONiZAkNDck6pjvUadTWu2FBfT3zhrN4o5eF+pmTtiLCQhn4T hcVk04Dw8fGIVmNYvafJ1Oy2SSUSU6I/njRvqwKnFUJgx46E18c50wWV4twlB72v XEsmgxmi4Okbsq2SgImaGigrWr+3Gfa32kuPCra7PYRxVqA7i1C8rUrIlCXuvNQT 576TnVG48IcrpG9Tx5eKZSYYO6dsCpNrRtiGgMlCoDxcYGdqZyXUWhnKw55owIB6 ByCm0YwXn6mguhDJ8md6cLdc9kTo+RnIbGp4N7ST5wgAqqr/sOQlnXqQ/6tzGTw= =CaVZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#860782: libnauty2-dev: suggest include geng.c source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear Kelvin, thanks a lot for your suggestion. Jerome On 20/04/17 06:35, Kevin Ryde wrote: > Package: libnauty2-dev > Version: 2.6r7+ds-1 > Severity: wishlist > > The source codes geng.c, gentourng.c, gentreeg.c have some #define > GENG_MAIN stuff allowing them to be included in a user program. Those > files could be helpfully included in the package for that. Not certain > where they might best live, maybe /usr/share/nauty/. > > callgeng.c example program shows the way to use them. Perhaps it would > go with the other examples in /usr/share/doc/nauty-doc/examples. Though > the Makefile there might then want the special compile rule shown in > callgeng.c and perhaps plus -I/usr/include/nauty, unless wanted to > change geng.c #include "gtools.h" to which is where > that file is packaged. That could be helpful for all uses. > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 9.0 > Architecture: i386 (i686) > > Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) > Locale: LANG=en_AU.iso88591, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.iso88591 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) > > Versions of packages libnauty2-dev depends on: > ii dpkg 1.18.23 > ii libnauty2 2.6r7+ds-1 > > libnauty2-dev recommends no packages. > > Versions of packages libnauty2-dev suggests: > ii nauty-doc 2.6r7+ds-1 > ii pkg-config 0.29-4+b1 > > -- no debconf information > - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJY+YbFAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaL1Q4gALSCTOiTD7ZT1XrKpxqbobAp rWT3kfpgN//bJApYTpNuWoVjcDIjqLTWLil1Cp9Qtc1dohu4QE6KE3RosOJ6Yx6i 3pEdLMWfCa0JupAp7HPLvvTdFQo5QlcjXzamQEXQMYtg40RbeLwqF2caUBHN3HcM 0j/qTmzShxJUQq8iH2BHsZGzzNwkpAHrU0+nGFk4DglUruJs/sej6jRy97vCh0dr 3UCOoInnWu1LGq8vQ/trHSspreZyMEQOmQJ0eU7a0mZMwnxyLQapSnT3JyVYUWmL UOtJvVh0cysOfP5jDCXhx6UhEbC1J7ndrcr+dAEzdqgBxiYlByw0cxZzDpbLmNK7 6HjRYFdmoQ9u2FPwQlQDqghj1EosOtZAjmsLYEfi/Xx7t1eoCdaitj2FjiHn203u q77L5aufM16sNsfbehUepPSB7rwZw4LCfdEuURRQQ/X0EZnKr6MPc5MPI68ayq5p 1tosAi1BgkADFKnq9Ehg5rKaAL3Ft5og3fjUJmoeYRdMgBOU/ylCfd/ctssB+eYi 40TKJx+McGHeXmK99brQg46OSzqiAzyECsypJV3ADFbWKS33OCYNW0Ggt4lBrAeH RhQJNZYE9p2gm2I0PE3J/dad5jLjab1L1MlssHRkVXwoM/Jbj1v0/FYB8xuUNywJ CWk6bZP717Caj+4h4hCobjnnmFJb9oCXNk3BEJ+9IljaRw7q4vRzBsE1TaocoNv2 8wzVm5TwkcDmvjDm0Li3jE7SZfiDV5y/Rwzs35qDLgtIXktfEkkwbXGuhbunjpSe 7NA6mV1wHwAWolXR2VVYx04AkfGCV29GUJg1dvWGQW7YQ8tBn2OCBQ8frlFwkAQ8 0Qf4p/s1MX5dpe013JhmtszPIuSWvIA7p1fpYkuu+/lfbmxMtyWApEkaymsviAE0 Ly/RJ48I21DlKPOqBATVJQAZrwLOOy3zjRxS2GAqB3rybqLE6j0+Kl0LQTdt7V++ iLl3wu7sNYTuygwYA4x+CT1TzLxh9hxoYyMBhPjaU+wCOky32f8A2XG3exPu1blH Zk2QSC/j575kp1Il937KB3hqT0DJ11viYW+tk/c37y1vxx/KkwhpMV+DySxpCT0m /5pRMPvOpQ1R8sWcDcZsCkCib6Z5ZtHUcgWZTSM5ZNO0UlZN6gatsvjzG1AgcWrF nkmtUBUK+zKrz8Dt99euc9xoBT9I5whUEo2Wvp1zwfY0ajuNhJIvuNyl6NB3XcQp e98WANaYZVbGFnmL7CuGBVKVOo9ioe1pvGdJFsVoU8T1/KcMiyJPw82q29wZKeBv eNGnL5U0WX2j3VSUo7UtFXhp6tuwTtHQJcJQBV6GeJeMjDa+ZHy2sT072zrRh2o= =As8C -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#856871: singular-doc: broken symlink: /usr/share/info/singular.info.gz -> singular.hlp.gz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Andreas, thanks for your report. On Sun, 05 Mar 2017 18:56:00 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: singular-doc > Version: 1:4.0.3-p3+ds-5 > Severity: normal > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates) > a broken symlink. > > >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): > > 0m24.6s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks: > /usr/share/info/singular.info.gz -> singular.hlp.gz > > > A file called singular.hlp.gz does not seem to exist in any > package in the Debian archive. singular.info was distributed as compressed before the venue of Singular: I forget this link story. I will fix it in my next packaging. Thanks, Jerome > > > cheers, > > Andreas - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJYvGZsAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLNVMf/3tWQdyVdnBFqepBtxDfmMYh Pk/Pn/01MLk9qPATZwHSn5ypQ0S8/RqIsnBNqFCp5cYcrqnvfmY+aBeI+B7xADaH +tit1t1h7654+ka7aA49y6KZQJWk/Skbr5HU3TjVHvPTdDO+l2CUmmUrdGCpuTX8 Z4vX37yR3VVRr6fnA1zZ8EvbKzI5hJNYlygXWqC1/HAEcmZ1HvuUfqZ3gfi8R0SN FNA4F3R+gPM4j6MTTQIm9hpa5CHLcmz9wei7KZvgkiA7IvuSpOiQc7eQHnOjaenZ qVwYNPlXQ9K9bwE0maQ5UvR5Eve/a1tZbc+5UPLEIaZ2VyAJZVwMq/2Jhyd7eYbj rzXLo8UEAveHv61PiXTfYhrqOsuP2jaEvnymR6BDQ3DcE0/IuVhpHxtwaRnLk4FN /yxWIUxGF24JzCe1QFdOdwlPUpWIgp0M1MtSIFFUtg06+1/2nTQbytAOtO3TFSUF FBXL8ypw1yvLcjJui8eA7Yp5JkRD6OLMZxrKBtTgZWtlPa5Z0BuCBiTHgu7Nf1BA PjP+SxMuRPVY9lLwklNWCahMjlnOfbh3DLaw0qN+8VDcVpNnrv1vgfv5SM74qkjs GO0bG5krg3WevBpjFBQEQxG8/VjrdtTBYrnqBVbomAJUEHmmU/CDHMBO/PxPK2N1 jCeSwlVT0dJ0m4lgVh7SP1eLVeT4Xbo/aXSoaUyXDd8XbBGdehrVh/P3XV91jAgC zPdsqY4S0+P1OE/tRx3penKGVilNFUn5djTnwPDXhFDPMUqrblZYKBhPwUjB/gT6 4dOPyYdeTazeheek9sCXnNrZIWFMZX6KAZOKjao7o/79BrfCdPeaYp/rpWdKcwj6 zXgrC1uwqcNllC4XjohxFlPphwsOUFBJtr90uY9xnB6UQHgLATM84r0s3nTbJjvN 9DmJZAEpLZu5H96/RztP05AaeJekEH5xpHMCJ0u20KVRofZ9aHSR5rtqZTc1BBiU Wf5z3yWyWr2pftfqnmFoeq7jkg5JmXdfUmJW78BX1rAWU6X3+jj+mLHk2YIga0ZK HXlGG20eQaZVeoX0V+F3rUilzl1VVVSer3uHZnreOsXbUm9ZO0i7P/Jj5DUJFoLd WgN+jyqVDyNHDViWo8vOOE/zKk0gcIVZDjbQk4liqM3lMpXJ0ALuDRFZCZbG2uPv 1PKVpdHP7GdA519hH5ivcpUEnsXetFtE5f8tbG2uia94EVYX46+dOfpBCYzL5I/H qw5MT9l2Vj4SaOp6NYOw8ILGhte6kttnmvYIEOlLbONf8joF4lHxOD4C4p6AAUSz XFly2l3WhYGm1DZOGXhqefx1OYgheHTgZ9G2P00wl9b6quySKwgmrlANvQ2Yj30= =Uioi -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#855615: tachyon: not binNMU safe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Thanks, now I can reproduce the issue. Jerome On 22/02/17 14:08, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > On 22/02/17 07:01, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> Dear James, thanks for your report. >> I am looking for reproducing the issue. So far, I cannot. >> Where can we get the binMMUed source material ? >> Cheers, Jerome > > Starting from tachyon 0.99~b6+dsx-7: > $ dch --bin-nmu test > $ dpkg-buildpackage -B -us -uc > > Or alternatively using sbuild: > $ sbuild -m'test ' --make-binNMU=test --binNMU=1 > tachyon_0.99~b6+dsx-7 > > Thanks, > James > > > - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJYrXq1AAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLytwf/1/+s2kWcTI+D0lKksSEItqR LvE68gKFPsSP82uWf6tXzbhSoDWXrQqBOX0pxbSVukyUogdczw1ZAxttFrN3ZRJI N5v+0UZTyhrbIem0BgxZeOWAZhhsWZQoddF10AFVLq04EIsNc687kdQqqFzAKM6M DglNeAv4HRBCXqcgNPZqeMEoOz385khL9gMCE4gKsuEXRQZNUKuCSxTVH5wdpOZY OcfiXowQeZkXAtszBqjNf0kVHHwTUJLEuTRg+0B3nkG0DGRtd9di72wTpiRlb6oY 8NztEKV0H0Kmx+a4oBHDk5LwiGvzZ1mlMxFIjVVGrKegFoHlRmiGarMoG77Fy0Jo uzcbJHq1OtUsz4vMi/jU0FDNoj9vVREuyG//CvNisZ8GAhqMbgMyLPn2qOB4smtb xwoyktLWXfPhaxghBBg8nvrpwxoztvSSjUOBQ+cQq0sOCtbyn5Iuv56865XZmdq9 kkrEb/LmrtP3rRVi7gAqAMUUDUg1253t/Hg8n3vcSMVQqd1MDGkZzbYWodnanFEM BrJKymf8HaNqRgxX2wPfmnYj9SRIu0+suTctY1OlWTrmoTX3vyxKJaXGeO0Ns9Tu SEhrIMIP9lF4ILGKTlXsGF4MziakSvlY9SzVh00853igEU/Dpwz9mbZDOPXPe6NB VdcK/nuyCnk9YO6eYBOFECdBV5vTSLNwmcWGH21lkl87gzaj2QiOPWGR4EElKv51 DKVfj7G2V+gdQE3ItQeCOjce21Ux9bY2Mf50bZgIeQ7jEGh2Qdy0v9UT6nAjtW3g fXDh1plYrUu2bt8CH004W2syyPSnuSZgotUTRSAfWQg3pW2uiUPNX8giZ+ly2FsW JXef7zSBmzh6d/UN4cWSLMizSS7XGZ/KOw6lI2Vv6mTC6pO/jXZgR5TcF1gKbiug 1eyEWG5Hvrzdp5zUVqfD5o9fyuzyrs9IwltgJbFz6KXW99MpgZ7b4TFlt/AO+YA6 GOOAh5RYqBQOVjZNlLlya36IEKcuia2MmEqEde6+pIE/XXbyX4wyB8qaxyoo+gji 9au6HKFV++TfRnkDjzsiE0y0GyPjsnzSA2YGzewXbgeGIOQ6k+nL5GlErJcSzZsc ijol+dISUZa9Kb2FgHhX0bParAcMfrU5JTG3yEBJ8HKuyaofGbmfLBvZuH4IOfn0 2m0okf/0ncLDrc1iLwPZbl2cpuFpiOLXaQje00a2LXvgJ3rTJq8+WyoPZKpqPyjx e3iWgDbB2LUKHL6mDP5eNzZV4vDdP2fOy+U/6q5Wfse2ZVu7fcQsJE4g3A5+q/7X W+YpP3wD44w2kqnE6SweS4zoUg84+R884Y42zgCeZUz2r71F0wMTyNJ1/onMrZw= =oo5G -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#855615: tachyon: not binNMU safe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear James, thanks for your report. I am looking for reproducing the issue. So far, I cannot. Where can we get the binMMUed source material ? Cheers, Jerome On 20/02/17 23:42, James Cowgill wrote: > Source: tachyon > Version: 0.99~b6+dsx-7 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > tachyon was recently binNMUed on mips* as part of fixing the fallout of > the binutils symbol table bug (#844227) but unfortunately it is now > uninstallable on mips. > > Multiple packages are affected, but for example the Depends line of > libtachyon-mpich-0-dev contains this on mips which is obviously > unsatisfiable: > > Depends: libtachyon-dev-common (= 0.99~b6+dsx-7), libtachyon-mpich-0 (= > 0.99~b6+dsx-7+b1), libtachyon-dev-common (= 0.99~b6+dsx-7+b1) > > This is likely caused by the use of dh_installdocs --link-doc (see > #747141) > > Thanks, > James > > > - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJYrTc9AAoJED+SGaZ/NsaL1+UgANMdjPsRAQLaI3aktjExBSxv +w1xZ+BhxtB1MKCxwbI9Oikr6/BgB3j14mtFldyr9dHEMaHyNuqkRbYCKct7AwGf l4JfW4AHJ/TZEkxIuWio23wt25DNywfjKrCXRstDfRvvXwH940YYOZR5dwDMHKJM 5ueSaRirSj1Dbrg26b6cAwZ1ZWcT4fgVn8v5xsYDAiKumjIXnvweqDq04PH9nWFs rNGWbHrhPdV3JtUqrpezbbV1Tfi7e0W0ZPYfgbGY9IkQ32HuHcCL77DlFmyP4chW O5OnxO3QpjZR/v0dF+NbzvhTBlGT/CBhj+O3t96fJIi11YLtRkd0vUKW1vfvI3Zg z7Xk+KORk2l9UzEVZh7hsb64JxSis+wqG41T1L6yauY/bplvdQglvv/zgkeByAMl gVdf9WTKkrnsEiPYKNDRIt5YaKBc8ENHm52ZXy/7c3SY2L2p2G1LdZa58UmzfCHy xgjGw1qO9c26TKKjZCyBcn25/kEzThcPTDfomo7+l8AZUkn+/TE7din9xhqxqss8 H5TFDkzOdS8H8QG6JtryGy5t9gzv5uxZB8nrD6rJtdd/UfoNNQx2agu3F+1d00ot nCkrV2JPQoBoXmDBVaIKffUyzqUYJoark9V3XuDPSleG/7YGZ/hH6n6jwohBruFz JJ88L39GSArOss60661HOamXxIR1slEVSenn6+tfoj+VZ5k4A3gWsb+MVMgYVttu +YwdH0UOfMhBKdj1ovMn75nOrcsMZGhXgri8tNjA+PODkV4bcGVryNfC9mAuiyzo sjvz/SjL1WHUmD1YEWjMxvFqFJ8MCFO2+53nWMUZyUiR6Hm90xs7K78rbOC88uzJ sPHb4zX9+EH0s9MxlQ+M4ahmunpIa07AaTbyphZHaVxRH8gTFiDbzZgNbgGw0UjG J+Ahp1ZvO8iRVV3/5vKPVpFIKTxZmgIk4mgzbXmqSC3jqogFWrYL5NkxcxeVeNlp P3m7wjlzk2PsVq4FIMSgVygPuFxz0IH5jQFJyVlU5V+7z4CK08jAbGeE5ipIXP5y jZPBza+vV7MJV57L88jKjisUShCVkQZojchPs7MdXrI/K+8662Ju5HYwBcqbMRys hRuqub7jjdZpHyIrqCXS1UTSdudp6uNnWs7T1Sy6IgFC6AZDMTiffOmZmkbp3NJ1 ryC5LJVQtB8laXriePVFsT4rNhOKue6ZiHrF4GdfaIIc8pyolH6kCy83w3tf9p5s FIx52v6Ao84NTzDXViPxpx9y4XC+OEZHecvwGANB1yAtfKeGubJa+3E1/TJdVVNK VKqSiaoekNZ5W5k9cJ/JAfLGhS6CNIGCUiRspOh70xF7gSfa9YaIhBh/y6th7wE= =z8iO -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#849945: evolver: FTBFS on ppc64el - error: initializer element is not constant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Fernando, thanks for your reminder. I am on my to upload. Jerome On 30/01/17 20:42, Fernando Seiti Furusato wrote: > Hello, Maintainers. > > I can send an RFS with the nmu of this package, in case you do not have > time to apply the patch. > I have tested it on amd64 and ppc64el. > Please let me know. > > Regards. > > > - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJYj3+MAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaL12Uf/36jXnbBkp9LMFowKeCysO+J G8OY/uMupLJvm0FPVZQJexFiwYUsot7lT3R52xdRSBtoC81v/sktr1+5EgAt1M2L VHa/ft+bYe4b+ZODQM7KfK8O34xtlIK23XqFjbiVJHF3qW4sU4WfQxYrMVTA9a5s IEsVAd+SEq/vuHU4uZbfR+00klFbW/AjxEZK4LfYNHE9cYU7iM6CmqDjVQthMS3L 3bQ9LMnsdIsbnUE2LkRe3AZ8+KWT/6pynKqCexf5apGjTfZCZGcXwHJ7jA9v8LCd o6mpA/l/YAijh7yBOcljNg3J/JeCEgeDTDNHw3plD7pcb5ZYMo3nR9AroPsF/mUV 0ow5Ntq8FsGxB50+j6lpvrqOcK/E7LvQFseMiu/GR2fwB8yHahyOI6DzelvGOlRV mT0dmcHsDEud8eisvp2b/4kHniUQEpohz6DAebzMQPPXXdlOf7yCzcmM0SEuSaH9 xMnySaQwP0ZFApW30xRfcHB1GulQXRCgV7+NHYkSxeYjdz6SNptEP1LIhv/soGhe uQFI5z+u7DdNZh05FaHDb7JHml0ii9Uzh4UWDbrDHRyhm3eLYpM4nHYlmUSRh6h6 cJn64ya7JazLNsV/2QAqtiQgJ/UqyLlcvf2TgjQBuWm5qnEnF9LC8EBcwonEj4Nj lwp1RyB4hf67WoyoytnX0IqvQN0ANHDpTKXXFerYX650+bXL9Z4NZEUNEoYtcDxO C7e7oR8rufIYC8aURB1x9dTpybj4r3i06EpT/aB776+ajWk1UpVH4TGW1ryb6izp AnIeKQTKZgnaO2E70xiKD41bssDv59QRBpCnkChsrlLt/57QKTAYhYhEhVTR9fDV d8rPXoHv2/WniWDDdBUejG+2xvmtnirpih6WuPfPblYb6MKH4cspZV0vXZtQczrw OC3WVmNf2B0dRh1wT+KXiynF5x8f+laq1ebFyRTDvVxAemxeflWJSGV3veF0rxAq wMgEOOctTb+3qDFyd6gD9qk8Od6WU9mZbSR3S6NL91IJULTPhjZVHPJyWExp3WuD 8X1DneLeAaVkcx2sV7atkMQhe92Bi48OdeC6ueL4ShaDVE60sltozA/YN03H2lL3 i0pImx67h840eZ75Aa7SyQq0cWINiZ09XC9nC1LqiC+BNc9ShU9Zc+dUbu9weZ65 cxd3V3D2u60ALSY+an9SvNhKUeO/M0tOxjojQfzwAQ57lwG0nLfAvUTJ5ybqPon0 P8rRPTrrckjaJfmAchsBdoBuE9hc7Ljkve0e14vYDcu1lFiPdGKhCPdfdPpLUqw9 LM+ug6cYfDyg+v5/Me6Sl48BjbCrj4TXY310q7O5A12LO7PzDIAp59nwa1+Eq7k= =hzaJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#849661: gap-guava: FTBFS with some SHELLs(?): cd: too many arguments
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello GUAVA enthusiasts, @Chris, thanks for report the issue. On 29/12/16 16:08, Chris West (Faux) wrote: > Source: gap-guava > Version: 3.13+ds-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source > Tags: sid stretch > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs > X-Debbugs-CC: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Dear Maintainer, > > The package fails to build: > > gcc -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 > -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/gap-guava-3.13+ds/2nd=. > -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security > -Wno-unused-result -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -o leonconv leonconv.c > cd leon make > /bin/sh: line 0: cd: too many arguments > Makefile:14: recipe for target 'all' failed > I can reproduce the FTBFS within a schroot Sid environment on my amd64 box with bash as sh. This shell issue is rather disturbing. > > There's definitely an error in the Makefile: > https://sources.debian.net/src/gap-guava/3.13%2Bds-1/src/Makefile/#L14 > > all : $(FILES) > cd leon make > This code looks insane. I am on my way to attempt to harden it, > > The variation appears to be that most shells treat this is "cd leon" > (and ignore the rest of the arguments), whereas some shells reject it as > an error: > > % mkdir -p foo bar; for s in bash zsh dash posh sh; do $s -c 'cd foo bar'; > done > zsh:cd:1: string not in pwd: foo > posh: cd: too many arguments > > (the others succeed) > > I have no idea what upstream intended there. > > A full build log can be seen on the reproducible-builds builders, which > vary the shell (between bash and.. some sh): > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/gap-guava > Thanks, Jerome - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJYZvAWAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLJBAgALNPE1jQx+vhGMGWTiFUJytV U9s3YDlwrnWN0BC+XIKOYouz7PXxgqZ7n5j4vbFhD2bUARxizYXjedWs7ClidGig PR2vFyuNHz63PP2NOyDDr+VPr2deIPSSsA1M3V5lJ1jzP6KJeK/JdrWRfMxgmwJT MdQZoLJsLADbJm+gY05iiK3juKwLkwS3TBRf1YVj9Qk1w+G226c2NLZu/8HylE0y cJCGUgAMJxiVViwoS6ycVcQ3GE0stAbtIw/Str7sDtAzcylweD6DEwkxg3/sNowT YB5yXpnELUPOBbM94nwRMOnIXbBjtCjpNS0Rv3ULBiFb/VgNdAijhIdRF+Xh/QxU ltkvcCmuV6jx7Kp2tKv0xQyktBvEoCq2RWxOsvOKqW3j/7HHa25OWno+icddslUE 6l9sJsN12NO6hQcmJKwNciof6+f7vkTtq6AT5iDWFjlfx6tCVQY1NBJU9EPX/C+P BvXbXzXtAvP4izAByyTbNiHaylDc8LaXGXMk8AWu1ZWWStI86L8wrL0L3AqF2V2l 648BvPIMgnOc0ljlEN+8ITOSpyzDEtPnNz/jPdIKcuIJ+o8RnAvgQ0xvaFzRz69k a1IFSeIkAXkNmW06hUN1oTJH8clTsnMCNRmr7QvjbGM9IyWXkCrZz1yQxLfAkQdg U4fHZmuOl92TyEIePO7V85C/GDB//+1fA2mf//QFFSvN5tfVhY6tXWgRhkLLsi3C JceuMQl0CIQZIksznlJCT0uO99F6JOdeYuYq5nfXtZriaJCtiLhoAuZmjoUnrind Iiy7tC6jErgCQ0fluCbCw3sey9joUKKePR8BwDMhZKpvDo4+KU6+gYD8aasqSeaw euDZi5b73g4eoM7Xz2g9arCLBFnIn8Fd7h9LFHXNtSmK4jsDcL0Pa4TDcsmC9faX TIj2EZLi9lG0SSU5ChwZ294wegeETw4y9chFYANNyBf/67ixICJtonJUjKDOHEj7 yQCxD9zivwCxMJZyHC1N3aJM/vpQiBAGpQ4H7NgK2KWfjXHkmZSGsaF7MbQLJfqF iWOAQFyEoeb54gLcZ5rAgy6IdrJ4FzlqL2FKFl9AyvcLGQIg5w6Hl0M3zYwHuyaP lh6+IDy32tTAgWCWf6L9UWbhK3M5jwcZCsK8OJUhMfSNNtAS2j2wS6M37bI6JAlj FyD3rkrCXHsZKIBuxvmtwG/zWJ/tGs737aoGlBepNPmTE4R6/s7NtdYOz5tmG2EZ o+aH9Bhzn0kF6SOBBWtgKbYHuPUpbeCru50m55w7fFd3PJ9vNFJHc9X8dP0KJJbs BnfqDtLhMy6L7ywRtqVKU+V23Asg1TeQkRLYaXLq1Ox3XU1VM4omRuusXTMlgRc= =YI3F -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#848246: sympow does not works properly when HOME is non-writable [RESOLVED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello SymPow enthusiasts, this issue can be easily workaround by pointing the environment variable SYMPOW_CACHEDIR to an existent folder. This feature was hacked in the patch d/p/upstream-system_wide.patch [1]. Sadly, I documented it only in the patch header. Second, at the time of writing this patch, I guessed that HOME is always existent. I am on my way to see how this patch can be improved (and more visible). Meanwhile, I am closing this report. Thanks, Jerome [1] http://sources.debian.net/src/sympow/1.023-7/debian/patches/upstream-system_wide.patch/ - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJYVJrVAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLw+AgAJp8p8eNi8qhMF2b4OUAFv7u vqWLbCulV3mO2s2yYV0uBAx371/RpyJBJQgJ+A9uGHIzUnBl8CJh1gjZ3Ui9pIwj FMGs/Pz/mukI+B4ww3Edl5gHirdI9rX39SfwFna0d8AZDzQsDSbBh0AZQ5TG021r OYt0SRmepNAenrIEt9VTPo0TcCWiWEXahC8Z3Bm1shpaHKU7ebZvmj32zchD5rSs FaMcrkGVMG8MwuzZZR98Bgxv2S9izgkkJ7N53E35kVIr5O4W7z0LSWFfwa1RhqPM ZtVl7SrtoeWLUyEAVbDd+Oyt47P3h18j8IslV1VqyLozU4Jxve6x4AMS0rZ7WBZL 1uiLjPCDlQY4NxiGBiTORgj4dCpAPolQTurHYlAITSg5biVPyOV/TpiyyCM7AjHW EbW0J001FNb98F1uqWcqcvtDnPCdgsxa/NC7oXOhWO8jGQbsA34ENfu5o1J2SCpL V2knV+tUs353m5TiFqQBe1QiYpQoJWubkYL5AjL9gLVPwPyVuTAakh6Otp7WaFlS YynDBkTtiT3ayRo5Vj/Ux7KjY4GQ85ECdjPBwB8ejHm554cQCJVu8xpBuGJmOOMJ lWtz1sArZ4c12+Mi/PYhN6pZ5/8zVEpseglhtj16WwCKICuHBYIHINZ/60/+zuRR AeyROHMlsGxMF2G2dCkILctUGwhouGeoXgxOTvryXUfnGFyCBD+k6PjXAsKvd16O l7OueHtVRUdYrqG7ROqq3LF6nKVctdnNnXH2eGVlZHVZ8H+6MrPOkJJlVpD4A4qL fRS1RYkiSg0aJi8oJm3NPDAekSJk8eMLuvqLHKr9AdnZ5WeSR6cJ/c7mmgmSkQ7o 1vor5honoA79kYX3Ogw9+75nSdxPZaRuxivWIlm9h6EeDHF5pp7CC2QSdPaW4S/+ x8QIVjglUfLZEFSB4Izr6wbAm5EM3R+8vSnBphZh8pzDEzG0vfc0xuw4rLYgSGG8 DSjf8TzuGy9YFjCs4aRGc4b5vEw1Gg1rP9/EunMUNveRvuWAvFMh074a809oPNYt ckZe8G6ScFR0S/vjdl/KoJFb8JIH6KyVqCWJY80mxILX0V8uLVic463u9CU1rO/I 8JHnfOTP8o2XDaVtOhUPpoPEh0wxzeY/U9GBhz4WmtR/2l3WWHXMBnkqcqF8Xemd hs29LNkg2v91TQKfMKA3bb3pFz2lBAP5c1bUPLUA/Xjf/JSyeu8NckeoU1P+ctrE 1U9GGo9QtVJnprcx9giCC/MRgSF5rg1Zf5fp+rsi4NRizsP2RJNpm7MERnUQTdfP SvZNpoUMoxvqk5/c6/R4+ps3sQvx6DA/lEDRoItsBWSJpXKL9p4z04AT2Vsbo4I= =xeXB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#848131: libmpich.so.12: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, I can reproduce the issue in schroot Sid environment on an amd64 box. The Depends fields for the libraries is ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends} and it works fine except for mpich. Before to add it by hand, I want to understand why dpkg-shlibdep does not make properly its job. $ dpkg-shlibdeps debian/libtachyon-mpich-0/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtachyon-mpich-openmp.so.0 gives something interesting: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: /usr/lib/libmpich.so.12 has an unexpected SONAME (libmpi.so.20) dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information found for /usr/lib/libmpich.so.12 (used by debian/libtachyon-mpich-0/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtachyon-mpich-openmp.so.0) And, more interestingly, ls -l /usr/lib/libmpich.so.12 gives /usr/lib/libmpich.so.12 -> libmpi.so libmpi.so coming from libopenmpi-dev while Installing only libmpich-dev on a fresh schroot gives similar output: it looks as a mpich building error. Thanks, Jerome - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJYUss5AAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLK1QgALlj2ZJXzdAxOmWpHKKVruY/ kCKyohDtPF5GhJJMQdH/rx2DUK8OXyNBO0mQfFPg4yEcqcO90xedVjnQdC/Zly79 SGP7UWyA0EX+qiIQsFXBFBVI53SOCDLBPoXN7YQBFio7kC7Cd33PpwceGVBkNb76 vkk2yonI54XP0HdpDvrodX+mxjiSVScNEj+6aWTvLLtvCfQ9JL6ZmAW1RXzSO2fS qLZ+k73QUW5AdgTetpRTrPDZ/OjNJjxyeKvnOkUT4OFfUG/By/fAReeLKY6OGpQa /MmciVqDm+cQftoqdjT94PJH9i+lamUM/qfUebjZ//cjlqNxmTz/uO3Za0tt8cxP 73+fXk4h+dc5SITx5/fV+U+Kuk76hCXr+W4Z4HoA4hhSmJ6viRNLeQVxsXajcqeH AsRIjFgPQFw8cfabCTycimbAud0UaSZUKdU1yrDIWjsmet8Cq7yMiJTnNrvWZnP3 85+YWPXulNuoeWWxBGSucJjsE/ytIXDBYMxGpNVjvoDSthh95ov0Q9UotTkSO9yO WAWUy9Jpa78+Xu+ZvFHm0/7cLWWPHkTojnUiHBhjNWFfA1KLFaMef4w2KKg6fjzp wa6idHQdmzz1W3o+ZL7ws7PeFFFgbFG18K4UX4wA5aaY6jiALGebh/iZBESKBAD3 Hke6SP6Y0df8Sq0ThXr+1PlNFnwBEzeReT3ktvjBAtOUy6USEK/JkiL0FBGQ4+F0 ttJQjm81n98LkZvjT/nxc2atZC0jF1ECtYej1b/Ws+KauGuX5KaRHDstafistIPB Art/UOCOMM/qD39kXaSv0vtl2n22VH+/pg4Z1w+BbndjYTVXlY6c7HD3YrFrWwCG eYtQvuH+GK+r9W4eFKdN1sDs6Ob/RpPknTbzyQStiWUZBioyEzWKtALpkFCps4lF tF0cKztNQCZXBKaJGksNHlnpB96h4z2XQcUSLynBlqEWM5zuobOWP8v0wSPWxz3S ARBd0/qlqJJybwP0v4id8ovvJg6bxZ4uBKZyEk1e/NIajs1Tbr7e7UBo1tBF+BCE MT6KC3bRP+DgdY++ibq6pLPipqTj9ereDxwdZOkTbQsb0PubcTVPsBOBlhvQLAwn 2hptW7kDQbLsafFzoPuj7qQ9JOgwCO4cplWlEoK48ziilJAudFLXHSLhQPORh9RC s/KyuoQ4lNb3xBs+OAU8zAUeg6+K6R47Jf7dRhHuhrFqcfT0vj7XNephZM20QMRR QlDdne1hGTPPX23Tl3InMYvFKnIIWjdpkQAZuF351WBJ/qODdzqrPAR4aqffyyrq DqH2+DJSCWq8JfjxQVXjs6HJKjhXhUZQg7p5JpPqtUJ/f6fYna/Sl6wyRiMydVE= =ZczI -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#848246: sympow does not works properly when HOME is non-writable
Package: sympow Version: 1.023-7 Severity: normal Hello Folks, it apperas that sympow does not work properly when HOME is non-existent or non-writable, what can be an issue in sbuild environment. Thanks, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages sympow depends on: ii dpkg 1.18.3 ii libc62.19-18+deb8u6 ii pari-gp 2.7.6-1~bpo8+1 ii sympow-data 1.023-7 sympow recommends no packages. sympow suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: Bug#848131: Acknowledgement (libmpich.so.12: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Ximin, thanks for your report. On 14/12/16 14:55, Ximin Luo wrote: > Control: reassign -1 libtachyon-mpich-0 Control: affects -1 > tachyon-bin-nox Control: affects -1 tachyon-bin-ogl > > Note that the problem occurs only when you install > libtachyon-mpich-0. (For some reason, that is what sbuild chose to > satisfy sage's "tachyon" dependency. Probably I should remove my > workaround of adding "libmpich12" to Sage's depends.) > > It should be fixed by adding Depends: libmpich12 to > libtachyon-mpich-0. I'm not sure exactly why this isn't happening > already - but for example, if it is dynamically loaded using > dlopen(1) rather than normal dynamic *linking* then I guess > dpkg-shlibdeps won't pick it up, so you need to add it explicitly in > debian/control. I can reproduce the issue in schroot Sid environment on an amd64 box. The Depends fields for the libraries is ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends} and it works fine except for mpich. Before to add it by hand, I want to understand why dpkg-shlibdep does not make properly its job. $ dpkg-shlibdeps debian/libtachyon-mpich-0/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtachyon-mpich-openmp.so.0 gives something interesting: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: /usr/lib/libmpich.so.12 has an unexpected SONAME (libmpi.so.20) dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information found for /usr/lib/libmpich.so.12 (used by debian/libtachyon-mpich-0/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtachyon-mpich-openmp.so.0) This leads me think that the issue caused by mpi-default-dev or a misusage of it. I willdig it later. Thanks, Jerome > > X > > Debian Bug Tracking System: >> Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. >> >> This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your >> message has been received. >> >> Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and >> other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in >> due course. >> >> Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Debian >> Science Maintainers >> >> >> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please >> send it to 848...@bugs.debian.org. >> >> Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish to >> report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. >> > > - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJYUjdoAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLB7Uf/1k2rn6ZBovjU0LhV5bZsa+Q TcQ/vkLfZlOi7wzSVsYEKXg+b4joBEvbXUlDcdsLhmgVz8eZYoPYEYq5E5C3EQvP KP0ExTHleIlaIUmmAOZfqOxGaYWGUD07JvWiV+I+JzBLc9mNL4Ts8nRWFbJchK43 tFosDQXlHspg+6asSDnXxRNtW9XOBtCTa6L52r9yIqFFHwdYInMkSPSQ7gVvCud+ CaYmEpThktNR3rJd1LeNIKxxQgywnuoBhCVIC2xSTVg/WPxGIDbB3M3mJBXX6/Ch RTL36jsTqlB10ty9SAnB6fTFIcIjCrghx7Hti9Ao35yG2tW15wBRK/tfj/m/UrzP lPXWRGV0iCHEcwXl2r2dUWqzL6xdMO++oILSfRB5UpZ5MtE4ZyDTnXS07wvVdmMv 7uzgpPOuXtKVlmQUtGcWfFYtfSHIDf9hnLniHkmLpgGje4YCyc42NwtLfZ+vqbx3 JY891I1xoKFQweKGR4cU3lxTUrx86E55HgqjXlEbzrkarU4o5JnvaFN/+jNlcG8A zcq1jWqF9j12eh7cZeX99zvJ2cNdwE8WkQ20eP+bbDygwJuHbVber05Tb/olxL57 +s9pVqLqkkKyY91NPf83TKnyb9gGeC7QzRveAnbtrEp3iX4jGjbQ3x+W/cFocvCr izDdKBau1ifROVGjUHamA9P4mDdlAgPhW0Pd8xe/J22TUNEdoQ0NFi3wgcGsw0yk 0pZ7DwgYbLdjZr1J3uneohrGK9/xOgi1tfZTvOCxVpX4+dN8IPkJ7iK7Qxsay4oB 5Cq0wIEW1zZBkvXRlDDSD0McVhRWTeI1S9j90pCg2TByVPk9Ee/x900ScVRYGyUp QVlK5XuG2oif2B0Q70/yzZKHQ3qHfOj57xJbG6N15YRdJvkidzHJNzMgAzKWQW8l HHdwzHQnf/U5349AclBHBTUe77EYNfcfF6npk3oCAcTVHZdl6sdClBvWa1x+EPol g7MrsOJ3S7zH1XoQ/m/pasKiXh6+FN1xqb9oQ7meVMWaFS6J3KJr21ONGMGdWGHl 0cFdfn/O2Auw9uu2bJ8bcaFs7itLkKC78J7JL+evbxpEOpNxUWnwIwYejpZ4dUai aTmMyleY0wGs613H0zczjfV+UaLLrx8zBKLfvofgyNjoolFFn8sckK1agCOLTF8s YPlv/BNaaLoJwVGnzrHX9R8kkCJuPVc4rnwmHzkndNAox8YYR4h6b7rSB4O+mE83 I24zYAMf1rpYeUleBikXbq5hyIBHGDrDAh55W+XwmjIMS/0KribjorraruP1m7UE yUT1HmlVNulTZv6xgT1+sm7PctecXE6E9TDQXWvooY6D28UiHapt+xzD9auIwY8= =4kMv -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: Bug#847699: apophenia FTBFS on several architectures: distances: The error is 0.0220695, which is too big (> 0.02).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Adrian, thanks for your hint. On 10/12/16 18:05, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: apophenia > Version: 1.0+ds-4 > Severity: serious > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=apophenia&suite=sid > > ... > PASS: lognormal_test > FAIL: ../eg/test_updating > PASS: ../eg/transform > PASS: test_apop > = >apophenia 1.0: tests/test-suite.log > = > > # TOTAL: 50 > # PASS: 49 > # SKIP: 0 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 1 > # XPASS: 0 > # ERROR: 0 > > .. contents:: :depth: 2 > > FAIL: ../eg/test_updating > = > > distances: The error is 0.0220695, which is too big (> 0.02). > FAIL ../eg/test_updating (exit status: 1) > > > Testsuite summary for apophenia 1.0 > > # TOTAL: 50 > # PASS: 49 > # SKIP: 0 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 1 > # XPASS: 0 > # ERROR: 0 > > See tests/test-suite.log > Please report to fluffm...@f-m.fm > > Makefile:1790: recipe for target 'test-suite.log' failed > make[4]: *** [test-suite.log] Error 1 > > > You cannot rely on anything being fast on the buildds. How can we manage this kind of issue ? Thanks, Jerome > - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJYTHLvAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLKQ8f/i3U94xzjis6UIj1VD8k/E2/ u3HchJLRX3VDFBLORIYMWlPyWSWOM7umDCOCaLaDjWvPI8o3DG/RnxVef1skGSt9 m3cNBEAzFa0wN/ozLIxZ/dPu686nEIeA1bAbZL8OqXtP9rNd383+8GQ8Z7wyb6bt h1/4yGCRbzf+DpXiLlPYv1CRLhm9v3NTssSWxJMVWFaxZWuLKkoWwmvXLwlIHYrf R3SPSVsG+1QE1KIhnhNaad73Q/90BWrnmq9s78QGzao7U33vH18eDoW7BajRy/qi 9JfO1XWEGbYWFL7CAQglXakwtza+Y/H17gRzTb4sVIs4dTnr39VmuSzxHn4O5dbG ZSgmaoYoiu+nJy4PE70JZG1FZKAOZe7eSB42TehQayVyLQUHWyVSymbv61k0SYer N/I6AC/YXlxEseCcp+ppw4NqMWRCssnQJ+lzCW84ekxOZhFiOSSGm2tzro6H81dX VWnQXo0eT4QUsvh2VcGor7h4Kw0hJ1jYUDry+CezykpElVojvJN3MX5mW+ilDeW+ edqtXuAaI9UG9lf2xWaD6q8EUUNrwXZP+964gy/GEa4N/3Y025JUG/oeck0VTl/h ZJKRD1/E3Ae2s9d2PkcZmnimKPYQjzzu2L0DRozg1oTW04qamuCWqMDyI+GHnxAQ hdFWRCVZF3lYX4mo9Ly+cn5YrJCwORWfyDGhGXuk+Oq38hJVMtthE+yQWhGmJ8Dq DOiLldqMM2bCPXO2BRiuGsSduuISmYkgAnFLz4+0oRwknkyjbNdIRp2Ei0Ype/zi UbVF952wyEmjJ1r4Xi+21sq8B/2ELdAqbLFMEoReEbNu0g8aSDSCucJUuVppa+N5 mBLW/oXJ62QDpV7YyfIi9A7rM+9LuT1hZhBPyTuua4t7+VyMvJ5opQpGuq+dln9j qGQVV6eM1fmzqmGEnX82+EPYXw7KHbNU+WivWHNqCl+wTZG7yWlj7mGGVuz7MOq1 rCb1ciAJbT8TAXiPeo5ZEQO3AMlqehnEOdSY2RD65lqhsVe+v5o4c2MQwSl9MEc7 CuXO3BvTBFhS2MLZG8u6xt6/ndubkWpsjX1Te+DTFbArnBsSqK6zLGahKwLl5Zwm uZPeWScuuY8lyfIbfLhxY30++AFop4eYuFYgBWMnyHiIazDAG6JrhUcFAACPlrR4 M9AotUQNyoHYcIapoJeQkrxQlAgue7kzZKKMbzysiUT8kFSJWY4CeFjgnO0dNkVC XWJukaFezy/STa4ERo+I2Ftqz3vq+RyZlFZAMqvu+ncxcuiNBAUAh3mWaeaKduFn QlzLX88gw6n1W6ERoHJHri7yEQpOG9hqkHFx+P6nrtd18eAU5oXJsa+xMdHlA5Y= =fk2E -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#841260: libfplll-dev: Please add -dev dependencies
Package: libfplll-dev Version: 4.0.4-2 Severity: normal Dear Julien, I have just noticed that libfplll-dev does not Depend[s] on libgmp-dev and libmpfr-dev (and eventually on libqd-dev) whilt it should. Thanks, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages libfplll-dev depends on: ii libfplll0 4.0.4-2 libfplll-dev recommends no packages. libfplll-dev suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#840481: singular-ui: segfault when piping to stdin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, thanks for your report. On 11/10/16 23:43, Ximin Luo wrote: > Package: singular-ui > Version: 4.0.3-p3+ds-1 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > Some extra Sagemath test cases are failing since we upgraded to Singular 4; > minimal test case: > > $ echo '12345*54321;' | Singular > [ fails spectacularly ] > > but it works if you run `Singular` and type it in manually. Presumably the > pipe > version also worked with Singular 3 before. Rebuilding the package against readline6 resolves the issue: so it seems to be a readline6 to readline7 migration issue: I am digging it. Thanks, Jerome > > X > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: stretch/sid > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (300, 'unstable'), (200, > 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > > Versions of packages singular-ui depends on: > ii libc6 2.24-3 > ii libflint-2.5.2 2.5.2-9 > ii libgcc1 1:6.1.1-11 > ii libgmp102:6.1.1+dfsg-1 > ii libmpfr43.1.5-1 > ii libntl279.9.1-3 > ii libreadline77.0-1 > ii libsingular44.0.3-p3+ds-1 > ii libstdc++6 6.1.1-11 > ii libtinfo5 6.0+20160917-1 > ii singular-data 4.0.3-p3+ds-1 > > Versions of packages singular-ui recommends: > ii singular-modules 4.0.3-p3+ds-1 > > Versions of packages singular-ui suggests: > pn singular-doc > > -- no debconf information > - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJX/nPnAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaL6qcgANcFlEjvPCqsgUpTpqr+iKXT 9CBQDjjm4bHNHUbrrzs5jFfD5v7Z+UyiLW8QweDlJEPwI2ihSJUqasp3OEDEugFY QBwNf+D5cdbNui6OYspnFqCUqz/Dmc4CAJ9nCqyESoDoQlH5wtlDq4T3mzqCSK4i MFgmku3kqDqDe3uEmsPBoBxzh7kuPPSKdr4gQj8GQTDi2KO6LbLVPyFTT7ys01CN zbzaiAhLLwJEXsDxNkopKJQFMc27kpdFMuCPrwB0wBLvk/ljdTDQ50Woll+V1Lhw 0SEyPfEOeep4QrogD9gumysWZbUG0iC7PoM+8gW0cB4r5t6yy9QaYYCMrs7AaiMz 5ocdZj7DXnPfxioihTBPcl8QJlAZc3o2THqJMDEiEOV3mqTnOf1GC3PKURkAl6Y2 wJREoEIDrtRJDAIiLU5N8K6a6UkIU2gTkuTGn9R+Iu0bRfzxFCu5mXocA7NK9eMP UVdPcOsbXtmsN+CDwRwdCGAxHInQzNcQGPYB2QdNhws2Bdu9jtuYo8KK/ZTLc7tG f71E9+bGhs2gpXeegXQn5PQssxdSV35zfoW57ME5bSGyUnNDc0We+y+qoOFj30p5 qrYwejZtIbtVtMtdUGMmk9KtV9gk2QqTMgygtjGr99l+piuPp4DelphuedD9hh5J e0PLzoAm0S/lCA3fNJZ4/6RPsYuqbxZU4Ocl/YDHTmRgE7l/fFC14ZDGqNGamzOZ ps3Zr3vO16RO5HMOYT81IJwL5bRx/+ybj/6AxMq9eI5DeGWAlKtdl7MSDckaOLDE biLeGvbg6QOVO0CAw2VNEoJ0ry7YtDv10ncfmFQfyR2Vh+4XF4DaURoGQ0DB1MlN O3izpMA/8a3AJ/jtL7VAhAs4WXoongQ8EBdhB8rRYjlYVw5c4MMa3qPpElDAQIPd 6Qfm/opjtfnitlXwd0dPjRyGUtTYmNpSmo7lwT4EyRbvAtAHwss/sII+OLaLVcUk 5gpHtoEE50t3qmFFtSESoVOG+MDr/0QMIixHe0HCQO5ZL6T6wCl8Y53PkdN8fMZ+ vG+CzI7hSH0Fhj36YrwEzBWWKYgxi/PYoVCYK8yT9YCCRX91okQnCAiTglCdrCNk 7vAeuHocEo06QRTdJKan2AStg7neSfASx7KRiA1n46aKTE4GLX0oGUr+RHKww3RT sZ1rYKuFYAgTVCOMFPYtQVhyQIQlFvb+AYz6PK4A0mG+MQIaFAbo8vvGkZ/Oo3y2 S6pYGikXJzQaC1n729O6NcwSRKOnBLfYcCKJwINCGI4RgOVMuJmGlhBN/F+8KqnC venUA0FTTW8goc/W8lJpM3deNj9UtxMRGCFzNpobg8dJzGHIuUQ6+QADzT45fSY= =Bzg4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#840512: libsingular4: please provide debugging symbols for singular
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, thanks for your report. On 12/10/16 12:04, Ximin Luo wrote: > Package: libsingular4 > Version: 4.0.3-p3+ds-1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > Please provide debugging symbols for singular. They are provided. > > In fact I can't figure out why this is not already happening - debhelper > should in theory generate them automatically. Have you tried to fetch them from debian-debug [1] ? Thanks, Jerome > > X [1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebugPackage > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: stretch/sid > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (300, 'unstable'), (200, > 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > > Versions of packages libsingular4 depends on: > ii libc6 2.24-3 > ii libflint-2.5.2 2.5.2-9 > ii libgcc1 1:6.1.1-11 > ii libgmp102:6.1.1+dfsg-1 > ii libmpfr43.1.5-1 > ii libntl279.9.1-3 > ii libreadline77.0-1 > ii libstdc++6 6.1.1-11 > ii libtinfo5 6.0+20160917-1 > > libsingular4 recommends no packages. > > libsingular4 suggests no packages. > > -- no debconf information > - -- Jerome BENOIT, Ph.D. | jgmbenoit-at+rezozer*dot_net http://www.rezozer.net/ - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJX/k9iAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLw3Qf/0yWSmvcXPeB8umk4HG+dEQJ /Gt5O8UVkQs64CwdIpEgyyhxAhtfwXexQI7uuQu1XVVzIakQckzIIPuRh6DnjZbR ZVryBDeFRdOJyouLPkp0v1IvBjy4icPJtiw7yZzYTjXi6EMnUAY8tp+RmFy5KNc7 GdYhx1t0dieh3UjOUkJ/3qQvXIxn7BfPmiUU+hHCNd4V93NFzN6eZlihGs3qsoOe RP40sG8MtnmZydlvD1C+faXhDIc9ke7DbCpXpwxZfCglOt3j6YhS5GRyMNYicmyP Pna11biMZ2amLMWpRvrZcS/prOqZPGcbPlwMPhe76oeTxWF3V2QZ8vuDV4WL5Y7K U1xkbTbK7gnb0pbKX+jtiPaTH52YditYsyMlBYRRPic7Zrf3z0D9hRWH/WYOMqFA gYuVZk4aEUES20tRHBhCpwlxxqUgDpwweKYyt6UsSobPQWic+uwNKezlMSxQZuH8 iq8y5DOVA0sjrsBZNocoEo4nSbqppUuhouSftKe0mFqL7/FlxkV0IeWFaJZfsgBQ gmy6dvfedfqi5ZVwVa7cViBSrgS/JFQTyj52ndhc1L2X+jw+Jo0mphXjTsf++j2u D5MR+1Lt6zZrzs8OS24WT2ijpM7rlPl4I1iTE0ZY5RBWI/oeerjqFN3OgIOkuWBr oGGudKk4tW1W4tQuw9f/CWbkS4VbnsEp+dbnDF6BGZbQvL17WmQCGsZN2KeJRzXd wXJy1RkNuM2JPZIHCdni0lVL1CslyhHK23D4kRDe4kQ+3THRo4809B7T3iZA8QWH ezcFN/wOhyuGovy4x8znPBKlVAtVEwstiiF5veSwzf/fpGIxrrV4Cp+t2fU8+eZ5 jZXwV2XOozyFRFN711frHjoXaihlhSdIJPJNBQAt+BrljoaJP+TmCN6ABcj/TwCO JnP0a0562+OJ/0yUdEkjGxfctUTE2NTbyAdrMmqcmYKqtv4VWF8sA+Lu5E1t5csh f8/g9bCwCsl48MS2W5cTMO0WqNXYcOOhpl6Cga1AMLVfAt1fzeOUtmoPx3f0lD8C GuAMLC9UYJC3/mL0N7ikOWt1d1dgNUUkjK8x8ql2Bf7paheCa5FvY4/9EAAIYD1v 5UBNTJjova5l7JjetGn6IuPugqfUSIZC1FxM/3MtKONL8p9vaWPIA/dPq66xL0E9 P6iRkig66rTdNVqNI/2xjNdQYxwr3QGq2+r7+t5E5nlIrUAPa1G5IuF+eMFvBNHM 6gv3bwz1uYZdvU4hn7RumSoQo1BrVI1f8mczY/8IfIFe4cmEwUNj1ADpRlFekYaT mb/uM1kEE9hju4KdizBh8R7tRST6lERRlxBK8GVWbUdnQipZDVUQRxQ2uyDOj3U= =1ZVu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: Bug#837016: singular: FTBFS: aminclude.am:35: error: DX_COND_doc does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL version graph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Thanks a lot, I will fix it asap. Jerome On 29/09/16 00:23, Graham Inggs wrote: > Control: tags -1 patch > > > Hi Maintainer > > The attached patch fixes the FTBFS with recent ax_prog_doxygen.m4. > Note the build-dependency on autoconf-archive should be bumped to (>= > 20160320) as well. > > --- a/control > +++ b/control > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ > Uploaders: Jerome Benoit > Build-Depends: > debhelper (>= 9), > - autotools-dev, autoconf-archive, dh-autoreconf, libtool, help2man, > + autotools-dev, autoconf-archive (>= 20160320), dh-autoreconf, > libtool, help2man, > libreadline6-dev, > libgmp-dev, libmpfr-dev, libglpk-dev, libcdd-dev, libflint-dev, libntl-dev, > graphviz, 4ti2, normaliz, surf-alggeo, > > > Regards > Graham > > > - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJX7FaVAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaL+C4gANbZ/XF6mdyBISlWmI42JSFH +XpZukHTBJvew1IiOVqVj8exMhHSHwkup7nNj9gGOVd8zq4EDLZm18Y0wM8ubksZ 5y3VDo7DweURJVyWDwUyla98DW4r1G44FUpksTRzzfO4bFx+QB+54vGWXY9HKNM6 dAicZJeTzuA0SwaA7vB8GZ9p7txwSaCztTWCixJus7ybvVSgOFXfmeXPDtvomno0 +c1JaHJrIrvpnbyR27eGc2RAyWpsPb7fbiPRX/5QDUDRRT10fLITmAzcK0uFb+7D e0maZ/ey9OSOnDK1wZu1Y57dy3649izvXl7v0q1wME26oXhN9Lb2kEPXYsQbNMzK 5CQOcx571ceKYY1dtdpKpcVSucnK9VAfFhcXVpdgTQSCNn5DSOIgas8RFn/knwxv SxnfpP4Zr1ofN/oHYEL+mesiMkolBFkHkqMJPwyDx7vO5nwWm3s3SGsPntuRt9sA /jnYvxfkFa1lDYxH+wJ+Lu3DoNnG3vYdxrxll90lgNPY4cPcusTWiTbc34u9Uwgu SsRfOUxxegBiJGxqNCTjGslllzXZIkaiWJaqygrAXcBQKfEVoTKn++KtTjg4VVhc GOPebgk25ocWhK5mCoKMGHZi2nWVBfmp4J7ntkcQcspcR1YvQMo5S9J8xahxz1Oa Yif0l7bjRCXA0/NyZoz075vHV87Bzk2GZSO1Y563JHcEm4DEB6slmwo86IrzGERm Ixj1HpLUM+IDhpGLeccRXMw+dgmZ+gMMF0wNaIjuFylZYf/2yPCtqa8pT1wHxkFO bll7EWW6248KnKZ+mFyzbPa2sgx9x+g5G+VMcnbRr1PA3y5Q/4oOKCNAZp1onZsz 1TjoFfqrQpmL+SJXowBq46WuOraGIxTsiDZ1C6fth8FUBW+858WEULqlYvoBf+p6 VlpgYLqkbcMK0KUZdkMxmCSw80+VqREZVGydK1bj2gDLQeaP2jxbUPoVKWoY9pXz cqkStNaZiUU2CBole8ODId18hm0yjnAooabbApN5cWNT6PAkVrsD1/PO+TnO/pH1 02aCBsK0SdGxieo5QwDmkUfc1mFsmHzTu2/QXRwIdn0CG3vUVyZZ8n9OWFLCiZGv MBYe38g5oCCzHhodKFwZ8eyxX9XwlJDmrhM4+Od+fpbS+dQSeAy5mqaPF4Z2IK8U ai1/FcuJ19seVoXtELl98ZDpFKkjzfz4OGK0GjA1sgzmsNPvI1qpipFG0rGj3y9e kT8swi1hYkFEDTXQQ3dBMSKbcQ4gy6+BqLi/j9pxdWTZ19WIJduOIDx9qDlVlrIG AYc3faUMrtGJxzVDVKKaNGiFsdYSakw6h5ATtqPDl4GVeCueVD0QrBD1p3h5RfA= =nnyd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#837012: tachyon: FTBFS: ld: tachyon_ogl-glwin.o: undefined reference to symbol 'XNextEvent'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, thanks for your patch. In fact the issue was not in the Makefile.am as a X_LIBS was already present, but in the configure.ac where X_LIBS was set up but not SUBSTantiated. Is there a way to cancel the dealy, given that the revison -6 was accepted. Thanks, Jerome On 13/09/16 06:27, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Hi, > > I've uploaded an NMU of tachyon that fixes this to DELAYED/5. > > The debdiff is: > > dpkg-source: warning: extracting unsigned source package > (/srv/build/tachyon/tachyon_0.99~b6+dsx-5.1.dsc) > diff -Nru tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/changelog > tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/changelog > --- tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/changelog2016-08-01 02:23:29.0 > +0100 > +++ tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/changelog2016-09-12 14:12:26.0 > +0100 > @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ > +tachyon (0.99~b6+dsx-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium > + > + * Non-maintainer upload. > + * Fix FTBFS: Needs to link against libX11 explicitly. Closes: #837012. > + > + -- Alastair McKinstry Mon, 12 Sep 2016 14:12:26 > +0100 > + > tachyon (0.99~b6+dsx-5) unstable; urgency=medium > >* Debianization: > diff -Nru tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/patches/series > tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/patches/series > --- tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/patches/series2016-08-01 > 02:12:39.0 +0100 > +++ tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/patches/series2016-09-12 > 14:12:26.0 +0100 > @@ -10,3 +10,4 @@ > upstream-rationalization-autotools.patch > debianization.patch > debianization-documentation.patch > +x11.patch > diff -Nru tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/patches/x11.patch > tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/patches/x11.patch > --- tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/patches/x11.patch1970-01-01 > 01:00:00.0 +0100 > +++ tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/patches/x11.patch2016-09-12 > 14:12:26.0 +0100 > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ > +Author: Alastair McKinstry > +Description: X11 lib is needed for linking > +Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/837012 > +Last-Update: 2016-09-12 > +Forwarded: no > + > +Index: tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/demosrc/Makefile.am > +=== > +--- tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx.orig/demosrc/Makefile.am > tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/demosrc/Makefile.am > +@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ bin_PROGRAMS += tachyon-nox tachyon-ogl > + man_MANS += tachyon-nox.1 tachyon-ogl.1 > + endif > + > +- > ++X_LIBS= -lX11 > + AM_CFLAGS = -Wno-unused-result > + > + tachyon_SOURCES = \ > > regards > Alastair > > > On 13/09/2016 01:50, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> Hello Lucas, thanks for the report. >> >> >> >> On 07/09/16 23:18, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> > Source: tachyon >> > Version: 0.99~b6+dsx-5 >> > Severity: serious >> > Tags: stretch sid >> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org >> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160906 qa-ftbfs >> > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 >> >> > Hi, >> >> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on >> > amd64. >> >> > Relevant part (hopefully): >> >> /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -Wno-unused-result >> >> -I/usr/include/libdrm -I/usr/include/libdrm -g -O3 >> >> -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>/tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx=. -fPIE >> >> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_REENTRANT >> >> -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -o tachyon-ogl tachyon_ogl-main.o >> >> tachyon_ogl-getargs.o tachyon_ogl-parse.o tachyon_ogl-nffparse.o >> >> tachyon_ogl-mgfparse.o tachyon_ogl-ac3dparse.o tachyon_ogl-glwin.o >> >> tachyon_ogl-spaceball.o tachyon_ogl-trackball.o ../src/libtachyon.la -lm >> >> -lGL -lGL >> >> libtool: link: gcc -Wno-unused-result -I/usr/include/libdrm >> >> -I/usr/include/libdrm -g -O3 >> >> "-fdebug-prefix-map=/<>/tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx=." -fPIE >> >> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_REENTRANT >> >> -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -o .libs/tachyon-ogl tachyon_ogl-main.o >> >> tachyon_ogl-getargs.o tachyon_ogl-parse.o tachyon_ogl-nffparse.o >> >> tachyon_ogl-mgfparse.o tachyon_ogl-ac3dparse.o tachyon_ogl-glwin.o >> >> tachyon_ogl-spaceball.o tachyon_ogl-trackball.o >> >> ../src/.libs/libtachyon.so -lm -lGL >> >> /usr/bin/ld: tachyon_ogl-glwin.o: undefined reference to symbol >> >> 'XNextEvent' >> >> //usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6: error adding symbols: DSO missing >> >> from comma
Bug#837012: tachyon: FTBFS: ld: tachyon_ogl-glwin.o: undefined reference to symbol 'XNextEvent'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Lucas, thanks for the report. On 07/09/16 23:18, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: tachyon > Version: 0.99~b6+dsx-5 > Severity: serious > Tags: stretch sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160906 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. > > Relevant part (hopefully): >> /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -Wno-unused-result >> -I/usr/include/libdrm -I/usr/include/libdrm -g -O3 >> -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>/tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx=. -fPIE >> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_REENTRANT >> -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -o tachyon-ogl tachyon_ogl-main.o >> tachyon_ogl-getargs.o tachyon_ogl-parse.o tachyon_ogl-nffparse.o >> tachyon_ogl-mgfparse.o tachyon_ogl-ac3dparse.o tachyon_ogl-glwin.o >> tachyon_ogl-spaceball.o tachyon_ogl-trackball.o ../src/libtachyon.la -lm >> -lGL -lGL >> libtool: link: gcc -Wno-unused-result -I/usr/include/libdrm >> -I/usr/include/libdrm -g -O3 >> "-fdebug-prefix-map=/<>/tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx=." -fPIE >> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_REENTRANT >> -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -o .libs/tachyon-ogl tachyon_ogl-main.o >> tachyon_ogl-getargs.o tachyon_ogl-parse.o tachyon_ogl-nffparse.o >> tachyon_ogl-mgfparse.o tachyon_ogl-ac3dparse.o tachyon_ogl-glwin.o >> tachyon_ogl-spaceball.o tachyon_ogl-trackball.o ../src/.libs/libtachyon.so >> -lm -lGL >> /usr/bin/ld: tachyon_ogl-glwin.o: undefined reference to symbol 'XNextEvent' >> //usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6: error adding symbols: DSO missing >> from command line >> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > The full build log is available from: > > http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2016/09/06/tachyon_0.99~b6+dsx-5_unstable.log I could reproduce the issue in a chroot environment. I am working on it. > > A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at > http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! > > About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from > Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every > failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures. > Thanks, Jerome - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJX101PAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLFKEf/jJj8WCg4UkPgR577HQQjIEQ Cf57htSrZ21id9z3WSV5kI56Bd7hr2nP/6gPme5O1RxdhKpCA4G8ZyVpVMgiVV2e 4SYklDUJACj902uDj5//5i9HoOK1S6W6iFc7qAT92q2H9HD56eSw6xaT0//Lfmlp nStHRFO4AvVg2i1KmvK2YBrW/DDnYRA4SIf2m0ESXIISA6CDzuRiNgk/C6DwKGO1 lusHHwLXStGKnb/A1OYDyz1tyeP4PdxoJiSOYPWdmqlw5Mb13UXuPesAR8YpSPjo PoItPxPGxkG0lIcxuIVxLWUB9jM/jtdF0s94IU8HbgU6BHjnXYntx0cnbEcKEfPK BNZnbkoNWCmfhlOeeB0M114p4WUiedrkXjIU+qEWZP1uEh7dX1FnfMlxutgL9q3g 2SwZovd55VEnZEs5kWdoqfUCBLHvBoHxI3rZRBl0SGe29ljcwu6NlUyb//DuCum4 HSb7L3ShKX9MLzPLPbruSIeJdmaIt2AjNMiOLCCsfgS3F6berFtXm3k5maPddvuC wUVVbHvdP+La4meTWjQ+CBnfOs4BxzG2vA5AVBjYMY8B6/eJ6wmuiJ8W98rOMz59 VrUFPZh3CdPN/0TIz2jH14u4U1TfHz7nTfZ4PBRzvycz0tU0xya6g7IuM30rExpo ARznnvc394rlKe5V9d/ewXzMPpgzcMEIA09a9G4CnP9uNDYhVHe0m8FuW3LLfoQg 47lwYgRho9FBabo5TXU6CJOUv8zt4wyhAqWLzL4h8y8x/xlh5dBNnEEqH2FGVhov haRBEdlv+0LpnqyCYaKKFD+fmYkw9QrwH+P7B1c1p4MfTPDSEd3PFoT5ySiq1CDb dWF1f1mzzZI6CvwIl02WKfrxcPw0O4x7S3cKjdL9hIihQ4IYEmxxkDMbZJKI5t5X MidKSdiXZmF2X1DGqcmkMEVPTJOWQvAJmzmNTCUjjkeMbZGmWq7fsR+qeMGd4OQN mWTYVcuaFrTXfQLfFDXW2tQ5fGzm1hhra9iwbmEcsiPJqKWlEjX8d8BkuCwoHI7u ky/GUxj0pn3evbeo0086dY5bV7naopxTc5zsYCXJgMhDZkHjF6kpxunA+dJgAd2i ty1cZ6z5YMuW1d7vi/iVsJ9QdaHbmAMw7QmB/d5TYBNo8/OTVUE/i9AundmUyb6g bMJ2JfPowczhGZOKjx+GRwLGdRWmNLPYH02y2eoH3/jvmfCIK41aMu4HgFUbYAeC twoTSeUU8sW8D10T/KGWmkb48dyp3TCaAlJwo0LPX2beM/E3VydnfuM0rBgv4nSp fX5RJYriTMeWmeXH8kepAEKmaYnDfamT4tE0U/Q7BX9U4MtEWbbxUHUlqj92wiI= =3XQj -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#835373: blitz++: FTBFS due to testsuite failures on several architectures
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello blitz++ enthusiasts, to begin with, this issue are not new issues but old ones: what is new is that tests has been improve, in particular their results is now taking into account during the package building. Otherwise, I am working on it. Thanks, Jerome - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJXxD3JAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLQMIf/1F6N92ovW6yNyn9RWffV23K 7YlKTEsyBfNI4PB8NKXnzOdsVJwxKwFgg95D+SXw4ZKg/Kw0JVr7RSd/UZSdLNyi mPgsdV9TkbhZW1GpdQrPlZ89iaKkmoSgxf7p37v2LlUG5+2eOA5c5pZIL8jfJaay lxHcFxIpaPExj0PprKlVVb14YkZceGRZzJv40S7nspUec/8t5tvsYh2hzxDOXb1K eSXzH4wUxQZNAwPMCXzrM00K4XBcny8X+CrAAcDAwWO+sr/2jPgrZp4V7bkWyc7N XZ7IvtWXMUibP27SPxQXyTHH8H+l43cI9YvQlG7KSD6UjSBnEqRFJV4apen3psDD IbTVxbwtdSKEwakzI4BMo2nuW8zfpoJBFujapU1VitOPTvFzxEJgOTW8rLdqSiah rzLTPJR9ErqsuVnlC9c3sJ1qYuszfZ1M55SiKUSmYOoiDHKOiaEwleI041CwJ+oK fAHAC96nxqBtuHEQ1lRGMlmtgHUGGKhnjVJoh0LT8QjocP2EpfRTG2LYKKX8y685 iWcjqNTXcpv57nIr/RuYqBplIjmxWKAsLO3U4jZyeVuGhUakNGMnrfO+7pZSvecj sxaOpqqNmn/sl8KSRdp0YHqdhgwojh2uZKSouyjFGchWFLFa1Mur45B45jTSEroj AMQv0q7fYWll9FpXfJTf2P2uXqhf5bV9jUWx+FQGivFWmpUtQ1AaIen12qm1PMVI 6JDFQ9UwoWADL/PTA3vntM+ePZfWtM5X2KrMByOU0Xq8hWWc1Ny0Bu4LCWkddNC5 uxuTSGC39Yk9Ystb672PNQ9/dyB/42CHI/wgcxW1uU6ZvXBQxPnCC0kJ4wruyr0G TirMIMxIZkpzJOmcJ9NtnLbF9beQtLuSoBAyMI7xvoZMTli9Dq+q+czUrSSO2nO3 tQxakeC5C6AwQfXa8TMTe2OU5mWc/RPOsDNsmkOuwYGMmoq6xRoEWLN7D4noBrcV +sf7kjjQAXLkVtNqS8l+NaWcLTRgThsNVfDtrkoFnmA37IjdJVwyTMf839lnEuOS u4xoQNv/S99Rts5SXd+5m/+KLHgokBxBYzB7fM/oKdxZjkOceg4bGRZZU5fywKhT LJ0Q2mh4+5/4ngMGrb0UuMrNcyeFmRSfPol9jpdKbxz8mFbPT7RO0+qOyD3xlG2O nKSUl4gAdPCx/mreLFKGVTsN7t4zZ6yo61W2K0AS2sIcfuO/EjeHVvD/3qWvHUBx ardOh5lkKcP3OLDr4aJf9KKoBcX4l5+IImk/14qUUCJwU5nGFHeRX5qs2QguiGBH w65wSM6DVubWS+Skry9uZozy7uasjB5hPOimAhZLXSqlt7cBKBsQL6qJtTABjMc= =oqBd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#835505: New fplll breaks your package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Julien, thanks for your message. On 26/08/16 12:51, Julien Puydt wrote: > Package: gap-float Version: 0.6.3+ds-3 > > The newly released fpll 5.x.y series breaks the api completely, so > the sollya and gap-float packages will need new upstream versions. In > the mean time, I'm going to upload (well, get sponsored) my fplll > packages to experimental only, so you have it at hand. For Sollya, there should be no major issue as it is actively in development. For gap-float I am not sure. Is there any guide on how to upgrade ? > > When everything is ready (and we have something nice down into > stable), then we'll push to unstable. > > Cheers, > > Snark on #debian-science > - -- Jerome BENOIT, Ph.D. | jgmbenoit-at+rezozer*dot_net http://www.rezozer.net/ - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJXwDDjAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLYOogALeLU39bM17Capj9CRmRGMXA pEgzjwzsDkOH+jNVu0oFmHceAP0rkhgs5ukO0cMsugL7b7iBCuIBepq4Yebhmmv/ z3IHF2LZ3WCkcfZf7zbP+lC14iRKNA+fKJYRd43mkhS5IMwP3wEg4F+fMt+kf7gf JBjtt7JILYJ7909kkfbLZZy/KkeuBQqcMmCT7mDpEGzxbAnrMHV1VAQTDwrCVNpa 9IIZaIcrAQXJaYx6Iq/ld9Z0eSlPXH5ujVz27OvmYP8gquhWEhNuo/v00lvTKQpB +ZgnVDJPP6pvXHhiITEsiyVVMJz0q3ffpEhnpdwdtMBKRYD6Fo8JcSw5rCD+RINA c/F3njxnQ0bTsHDQKkQOz39NlkIX/ZJtmWxBoqj+K7fTZnv/iDNALvqzBAkP4xdC h5axcn4eXYMxlyfCXRRA3FkTR31td6UlkxLCXLfiLFYFL6Mfw89mT9g0qSYMHDTz k3KzoiH00XUQ39RmPT/BJXXOvmg/EiJlkgzu9qoywhqvTGytx6IhN8yDBczTgPfJ FMBr5WmPMTBXJxmnIxWy/43sitn959KFjywVElosi24RQqFlUL3h5yNJ5W55tyyD 03R7o2nukksWp4/Xd3wviC8k2QJyZkU/Vs9XTuW8TOAhakdJrsfOx3lGNqJ2yPe2 AxrzykwW+mAm84V+G7/foBuNXBiKg0ZZQNqqZapDyJJpMntv9fqwvjYGQIE+zD6g WQa7yfI75ruukfq0P5WexOPGrCCEQoRZCgsbFf+1wj+eelyxSBQNy98XsjVKOLS7 uFvj/Ie0Tu+pLTuZUIRTV2iLSUs/SqS5Ir8/6ob5RdUX25q+SqKMS2lIVfiMMH7H OrSIX18khJZu5rLhrJR2adslkKMuBDr2wwF9mAcaRe6nygs9GLD2XykNEfsqKGaj spZdu/iOAQLPJknKhaSKCExepWbZ9BF1JF1OTNXBfmgArUaUdI0oAOljZZFl+sLP Ou/OPeNRufEID0KQoIyNx+GJ3UnSPANhwB7MTEA4WlvVFr0mdor1bktksZhd8slP Qkb6yQ6KR3fx7oyZ5GxTepQiHoSILJiKrWnmB6Xh6wDSn/6NnJ6IksAs9rAnCuDa zqzrh2BPVU4nRkd0NTBDqW+ckTfYfQOROojx9nujZdncd6+AkwW+7lGDdVplWJ8N VeZvfrum9Lvq+iWmsBMFvkdxcHXMsEMO3QXjdXA89WQTOxGE4DJSpcDcMWx8vxMl sj/jEmS+uaIxmu0Mgv68C/hh9hLpkib3scUweETU5zphDh2K6QE4xTgwMBycxV9K eu/SW2zKC+dgV4clE3lkqSgUChCZMZpp1UXv9gTWI8nq1q7w0WDFkvbBgOysZ6M= =E093 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: libgap-sage_4.8.3+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Chris, thanks for your time. On 14/08/16 15:00, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Lots of files missing attribution, for example: > > src/intfuncs.c > src/sctable.c > src/sctable.h > src/vec8bit.h > src/weakptr.c > > I stopped looking here. The copyright of the these files are ambiguous as commented in the d/copyright file. I am on my way to resolve the ambiguity. Thanks, Jerome > > -- Chris Lamb Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:11:21 + > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our > concerns. > - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJXsHzRAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLnmkgALiRtQRnC3w65HbjHqSs6jlJ iKOqVOHiLu2hastKM7tNpri8SH5W+T7EqhWC2h3lyr6CSzFUet0XG96C5gjYdq2L SX96E6vS5hNQmVe8VCeEFuxBxCb0u5VvtrZNGFUtB1ZkSb8o3/qZ0sK7OaUqPEKL 5Hq5hQqMYqt/M8UltYb/U8uNJlk4wa/y0Z5LeQtX7/vMMbkpg2idI9bFxcELE6zx O+lOLftTtbLcwUhzqEkKCuyO5M6VNTM4cNu6u9obcjefiGDXxise+dsxUXiGYkbS cdNNRGghLZLnxMvB4TgP6wnm+HrpkQBfF/rM3baqQI29jKtnvCGGfvSyzKeIxjUZ Jnu8mLdsSwR2H/GaUdUJudFo5RXPFnT85COjmG+BfTU02rZ0AJSmBP7Pq2o/cVtn bZC1TLKw3/vW14f7rGvFD4OCuuBHhm3ge7HwXpkxkiL0J6qdD+ApiQEVEMNs+2zK egFgccsDIiw5+lNaGmXAGxfCqDh2uRvLkSflM9QQh+2exF14REN22ft7PGNo/MPT HNWmUrlPlctRuxzvtOhSBB/Gk7jXc5daLTANo8CjfSSkn92E9L26xzmCiW2K9Z1X 4lkAguDPA/DGxyaHFKZCV/66d20BjBTyQC125Hn0hcMhwQGaXQSa1k0TXIqXJmp4 QXlYzTjyDxjPwgWed6Her39J2cizlSVQ6aVtkLROp2tbJPV5fqF3O+t8O9CEuHMV W3arKmRzWK3F+04OAiUigdv7G6YcDuBJX2lXA+9EYqBhCOwcdqtJrnlrvVfGwHJY fxPXZsevxsOEGsqy4Bc40TJlkBLZPm9u0BS1igUg94Ft4AG8ABOjGQRG/NMMhEMK RSYVUUG8YjehNF299vL+JEHOuA0I5Td5Z0Da1VPpUoKW4C4u8F5OD/hNSBwAvmcX 9y00hjB1bkJV3+3Au+p7w5E4FBJ3ZrvzZrIgBusxKSAb8u/QgFWuugFnvZCOObKS uCy0DDecPrRcFtXC6L9YRH3pm+oy+T1Z8g/JFsoZn2doi3aLm78UcUKA1CgUFU7w tNVYbV922AoNINk2HNtq2s6NIzzbUIAaYI53MJESZXzg+w3QU48wtx7KiFCBcAem /Vy/ZuLBlqBsFSXcrGDB5Vz8zE6AjvhygaOWBwQSiRhtqGECsOu1/S6uKvFYW3eQ 8Vd7fVJF9oydWv7JPkkIqrQzRLuA2Sehad5TvOFi0ytcv7Cd1P8gW6ZlRx+SUsAH 8XWwkug9h9qWvbyrYgoAN3Yed+affuz51Fh8LK1OK3lblhcCjCebkFlvupq9v23x fUZyvWOmrgwTnAG6TP1DoTLZHJU8FsXqEZ/s8jwe4M11dVypda8NDnvLIg2PX+8= =+Rd3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#833870: libprimesieve7-dev-common: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/include/primesieve/Callback.hpp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Andreas, thanks for your report. On 09/08/16 17:50, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: libprimesieve7-dev-common > Version: 5.7.0+ds-1 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from > 'testing'. > It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails > because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a > Breaks+Replaces relation. > > See policy 7.6 at > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces > >>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): > > Selecting previously unselected package libprimesieve7-dev-common. > Preparing to unpack .../libprimesieve7-dev-common_5.7.0+ds-1_all.deb ... > Unpacking libprimesieve7-dev-common (5.7.0+ds-1) ... > dpkg: error processing archive > /var/cache/apt/archives/libprimesieve7-dev-common_5.7.0+ds-1_all.deb > (--unpack): >trying to overwrite '/usr/include/primesieve/Callback.hpp', which is also > in package libprimesieve6-dev-common 5.6.0+ds-2 > Errors were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/libprimesieve7-dev-common_5.7.0+ds-1_all.deb > > > cheers, > > Andreas > > > - -- Jerome BENOIT, Ph.D. | jgmbenoit-at+rezozer*dot_net http://www.rezozer.net/ - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJXqgxMAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaL/CIgAJ5IKRH4RvL5bdfLv/Ug4e2a I3xNBjYZCdUskP9V/XaRw3Od/6hUKQQnzI8Urp+HhDTqbrFRsz/lsiECzorXIQi/ nLUPYrMzhka88YG1DOhsKdQ9OYIoZZ7BjB6nE6RmX4tdCUPN2kjKTFL297QrIrWK m3AMkddaRzyWsXHAtXLAaawivoS74qzWnM4IVCMWriTy+GJhLQkLGvvBJ4VS/p3K 9nGVxsSmkHhiY5SNjDZ1Jjf0ffMI2s9xm3fr7XjFSM3TQS9Z2DS5nEl8Q3E/S9Qi hXdL4zAiPZWNt9M/FnwqBfiTS9IqTlyxfMPQid5zFVaeSIckjfyiEBKEICh9QbYY 0/bG0m1D6aNpDwNAOfBdQ11+HDZZehixmdsyFDvyNLfkIfP9BnRIZpJ0qw/cwIvl gHvukodKtKq6Z5wo9ZuszkFYAqfKu2cL0UIATdu/2YF0J/YHvVNqLNBrNSvUDvbj QLVYUHk93pyEYkOkxYF39MwLsXpL3OTF0rGhdt2EbG4S1vvfCavEqReEMfHnndOW NchAH7jFkoohxd/NT+PbXbfyxgWtv7tWJF6S1NzxzvNZW6lFmjmfUMWtycUwEvIX J/Isg551XdQal6IYQ90gZ8ayVEcFYEhUJhjuu9K5VRoTNndipJfcZnT2OPRUi0Mf ubEt5e2bhuDa6ppT0hnkUmb4k9bxnqcVftM8dCIhZ0YK9VP+ifeqWWA5pN1oC3u0 fulPUbBbKVGIuWpIHhOKf84bRkxlPGSBjGMNWUpAqDxGQiDGMoXOS0EopNRk4DmS hv7p4YraG07gA/Fmk3sGFB4l7sTnhWuJDY9rjezqVT2LZrcnemFXUZOIyURdF5Iu ZM9Nxcn0c1brZEuI/ISOTR+nwH14Q607XeE8EomPRb/wNgu7M3IM7fVLIwgaj/Oa iRQFDZiBcFRDpvlmbXgi9zYHF77ekHA5xAO1Y9HRet1GkjM6TEjV8SGyc9CgHxHD CsT80yn8YhiukpQcEvswCIbUQRXiSIb6wbsbJnvyYX92czOQHqSD6JGIZ/c6rEDK ZfqJ5h5iZumKKriWgjy83M95DvBGghZOw2xREGTZ5AdNyyn3cYKPcc/EfbFaR8c+ g6lPY5LnwGUsQ/wGN+fCZWyEUzrOoBW2t/bLrO3BnA+R8BqrrO3cNdAtG5hh1dKD 7FZSjpjoDyjeweAJ7oaQPRcY1xm/L4HRzGV2gG1CUydePGshKjL8Miu4gT4TBsEX Ssg1av8aEBf/DsgwxuMDRnbGce988ncj4xSKRTy5x15o1t6ZEbqLADBcntJSUmFl 00g/91c+Z0Cxfpo4tfKVRpOUwoJ0M3F4bsTIDuAFaAqbTq7R4BdC2fNpjxmUlr8= =vUGz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#832951: sollya: FTBFS: nondeterministic test failure
Package: sollya Version: 5.0+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Dear Sollya enthusiast, it appears that a test based on time, tests-lib/tget_element_in_list, has not (yet) been neutralized: be assured that it will ! Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages sollya depends on: ii libc6 2.19-18+deb8u4 ii libfplll0 4.0.4-2 ii libgcc1 1:4.9.2-10 ii libgmp102:6.1.0+dfsg-2 ii libmpfi01.5.1+ds-4 ii libmpfr43.1.2-2 ii libstdc++6 4.9.2-10 ii libxml2 2.9.1+dfsg1-5+deb8u2 Versions of packages sollya recommends: ii gnuplot 4.6.6-2 ii rlwrap 0.41-1 Versions of packages sollya suggests: ii libsollya-dev 5.0+ds-1 ii sollya-doc 5.0+ds-1 -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#831072: singular: FTBFS with GCC 6: segfault
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 retitle 831072 singular: FTBFS with GCC 6: segfault thanks Hello Folks, it appears that it is segfault bug. I could reproduced it the vanilla source ball by building with GCC compilers (6.1.1) and by forcing shared library at configure time: $ ./configure --enable-shared --disable-static Then, after processing `make', ./Singular/Singular emits a segfault. The GDB prints: GNU gdb (Debian 7.11.1-2) 7.11.1 Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu". Type "show configuration" for configuration details. For bug reporting instructions, please see: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>. Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>. For help, type "help". Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"... Reading symbols from ./Singular/Singular...done. [New LWP 7786] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by `./Singular/Singular'. Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 0x7fa9769a810d in idrec::get(char const*, int) () from /home/calculus/singular/unpacked/singular-4.0.3-11/Singular/.libs/libSingular-4.0.3.so Exporting dpkg-buildflags FLAGS, shows that the issue is emiited from line 104 of Singular/ipid.cc : l=IDLEV(h); where `idhdl h = this;' (line 94) and IDLEV is the macro `((a)->lev)' defined in Singular/ipid.h . Thanks, Jerome - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJXkgy7AAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLfa4gAKkOJfSVdtNLv3WUO5mfDFr3 /iaky+2BxHMEXt/s5/hURe0/6JbdP5I/Y2dIsuHXObTp8xt0WKIIVgIhF7BuJ53m vU4bOv4F/ByncstN+6fekXTTwI0xYi2EZwmhPCdAcz5Dn4Rx4gE7ixPynDOl5iJZ 6CWOBdlH+Cq6nqqHZun6cihol6FjKUiDWtRyvnuGqEopv05aEbtH3MZFECAHxi3j himoj9VOgGDOYZ2IW/Ro0mAPkZyay5KcBAY0NGen4kry0OlYV6OmG+N5ogV6IKFh o2ICpF7m5mbiagLF2XcjK03oZWLcCeS/EzG0YIIL1fd/Y7dJg6KxHvAJwSD04mW+ c8AGmqTeeeWxv7JnvU+MtixiVVjQPwkSs53K5EOMzJVT/6gtH/wUWTN/AtXn20te cbo8KXht/K1x+oFuq/ELpRWK8yvuzCJ9WT1vvkxE1bTm/8D8ABgmyDHIXQ6siUWk zFQtiWV9aRLpQjO4WWMRFx/UW3cg4uG0lnvirbxBK9nCKk6BrV5X5lh+98/bPvnd F+Ab51Rf+s50TLEN6Z2ju3yD5RCGPrBIY3MckiG8U2sglKfbfDwMxu+EAqWjESsb dYiby2h4FWWODUOK8N1JzLc0aMS9Gc6vX+IVLilCVKxfAzvCXJ5SZ54ZvUsTfZg/ oOGWcM0EkEsZGAgSOHonLOa+AbvdwOFfPAjm63u+MXGE3537Gteo9U6MmLfF8Yc6 HYpopsYMvxd4b57tRETc+d4KPTLqR/jjl4ObtxQ79nFjR1CnEIRuI+6P7593aJAw Dlo8nhzgIuitwysfd+vKbmPCjXk47NtN/cVi7qHfd93vYlUFaR+7Ey3KVqA4Emut W4lscFaR7PVjRYW+HPzR5zmUdB++ZIm21awlbCCgzqYq8MJb785jxdogbf6ekpC/ FiS1kk0PyWWQbFu7sOEkjwCtTfvr4+5XvIeDsh5U8oJJV8BgfDvMOfdi9lIKAg7P 13KCdLtqGn7XxaMvWHjVcpxfmd6V8MuSAfWdf/ywguIiEN0LoxAM7T4MzPufOLVs P1RhQioURYGVc73QD6lH0Q5y6uU4t2PjLr7CNRNIfhuD2HBXgmtkQAlr9luFbqXx TStcMNIr/yWkMz1QWNW8QJlWq3oRL34t7ipaCmkG/eQkXOOrLxYNFAoezNyB6FPd M2AFsHV9PDxUqkSsJZ9ciw6P1ZS7HUh3iP4W+DGZzGQh1NUVsVMHqXi1pqKVksyr gdXCF6Rucp1+jVNew/ncWw7sxZAXZl3EiNT9/uxvJvZ6ho/pl/07TXGXZsp1jFqM m+OkuG7Y4H2yAUUYaxuR6M8KNQ7CWFRjEWvTBbJEbElIeBOUu17qaoRDsMpMZCU= =z9wv -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: blitz++ is marked for autoremoval from testing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Andreas, On 20/07/16 10:33, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi folks, > > is there anybody who wants to take care for blitz++. If still applicable, I am ready to take care of it: can you orphan it ? Christophe and I > are listed as Uploaders. While I think Christophe is not active any > more (Christophe, please correct me if I'm wrong) I for myself had never > any specific interest in this package. It simply came to me and I do > not have free time cycles to care any more. The only reverse depencency > is odin (maintainers in CC). > > If somebody might provide a patch I might consider applying it - but I > hereby confirm that this package has very low priority for me. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. Cheers, Jerome > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 04:39:08AM +, Debian testing autoremoval watch > wrote: >> blitz++ 1:0.10-3.3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-07-29 >> >> It is affected by these RC bugs: >> 811923: blitz++: blitz++: FTBFS with GCC 6: invalid preprocessing directive >> #! >> >> >> -- >> debian-science-maintainers mailing list >> debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers >> > - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJXj02ZAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLwBcgAMVpBp7ADFFs8Nn95Qxovcqw We2hiMt22o5Ahg179D3NubrvvF0R97h8tn0OaUQfy+fScMWx7V0snRJHAVaSxego RajEghAELX6m5R5Cwel3tElMiTgN+9HFSvPeYw2MjpSSYflhb3Fb0NVL4p58EoS1 t1+ifoo43Z34LyFH1mfS7d/GbqxnnCJfjwnqQdd7yo8UJopMN/UWhijtvh7/mO1z 8+L4m7AhQ80+NChskuqHEn4sNozOVmWwruw4KPPxvm88WNZ94DmRa1RrrhANHtni 2HCdO822oiHqlFtzX9zpzasE6X8r+BVLPqw4oj92n97KNfLjQ7rJ2uhsVzS+HYVK AvoO4P/jvGaUZMeAMc5wUVEE064xcgou6gRT3h3DQohDh1RWMgXE9hJrT942q/3F OoZTK7dJaDAt6PjlBfmMvaixJiYASFnzFX0PJwpx+0LvqI5qtwQ5nA/enqjEOzc6 PqK1A2/kUyVwa8GLrZ4a2kbPWMF/2IxqqgknFM5iKpUnTvzObtKwI5iCXdIjNgUJ /o7Y3FTKUzcBnEgpenLHuwpV2cViM1eH2z62I0EMAWnqnMnGO7KXBkbIcubw46cb JktL7rGXjtvO/vy4ztSuoLVZQ/H60LFnz0vb72m8BIZIfd2soTOFSf1XkY3qpzj0 MoWtzhj9mAEPI/P4TTWOUc2qtcy8Sj4N7GSVSmwpunHoRucRXd8UkjCaF56ZkZcK xEilIlPMCt6FnliTnLNQj7qExz0VjLzOOgYlgVVk43l4Amr/H7q4ObcUsThkKMCG qZpcBhoTc5kUjMm2S8KAJew7mPzyBcQzGiu01S9yfc7S3Bwz9juKRx+jJsYVjCFO HW6moG/1Z92F74anXi4DxIyVvWpuaR+tPENMirIG5U5G4IDQCjnkfKLUEjOgEahh g+wDdaMaeVgu3/xc83jfLXattnnIwJxI/cxup5Z2mNdCAWTpERRhDd4o7DBFY+ao 8o2Mi3vdfWs0oMldIbXMYbCxFM6uu+lrGALNuhNgPO8pc3yYZ8qWmDC2IRVIn5FB R8SLuRgIp1qYQUH/MGCvBR8MJU70jI86zBrtx/Ud5JbzcFgi3YFlfFY5QiiO4pTz 7vVjmq961SGrjaZXNSZpPpI1vmyjb2UE0KSzD+uzjpsVPh43L8LckuW2SV2tdvh+ mJ7Y7yU+OoRFPttZnba3IVgqH+682zq274v2YHfk48kLtAp655ejFCg3HXKd53yk C8Qr00Lnq3nVCulJNRu6Q3xc9HdB/621cjwD6CkGycJbbfyPSZuVbeFHSiGacGW2 YCPtnL/RHxTYWCTYTuyjoYpe7VHbv/VamFRqLmc83YzF705PGBYewJZuE8ICghc= =7tNW -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#830301: geomview: please provide PDF document uncompressed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, On 08/07/16 01:45, Jerome Benoit wrote: > Package: geomview > Version: 1.9.5-1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > it appears that the PDF documents are gzip compressed: > as such they are accessible from The Geometric Center of course you got it: you must read: (...) they are NOT accessible from (...) > because it looks for ungzipped PDF documents. Note that > each PDF document might be compressed internally rather > than externally. > > hth, > Jerome Jerome > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: Jessie* > APT prefers stable > APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) > > Versions of packages geomview depends on: > ii dpkg 1.18.3 > ii install-info 5.2.0.dfsg.1-6 > ii libc6 2.19-18+deb8u4 > ii libgcc1 1:4.9.2-10 > ii libgeomview-1.9.5 1.9.5-1 > ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 10.3.2-1+deb8u1 > ii libglu1-mesa [libglu1]9.0.0-2 > ii libice6 2:1.0.9-1+b1 > ii libsm62:1.2.2-1+b1 > ii libstdc++64.9.2-10 > ii libx11-6 2:1.6.2-3 > ii libxext6 2:1.3.3-1 > ii libxm42.3.4-6+deb8u1 > ii libxmu6 2:1.1.2-1 > ii libxt61:1.1.4-1+b1 > > Versions of packages geomview recommends: > ii evince-gtk [pdf-viewer] 3.14.1-2+deb8u1 > ii mupdf [pdf-viewer] 1.5-1+b2 > ii zathura [pdf-viewer] 0.3.1-2 > > geomview suggests no packages. > > -- no debconf information > - -- Jerome BENOIT, Ph.D. | jgmbenoit-at+rezozer*dot_net http://www.rezozer.net/ - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJXfxN2AAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLslwgAIJUZYm/gK08NRcaoOUjfNVK eAi3WcgMveM1Rtnc6PcUyKzi9+2BaKpqiYCXmvpJyXXM7qSd7V/rkB0EWXnezgJD jw0Z9c5TIo8pfnQzKifNIm9hZOdZvZqSMml2eKrYOxKeHSHeDOLOozW5x3ha/2uK Q05TnbmDlEJyUxu0xNDh1QsyvGYMIecvsNymQpVSDIgXW+pEylJpDRV335GgxnL/ 0FwRai1hKGUwKEVR01U5wBol4BR/vlNQqtm+++V82kkAE1KD/olZR/edyvG8FkxE BgOaQi185GsozQDPiSwjMifyevXk1wdSv1xpFfJIvXa5FwsTeIY2qsDv70IexWuN r/C5hiremIy5S5aIz8qUz1XDFLI43ccHZ08OBfA960IayAUr+ktzV6w+xoWywztw vlC4llOg6BDNH1fWyIQQ4XdFPDEoKstNfLIUjzMiQhgBCCKgsFVdLjrdBmPFJTwH 4J0g0tP9eKEznOVFLJqAZaE4Qq1S2kRZ/7No1d1P9wWa262DO8NWFPwezHiBPcsa E37ddqmssDUEWB/3yp28wSDO2149ZMvLy//Dg32Xb1kjTmv5dtNwKajAofYix8d7 XnszYGf/kR/x3lha5EOv7NxBMC2vTk1LxS2JOUYOgIGSZ3AF1x48ikfOeohmE5ZC buPkwea9h727aIeT/zhLXObdoIgAo7RhpLxshrk/7bcr8kGS5cy74auzRKVNsb5R xyGk6XOrsCf7db4ex4gVQxIqft1WB+PipLhEWoHc0DJ3VpghZlEY/QZmQ1J+BL75 pJjAsN8VhWVcoOorJvEFt2Wwe8oXMriyAd8KXinxzqJfRxCDG/ww/MZD1RMnfKWx Oh+JtKpG/NVB5Si2OFZd9UYXp/IhQklEXtWN8oMwLNJAf9f/f5echtfin9tUtahe 9X0jcLyclL/4CMb2Oh1cV2fO3Mr4TDjmtA2E9+EW/ZaXIxmmnauRt0HgG4O16Ky/ WP47PIzAuylF3qa18AABoQkfs8ch0p8xuehyrtuzJ4ii5Ihil9bx5UiCliRaORV4 BLkG6XwXsRPNagGJjv7UMCjw6J8nazsDa2Rsuak47GDybH6vmD8dJDgAG6I0y57Y 8OlrjTMUDJiHTLqwJtjjYbFvHujHRV0Jm32ma3kFl0HDMnTcIuSdfwBJ5+v5TrlR Ldm2lYlLyxYXuYbw8lNcSJX45afG/fyK2LVRoKgqhBQHJCKJW86peRkQ7sjKHa9Q x0HYs9IjOvFI5a3Vpg3q3BMG/Pw8n7aK+zq+zFUA77cnVz6fg0nwUX87KA5Wf3VA D4noP92cNkcJTMuQePgOzMP6b+vbGiutJDv0fXeoIMpkVHJxjF4c4evCXOCOpoQ= =3rEC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#830301: geomview: please provide PDF document uncompressed
Package: geomview Version: 1.9.5-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, it appears that the PDF documents are gzip compressed: as such they are accessible from The Geometric Center because it looks for ungzipped PDF documents. Note that each PDF document might be compressed internally rather than externally. hth, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages geomview depends on: ii dpkg 1.18.3 ii install-info 5.2.0.dfsg.1-6 ii libc6 2.19-18+deb8u4 ii libgcc1 1:4.9.2-10 ii libgeomview-1.9.5 1.9.5-1 ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 10.3.2-1+deb8u1 ii libglu1-mesa [libglu1]9.0.0-2 ii libice6 2:1.0.9-1+b1 ii libsm62:1.2.2-1+b1 ii libstdc++64.9.2-10 ii libx11-6 2:1.6.2-3 ii libxext6 2:1.3.3-1 ii libxm42.3.4-6+deb8u1 ii libxmu6 2:1.1.2-1 ii libxt61:1.1.4-1+b1 Versions of packages geomview recommends: ii evince-gtk [pdf-viewer] 3.14.1-2+deb8u1 ii mupdf [pdf-viewer] 1.5-1+b2 ii zathura [pdf-viewer] 0.3.1-2 geomview suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: Bug#830206: libmpfi-dev: undefined symbol: mpfi_is_strictly_neg_default
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Ximin, thanks for your report. On 07/07/16 12:10, Ximin Luo wrote: > Package: libmpfi-dev > Version: 1.5.1+ds-4 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > When trying to compile Sage 7.1 as described in > > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Sage > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/sagemath.git/ > > Sage compiles successfully but the resulting binary crashes when I try to run > it, with an error related to cython dynamic library loading: > > cd ../.. && sage-logger './sage --docbuild --no-pdf-links all html ' > logs/dochtml.log > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/runpy.py", line 163, in _run_module_as_main > mod_name, _Error) > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/runpy.py", line 111, in _get_module_details > __import__(mod_name) # Do not catch exceptions initializing package > File > "/home/anonymous/.sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage_setup/docbuild/__init__.py", > line 22, in > import sage.all > File "/home/anonymous/.sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/all.py", > line 79, in > from sage.rings.all import * > File > "/home/anonymous/.sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/all.py", > line 50, in > from finite_rings.all import * > File > "/home/anonymous/.sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/finite_rings/all.py", > line 21, in > from finite_field_constructor import FiniteField > File > "/home/anonymous/.sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_constructor.py", > line 176, in > import sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_element as polynomial_element > File "sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx", line 53, in init > sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_element > (/home/anonymous/tmp/sage/sagemath/sage/src/build/cythonized/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.c:78933) > File > "/home/anonymous/.sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_ring.py", > line 148, in > import sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_element_generic as > polynomial_element_generic > File > "/home/anonymous/.sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element_generic.py", > line 1057, in > from sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_rational_flint import > Polynomial_rational_flint > File "sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_integer_dense_flint.pxd", line 7, in > init sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_rational_flint > (/home/anonymous/tmp/sage/sagemath/sage/src/build/cythonized/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.cpp:21576) > File "sage/rings/real_mpfi.pxd", line 11, in init > sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_integer_dense_flint > (/home/anonymous/tmp/sage/sagemath/sage/src/build/cythonized/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_integer_dense_flint.cpp:19473) > ImportError: > /home/anonymous/.sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/real_mpfi.so: > undefined symbol: mpfi_is_strictly_neg_default > > This function is present in the source code, but not in the compiled .so for > some reason. I will investigate further in the meantime, but any tips on this > would be appreciated. A script version is created on fly (see d/changelog and d/p/upstream-libtoolization-version_script.patch): mpfi_is_strictly_neg_default is not meant to be exported according is the sense it is not in the header. Is there any other missing symbol ? can you use an official symbol instead ? Thanks, Jerome > > Thanks! > > X > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: stretch/sid > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (300, 'unstable'), (200, > 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > > Versions of packages libmpfi-dev depends on: > ii dpkg1.18.9 > ii libgmp-dev 2:6.1.1+dfsg-1 > ii libmpfi-dev-common 1.5.1+ds-4 > ii libmpfi01.5.1+ds-4 > ii libmpfr-dev 3.1.4-2 > > libmpfi-dev recommends no packages. > > libmpfi-dev suggests no packages. > > -- no debconf information > - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP S
Bug#829742: dpkg-maintscript-helper fails to convert directory to symlink on upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Tobias, thanks for the report. On 05/07/16 18:46, Tobias Hansen wrote: > Source: mpfi > Version: 1.5.1+ds-4 > Severity: grave > Justification: prevents package upgrade > > Hi Jerome, > > When upgrading from version 1.5.1+ds-2, I get the following error: > > Preparing to unpack .../libmpfi-dev_1.5.1+ds-4_amd64.deb ... > dpkg-query: no packages found matching libmpfi-dev:amd64 > dpkg-query: package 'libmpfi-dev' is not installed > Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files, > and dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list their contents. > dpkg-maintscript-helper: error: directory '/usr/share/doc/libmpfi-dev' > contains files not owned by package libmpfi-dev:amd64, cannot switch to > symlink > dpkg: error processing archive > /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpfi-dev_1.5.1+ds-4_amd64.deb (--unpack): > subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 > Errors were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpfi-dev_1.5.1+ds-4_amd64.deb > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > > The directory contains the following files > > ls /usr/share/doc/libmpfi-dev > changelog.Debian.gz changelog.gz copyright Indeed the migration part of the story had been messed up for a while: a couple of fixes has been done to fix it. Tests via piuparts and the absence of any piuparts bugreport let me think that is now working with the current distributed versions: 1.5.1-1, 1.5.1-3, and 1.5.1+ds-4 . Your former version, according to the report is 1.5.1+ds-2, a buggy one that was for a short while in testing or unstable: my guess is that we can consider it as over. Otherwise, I am not sure if it is relevant to fix this very migration as it is quite unlikely while I am not sure how to reproduce it. Thanks, Jerome > > Best, > Tobias > - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJXe/+fAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaL1/4f/RVpaR7BW9zDMFWcfdmC4t/N z0JR87VQdLJvI4QEjRiCBuoI9h6FnzX+GQUrr/Efl2q0hUmzlfPif6nOLr0jCjNf Y6YnXyJuwLIYZTlTgVuFrgTph8cqwP0wb1l+6GDyn1XzuWttkclYuJDhoMreaFwp dKE7i0H48u9x2Spc2+5ouWtPKbDER4fVDeqhC9+szIjd2S09/zNe+t8/qiWg39Nz PtIk7CDCJ2fMQeoqZHithplVWfNvd9jq7ZXa4gOcYyq+faTHmIdsPaU6Dn1DNmzg QXiIbXJWJwvCMYOXxvhBo3XVUP7Mf+r6ecupeS3K4JoV77kSk51+pePCTAANoX98 400T9ohxzpOr+RIWMvEuTrc19bqEmDhw4Dg+e8V5lOMVDQTc6C5DnfJ5izgVMlSN n5T4KTFtiXYOX8tv+UwEjSnAYl3tLxDv4XslDwwgoBCV9Ttpm/4SlOmdM9yA+7Bh pyg72UpCkMPx8dO96GGMzOEPG6NkdKlKvbWU03sC7oegRKq3FzK6wU7Ltbr2GOkq sswptIjM/vfxrCRPvuyV/k4zii+K8eN6Xuoe/p+xLbNLzWjFzE3UThfrxKWjFftv zwT8ldFDNWApskmQgjnGTu8jMLmlpYy6osHdXbJS+qW+Caj3ZYXNBQEDlhvDpEkO 8uPn7sEu7lQnc3kT7QFP6NjXzGWYHbk7JdwB98Vg059XkAlMnWsIm75jrXvEMBJ3 MwzMccNr0OVgSn9oeIyMz3UR5aOr0/vcwQ9KIZJqBcIjNzRWqWZ+pAnMhavFsfaN P9RdoqigICNFdfMwPNjC9+wITELKUL+yDnB1Lk3z7iu71x9xhtiOA0YECaM8XSgS E0FklJzOf5M/RT9E5LC7alkcY5AeDsWwaKV7okDrx3ml/jSEiB/2lrAgZbYT/RkQ q4+zrDAZnar+qgQtNyiSYm264f0PN8ityWJNWOUc+IV9kcbdFshs5JDuw7x+NMOI 2OFsR43ZHZtQ24xwRt/nPOkLBrDE2uSvuFMvToOa3VsULXGRF1YnkK4JVZo76O2k C3usGatrHUDHqRhULAha+rhKsSEbTINK6wEUjTMj/b3qtsio0ewDRZ7sW4vDis0U ebhiJJjSXbjXAjKI4viq/OkGjugArBQ6w8lNOBpMwXolPYn/eJo5IBJZODaq+/Zj vrNWU3PxzqcdREW4gFRWA6Nd7oXhrPm4f/f3BiTDqMn5KpXZCqcGU1rewgyfIbtn YAB623J90kEwRFTVyvbUthwia/RBf2fIUXXrW8pKwtdnT/fFNAL/41/qoQgZFdkT KLtEOYK4BI21vn40NjQUosUuHUaMkcUHc+6U50nXf/u5sCOEy6yo9W7B5+TIO9Q= =LsnY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case
Hi, On 08/06/16 09:51, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > > >> i am maintaining many packages, which were maintained by Adam >> originally. But all of them are team-maintained (Debian Science), >> and this one is not. >> >> AFAIK Adam is not active in Debian last several years. From my >> point of view, it will not be too offensive, if evolver will be >> moved under the roof of Debian Science and you can be added as an >> uploader of this package. But we need a confirmation from Adam or >> MIA-team, I think. > > > last activity is around 2012 according to db.d.o >> Another option for the time being is that you are preparing a new >> upload, file a bug against evolver ("new version...") and the >> package will be NMUed after some time. > > > I second this option, together with the move on debian-science of the > package. > > in the meanwhile, according to quantz, the MIA process started some > time ago (on 2016-05-24), How can we get the current status of the process ? Thanks, Jerome so I guess you can start proposing patches > and open bugs, and then somebody will sponsor the work (after some > reasonable time), together with a move to science team. > > > thanks! > > Gianfranco > > > 2016-06-07 23:42 GMT+02:00 Jerome BENOIT > : >> Hello All, >> >> since a while I [0] have wanted to update the [surface] evolver >> package [1,2] because I used it a few years ego [and because I may >> use it a gain sooner or later]: I try to contact several times the >> current maintainer in view to get the package officially orphaned >> before any ITA submission. So far, I got no feed back. The package >> is clearly abandoned. Is there any Debian authority that have the >> permission to orphan it ? If not, what can be done ? >> >> Thanks, Jerome >> >> [0] >> https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calculus%40rezozer.net&buildd=1 >> >> [1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/e/evolver.html >> [2] http://facstaff.susqu.edu/brakke/evolver/evolver.html >> >> -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list >> debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: Bug#828717: gmp-ecm: 7.0 regresses on 32 bit platforms
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Thanks for your report. I believe that the upstream team is working on this issues. Whatever, I am forwarding your report to them. Cheers, Jerome On 27/06/16 07:33, Martin Pitt wrote: > Package: gmp-ecm > Version: 7.0.1+ds-2 > Severity: important > > Hello, > > Since version 7.0, gmp-ecm fails on i386 and armhf (the two 32 bit > architectures that Ubuntu runs tests on): > > http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/gmp-ecm/yakkety/i386/ > http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/gmp-ecm/yakkety/armhf/ > > 64 bit still works, like > > http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/gmp-ecm/yakkety/amd64 > http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/gmp-ecm/yakkety/ppc64el > > I haven't yet found out what to search for in the log [1] to see the > actual error. There is no "fail" in the upstream output, and all the > "error" hits that I checked are also present in the amd64 log, i. e. > they are expected error messages triggered by the tests. I hope you > have some more familiarity with the test output and know what to look > for. > > We don't run 32 bit tests on Debian, so this doesn't appear on > https://ci.debian.net/packages/g/gmp-ecm/. > > I'm setting severity "important" as this package may be a building > block for security mechanisms (even though nothing in Debian currently > uses it). > > Thanks, > > Martin > > [1] > https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-yakkety/yakkety/i386/g/gmp-ecm/20160623_084317@/log.gz > - -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJXcQ7EAAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLJW0f/3EYKF7E24a5p4MdiOGEKMpv W10rGQeVHUafZni52UyYzv+NBR4eyqD52ywMgGJtOU8Z4UBlf0EL8Nvowy5OmNJZ lEdBdGN4D8L040YtvdNiwco3RIEgjRMOuqqzwj5Fqw1ePxvKMGFjMtA9YYNkdS+U q1RJbZ4n9uw8tSGv0Cjr1gvlqHFcP/27DMQkjhBd3cKyB3BRotDXR2Ncsv76EefQ QVGHI8J1e4sQYjLwYZXy9hCMAPhKMqIhPiIVzJld7HJEKXRGUL9zd4mUcwEe8+P/ kANvmbwQvEMZK6tH7AFG/Anras9x8wnJ+XX+sv8NtZfMk8otMj9LPzFldw1nPD74 yCvxVN0PStlO351X2ux7cwYfuBG5+AI+4rPr//6XpP69xAaDyS7oAfgCT9HXr1vr M8du3qkgd6g7G4FFDuzpTxZqzdMjXb2kDqGXb51YnrYXtEspKnxLAUYsGmj4TTpD TIC4Kn7XEToSDOJBYkBw4t2hTgs+lw5iiJ3nKeUiV9NkWewL5XLKq2lE44lug9OT cWe75mMxyDeZ1Xn0asXjvZgogFK+j8wcJc5sK2IRdQmbPLyz1Rk6kREBMVmQn0BF DsqVg7eOsy5bZ7fwADPoQ4zQj2RhLwSSduJLYYUwueRfdgxcfgylKh5uXGoymP0Z LKRSHzTWN/exHRBrKx5IB+hm/DmIqugQ0TGW4J/9jKQRJd63NHl08lj1bGfVXCmi 7DLxK3UpyZA4Iddt5gavhxSCFzOwKmZgZuUG/BC7Ic3AotctJ+TUrjLhNb696Dxc 9hz9xTDhkHih2RuaWYhKa9T6weFpWQxsh5vOOZma7BQT2YpLlkD2kAcvBHoYv+IE MX6AW1kzVS5ak0JitdXfzDIzj6NTF3db833oZNoZB3LKu6/LtYKInBqIkn4b7089 Qb+fWgRVYSImL67St1mO8QUFRHfQc0XNGSOQJUgYLnNITxlDzQbUoc1E/gij3t3X g9FIMszBSzNiKUbxdzFnoVso9hC8pvTxQ2PKx2sX06o43mO2gWAh310VKhXoVU+2 SEMIP32jwS3SSymlo4HUjIdUHJklNkAoUqJz8aHsJafpNcrj8DdYSix5sAiZJf8T pHNfNa40+UkyzsMDBkmamSdZMtpyuAy3YVOQ5HmAXq0dbGd2iEktRiWTilrg6K91 uFdSmQi95y/vcZjn4Lo/F0diGkpLk8ZLP75qTRH82Zx8i1V65wyVs7QJqtr7lLrJ HyemZaWIN80vBmquBjVMcaZFp227YCYWeSSLuCKRICtvtaGoxmgQ6CXo1coZ3J+h 6I1SNhVBav4gKypw3cZhaZlUXbADMjGWAXmSl8/q36/9H42MXxzliyPvrgoMmxI= =NTYc -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Fwd: Bug#827509: ITP: sollya -- library for safe floating-point code development
Forwarded Message Subject: Bug#827509: ITP: sollya -- library for safe floating-point code development Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:06:02 + Resent-From: Jerome Benoit Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, w...@debian.org Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:02:32 +0100 From: Jerome Benoit Reply-To: Jerome Benoit , 827...@bugs.debian.org To: Debian Bug Tracking System Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: sollya Version : 5.0.0 Upstream Author : Christoph Lauter * URL : http://sollya.gforge.inria.fr/ * License : Cecill-C Programming Lang: C Description : library for safe floating-point code development Sollya is both a tool environment and a library for safe floating-point code development. It offers a convenient way to perform computations with multiple precision interval arithmetic. It is particularly targeted to the automatized implementation of mathematical floating-point libraries (libm). The Sollya library also opens to dynamical extension with bindings such as for Python and Sage. This package will be maintained on behalf of the Debian Science Team. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#827034: FTBFS: test failure on s390x architecture
Package: gmp-ecm Version: 7.0.1+ds-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear All, it appears that some test failures persist on the s390x architectecture when a shared library is built instead of a static one. Thanks, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages gmp-ecm depends on: ii libc6 2.19-18+deb8u4 ii libecm1 7.0.1+ds-1 ii libgmp10 2:6.1.0+dfsg-2 gmp-ecm recommends no packages. gmp-ecm suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case
Thanks for the reply. On 08/06/16 10:40, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > >> May I fill an ITA or something to signify that someone to working > >> the [surface] evolver package ? > > A bug with patches should be enough, ITA means somebody orphaning the package > and only the maintainer/MIA team can do it. > > But a bug with patches and you proposing the maintainership is something > that might be appreciated by the community Right now the package rocks. But the upstream version is (very) old, and the Debian package material clearly needs some refreshment. Is a patch really appropriate here ? May I rather wait for clear orphaning instead ? Jerome > > G. > -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case
Hi, On 08/06/16 09:51, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > > >> i am maintaining many packages, which were maintained by Adam >> originally. But all of them are team-maintained (Debian Science), >> and this one is not. >> >> AFAIK Adam is not active in Debian last several years. From my >> point of view, it will not be too offensive, if evolver will be >> moved under the roof of Debian Science and you can be added as an >> uploader of this package. But we need a confirmation from Adam or >> MIA-team, I think. > > > last activity is around 2012 according to db.d.o >> Another option for the time being is that you are preparing a new >> upload, file a bug against evolver ("new version...") and the >> package will be NMUed after some time. > > > I second this option, together with the move on debian-science of the > package. > > in the meanwhile, according to quantz, the MIA process started some > time ago (on 2016-05-24), so I guess you can start proposing patches > and open bugs, May I fill an ITA or something to signify that someone to working the [surface] evolver package ? and then somebody will sponsor the work (after some > reasonable time), together with a move to science team. > > > thanks! Cheers, Jerome > > Gianfranco > > > 2016-06-07 23:42 GMT+02:00 Jerome BENOIT > : >> Hello All, >> >> since a while I [0] have wanted to update the [surface] evolver >> package [1,2] because I used it a few years ego [and because I may >> use it a gain sooner or later]: I try to contact several times the >> current maintainer in view to get the package officially orphaned >> before any ITA submission. So far, I got no feed back. The package >> is clearly abandoned. Is there any Debian authority that have the >> permission to orphan it ? If not, what can be done ? >> >> Thanks, Jerome >> >> [0] >> https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calculus%40rezozer.net&buildd=1 >> >> [1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/e/evolver.html >> [2] http://facstaff.susqu.edu/brakke/evolver/evolver.html >> >> -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list >> debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case
Hello All, since a while I [0] have wanted to update the [surface] evolver package [1,2] because I used it a few years ego [and because I may use it a gain sooner or later]: I try to contact several times the current maintainer in view to get the package officially orphaned before any ITA submission. So far, I got no feed back. The package is clearly abandoned. Is there any Debian authority that have the permission to orphan it ? If not, what can be done ? Thanks, Jerome [0] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calculus%40rezozer.net&buildd=1 [1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/e/evolver.html [2] http://facstaff.susqu.edu/brakke/evolver/evolver.html -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#825462: FTBFS: build-arch failure
Source: scscp-imcce Version: 1.0.2+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Dear Folks, it appears that the newly introduced build-arch machinery fails because it also composes the documentation while it must not: this faulty behaviour is caused by the debian patch d/p/debianization-doc-texinfo.patch which should be discarded. Sorry for the noise, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#824134: [libtachyon-serial-0] OpenMPI in the description of libtachyon-serial
Dear Katsuhiko, thanks for your report. Jerome On 12/05/16 18:46, Katsuhiko Nishimra wrote: > Package: libtachyon-serial-0 > Version: 0.99~b6+dsx-4 > Severity: minor > Tags: patch > > Dear maintainer, > > I'm afraid that the description of this package is little bit wrong. > (OpenMPI in libtachyon-serial-0) > > Here I attach a patch to fix it. > I hope it helps you. > > Regards, > Katsuhiko > > > -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#806108: singular: FTBFS due to indep build failure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, I upgraded (again) because the then last package (4.0.3-p1+ds-1) was non-usable: working on this issue was then my highest priority. I thought that I could postpone this issue, but I was wrong (obviously). Whatever, I fixed by forcing a complete build. I am on my way to submit the new package *4.0.3-p1+ds-2). Cheers, Jerome On 29/04/16 10:36, Santiago Vila wrote: > severity 806108 important > thanks > > Hi. I *really* appreciate that you consider this has a greater severity > than "important", but I prefer to keep it important for two reasons: > > * I don't have the "blessing" (so to speak) from the release managers > to make these bugs RC yet. > > * If this is serious, all the other similar bugs should be serious too. > Here is the complete list of similar bugs: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=binary-indep;users=sanv...@debian.org > > > Well, those are my reasons, but of course if you insist that this must > be serious, go ahead. I promise that I will not downgrade it again, > otherwise it would be a very odd severity war indeed: Maintainer > raises severity and reporter downgrades it :-) > > Thanks. > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXI3s2AAoJEIC/w4IMSybj4FEIALt14ADF/mlQyyBashkqeRi+ DANq2IiGX98MkbXpZiZI6EJG1GBZJcifx+1Pqfk8ht8Vk+ZYqreCCymzR4ukw2dY 4Mia1+CqtrhgnQ3z3nbm5kmTXN13jDwinK9mawycvWYVOW6hlbaYw1XHqWO4WAfr a42bhLhqXVrIVN2OBe3NZfl/QImzRb1+H3B3ydyr71V1A7O0VLUC74qA4kvr81d2 +EJfkaHvzSgk7RYPqjuba5YgQzWMW7zMafOy1DMOqpWECcjoSwr8mXMkk1Q2qmno uAPriagKIpV+M2zBJN9XxReQlnTqjjP0Ni2Emdwk0PK2w2bTHKVVER9au5/x0Gc= =rWFS -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#819702: FTBFS: test failure on architectures mips, powerpc, s3990x, ...
Package: gmp-ecm Version: 7.0+ds-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) For the records: It appears that the new major version of gmp-ecm (version 7) failed the check stage on some exotic architectures. Thanks, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages gmp-ecm depends on: ii libc6 2.19-18+deb8u3 ii libecm1 7.0+ds-1 ii libgmp10 2:6.1.0+dfsg-2 gmp-ecm recommends no packages. gmp-ecm suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#819696: gmp-ecm: the library should not recommend an exact version of gmp-ecm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear Vincent, thanks for your report. On 01/04/16 01:17, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Source: gmp-ecm > Version: 6.4.4+ds-5 > Severity: normal > > One has for libecm0 6.4.4+ds-5: > > Recommends: gmp-ecm (= 6.4.4+ds-5) > > and for libecm1 7.0+ds-1: > > Recommends: gmp-ecm (= 7.0+ds-1) > > i.e. each time with an exact version. > > According to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819636#10 > this is a bad idea. > > BTW, is there any reason why one has a "Recommends"? This a good question. Actually I am asking myself the same question right now for an other packages. I guess I picked up the scheme from an other package. But now, I am realizing that it is not a good idea. I will remove this Recommends fields. Thanks, Jerome > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: stretch/sid > APT prefers unstable-debug > APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, > 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) > > -- no debconf information > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW/cbEAAoJEIC/w4IMSybj4z4IAMvLlgilGFvpMge94cfSGDcF PFCO9JsnQToDhc5ONKUWAfRWrM1HPxNL4LMkOILjkCpkeZ9S8ii51dURmPFzD+gz En8Tc9wAHnAxCm/KfF3cPP4NKIJYH7yqi70YnoqBZYbsIGo5VSW/Xc82j8w6Ii4V H30QObGuVb+pWg8h82CBm2m47lA8qFroX285PMVs6OGiE5ooxGtVzuoDeP4WGHX6 XOj/yfGTocPGbnmlYei8qD3guN7tQI4nytGJywbPnqvstDebrW+5f9AEiXWYz2Nv RXR+fyz7RNRbwueAuiOjSUDqrWRrF1FTAR+h0LafRvJ441xH4dNZGZ3rt8M87mg= =EBbK -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
sage: singular4: API or interpreter ?
Hello Forum: In the Debian wiki dedicated to Sage [1], we read: Singular 4.0.3 is now in Debian but unfortunately its API is completely incompatible from 3.1.7 and the latter is what Sage are using. This is very unfortunate indeed. On the other hand, on the Sage page dedicated to the Singular interface [2] we read: This interface is extremely flexible, since itโs exactly like typing into the Singular interpreter, and anything that works there should work here. Of course, I may quote the remaining: The interface offers three pieces of functionality: singular_console() - A function that dumps you into an interactive command-line Singular session. singular(expr, type='def') - Creation of a Singular object. This provides a Pythonic interface to Singular. For example, if f=singular(10), then f.factorize() returns the factorization of 10 computed using Singular. singular.eval(expr) - Evaluation of arbitrary Singular expressions, with the result returned as a string. Of course, there are polynomial rings and ideals in Sage as well (often based on a C-library interface to Singular). One can convert an object in the Singular interpreter interface to Sage by the method sage(). So I guess that what might cause troubles is the very last paragraph. Even so, my understanding is that the Singular library did not experience any big change. I also understand that the Debian package of Singular4 rationalize a bit the library dispatching, but these changes are transparent to autotools. What force us to stick to the old dead branch 3.1.7 ? Best wishes, Jerome [1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Sage [2] http://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/doc/reference/interfaces/sage/interfaces/singular.html -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#814970: FTBFS: libpng12.a: error adding symbols: Bad value collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear Maintainers: A bunch of packages are flagged for removal because they depend on libm4ri: do you plan to fix this minor before the dead line [20160401] ? Thanks, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW1iw+AAoJEIC/w4IMSybjRv0H/0jEEMXR4o+9ptHf3Bc9uzt7 6E97d6c0NEPn5oD0Jg9V1vsXZfHrDZ8hefVtG6Q8yBExOZVgnbqAr2HH+4XhGAjk YODS91rI7kVq+ldbIArBBooEIf8pnb1uDhRaJWxxRoJ/bFnuhLFlwGdvk0ALRK3C 2D4kkdxR0yA66qGJD3VbcesTI9Eyed+LPO7ahKQDmI2Jy9+B/t+iRPdbni8uk7uU ZMdXyvrd1XcP4MSp5N35zq3dDYsO2aF36q1U48nd1xno/e6/hZbm+hcVIoQGYYRg 7X4mB51fFurFyjoQIn+ehHxudBYW4U4mgTIX1yk5lSDR0W1uanLreuwwlu6yy08= =bk84 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Fwd: Bug#816242: RFS: gap-openmath/11.3.1+ds-1 [NEW VERSION] --OpenMath phrasebook for GAP
Forwarded Message Subject: Bug#816242: RFS: gap-openmath/11.3.1+ds-1 [NEW VERSION] --OpenMath phrasebook for GAP Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:03:02 + Resent-From: Jerome Benoit Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Mentors Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 03:01:01 +0100 From: Jerome Benoit Reply-To: Jerome Benoit , 816...@bugs.debian.org To: Debian Bug Tracking System Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors: I am looking for a sponsor to bring to Debian the latest version of gap-openmath [1], a package for the Computer Algebra System (CAS) GAP. Thanks in advance, Jerome [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/gap-openmath.git/ -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Fwd: Bug#815039: RFS: normaliz 3.1.0+ds-1 [New Upstream Version] -- math computing tools
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 - Forwarded Message Subject: Bug#815039: RFS: normaliz 3.1.0+ds-1 [New Upstream Version] -- math computing tools Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:45:02 + Resent-From: Jerome Benoit Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Mentors Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 06:40:20 +0100 From: Jerome Benoit Reply-To: Jerome Benoit , 815...@bugs.debian.org To: Debian Bug Tracking System Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors: I am looking for a sponsor for the normaliz package [1], a mathematical package used by Singular. This package brings to Debian the latest version of normaliz. Thanks in advance, Jerome [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/normaliz.git - -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWxxP4AAoJEIC/w4IMSybj+9EH/Au3aI37xp9JlkDJ9r9faqDb vQjLDR5JsUHdVOkCxBNWzeWfs9mxk4ww6xgGk8C1KrBEW7hfDKd7ZqqQ4+Y8GyEA qTHcwhNQmkGKYrr/iv5yCyyROmlcH20vmou2x478LJSkQ5iYTjgg81FYzZSFiHM6 Bc3lENVu+PooyqZihh02kipevYWlnqz03jjp96h7Y3RGyH884AN+puN4nBqCvOhL sL3cpebb7zD83cVJLrmkRBeXfDcB0h25LkqUV6Vgdv17HXS4e2UIi+Uta9P7gThO wcivjqszzmkU7mgUncuTF64UuubGpS8O+0A3OEBQUQdEzG2EdCH3d0FKyoZUqio= =cKEB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Fwd: RFS: gap-io/4.4.5+ds-1 [NEW VERSION] -- low level C library IO bindings for GAP
Forwarded Message Subject: RFS: gap-io/4.4.5+ds-1 [NEW VERSION] -- low level C library IO bindings for GAP Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 23:21:24 +0100 From: Jerome Benoit To: Debian Bug Tracking System Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors: I am looking for a sponsor for my Debian package gap-io, a GAP package that brings low level C function to GAP. This Debian package mainly brings the latest version to Debian. Thanks, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Fwd: Bug#810361: RFS: mpfrc++/3.6.3+ds-1 [new version] -- multi-precision floating point number class for C++
Forwarded Message Subject: Bug#810361: RFS: mpfrc++/3.6.3+ds-1 [new version] -- multi-precision floating point number class for C++ Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:24:02 + Resent-From: Jerome Benoit Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Mentors Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 15:22:11 +0100 From: Jerome Benoit Reply-To: Jerome Benoit , 810...@bugs.debian.org To: Debian Bug Tracking System Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors: I am looking for a sponsor for the package mpfrc++ [1] that I am maintaining on behalf of the Debian Science-Team. This package is an update with some refreshments. Thanks, Jerome [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/mpfrc++.git -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Fwd: Bug#808411: RFS: primesieve/5.6.0+ds-1 [new upstream release]
Forwarded Message Subject: Bug#808411: RFS: primesieve/5.6.0+ds-1 [new upstream release] Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 20:57:01 + Resent-From: Jerome Benoit Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Mentors Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 21:55:00 +0100 From: Jerome Benoit Reply-To: Jerome Benoit , 808...@bugs.debian.org To: Debian Bug Tracking System Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors: I am looking for a sponsor for the package primesieve [1] that I am maintaining on behalf of the Debian Science-Team. This version brings to Debian the lastest upstream version. Thanks, Jerome [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/primesieve.git -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#807829: 4ti2: please make the build reproducible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello All: On 13/12/15 16:49, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > Source: 4ti2 > Version: 1.6.7+ds-1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: timestamps locale > X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Hi! > > While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed > that 4ti2 could not be built reproducibly. > It embeds a locale- and timezone-dependent timestamp into the > documentation. Indeed. Sorry for forgetting the locale aspect of the time stamp. > > The attached patch fixes this by using the C locale and UTC for > generating the timestamp. I have just applied the patch to the git material. I will wait for more material for submitting the package. Best wishes, Jerome > > Regards, > Reiner > > [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWbZ8rAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjiMgIALnCSa5XuL9OMOGGiPuarODC 72SNHEYrZ3uU0+oIrKqRwb2KhOjdBGXbCTaUUXbdi+Qso/2UfvwpnWk3MCc5lEeM IBcUkozqhtEtKf6eOoknnv9D1QLXnA3dR1htNgOFykv6/iju6/w6ayJcgl9y99mk khBRW73hwLJGaK7td4Ub6uZri9v9Qlo/W9+fTernpf7GJ1l4CmetFcJiSDrkSGni akJu6oJ3+W+pdhxPSpF5nN821eELc5pswLnnq7MYMBZXf2F/8Xye3u8+YWMi4dUt roSfV+p5khON7LTTsfEbjuUr7WH71CjgtUHh2T4kQuNAk8ana4EU/IR2rFA60Fs= =XaGh -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-3_amd64.changes REJECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi: I have just deposited material at mentors.debian.net hth, Jerome On 03/12/15 23:33, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Hi: > > On 03/12/15 21:06, Graham Inggs wrote: >> On 3 December 2015 at 20:36, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >>> Stricto sensu, it is a Debian release: no need to upload the upstream >>> source material; >>> uploading the Debian source material is what is needed here. > >> See: >> https://wiki.debian.org/SourceOnlyUpload > >> dpkg-buildpackage -S -sa source is diff + dsc + orig > >> dpkg-buildpackage -S -sd source is diff + dsc only > > > > I think that the material is upload from the Alioth git material. > Second, by Debian source material, I meant the material in *.debian.tar > > > Jerome > - -- Jerome BENOIT, Ph.D. | jgmbenoit-at+rezozer*dot_net http://www.rezozer.net/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWYPhNAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjrJgH/ih7WnOQdKh5bptD209+KhAx cDg0k0nDsny60iQt6/Uy0hRUn7m78se3lFuv4nOFDPW6XeQjR9ZB23ctFQUW4kwd PqQUFAeQIvXTB/rRexb29QaG/FPzTJIq+PjwrArygv58CU18FXC1+30fwfcSJ2Ji wcuLcbIi+4a8S4tWqwRkrLvbxXZGzk+65HtoQwchhJzfRqao+EcPRRFjIllPinPP uhAzhlC3wfrToIRpCKh1YAPthTFJznWn5fHMcJgg4bRRNnIir8hpdc1A8iaPln4P 6zZrr/IAro38oTPDLibUY5dHjHEIbGEXtX6KhBB0/fODXhrW3Yddvf4pK6rtPWg= =avuN -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-3_amd64.changes REJECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi: On 03/12/15 21:06, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 3 December 2015 at 20:36, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> Stricto sensu, it is a Debian release: no need to upload the upstream source >> material; >> uploading the Debian source material is what is needed here. > > See: > https://wiki.debian.org/SourceOnlyUpload > > dpkg-buildpackage -S -sa source is diff + dsc + orig > > dpkg-buildpackage -S -sd source is diff + dsc only > I think that the material is upload from the Alioth git material. Second, by Debian source material, I meant the material in *.debian.tar Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWYMNNAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjmZUIAK6M4BbfXl7f1kbFZa+a0NFF crWx7x766IgIEM3AH1tzZQ78EcWW2q5ncTXrZo9jpSv2O0S7KlSHS+e16yTEeFwV riIaFYf99dUOqqRDNIPicAQ8G42f0xEyvW8HBBcSaxu4Mq+B6Rcm0ZkpUbqEM6g9 R/fBr9So8LC66yswE6nKcCKwJRwIUFdgUb6OT47tXZQW0tX/ySm9J29ZQm7Pw72v aaXXGU//9Q6w+1NWUcuo1S9d0T6ZVd2AOP90itYxq3+l8I9OqQF2Eldc2AiEEssJ F29iGQDIH9W7gwB1lBTr4MWa+NP9NkLmSdI5/+6LIPG4BiWRzT7GrxrhyZbSQW0= =X/W/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-3_amd64.changes REJECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello Graham: On 03/12/15 19:28, Graham Inggs wrote: > Hi Jerome > > On 3 December 2015 at 19:53, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> Please let me know what I may do to solve this issue. >> Thanks in advance, >> Jerome > > I don't think you need to do anything. > > Andreas just needs to do regenerate his orig.tar.xz from the > pristine-tar branch you fixed recently, or do a source-only upload. Stricto sensu, it is a Debian release: no need to upload the upstream source material; uploading the Debian source material is what is needed here. Thanks, Jerome > > Regards > Graham > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWYIueAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjhs4H/1Bdsb1a3Ae5FcN7RMHqzEtt lHCZrk6er36tkxVP/pswZyKdmNG0FJz7f59DVIARnDZcr8subPxine4y9s0kuqpV 7p8Ut+pPJFFHiYKmdlYLleyk5FI8oegidPQE0KIgDZ2RkVBM+5HK1BfF3q/vmQ9R TWSODt6JihLddAQAd2etQIamlyQtIybgzXqycpROx/RnVOlamfandB8CEk0LMX9U 06jUk6lMfGoJb2zVXrIklfmMkpVRiU4TT7FvH0EJiks45jfcrAOtEUa3k/1q+fEU zyrj4UYE0avS56wBSK0bGFJvQN0eFz2pfnbOH3B60C3cFSbOKgTtVXDqJ4ABHwk= =9fAZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-3_amd64.changes REJECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello All: Please let me know what I may do to solve this issue. Thanks in advance, Jerome On 02/12/15 11:21, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > > normaliz_3.0.0+ds-3.dsc: Invalid size hash for normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz: > According to the control file the size hash should be 496120, > but normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz has 497920. > > If you did not include normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz in your upload, a > different version > might already be known to the archive software. > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our > concerns. > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWYIG3AAoJEIC/w4IMSybjqlQH/RNfOCJZGvwMK5YeDI/6LtIW JHDNAk2XeKgBOr1Z8inTK0MIXT7p0SG+QyFrB9HkSW/k4FA8FSYWoN5XzwoZyP92 ieeWolUlCKZKbAOlQXQnaLnH0nvQ/pSf2ecEuz9FYdpGXVAbKyEf5HwQcNXQtWDO MR/fA2mQkwUblNLLW1fLAMkJSvfOfPmUqc7EtVSCq9ZLJxDqGjQv1cfVpCf4BlbT kds4B66NoIUYPEz3YXnQe3Kl3blXw1YSFB/LnUb+W/Tfo5AharYemu24woDYYTbs rqbiNbT9dshtTPFM/8UVAd450F5uMHBWZBJUhYYdDOnrtDvaJnXDscyYDCoV6Jo= =A9uf -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-3_amd64.changes REJECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello: On 02/12/15 11:21, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > > normaliz_3.0.0+ds-3.dsc: Invalid size hash for normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz: > According to the control file the size hash should be 496120, The already uploaded source ball has this size and the same sha256 hash as the one in the dsc file ( dd9b9202b52388c707e636f94644f892bf8d1f8581e27631fee9d48e1f03baba ) > but normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz has 497920. > > If you did not include normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz in your upload, a > different version > might already be known to the archive software. hth, Jerome > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our > concerns. > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWXxGaAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjlgsH/0a/tiE9gS1QUWDsgY981Ov1 bPwKVEjvt/zDuWGxNFy4CUo/R8mqmPWZPi3as8SY0PoR6Pp6vgLioFzNWf+EfBmF ARVHVFj/HG/ixBfONz0FV/4zyYuW9bYLzf4KJLTT9BNqmex8bziJFCBX70bU7ERs 25Ryh3/dVBRv7eAwQF7X9aJrIAMW3epOZMCjMBJYwfabATxH5/vVL2W2qHsvSZ7D sfwrEOWtMS1/UYaXbsWzXZgUV9HYqUaeUNUBoaXiQGP+sS3ZbNnfCc38SC5WuV0V I81UkAu72Wm+R9BT7d1GOdcedhKgc9NlZ24BdvLBrg9Qeo6DvBpIPBoRHpvGLlY= =qgIP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#806769: FTBS: failed test on mipsel architecture: random Bus error emitted from GOMP
Package: normaliz Version: 3.0.0+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hello Folks: On mipsel architecture, normaliz is subject to random `Bus error(s)' that are emitted from GOMP. A GDB backtrace typically reads: --8><-- [...] Starting program: /home/calculus/normaliz/normaliz-00/normaliz/_build/normaliz -h test-h/cut.in [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/mipsel-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". [New Thread 0x77913450 (LWP 24948)] [New Thread 0x77113450 (LWP 24949)] [New Thread 0x76913450 (LWP 24950)] Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error. [Switching to Thread 0x77113450 (LWP 24949)] 0x77b1ef60 in GOMP_loop_ull_dynamic_start () from /usr/lib/mipsel-linux-gnu/libgomp.so.1 #0 0x77b1ef60 in GOMP_loop_ull_dynamic_start () from /usr/lib/mipsel-linux-gnu/libgomp.so.1 #1 0x77b1ee7c in GOMP_loop_ull_dynamic_start () from /usr/lib/mipsel-linux-gnu/libgomp.so.1 Backtrace stopped: frame did not save the PC (gdb) --><8 For the record, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages normaliz depends on: ii normaliz-bin 3.0.0+ds-1 normaliz recommends no packages. Versions of packages normaliz suggests: ii singular 4.0.2-p2+ds-1 -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Fwd: Bug#806754: RFS: gmp-ecm/6.4.4+ds-5 [FTBFS fix]
Forwarded Message Subject: Bug#806754: RFS: gmp-ecm/6.4.4+ds-5 [FTBFS fix] Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:57:02 + Resent-From: Jerome Benoit Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Mentors Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 22:52:48 +0100 From: Jerome Benoit Reply-To: Jerome Benoit , 806...@bugs.debian.org To: Debian Bug Tracking System Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors: I am looking for a sponsor for the package gmp-ecm [1] that I am maintaining on behalf of the Debian Science-Team. This version fix the FTBFS issue #806619 that pointed that the gmp-ecm package did not honour the arch/indep built scheme: this release introduce a fully working arch/indep built scheme. Thanks in advance, Jerome [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/gmp-ecm.git -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Fwd: Bug#806389: RFS: jsurf-alggeo/0.3.0+ds-1 [new uptream release]
Forwarded Message Subject: Bug#806389: RFS: jsurf-alggeo/0.3.0+ds-1 [new uptream release] Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:51:02 + Resent-From: Jerome Benoit Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, Debian Mentors Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 23:48:29 +0100 From: Jerome Benoit Reply-To: Jerome Benoit , 806...@bugs.debian.org To: Debian Bug Tracking System Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentor: I am looking for a sponsor for my package jsurf-alggeo that I am maintaining on behalf of the Debian Science-Team. jsurf-alggeo is a java library dedicated to algebraic geometry: it basically renders real algebraic surfaces into PNG files [1]. Thanks, Jerome [1] https://packages.debian.org/sid/jsurf-alggeo [2] https://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jsurf-alggeo.html -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#806389: RFS: jsurf-alggeo/0.3.0+ds-1 [new uptream release]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentor: I am looking for a sponsor for my package jsurf-alggeo that I am maintaining on behalf of the Debian Science-Team. jsurf-alggeo is a java library dedicated to algebraic geometry: it basically renders real algebraic surfaces into PNG files [1]. Thanks, Jerome [1] https://packages.debian.org/sid/jsurf-alggeo [2] https://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jsurf-alggeo.html -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#806108: singular: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No such file or directory)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All: >>After checking that both "dpkg-buildpackage -A" and "dpkg-buildpackage -B" >>work properly, this package will be suitable to be uploaded in >>source-only form if you wish (you might want to try it). I would be very glad to render it suitable to be uploaded in source-only form, but singular appeared to be quite messy (and it is why singular have not been around since oldoldstable): 1] so far so good :); 2] part of the independent files are not yet packaged; 3] I am going step by step here. Thanks, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWVSBXAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjIWcH/RSNqoVRe6M+0EMFwKalYoYR pxycJ3KP8r4EEN1uLuxQYgA6ZGBmovW79/wenHlRedXmUVPRuTiXMQFhijE/4LuK NavAO7ntsfOXTvig7BsVMxjZ6m2BgzCl9+D/cCU4oz0tEwJ1vX27GiBTMvsLp0T+ rowirxdQfGxrKIJlZHjI5JwBjyTvXpcYsmjsYaq9F+G+UOjmWa4SsrMnQwYJ/sUs Eu81eBbfVdjTSbwbpmNoexsXvoj261fTwRGtg8ZweqGtu+sRZiijep4Iq89wcRdZ a9AEmt5JSDGdmhupFm5CK+E9+Py3k0pm0dQ6zstENPgKdjKFzka9IqgbGfEGwZI= =Gl/V -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Graham: On 22/11/15 08:27, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 22 November 2015 at 07:04, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> I have just done the dirty manoeuvre and some checks: >> it should be ok now. > > It looks OK to me. Shall I go ahead and upload? Yeas, please. Thanks in advance, Jerome > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWUXOnAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjI7YIAKIMpkvfQuOeW4rRF/KNFLN4 DuMl3YZotmqh/afxloKmdSiLWQNjS9JXl5x6qtQ6t0D8dy80V7DwZSnNUrNoY0J2 52TT7TQI04SCypRnwTfI1EJXooLS2cOxRrEyGWmkIInClKMwQTvwo0xhGQYWFLz2 lCa0ohDZzOa/PZYcgByEN/bkOAHPfPoE2tP73J6e8bX9r5sAEgWmUEaSFmY7D7N8 asoNplfcz7uB4AGOj9dNIuaVfs5mLaztFSdqK2QOx/jkHK2CJv18QxRjH+Or/9kJ wkxWU7tCj+7F12yUErv01pIqyUG5NPP5W82puFNn1+x0SIaeb0yGB05SJi5CZGU= =oxug -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Again: On 21/11/15 13:06, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 20 November 2015 at 14:06, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> It appears that the faulty one is the one in the archive, if it makes sense >> to say so. >> For a least two reasons: >> 1] ` ./debian/rules get-orig-source ' gives the one in the git; >> 2] the one in the archive is certainly derive from the git itself. >> >> Do I miss something here ? >> What is the best way to fix this ? > > I've just run your get-orig-source rule and ended up with a 3rd > version of the orig.tar.xz. > I guess re-compressing with uscan is not reproducible (yet?). It appeared that tar does not produced reproducible balls. > > So yes, the faulty one is in the archive. The uploader of your > package should have used 'pristine-tar checkout' instead of running > the get-orig-source rule. Ok. > > Unless there is something wrong with the version in the archive (have > you compared the files?), I suggest deleting > normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz.id and > normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz.delta from the pristine-tar branch and > running 'gbp import-orig' on the version that in the archive. > I have just done the dirty manoeuvre and some checks: it should be ok now. Thanks, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWUUzCAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjemsH/3CPochrA3FT/2zkaqiQfBlP KNPZneD3No2AkW/KY/c0uk0d/Dz+ylv8SV5lx/AVzO+bEyUbb+CRoVNq8vgTYybT gnyz4vW1mKoW+z2/Yg0GseBYghL95d9wf10svhNY55pRFBcJj2E5klp2JXCBPLmh oRrblGYUAYUoqBOo+uHGsjM8m0Iz4tF4kEw22WAnqs61WhqkRePUzg+JjTAkKn3v Ewy4Ko7S9waSCFBScLFLkBB6/oEZMftqYOkQkxv15eQkyCt0X0PkC6Iapkn/nJPx ibtNokV/FvhUpknYb5T9rqfFKlQsqZqb24PhpsLrOAM6RAyi4gAqmP5bk3o9MqM= =JP7t -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Forum: On 21/11/15 13:06, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 20 November 2015 at 14:06, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> It appears that the faulty one is the one in the archive, if it makes sense >> to say so. >> For a least two reasons: >> 1] ` ./debian/rules get-orig-source ' gives the one in the git; >> 2] the one in the archive is certainly derive from the git itself. >> >> Do I miss something here ? >> What is the best way to fix this ? > > I've just run your get-orig-source rule and ended up with a 3rd > version of the orig.tar.xz. > I guess re-compressing with uscan is not reproducible (yet?). On a porter (partch), I could reproduce this issue. I will try to figure out what is going on here because this sounds endless. > > So yes, the faulty one is in the archive. The uploader of your > package should have used 'pristine-tar checkout' instead of running > the get-orig-source rule. > > Unless there is something wrong with the version in the archive (have > you compared the files?), I suggest deleting > normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz.id and > normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz.delta from the pristine-tar branch and > running 'gbp import-orig' on the version that in the archive. > Thanks, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWUMHFAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjceMH/iWRCSkC5XhpgVJSEh6yHjsK 2axMTzHE6KWZn6tKPi77P4octjQTbhmFJNA18DLNBqIgtXTNhMDYgCVdU9DDoxu/ 7CHJcX6oFpyPugSVrx8LTwssBFYMVebooVsDLo3NlwC0cGUhf83IKNYtk7igN9Ha WlHTAx3kwoMltHeVU8W4gM0XalwtXlEGjvGV9TyP9yGkiw9MvwPig7ypNJgqC+Ov NwdXeA5G+OVpNfbQU1j3ivIHz/BpmwSuBJ1C9oAp7g3Bs0e91Qd3A61uiPSaQ2GY 0265ToqS8bR8MEiMlGY9H3O4ANN9nr+xf5UFpGv1T+94Z9jGzMSvPX+ZsGocUt4= =ci95 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello: On 20/11/15 10:31, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 20/11/2015 10:57, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 03:36:31AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >>> >>> Just to confirm that the original source (version 3.0.0+ds.orig) material >>> was not touched. >> >> I was just building from Git with pristine-tar. > > The problem is the orig.tar in the archive is different to what is in > pristine-tar. > > md5 checksum of normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz in the archive: > db20967299367a80546738ad2e82e436 > > md5 checksum of normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz in pristine-tar: > b9cd4813f1dec8ec86fdb160506d2385 > > It would be good to fix this in git before uploading again. > It appears that the faulty one is the one in the archive, if it makes sense to say so. For a least two reasons: 1] ` ./debian/rules get-orig-source ' gives the one in the git; 2] the one in the archive is certainly derive from the git itself. Do I miss something here ? What is the best way to fix this ? Thanks in advance, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWTwzTAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjKzgH/0lybKfwsJ9X9ZsMmYK2xm2c EjiQA5jXx9f85mNUogVnDoX2IbrcNluNPZtgoubqbUJBE2iYwl+Q0cqgzqHhAccM lw+fTt7te0ed4e0IWG0Ex0AJiVOJHHjcUtyIvZj1Y43W9JCFw4BMnD8BSNUT38Dk QE1+HvZKV9GFNHNNtpvr8WByVBxUVS15vHaHmWojEBfMkrhPBSXW11aAfZSnJQh3 ohiSP8nlOzK0dE7Pu8eahG03t6mRj5JpblXR3KiNWFd8FHgcMe9//N+tZQ7lbUaF NMelUm0hG9DkI/kGYWnnXRd9qRz6B6w8bzicrXnRLDKA8OefkvO8VkboskJA6AQ= =Ujzh -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Andreas: On 19/11/15 19:49, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz: Does not match file already existing in the > pool. > > Just to confirm that the original source (version 3.0.0+ds.orig) material was not touched. hth, Jerome > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our > concerns. > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWTocgAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjLKgH/0bHYNp8CN5cA6YL6o4D1ih2 TLgMv8PjOiGRAalVXk2aCJfI4pUMhTmKQQ9YOr/KQQwBxwa5M82tk2wHyAJ8TAOq juYXCkNxteNVa37nylq8GtgAh5VU/iE33Y9IH6PrJGxvqM230lgw+zTDwrNM4XEA iJMHSJg8FFP+3g/hFYbWUjFcygxlxzR/KttCtBphjRZCkiv/9WxrivM7wDxW00ZI AOzihjEq9rmSpnj5nlzu5b7ganfnZYyHnvmIdrnEkQEncoWtP8GVfDYlV+H3mBRr nEIAaM33mw1ypqPvcUlSIZXvQc6+gr1Ahxq993WyDe1IMTrjEsvqUcSoWOlEwGo= =owa8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: 4ti2_1.6.6+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Weird ! This package reached testing 11 days ago: https://packages.qa.debian.org/4/4ti2/news/20151108T163910Z.html Jerome On 19/11/15 08:48, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > > Version check failed: > Your upload included the source package 4ti2, version 1.6.6+ds-1, > however testing already has version 1.6.6+ds-1. > Uploads to unstable must have a higher version than present in testing. > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our > concerns. > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWTe7DAAoJEIC/w4IMSybj5HcH+wZ3HTaYKJLyH1bUVGi1akcV N0jMpTTOnmWqKk7PuPBXBjOvQuSUwSx+gFOvjc8Dr86ELOGrfnqiqbv1D0tkhosK DPETNGHTtfkBXEUdD0aafDtKiSxYgVcFiSgBuku6lX8JEyjMysDv9vOzuHVoQ/2K 19kZb7gsH+PluYYJqc83beZphmZ+xDt0DlWPI37FjfZI6fdJZ+9l1kom+6xMTXVK VeswDlFawPa6GRKzJRLX9RfxIb8YdfAXeTfMMabjqi4VvQzgR9lzjUvVJiWdv+kE ymXydkGYzusCDwWTQME/XCyaLjFb8dnnQc4wrwwGKBm+yXlZjLCUs1f+rqP95Ck= =uND7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#804981: jsurf-alggeo: failure of the make-TestJSurf autopkgtest test
Package: jsurf-alggeo Version: 0.2.0+ds-1 Severity: normal Hell Folks: It appears that the make-TestJSurf lacks a dependency. For the record, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages jsurf-alggeo depends on: ii antlr33.2-10 ii default-jre [java7-runtime] 2:1.7-52 ii libcommons-cli-java 1.2-3 ii libvecmath-java 1.5.2-5 ii openjdk-7-jre [java7-runtime] 7u85-2.6.1-6+deb8u1 ii openjdk-8-jre [java7-runtime] 8u66-b17-1~bpo8+1 ii oracle-java7-jdk [java7-runtime] 7u76 ii oracle-java8-jdk [java7-runtime] 8u40 jsurf-alggeo recommends no packages. Versions of packages jsurf-alggeo suggests: pn graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#804892: FTBFS: failed to build on powerpc architecture: __builtin_frame_address not fully supported
Package: singular Version: 4.0.2-p2+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hello Folks: singular failed some check (omalloc check, precisely) on the powerpc architecture because of a partial support of __builtin_frame_address on this architecture. For the record, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages singular depends on: ii singular-data 4.0.2-p2+ds-1 ii singular-modules 4.0.2-p2+ds-1 ii singular-ui 4.0.2-p2+ds-1 singular recommends no packages. singular suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#804742: FTBFS: failed to build on armel architecture: exception_ptr not suppored on armel
Package: normaliz Version: 3.0.0+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear All, normaliz failed to build on armel architecture because of a lack of support for exception_ptr on this architecture. For the record, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages normaliz depends on: ii normaliz-bin 3.0.0+ds-1 normaliz recommends no packages. Versions of packages normaliz suggests: ii singular 4.0.2-p2+ds-1 -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#804714: jsurf-alggeo: new upstream version
Package: jsurf-alggeo Version: 0.1.4+ds-1 Severity: wishlist Hello Folks: A new upstream version for jsurf-alggeo is available. For the record, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages jsurf-alggeo depends on: ii antlr33.2-10 ii default-jre [java7-runtime] 2:1.7-52 ii libcommons-cli-java 1.2-3 ii libvecmath-java 1.5.2-5 ii openjdk-7-jre [java7-runtime] 7u85-2.6.1-6+deb8u1 ii openjdk-8-jre [java7-runtime] 8u66-b17-1~bpo8+1 ii oracle-java7-jdk [java7-runtime] 7u76 ii oracle-java8-jdk [java7-runtime] 8u40 jsurf-alggeo recommends no packages. Versions of packages jsurf-alggeo suggests: pn graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#804408: gmp-ecm: constant failure of the make-longcheck autopkgtest test
Package: gmp-ecm Version: 6.4.4+ds-3 Severity: minor Hello Folks: It appears that autopkgtest is not yet ready to accept relatively long tests (3 hours does not seems that long for numerical tests perform with valgrind). Meanwhile, the crunchy test might be cooled down. For the record, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages gmp-ecm depends on: ii libc6 2.19-18+deb8u1 ii libecm0 6.4.4+ds-3 ii libgmp10 2:6.0.0+dfsg-6 gmp-ecm recommends no packages. gmp-ecm suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#804186: FTBFS: underterministic check
Package: singular Version: 4.0.2-p2+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear All, singular/omalloc check are undeterministic, what emits random FTBFS. For the record, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages singular depends on: ii singular-data 4.0.2-p2+ds-1 ii singular-modules 4.0.2-p2+ds-1 ii singular-ui 4.0.2-p2+ds-1 singular recommends no packages. singular suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#777073: Current version doesn't seem able to factor... 1 !
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Julien: The latest gmp-ecm package has finally reached testing: have you made any progress on this issue ? Do you think that we can close it ? Thanks, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWNbP8AAoJEIC/w4IMSybjVS0IAMbwO3zS5F0OYj+vHrTdGB5q s7Xpp/ZDTglYD8KQ61QZUzgzrlk1eTQXqUYw+qxCTbh5bNWqAeVKLVBFwN18i/6s kw7fJJeoaV0KjflGvsInnTt3P9LJEpQUm/FTYRxVNC8k5u5tEGtMq0Hzv2QZhQlf RWbEPX7tGhI7Wk7Y2+8//Ty64z7rLyD0LDoODnpznG6ZQWmdDrbBlB50mREwP0fx SrIerTZP0/va/xBjClG1kATAPs2YvQnifKxkrzKPkZvazwgJHLPHFCdHmd086Fsc lLXWJ3nCzEjL2JlP+vGiNevtSZcsglxXlpaIqZmb18gYNe4PhvH3mEVz3AoOrCI= =J46q -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#793012: gmp-ecm: FTBFS on mipsel: bad assembly?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello: Finally I could access to the mips and mipsel porter boxes and check the patched version of the package: everything is fine. Thanks to Jurica Stanojkovic. The patch has been brought to Alioth as is (modulo some comments). I will submit the new version for sponsorship soon. Thanks, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWJr+uAAoJEIC/w4IMSybj4BEIALr2myT9YP/2t/Z1J0Khzsjt T4fdKIbbKJ/f+Z0EvjGYRy4wREK+PyctyP0IeSxv809eohywkrfHhvaRVJvhwILP GOuNi9uWWcfheoXP1GVse8DjcZaFZAniqIji7yqeixSOyDuwL1iqWNajbFIXQDLV j6k3aWS8EQV3v4fn72l+dkg64ebFnkd91mFCo2EwatGSN6V5+WBG/tPuXrTA4GIz eFdKuMKlQg8YWYB73U657mIjwFu5nCddJnWpPldK08o95XvMSRJf1WPuxjDj2Fdl STE9/PVI5rpupDQOuBFyklKHAfIdPanuVGBaaUeIM16g8ADbHeV5yI5ErxQqjgs= =oubH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#800961: singular-ui: fails to upgrade squeeze -> wheezy -> jessie -> stretch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Andreas: I downgraded the severity from Serious to Important because the issue involves the package from the oldoldstable (squeeze) distribution while the package is not present in oldstable and stable. Thanks, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWEnqRAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjI+MH/3O7ZRjyzxbNiHxRphhmu/S0 y5HMXY5xz/H6zVMDRq3ELRQXkTOfksb0bfoKPYppyFtYr8Yr003P1InkMi54TGIs KPDqXg6fvU03V4/bJV/oc4/VjcAYHSlPxOupd/aR/yaGlwJ0+sgsBdEtA+i/WHH5 UYjmVbVIqMkfEuIU8f/eLKYktHwhYIOAnvU1xBCHDptea6llOHZVeEaXyxRGySBu ba/F/2EY24d434F1JvrdozPw3UDaSFXf4P/Wz59C+qjrEAJ+hQjemhlIubMtSdVh o9D/gCiHVLPiqLJa5XeouvgprbelcDD0/EumYsaOqEUvgXV9CtLv5+rJRffd1H0= =eHd0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: Bug#793998: apophenia: FTBFS: tests fail on certain architectures
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello: On 31/08/15 22:38, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > notfixed 793998 0.999b+ds3-3 > found 793998 0.999b+ds3-3 > thanks > > "Aaron M. Ucko" writes: > >> * distribution_tests fails on *i386 and ppc64el. >> * ../eg/test_updating fails on arm64, (traditional) powerpc, and s390x. > > These two tests are better now, thanks! Thanks ! > >> * s390x has one other failed test: ../eg/t_test_by_rows. > > This test continues to fail on s390x, though; please keep this bug open > until you've addressed it as well. I am on my way to fix it. To begin with, I asked an access to a s390x Debian porter. Thanks for your encouragements, Jerome > > Thanks! > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV5ObDAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjiJgH/jl+iO2bGa1etxghkCF+PA1F 8YOhs7zLon6UUS7bAPclY9a4IdE6Sb/dSUoxXljJ7PEMyd4qs1pdRYcDIRYq3HJv huCt4muGlgiyNchkLo4e840mSaxnth0E9KthO2xRZy7kxWGWTahjYEZieaZ2fGMK VGfeo/VFml84VZTVT+9bvJnqYDxceadljPRvcjEJoxVCCIaVSXqyU9fjC7NP1K2P vM8Un6ROGZrLaAFryVpfhoWhq/4Azxe/hjVWs16Grapeg6PJ3vBuOYtUsXI31Yrp 4Gg+bH8X70YgAOoKO/679UwGauFFNoUyUbZ1dBQMNc1EbW45IhtB2lJqg1yeUSg= =utxr -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#792850: gmp-ecm, libecm-dev: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Andreas: I have just installed piuparts 0.66 on my box in order to reproduce the issue: so far, I I have not succeeded to reproduced the issue. Please can you confirm the issue ? Or give the proper option to reproduce it ? Thanks in advance, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV3fblAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjBU8IAK99p+S0YZVoHZ0gc5Lu1jLp lDTVawB7razlDFFjrFh2+m6/ykbu5INgKyxyOe82JXTcI/5+CCQ4RRMaPPLTv6Zt n39/CCHVgmk0fBsUpapaiWKGmOIqkZpg7l8PEUpPRU9jleDh6laP8rBkcrLhB+5Y 4RSMgdlbcQ9nit1jyrc3KBrvOx/Gl+KO80XkIgAidpytLQ+/Y87DxxhJXWiR0nTQ oASA74dEHDW5OkZa0c4OFXdBH81NnuweBzdWE0Jc8h/+toXpb5pKdj3poL3aL4Sl cM1BhRdU+q1Ife82uimMNepHKvXA+tIRuzMajoevohjmm6KOscd0yQvvf+uE288= =Xu44 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#793012: gmp-ecm: FTBFS on mipsel: bad assembly?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jurica: thanks a lot for your material ! On 26/08/15 15:54, Jurica Stanojkovic wrote: > Hello, > > I was able to build package gmp-ecm_6.4.4+ds-2 with patch that is attached. > > First part of patch is taken from upstream (file longlong.h) > I had to add second part (file sp.h) in order to build package successfully. > Patch is attached. > > Alternatively, if following code for umul_ppm is used, instead of upstream > patch, > package also does build successfully. > #define umul_ppmm(w1, w0, u, v) \ >__asm__ ("multu %2,%3\n\tmflo %0\n\tmfhi %1" \ >: "=d" (w0), "=d" (w1) : "d" (u), "d" (v)) > I will try first the short version, namely the three above line. Thanks, Jerome > Thank you! > > Regards, > Jurica > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV3e8WAAoJEIC/w4IMSybj3oQH/0o+JsURtfTepyN2n3WzRmI0 k8ggwYatQ5nBFcfESNb0efJSY5n5b27VCtByvEXtZAMIQBvzapyR8Br1pWKH/t04 AR8yCyRoyk2IPML0ZL6Ga/tnWl5CKwGEu2wPVEvvtWJGYSBTf0M7YcqgKGICEheV WZrsWBrWsJBoVxJFgsN79xwnfSbURY1ZzoicO2mIlQeLaKbHz82EBdJUi2uB/b1L ZRhWwnXsVM1QBfJg/X0iWXecCu/q50ardpWYo2LYdYuNwykmv6PpPGiQolE/Q2dH AAWiFb41v+CEYA9PGTOX79u49TLB0ViOGKC79sMJ+ireUbZjqT7/Ty3jRTBNom4= =pmvu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#793012: gmp-ecm: FTBFS on mipsel: bad assembly?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Arturo: Have you made any progress ? Thanks, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV2QsmAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjxcQH/j96ha2fKrodVdu8E9MxMB7F bMdpC5SokKhRh+Eu6rZGioC59DecM8HkAPuuqiYsmazYe2mNFLpf2rseiTC3jb3V IdiTlxfV9XkpUHejE3is/HiM/NfDue+2CqwdTwhKDsCB7rRlVtREeIIuD9MwZjFp FHp8Ou6JJ8opwJVv0XkBOFbt0apy/78XpxLl45nMxzYdoTKuLwIBVRxCaHizkTyX /v+7uPGnvuSxnyREmqNeVZenWLK8Ssu1Qyccw8Lr0kqbpg3r0I6XpbRNy18tx6qF FNZTxpYWRpk0guRRyjyByh7DX5m5YCxMAybwDf1COqzdIdxAKW+OhvpRIO8Knd8= =6ipP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: Bug#793998: apophenia: FTBFS: tests fail on certain architectures
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Aaron, thanks for your bug report. On 30/07/15 19:10, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > found 793998 0.999e+ds-2 > notfixed 793998 0.999e+ds-2 > thanks > > These failures are still occurring, and may well indicate real problems, I am agree. > in which case ignoring them by disabling the tests tests were not disabled, but only extended tests, otherwise the it would build just well as the build failed on tests. would have been > inappropriate anyway. Could you please take another look? I will. Meanwhile I contacted the upstream maintainer who will have a look as well (after his vacation). Of course, you can also have a look. Thanks again, Jerome > > Thanks! > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVul0yAAoJEIC/w4IMSybj38AH/R9twUU1lq4J5GEXRzssYTXE d1MHjI5NFZDdcu/2x6ujSphVfzk+P4tGmlcDFSJoCH7Eh/DKNrNoEEAAQRMr0/xq cQa0/WiJwGD/Mt8K/hL/5jKXSoBvOVg+nNKUcI3/HOqCOiyes/BgewUWVgtlrQ7G ba9YG8EVXIgh2WXTz7WWFAysgkKsOlhJP/7A/nibVgSkqH3NjTRQbpLQh2FoPOtn 9eW2StTCKrQ63/5pgHpP1ylLNDes5lbCyCVz5g/EY7H4Q0I/WEuIqSD6rDret5BX CBGt/m0yawif4jiNICoIgNJmzyyXXnDxVSG73D3c3t2wFAXNlc270Z1cZEdGf2g= =MnhQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#793998: apophenia: FTBFS: tests fail on certain architectures
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Aaron, thanks for your bug report. On 30/07/15 19:10, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > found 793998 0.999e+ds-2 > notfixed 793998 0.999e+ds-2 > thanks > > These failures are still occurring, and may well indicate real problems, I am agree. > in which case ignoring them by disabling the tests tests were not disabled, but only extended tests, otherwise the it would build just well as the build failed on tests. would have been > inappropriate anyway. Could you please take another look? I will. Meanwhile I contacted the upstream maintainer who will have a look as well (after his vacation). Of course, you can also have a look. Thanks again, Jerome > > Thanks! > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVumIdAAoJEIC/w4IMSybj3xUH+QEI1rM87KxpXmI0JFEz2/Ik UzGDVitNEm9KUs/+FQJsDy9BrfehLjUqEqiTxh4rttPL2jHhtPjKHlnqQWdPivnm GnvWQ0KNJyHzExnHlfqC8zRDtKQ6Ixw+gf62SODEQcLd7lzubBHuivc2M+r1c7Jh MD1z/UuwvJ0KKOpgt6bLfCDOu5c84nbekiVHt6VlsqUhnuYimUWa9Su5eu2OFiGD 1UUlZFUDa0P6uLKwa/mljcu1RvnixQHEGmCTfg7NaFgnZ+MCDl2SxXYXRjqAnW/G bFnN6bmLbL65K9jjq8ZdLb9qJy3tXZGiDpl21dDpGa/iAZmcf3HW+zK/kA/+hTk= =AOjp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#792850: gmp-ecm, libecm-dev: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Andreas, thanks for your report. I am agree that there is an error here: I would save some space and at the end I get a bugreport. Poor me :-( Whatever. My point is that I am ready to fix it: the main issue right now is that I am blind to this error because my piuparts cannot detect it: I run piuparts version 0.64~bpo8+1 ((on my fresh Jessie box)) while your attached log was produced by the most recent version 0.65~201507160102~0.62-31728-gf6286b : in short, I feel stuck, not to say uncomfortable. It would be great it I could reproduce the issue on my own box before to try to fix it; I think. Thanks for your work, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVuDZSAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjMJ4H/jbMF8tjvtFWRhCRGQENGh5q vH5oTOP7/zs/hjw1xkbgGnzeq85f6cTpJrkIre1plLHGqGg8lwSxOGPHlNaKoySz M1zlNhNjFVhkxKOwfBDw2LpVFVxh7x/Mh7IX7AfFSQvdnR88umj2X+7TNylnri9G wPzTEghUmeYjoUAUnvDPIg57gmy2lhssahXgXFKMQYGn1rpwcn2qSkKatRsLuSeS ReBb769iYPIq3jN499D6nFoOVeukJhyeWRPpQZiPxqS2omzCMbJzXpmS8Y+IwXF6 hkKZjDyqvKnAwQQ6AWfKkIqNjyufzxkatR/+D1iiLb6WxOMZaGOSw/dnylVSWQM= =tztT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#793012: gmp-ecm: FTBFS on mipsel: bad assembly?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Arturo: Thanks for your remark. I noticed the issue but unfortunately assembly stuff is Chinese for me, so your fix will be welcome. Note that a bugreport about it was sent to Sage a while ago [1]. Looking forward, Jerome [1] http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17749 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVrPNMAAoJEIC/w4IMSybj7nkH/RRiRTW2QvpyqdM2gSU/cviz H3C2MfzmZ+3FA7yPhksOoCTXqI5R9jx65TrXI8GkeGXvTTqUXOglGcxbK7IybF/j IkODRNuymuw/LjHcYN16FeGkS9sg7D3Zczr/lB15OB5FXcuMOfPvgsLZaIJFZkfi kyJDk8cji/XsIYxQNpo5lt/Stlu+6GqR4al1h7hEthRqYEkpNHyuPBz0P+tsasTE dlw6W9JA6GvJJitKvGHvWKAvY7YPef4x5mN5wlFeW49y5HD2gvNIdI1H58J2pf71 bHI37+/Divv4JjnHvB79dfkdT2RxBlM2vbYP119e1cFYFns6ZYO1ys1EAhAqfHo= =+Qw/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#777772: apophenia: ftbfs with GCC-5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, finally a new upstream version has been released: the corresponding package has been push at Alioth, and sponsorship is on the way. The new upstream closes this bug. Jerome [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/apophenia.git -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVoPzYAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjKd8IAI+x1eUIIPC1AD/LqKGoPjl5 ZatneOBCu5rIQ4M4uY4iGjwGSP6lHC2zP5cFkLqrczceyj/7txSouZQFWYoLjauV 3BNyeCC0QTbV657d5lNG0S0o/avMT/WC3xJaBQ+yrDH0nBUfprmj8elZw31SUOUx mEaF3d+iWa3YohsdJxgBFsGfjiAqIWlBme8DvYi+kl1cij+4Ihxm8Oed6gLtmu1Z UHOIqN8GBC++bjmd2JYBDLKMp57mQdfTp8sIMLeoRC10USLoVluiZY/Eq9o6jGsR 8VxxZ4m5aKIO8Oqa3z5ali14K3OKEVdUfXIShp5Fq2HBmVHwCTvB+oDP7/z3CsQ= =+zlb -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#781566: COPYING2 contains some armchair licensing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, finally a new upstream version has been released: the corresponding package has been push at Alioth, and sponsorship is on the way. The new upstream closes this bug. Jerome [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/apophenia.git -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVoPzmAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjsk0H/0Whe4qzN4o8miM9oCfb0EQH udz439kh9YqLnn3PPV7eXuW76KfSaXy6PSu4Np9VHP64Hsn/tcRVv2PiocrJbNBI 32HOLE8k6/TglfVTj52obS1ZO/UKEnFwlE7zxMD/2up/OLUTKlDMO051izfKzmAV GwbQv9UjmwQLOkUGY4NOKR24NvuNaBfgzGNj0ihpbT1EDxrr3zwtygEF3yzXC9Pq rkTjyVX/Ez5GnDk9Qm7BJ8spPFsi22RsAoWAoSUK00pC4PBYiN9upS1HBw3CuTJh iYla0NNYmBb7XpMTgqq+53a2yQAHwOyD3qiMKe0EeLYfT4gWCf/ehnyn5QOl2kY= =EcmD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#781566: COPYING2 contains some armchair licensing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, please be patient, a new release version is on the grill. Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVm8gNAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjMZwH/iCgXYHVtFxvuqPzUIB2N6Lz SifwYY45dVjLdhaKbppCkzHBArHS4tEgT9j6XobT5ithWNMPFkoITcD5222un7Or iKIa59VRUwIfvUMOeDs4Ro7E9f22tbDU0HP+tQLwyqRIha1WK3DUEl16GD/K4uol Ztzx1oDHECnwCljz4t4/cJ2tbYdkJDY7kdDiW5dRk3p2MgzgWbtxjIAfGzGu9zb6 gikw67RO8cmXHThXpka7rLZ/Nsrd0reTjQjTS7aEb6hqhjTK1O2kW5Hst9016C7j nf4tPUkXTz1gsMgfolmbYBhi6EL695QzSlZPxi1Sv5Z2Or0zS442tqpcfNJ5hKo= =zfoa -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#790509: libmpfi-dev: transitional package uninstallable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Andreas, thanks for your report and your fix. On 30/06/15 00:38, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: libmpfi-dev > Version: 1.5.1+ds-1 > Severity: grave > Tags: sid > Justification: renders package unusable > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is no longer > installable in sid: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > libmpfi-dev : Depends: libmpfi0-dev (>= 1.5.1+ds-1) but it is not going to > be installed > > This is caused by the Conflicts in libmpfi0-dev: > > Package: libmpfi0-dev > Source: mpfi > Version: 1.5.1+ds-1 > Replaces: libmpfi-dev (<= 1.5.1-3) > Provides: libmpfi-dev > Depends: libmpfi0 (= 1.5.1+ds-1), libmpfi0-dev-common (= 1.5.1+ds-1), > libmpfr-dev, libgmp-dev > Conflicts: libmpfi-dev > Breaks: libmpfi-dev (<= 1.5.1-3) > > > The transitional package being uninstallable will prevent migration > to testing. Please don't drop the transitional package (because > upgrades won't automatically switch from a real package to a > virtual one) but drop the Conflicts for now. > For stretch+1 you can drop the transitional package and switch to > unversioned Breaks+Replaces (or Conflicts+Replaces) to ensure the > old transitional one gets removed upon upgrades. Let be specific. The current d/control metadata for libmpfi0-dev are: Package: libmpfi0-dev Provides: libmpfi-dev Section: libdevel Architecture: any Replaces: libmpfi-dev (<= 1.5.1-3) Breaks: libmpfi-dev (<= 1.5.1-3) Depends: libmpfi0 (= ${binary:Version}), libmpfi0-dev-common (= ${source:Version}), libmpfr-dev, libgmp-dev, ${misc:Depends} Conflicts: libmpfi-dev Multi-Arch: same Description: multiple precision floating-point interval computation library -- libdev [[LONG DESCRIPTION]] May I replace them by: Package: libmpfi0-dev Provides: libmpfi-dev Section: libdevel Architecture: any Replaces: libmpfi-dev (<= 1.5.1-3) Breaks: libmpfi-dev (<= 1.5.1-3) Depends: libmpfi0 (= ${binary:Version}), libmpfi0-dev-common (= ${source:Version}), libmpfr-dev, libgmp-dev, ${misc:Depends} Multi-Arch: same Description: multiple precision floating-point interval computation library -- libdev [[LONG DESCRIPTION]] Namely, removing the Conflicts: entry. > > > Cheers, > > Andreas > > PS: Is it really necessary to switch from an unversioned -dev package > to a versioned one? For consistency ? Best wishes, Jerome > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVkdUoAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjltsH/RWaOTW8Hy5q4YL100sUNnKY Q0spSuFleAtlizziWARSXGBD8qQQTVfmRvzkKLXy7oovQajr1U1w/j8RAJKqTkym ztSPgorbGhkWo/+Gd+M5llwmheEO4Jq9FLQZ15ZFibwHxK0AyPmZR2UjEjrgG41M nZUNdWUZBnLauCCAmBpQjWtLRl+HiumhhjAlTWVoeB8wk7awUvjgeM0QN39su5wS TKhP2T/mwm368OrYC6GISMybTpEC9j1YZDz6EMMdl//lRd2L3I5pz6j+wNm0Q2rf /YHGypFlzpdr1pH6mAF6djKc8qJLzV8tKv2U3qsLXN7Mthfz/zvcNMfnW5NJ+DI= =8uzq -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers