Comments regarding r-cran-emmeans_1.1.2-1_amd64.changes
Hi Andreas, I marked the package for accept, but this package seems to be a good candidate for GPL-2+ ... Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
orocos-bfl_0.8.0-1_combined.changes REJECTED
Hi Johannes, one of our trainees had a look at your package and found: * software last changed 9 years ago * pkg-config file in wrong directory * licence infos correct * some copyright holder missing from copyright file. example: orocos-bfl-0.8.0/src/pdf/linearanalyticconditionalgaussian.h: // Copyright (C) 2003 Klaas Gadeyne //Wim Meeussen //Tinne De Laet vs. Files: * Copyright: 2006-2009 Tinne De Laet 2001-2007 Klaas Gadeyne License: LGPL-2.1+ Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
cohomcalg_0.32+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Doug,
according to cohomCalg-0.32/manual/latex_source/manual.tex:
The lightbulb image used in the application logo was made by
\href{http://dragonartz.wordpress.com/}{DragonArt} and is used under the
\href{http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/}{Creative Commons
Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0} license.
there seems to be a DFSG problem with the logo.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: Comments regarding petsc_3.8.0+dfsg1-1exp1_amd64.changes
Hi Drew, thanks a lot for all the explanations. On Sun, 25 Feb 2018, Drew Parsons wrote: * executable-not-elf-or-script (37) matlab scripts. Not sure why upstream marks them as executable. I guess it's not needed, I can remove the executable flag. ok Also d/copyritgh is not full. I've found the following file: petsc-3.8.0/src/ksp/ksp/examples/tutorials/ex63.cxx, which is licensed under BSD-2-clause and copyrighted 2011 Sandia, but it is absent from d/copyright. Thanks, I'll update copyright. So I marked the package for accept now and please fix this with the next upload ... Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Comments regarding petsc_3.8.0+dfsg1-1exp1_amd64.changes
Hi Drew, one of our trainess had a look at your package and found the following stuff. He is nice and doesn't want to reject the package but just have your comments :-). Thanks! Thorsten Not lintian-clean: * package-has-unnecessary-activation-of-ldconfig-trigger (1) * csh-considered-harmful (1) * executable-not-elf-or-script (37) Format in d/copyright is in http, where https is prefered. I'm not sure whether it is possible to reproduce the following files (and whether is is required at all): - petsc-3.8.0/share/petsc/datafiles/matrices/ contain suspicious files in binary format. Quite possible related to some computational stuff, but i'm not sure. - petsc-3.8.0/share/petsc/datafiles/meshes/*.exo are in CDF format, which is rather a binary format. - petsc-3.8.0/share/petsc/datafiles/meshes/*.med are in HDF format, which is rather a binary format. - petsc-3.8.0/share/petsc/datafiles/meshes/*.cgns are in ADF format, which is rather a binary format for database storing. - petsc-3.8.0/share/petsc/datafiles/meshes/horse.ply.bz2 is an archived file, containing some binary data. - petsc-3.8.0/petsc/src/dm/impls/moab/examples/tests/input/ex3_in.h5m is a binary file in HDF format. Also d/copyritgh is not full. I've found the following file: petsc-3.8.0/src/ksp/ksp/examples/tutorials/ex63.cxx, which is licensed under BSD-2-clause and copyrighted 2011 Sandia, but it is absent from d/copyright. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
dolfin_2017.2.0.post0-1exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Drew, one of our trainees had a look at your package and found: * copyright file, while autogenerated and unreadable, incomplete. missing for example: test/unit/cpp/mesh/MeshColoring.cpp:// Copyright (C) 2016 Garth N. Wells Is there a reason why you manually added a debu package? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
node-shiny-server-client_1.0.0+gitf214eae+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Philip, please mention Joyent in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
console-bridge_0.4.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Jose, please mention google in your debian/copyright Thanks Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Comments regarding pyraf_2.1.14+dfsg-1_amd64.changes
Hi Ole, I marked your package for accept, but shouldn't that be better LGPL-2.1+ instead of only LGPL-2.1? Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
sasview_4.2.0~git20171031-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Drew, I am sorry, but as CC-Attribution-ShareAlike is not yet listed in /usr/share/common-licenses/ the full text should be in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
keras_2.1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Daniel, according to LICENSE, Microsoft is now copyright holder as well. Also Keras-2.1.1/docs/templates/applications.md mentions other licenses that possibly should appear in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
sasview_4.1.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Drew, please mention sasview-4.1.2/src/sas/sasgui/guiframe/images/report.png in your debian/copyright. While you are at it, please also take care of all those: E: sasview-doc: privacy-breach-uses-embedded-file usr/share/doc/sasview-doc/html/dev/api/modules.html You may use the libjs-mathjax package. (https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mat hjax/2.7.1/mathjax.js?config=tex-mml-am_chtml) E: sasview-doc: privacy-breach-uses-embedded-file usr/share/doc/sasview-doc/html/dev/api/src.html You may use the libjs-mathjax package. (https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax /2.7.1/mathjax.js?config=tex-mml-am_chtml) E: sasview-doc: privacy-breach-uses-embedded-file usr/share/doc/sasview-doc/html/dev/api/src.sas.html You may use the libjs-mathjax package. (https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mat hjax/2.7.1/mathjax.js?config=tex-mml-am_chtml) E: sasview-doc: privacy-breach-uses-embedded-file usr/share/doc/sasview-doc/html/dev/api/src.sas.sascalc.calculator.c_extensions.html You may use the libjs-mathjax package. (https://cd njs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.1/mathjax.js?config=tex-mml-am_chtml) (...) Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-recipes_0.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, almost perfect, but the clause "or (at your option) any later version" does not match the entry in DESCRIPTION. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Comments regarding r-cran-matching_4.9-2-1_amd64.changes
Hi Andreas, I marked your package for accept, but please have another look at Matching/src/scythematrix.* Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
cod-tools_2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andrius, please also mention at least cod-tools-2.0/src/externals/spglib/pyspglib/test/vasp.py cod-tools-2.0/src/externals/spglib/* in your debian/copyright. If you name a license as GPL-2, the text should not contain the clause: "or (at your option) any later version." Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: r-cran-drr_0.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: Fixed in new upload. great, ... and accepted. I remember times when this kind of minor issues were part of an "accepted" mail since you trusted the maintainer to fix the issue in the next issue. Was anything wrong with this approach? Nope, if you promise more in debian/copyright than the license (e.g GPL-3+ instead of GPL-3), you get a reject. If you promise less in debian/copyright (GPL-3 instead of GPL-3+) you get an email. Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Comments regarding slepc_3.8.1+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes
Hi Drew, I marked your package for accept, but there are some issues found by one of our trainees: * all html files include , which is reported by lintian * html files for sources are not regenerated * a lot of autogenerated interface files for c-to-fortran, not rebuilt Please take care of them in a later upload. Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-drr_0.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, please remove the term "or (at your option) any later version" from the GPL-3 license block. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-prodlim_1.6.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, please also mention Copyright 2007-2009 Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-rgenoud_5.7-12.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, according to DESCRIPTION the license is only GPL-3. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-drr_0.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, according to DESCRIPTION the license is only GPL-3. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-ddalpha_1.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, according to DESCRIPTION the license is only GPL-2. I also found files with LGPL being mentioned. Those should also appear in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
python-periodictable_1.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Drew, please mention periodictable-1.5.0/periodictable/cromermann.py in your debian/copyright. Please take also care of all those lintian errors: E: python-periodictable-doc: privacy-breach-uses-embedded-file Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
benchmark_1.3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Anton, according to AUTHORS: # This is the official list of benchmark authors for copyright purposes. So shouldn't that list appear in your debian/copyright? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-aer_1.2-5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
as requested by private email ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
python-bumps_0.7.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Drew, please mention the files that are licensed under GPL and Expat and take care of all those lintian errors. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Comments regarding gmsh_3.0.5+dfsg1-1_ppc64el.changes
Hi Anton, I marked the package for accept, but please take care of: W: gmsh source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique (paragraph at line 221) W: gmsh source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-2+ (paragraph at line 97) W: gmsh source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright lgpl-2.1 (paragraph at line 125) W: gmsh source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-2 (paragraph at line 117) Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
statsmodels_0.8.0-4_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Diane, please also mention at least Erik Tollerud, Chris Wanstrath and Stefan van der Walt in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: cohomcalg_0.31d+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Doug, On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Doug Torrance wrote: This package was rejected from NEW several months ago for the same reason, and I thought I'd fixed it prior to the re-upload, but maybe not. :) hmm, before this passes out of my mind again, please reupload and ping me. Is there anything else that needs to be done? No, I am afraid not :-). Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
cohomcalg_0.31d+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Doug,
according to manual.tex:
The lightbulb image used in the application logo was made by
\href{http://dragonartz.wordpress.com/}{DragonArt} and is
used under the
\href{http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/}{Creative Commons
Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0} license.
Shouldn't that be mentioned in your debian/copyright?
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
python-bayespy_0.5.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, at least bayespy-0.5.6/bayespy/inference/vmp/nodes/logistic.py should be also mentioned in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-aer_1.2-5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, I am going to reject this package now .. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-miniui_0.1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Leopold, the license block still contains the "or (at your option) any later version"-clause. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-v8_1.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Leopold, V8/inst/doc/v8_intro.html doesn't really look like the preferred form for modifications. So please ask upstream for the real source of this file. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-shinyjs_0.9-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Leoppold, please mention Cory LaViska in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-miniui_0.1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Leopold, if your package is licensed under GPL-3, you should not use the GPL-3+ template in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
libmseed_2.19.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Pierre, please mention the license/copyright holder of libmseed-2.19.2/genutils.c in your debian/copyright. Please don't forget the information at the end of that file. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
sundials_2.7.0+dfsg-1~1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Dima, as I didn't find the depedency mpi-default-run in the archive, I assume that this is a typo. Please reupload the package if I missed it somewhere ... Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
cvxopt_1.1.8+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, please add SIL OFL 1.1 to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-survey_3.31-5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
as requested by email ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
cohomcalg_0.31d+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Doug,
according to cohomCalg-0.31d/manual/latex_source/manual.tex:
The lightbulb image used in the application logo was made by
\href{http://dragonartz.wordpress.com/}{DragonArt} and is used
under the \href{http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/}
{Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0} license.
Which is not compatible with DFSG.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-survey_3.31-5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, according to the file header survey/R/olr.R is GPL-2 and missing in your debian/copyright. >From the policy " ... a verbatim copy of its copyright information ..." does not match with "... for simplicity reasons ...", so that should be GPL-2+ and not GPL-3. All rda files are without description. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-aer_1.2-5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, those should be mentioned: Copyright (C) 2016 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Copyright M. P. Wand 1997-2009 Here we also have the simplicity- and data-description-problem. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
debian-science_1.6_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, the dependency astro-virtualobservatory does not seem to be available in the archive yet. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
gtkdataboxmm_0.9.4-4_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, according to COPYING and the file headers, the license seems to be LGPL-2.1+ now. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
sagenb_0.13+ds1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please mention sagenb-0.13/sagenb/testing/selenium/selenium.py in your debian/coypright. As sagenb/data/jquery/plugins/extendedclick/* just talks about GPL without any version, one can assume GPL-1+. Looking at the date of publishing, it might be reduced to GPL-3+. Mentioning this would be at least better than ignoring GPL at all. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
maxima-sage_5.35.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please mention maxima-5.35.1/interfaces/emacs/imaxima/breqn097a/* in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
sagenb-export_2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, in case the license is GPL-3, your License block should not contain "or (at your option) any later version.". This doesn't seem to match. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
cvxopt_1.1.8+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, please mention Expat and SIL for files in cvxopt-1.1.8/doc/source/.themes/* in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
lua-torch-trepl_0~20160613-g06128f9-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention readline.c in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Comments regarding urdfdom_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes
Hi Jose, I marked your package for accept, but please mention Google as gtest author in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-mi_1.0-3_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Joost, please take care of the FIXME in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-sem_3.1.7-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Joost, some files are licensed under GPL-3+, so the GPL-2+ in your debian/copyright doesn't seem to be correct. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
lua-torch-xlua_0~20160617-g0dd5f4c-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. The license of OptionParser.lua and init.lua doesn't seem to be BSD3, so please mention them in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
lua-torch-sys_0~20160415-g8d2b8fa-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
This is number 3) Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Comments regarding kido_0.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes
Hi Jose, I marked your package for accept, but you should extend your LGPL-2.1 license block from kido/lcpsolver/common.h to something like kido/lcpsolver/* Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Comments regarding lua-torch-sys_0~20160415-g8d2b8fa-1_amd64.changes
Hi, your package Depends: on lua-torch-paths, lua-torch-torch7 Do you want to upload them as well? Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
ignition-msgs_0.4.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Jose, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention ignition-msgs-0.4.0/doc/search.js in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
apertium-kaz-tat_0.2.1~r57554-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Kartik, please mention the LPPL of some tex stuff in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
apertium-hbs-mkd_0.1.0~r57554-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Kartik, please mention the LPPL of some tex stuff in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-corpcor_1.6.8-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Joost, according to NEWS the license of this package has been changed from GPL-2 to GPL-3+. Please update your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Comments regarding r-cran-semtools_0.4.12-2_amd64.changes
accepted, but with the same wish ... -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
apertium-hbs-mkd_0.1.0~r57554-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Kartik, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention the license of apertium-hbs-mkd-0.1.0~r57554/freerbmt2012/*.sty in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
apertium-id-ms_0.1.1~r57551-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Kartik, this package has the same missing-license-problem of some latex styles. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-spdep_0.6-4+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, for whatever reason the fileheader of R/bptest.sarlm.R does not match the entry in your debian/copyright. While you are at it, the copyright holder of R/lextrB.R (Daniel A. Griffith) and R/nb2mat.R (Martin Gubri) should be mentioned as well. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
ntl_9.9.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Sorry, but only the pointer to /usr/share/common-licenses is ok. Otherwise the complete license text needs to be in the license block. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
getfem++_5.0-1_ppc64el.changes REJECTED
Hi Anton, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Lots of files seems to be only available under LGPL-3+ now. Please mention them in your debian/copyright. While you are at it, please take also care of: W: getfem++ source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique (paragraph at line 39) W: getfem++ source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique (paragraph at line 75) W: getfem++ source: invalid-short-name-in-dep5-copyright bsd (paragraph at line 75) Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
ntl_9.9.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Julien, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention the license of ntl-9.9.0/src/GetTime0.c in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Comments regarding toulbar2_0.9.8-1_amd64.changes
Hi Thomas, I marked your package for accept, but please mention toulbar2/src/SimpleOpt.h in your debian/copyright as well. Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
clapack_3.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, please remove clapack-3.2.1-CMAKE/INSTALL/psfig.tex from a package that is intended for main: % Permission is granted for use and non-profit distribution of psfig/tex % providing that this notice be clearly maintained, but the right to % distribute any portion of psfig/tex for profit or as part of any commercial % product is specifically reserved for the author. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
python-escript_4.2.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Joel, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the license information of: doc/user/listings.cfg to your debian/copyright. Also there is no need to add the complete license text of the Apache license to your debian/copyright. As this license is available in /usr/share/common-licenses/, it is fine to just add a pointer to that file. For example: License: Apache-2.0 Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at . http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 . Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. . On Debian systems, the complete text of the Apache version 2.0 license can be found in "/usr/share/common-licenses/Apache-2.0". Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
calculix-cgx_2.10.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Wolfgang, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention the licenses of: CalculiX/cgx_2.10/netgen/ng_vol.cpp CalculiX/cgx_2.10/examples/dolfyn/cgx.patch CalculiX/cgx_2.10/src/trackball.c in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
hdf-compass_0.6.0b5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
as requested by email === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-spdep_0.5-92-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
same reason === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-spdep_0.6-4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, ok, one step further, but two questions remain: - "... in its entirety ...", not being a native speaker, but for me that sounds like you are only allowed to distribute the whole example code and are not allowed to use just parts of it - anyway, the main point is that you are only allowed to redistribute the code but have no permission to modify it, which is against DFSG 3. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
vmtk_1.3-3_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Mattia, at least vmtk-1.3/distribution/egg/windows_dll/*/msvcp110.dll doesn't seem to be distributable. So I am afraid they must be removed from the source tarball. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Comments regarding r-cran-spdep_0.5-92-1_amd64.changes
Hi Andreas, the issues about src/soigraph.c are not really solved. According to the file: * The subroutines TwoCirclesxx and SubVec are adapted for R and Double * precision coordinates by Nicholas Lewin-Koh, from Computational * Geometry in C, Joseph O'Rourke, Cambridge University Press * (1998), specifically from arm/arm.c. Copyright for those subroutines * remains his. As you can see, for example on Amazon, this book contains a paragraph: This book is in copyright. (...) no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. >From my point of view this does not look like that "This code may be freely redistributed" ... Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-spdep_0.5-88-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
as requested by email === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Comments regarding fcl_0.4.0-1_amd64.changes
Hi Jose, I marked your package for accept. Don't you want to mention the OSR foundation as copyright holder in your debian/copyright? Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Comments regarding dxflib_3.12.2-1_amd64.changes
Hi Alastair, I marked your package for accept, but please mention the GPL-2+ license of some files in your debian/copyright. While you are at it, there doesn't seem to exist "Files: test/*" in the source tarball and this: E: libdxflib3: symbols-file-contains-current-version-with-debian-revision on symbol _ZN10DL_WriterA10strReplaceEPccc@Base and 204 others might be bad. Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Comments regarding trilinos_12.4.2-1_amd64.changes
Hi Nico, I marked the package for accept, but please add the license of ./trilinos-12.4.2-Source/packages/stk/stk_classic/stk_percept/unit_tests/boost_python_getting_started1.cref to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
gazebo_7.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Jose, your debian/copyright looks a bit strange. You don't need to insert the complete text of the LGPL-license but can instead point to the corresponding file in /usr/share/common-licenses. You tried this for GPL-2 but the text of that license block contains "or (at your option) any later version.", so you should better name such a block GPL-2+. But as cmake/Ronn2Man.cmake is really just GPL-2 you need to add another license block without the "later version"-term. If you do this as well for your LGPL licenses, lintian won't complain anymore and you can remove the override. In case of a LGPL-2+ license block it is not sufficient to only mention "See '/usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2'", but you should also add the whole text from the fileheader of for example src/AtmosphereManager.cpp Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-arm_1.8-6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Daniel, as your R-package contains data files, please describe the contents in debian/README.source (the reasoning is explained in [1]). Please also take care of W: r-cran-arm source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-2+ (paragraph at line 16) Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: r-cran-glmnet_2.0-2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016, Daniel Pocock wrote: as your R-package contains data files, please describe the contents in debian/README.source (the reasoning is explained in [1]). Is it sufficient for me to include 1 line stating they are sample data files, or if something more verbose is required, can you give me an example? Oh, sorry, I forgot the example. Normally I point to the README.source of package r-cran-genabel.data. Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Comments regarding r-cran-lubridate_1.5.0-1_amd64.changes
Hi Daniel, I marked the package for accept, but please mention in your debian/coypright that lubridate/src/tparse.c is licensed under GPL-2+. Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-glmnet_2.0-2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Daniel, as your R-package contains data files, please describe the contents in debian/README.source (the reasoning is explained in [1]). Thanks! Thorsten [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/09/msg00332.html === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: python-pynlpl_0.7.7.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Maarten, On Sat, 13 Feb 2016, Maarten van Gompel wrote: Thanks for processing the package. If I understand correctly (it's my first package) this issue is only because of pynlpl/datatypes.py which subsumes MIT licensed code and I should just stick to the the GPLv3 for it as indicated in the file header? this is not really a problem but you might add in a comment that only parts of this file are licensed under MIT and the derived work is GPL-3. The other problem is that all file headers state that the license is GPL-3 but you write in your debian/copyright that it is GPL-3+. Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
petsc4py_3.6.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Drew, can you please take care of E: petsc4py source: source-is-missing docs/usrman/_static/jquery.js line length is 517 characters (>512) E: petsc4py source: source-is-missing docs/usrman/_static/underscore.js line length is 530 characters (>512) and mention the licenses of those files in your debian/copyright as well? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
python-pynlpl_0.7.7.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Maarten, according to the file header, the license is only GPL-3. So can you please adapt your debian/copyright? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
giella-core_0.1.1~r129227-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Kartik, please mention all files that are licensed under GPL-3+ and Apache-2 in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
python-escript_4.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Joel, unfortunately i have to reject your package. As the OSL-3 is not compatible with DFSG, this software is unsuitable for main. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Comments regarding apertium-dan_0.3.0~r65318-1_amd64.changes
Hi Kartik, can you please explain why these files are licensed under GPL-3+? If I remember correctly other apertium stuff is licensed under GPL-!? Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
openggsn_0.92-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Ruben, please mention the files under LGPL in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-markdown_0.7.7-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Joost, please take care of: E: r-cran-markdown: privacy-breach-uses-embedded-file usr/lib/R/site-library/markdown/resources/mathjax.html You may use libjs-mathjax package. (https://cdn.mathjax.org/mathjax/latest/mathjax.js?config=tex-ams-mml_htmlormml) Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
shark_3.0.1+ds1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Ghislain, please mention the BSD license of doc/* in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
ros-metapackages_1.0_amd64.changes REJECTED
newer version accepted === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
ros-metapackages_1.1_amd64.changes REJECTED
newer version accepted === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
r-cran-formatr_1.2.1-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Joost, please add the missing license of inst/shiny/* to your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
kbibtex_0.6+20160117git.3424e658c4268-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Bastien, as testset/isi/ISI_export_format.html is licensed under CC-NC, please remove this file from a package for main. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
vtk6_6.2.0+dfsg1-5_arm64.changes REJECTED
Hi Anton, please mention all licenses in your debian/copyright. At least Apache-2, Boost and MIT are missing. There seems to be a typo: E: vtk6 source: version-substvar-for-external-package libvtk6-dev -> ibvtk6-java Please take also care of: W: vtk6 source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique (paragraph at line 66) W: vtk6 source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique (paragraph at line 73) W: vtk6 source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique (paragraph at line 111) W: vtk6 source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique (paragraph at line 156) W: vtk6 source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique (paragraph at line 178) W: vtk6 source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique (paragraph at line 200) W: vtk6 source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique (paragraph at line 231) Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
