Bug#743131: FTBFS if default-jdk is gcj-jdk
Package: glpk-java Version: 1.0.32-1 Severity: serious User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, glpk-java FTBFS on kfreebsd-* because those arches currently have gcj-jdk as their default-jdk Maybe glpk-java should have a more specific build-dependency on openjdk-7-jdk instead of default-jdk. Then it builds fine. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: kFreeBSD 9.0-2-amd64-xenhvm Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#743131: FTBFS if default-jdk is gcj-jdk
On 30/03/14 19:53, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Maybe glpk-java should have a more specific build-dependency on > openjdk-7-jdk instead of default-jdk. Then it builds fine. This is apparently not allowed by Debian Java Policy, according to https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2014/03/msg00129.html Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#743131: FTBFS if default-jdk is gcj-jdk
Le dimanche 30 mars 2014 à 22:08 +0100, Steven Chamberlain a écrit : > On 30/03/14 19:53, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > Maybe glpk-java should have a more specific build-dependency on > > openjdk-7-jdk instead of default-jdk. Then it builds fine. > > This is apparently not allowed by Debian Java Policy, according to > https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2014/03/msg00129.html It seems confirmed by: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/x84.html Therefore, would that be an acceptable course of action for you if I restrict the architecture set of glpk-java to those were the default JDK is openjdk, and then downgrade the present bug to severity important? -- .''`.Sébastien Villemot : :' :Debian Developer `. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien `- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#743131: FTBFS if default-jdk is gcj-jdk
tags 743131 + patch jessie sid clone 743131 -1 reassign -1 src:eclipse-cdt found -1 eclipse-cdt/8.3.0-1 thanks Hi, On 31/03/14 17:49, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > Therefore, would that be an acceptable course of action for you if I > restrict the architecture set of glpk-java to those were the default JDK > is openjdk, and then downgrade the present bug to severity important? A better way seems to be: Build-Depends: default-jdk (>= 2:1.6) which is satisfied only by arches having openjdk-6 or openjdk-7 as default currently. That way, if kfreebsd (or any other architecture) switches to openjdk as default in the future, your package can be built again without changes. (Although - I'm hoping kfreebsd, along with all release architectures, might be able to use openjdk-7 for jessie, greatly simplifying things and making this change unnecessary). In the meantime, the outdated kfreebsd binaries could be removed by ftpmaster if you'd like the package to migrate. Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#743131: FTBFS if default-jdk is gcj-jdk
Am 31.03.2014 19:50, schrieb Steven Chamberlain: tags 743131 + patch jessie sid clone 743131 -1 reassign -1 src:eclipse-cdt found -1 eclipse-cdt/8.3.0-1 thanks Hi, On 31/03/14 17:49, Sébastien Villemot wrote: Therefore, would that be an acceptable course of action for you if I restrict the architecture set of glpk-java to those were the default JDK is openjdk, and then downgrade the present bug to severity important? A better way seems to be: Build-Depends: default-jdk (>= 2:1.6) which is satisfied only by arches having openjdk-6 or openjdk-7 as default currently. That way, if kfreebsd (or any other architecture) switches to openjdk as default in the future, your package can be built again without changes. (Although - I'm hoping kfreebsd, along with all release architectures, might be able to use openjdk-7 for jessie, greatly simplifying things and making this change unnecessary). In the meantime, the outdated kfreebsd binaries could be removed by ftpmaster if you'd like the package to migrate. Steven, the kfreebsd port was backported from OpenJDK 8 by Damien. In the past we had to wait for several months for updated kfreebsd patches to get the openjdk-7 built again on these architectures, despite pinging the kfreebsd porters. How did that change? How can you make sure that this won't repeat again? I'm not in favour defaulting that again to openjdk-7 or openjdk-6. Matthias -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Processed: Re: Bug#743131: FTBFS if default-jdk is gcj-jdk
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 743131 + patch jessie sid Bug #743131 [glpk-java] FTBFS if default-jdk is gcj-jdk Added tag(s) sid, jessie, and patch. > clone 743131 -1 Bug #743131 [glpk-java] FTBFS if default-jdk is gcj-jdk Bug 743131 cloned as bug 743234 > reassign -1 src:eclipse-cdt Bug #743234 [glpk-java] FTBFS if default-jdk is gcj-jdk Bug reassigned from package 'glpk-java' to 'src:eclipse-cdt'. No longer marked as found in versions 1.0.32-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #743234 to the same values previously set > found -1 eclipse-cdt/8.3.0-1 Bug #743234 [src:eclipse-cdt] FTBFS if default-jdk is gcj-jdk Marked as found in versions eclipse-cdt/8.3.0-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 743131: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=743131 743234: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=743234 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
