Bug#876300: libsundials-dev: libsundials-serial-dev is gone

2017-12-24 Thread Paolo Greppi
Il 24/12/2017 04:10, Dima Kogan ha scritto:
>> Should there be a transitional package to ease the migration ?
> 
> There's nothing that depends on libsundials-serial-dev, so it's not
> obvious to me we need a migration package. Why do you think we need it?
> 
> dima

Hi dima,

It will cause breakage when existing installs will be migrated to buster.
My understanding is that with 'apt dist-upgrade' libsundials-serial-dev will
be gone and nothing will hint the user that she should install libsundials-dev.

Users hitting this issue may stumble into this bug report and find some relief.

Or you could document that somewhere (but where).

The transitional package would be classy don't you think ?
and it shouldn't be too much work; we're case #5 of:
https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition

Paolo

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers


Bug#876300: libsundials-dev: libsundials-serial-dev is gone

2017-12-23 Thread Dima Kogan
Thanks for the report


Paolo Greppi  writes:

> on stretch libsundials-serial-dev is available.
>
> With the update 2.7.0 release this is not available anymore. I assume it
> is replaced by libsundials-dev.

Yep


> Should there be a transitional package to ease the migration ?

There's nothing that depends on libsundials-serial-dev, so it's not
obvious to me we need a migration package. Why do you think we need it?


dima

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers


Bug#876300: libsundials-dev: libsundials-serial-dev is gone

2017-09-20 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: libsundials-dev
Version: 2.7.0+dfsg-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

on stretch libsundials-serial-dev is available.

With the update 2.7.0 release this is not available anymore. I assume it
is replaced by libsundials-dev.

Should there be a  transitional package to ease the migration ?

Thanks, Paolo

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.12.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages libsundials-dev depends on:
ii  cmake  3.9.1-1
ii  gfortran   4:7.2.0-1d1
ii  libhypre-dev   2.11.1-4
ii  libsundials-arkode12.7.0+dfsg-2
ii  libsundials-cvode2 2.7.0+dfsg-2
ii  libsundials-cvodes22.7.0+dfsg-2
ii  libsundials-ida2   2.7.0+dfsg-2
ii  libsundials-idas1  2.7.0+dfsg-2
ii  libsundials-kinsol22.7.0+dfsg-2
ii  libsundials-nvecparallel-hypre22.7.0+dfsg-2
ii  libsundials-nvecparallel-mpi2  2.7.0+dfsg-2
ii  libsundials-nvecparallel-openmp2   2.7.0+dfsg-2
ii  libsundials-nvecparallel-petsc22.7.0+dfsg-2
ii  libsundials-nvecparallel-pthread2  2.7.0+dfsg-2
ii  libsundials-nvecserial22.7.0+dfsg-2
ii  mpi-default-dev1.9
ii  petsc-dev  3.7.6+dfsg1-3
ii  pkg-config 0.29-4+b1

libsundials-dev recommends no packages.

libsundials-dev suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers