Re: Major TCP Vulnerability

2004-04-23 Thread Florian Weimer
Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 This Vulnerability is ancient news, and it is not really a
 Vulnerability.

It's one instance of a more general set of vulnerabilities which stem
from the lack of control plane separation.

 What happens if the route goes dead? Same effect.

Not quite.  ISPs hope that link failures are not correlated (to some
extend, they bet their business on it).  If you can bring down links
with deliberate attacks, there is a correlation, and the ISP typically
suffers far more than from random link failures.

 Overloading a router with too many MAC addresses(overflow) has a similar
 effect,

But this doesn't happen on a properly configured core router.  It's an
issue closer to the edge, not in the core.

 I don't quite understand this. Poisoning BGP would be more effective.

It's not that easy. 8-)  It's being done, mostly to cover up all kinds
of net abuse, but not an extremely large scale.

-- 
Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the
following domains: atlas.cz, bigpond.com, postino.it, tiscali.co.uk,
tiscali.cz, tiscali.it, voila.fr.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Squid proxy help

2004-04-23 Thread Volker Tanger
 I was just wondering if you know how I could possibly setup squid so
 that it will accept connections from the internet and filter before
 they hit a IIS6 hosted intranet.

RTFM!

http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-10.html
http://squid.visolve.com/squid/squid24s1/access_controls.htm

Bye

Volker Tanger
ITK Security


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Squid proxy help

2004-04-23 Thread Vincent Deffontaines
Craig Schneider a dit :
 Hi Guys

 I was just wondering if you know how I could possibly setup squid so
 that it will accept connections from the internet and filter before they
 hit a IIS6 hosted intranet.

 Any ideas at this point would be welcome.

 Thanks
 Craig




Squid has quite nice docs that explain that kind of reverse-proxy setup.
You can also consider using Apache with mod_proxy, and possibly mod_security

Vincent


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Woody Backport of tripwire

2004-04-23 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Thursday, 2004-04-22 at 20:32:42 -0400, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
 Can anyone refer me to a woody backport of tripwire (or a version such
 as 2.3.1.2+)?

I recently did a backport, but it's not up for downloads. I could mail
it to you, or you can do it yourself from the package source. If you do
that, you will need to use
  CXX=g++-3.0 GCC=gcc-3.0 dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
(Or similar) g++ 2.95 will not do.

HTH,
Lupe Christoph
-- 
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   http://www.lupe-christoph.de/ |
| ... putting a mail server on the Internet without filtering is like   |
| covering yourself with barbecue sauce and breaking into the Charity|
| Home for Badgers with Rabies.Michael Lucas |


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: kernel security problems again?

2004-04-23 Thread Giacomo Mulas
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:

 There is also:
   * e1000: fix probable security hole

yes, but while the other two problems affect almost any Linux workstation
running 2.4.x the latter is relevant only to a specific piece of hardware
(although I do have a few of those as well...). This makes it a bit less
worrisome for me.

Bye
Giacomo

-- 
_

Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI CAGLIARI
Str. 54, Loc. Poggio dei Pini * 09012 Capoterra (CA)

Tel. (OAC): +39 070 71180 248 Fax : +39 070 71180 222
Tel. (UNICA): +39 070 675 4916
_

When the storms are raging around you, stay right where you are
 (Freddy Mercury)
_


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Woody Backport of tripwire

2004-04-23 Thread Giacomo Mulas
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:

 I did not realize 3.0+ was needed.  The build dependencies did not
 specify that.  I might file a bug against tripwire for that build
 dependency.

it is meant for sid, the default compiler in sid is 3.3. I suppose this is
the reason it does not need to be specified. This is what the maintainer
might tell you if you file such a bug.

Bye
Giacomo

-- 
_

Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI CAGLIARI
Str. 54, Loc. Poggio dei Pini * 09012 Capoterra (CA)

Tel. (OAC): +39 070 71180 248 Fax : +39 070 71180 222
Tel. (UNICA): +39 070 675 4916
_

When the storms are raging around you, stay right where you are
 (Freddy Mercury)
_


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Woody Backport of tripwire

2004-04-23 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 03:48:59PM -0400, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
 Therefore, in my mind, it is mean for sid is not an excuse to omit a
 build dependency.  What is to say there won't be a g++2 and g++3 package in
 sarge when it is released?

If the build dependency is part of build-essential then it doesn't
need to be explicitly stated by a given package.  apt-cache show
build-essential or see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-pkg-relations

noah



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Squid proxy help

2004-04-23 Thread Craig Schneider
Hi Guys

I was just wondering if you know how I could possibly setup squid so
that it will accept connections from the internet and filter before they
hit a IIS6 hosted intranet.

Any ideas at this point would be welcome.

Thanks
Craig



Re: Squid proxy help

2004-04-23 Thread Adrian Minta
Try this link:

http://www.google.com/search?q=squid+web+acceleratorsourceid=operanum=0ie=utf-8oe=utf-8

-- 
Adrian Minta
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Major TCP Vulnerability

2004-04-23 Thread Florian Weimer
Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 This Vulnerability is ancient news, and it is not really a
 Vulnerability.

It's one instance of a more general set of vulnerabilities which stem
from the lack of control plane separation.

 What happens if the route goes dead? Same effect.

Not quite.  ISPs hope that link failures are not correlated (to some
extend, they bet their business on it).  If you can bring down links
with deliberate attacks, there is a correlation, and the ISP typically
suffers far more than from random link failures.

 Overloading a router with too many MAC addresses(overflow) has a similar
 effect,

But this doesn't happen on a properly configured core router.  It's an
issue closer to the edge, not in the core.

 I don't quite understand this. Poisoning BGP would be more effective.

It's not that easy. 8-)  It's being done, mostly to cover up all kinds
of net abuse, but not an extremely large scale.

-- 
Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the
following domains: atlas.cz, bigpond.com, postino.it, tiscali.co.uk,
tiscali.cz, tiscali.it, voila.fr.



Re: Squid proxy help

2004-04-23 Thread Volker Tanger
 I was just wondering if you know how I could possibly setup squid so
 that it will accept connections from the internet and filter before
 they hit a IIS6 hosted intranet.

RTFM!

http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-10.html
http://squid.visolve.com/squid/squid24s1/access_controls.htm

Bye

Volker Tanger
ITK Security



kernel security problems again?

2004-04-23 Thread Giacomo Mulas
I just read the changelog for the 2.4.27-pre1 kernel released by
Marcelo Tosatti, and saw two worrying lines in there:

* Fix potential memory leak in devpts
* Fix potential memory access to free memory in /proc handling

Since most people use devpts and almost all use procfs, this would seem to
affect just about anybody who is using a 2.4.x kernel, right? Can someone
who is current with the linux kernel mailing list comment a bit about
these two problems and their possible security implications? And maybe
send a link to some thread in the mailing archives where these problems
are discussed along with possible fixes for mere mortals like me who
are decent programmers but not kernel hackers...

Thanks, bye
Giacomo

-- 
_

Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI CAGLIARI
Str. 54, Loc. Poggio dei Pini * 09012 Capoterra (CA)

Tel. (OAC): +39 070 71180 248 Fax : +39 070 71180 222
Tel. (UNICA): +39 070 675 4916
_

When the storms are raging around you, stay right where you are
 (Freddy Mercury)
_



Re: kernel security problems again?

2004-04-23 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Giacomo Mulas wrote:
 * Fix potential memory leak in devpts
 * Fix potential memory access to free memory in /proc handling

There is also:
  * e1000: fix probable security hole

-- 
  One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh



Re: Squid proxy help

2004-04-23 Thread Vincent Deffontaines
Craig Schneider a dit :
 Hi Guys

 I was just wondering if you know how I could possibly setup squid so
 that it will accept connections from the internet and filter before they
 hit a IIS6 hosted intranet.

 Any ideas at this point would be welcome.

 Thanks
 Craig




Squid has quite nice docs that explain that kind of reverse-proxy setup.
You can also consider using Apache with mod_proxy, and possibly mod_security

Vincent



Re: Woody Backport of tripwire

2004-04-23 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Thursday, 2004-04-22 at 20:32:42 -0400, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
 Can anyone refer me to a woody backport of tripwire (or a version such
 as 2.3.1.2+)?

I recently did a backport, but it's not up for downloads. I could mail
it to you, or you can do it yourself from the package source. If you do
that, you will need to use
  CXX=g++-3.0 GCC=gcc-3.0 dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
(Or similar) g++ 2.95 will not do.

HTH,
Lupe Christoph
-- 
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   http://www.lupe-christoph.de/ |
| ... putting a mail server on the Internet without filtering is like   |
| covering yourself with barbecue sauce and breaking into the Charity|
| Home for Badgers with Rabies.Michael Lucas |



Re: kernel security problems again?

2004-04-23 Thread Giacomo Mulas
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:

 There is also:
   * e1000: fix probable security hole

yes, but while the other two problems affect almost any Linux workstation
running 2.4.x the latter is relevant only to a specific piece of hardware
(although I do have a few of those as well...). This makes it a bit less
worrisome for me.

Bye
Giacomo

-- 
_

Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI CAGLIARI
Str. 54, Loc. Poggio dei Pini * 09012 Capoterra (CA)

Tel. (OAC): +39 070 71180 248 Fax : +39 070 71180 222
Tel. (UNICA): +39 070 675 4916
_

When the storms are raging around you, stay right where you are
 (Freddy Mercury)
_



Re: Woody Backport of tripwire

2004-04-23 Thread Phillip Hofmeister
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 at 11:07:23AM -0400, Lupe Christoph wrote:
 I recently did a backport, but it's not up for downloads. I could mail
 it to you, or you can do it yourself from the package source. If you do
 that, you will need to use
   CXX=g++-3.0 GCC=gcc-3.0 dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
 (Or similar) g++ 2.95 will not do.

Thanks for shedding light on this.  I had G++ installed (2.95) and it
kept telling me no C++ Compiler, and I was getting quite frustrated
(what the ^*^*(%(* do you mean no compiler, g++ is working?!?!?!))

I did not realize 3.0+ was needed.  The build dependencies did not
specify that.  I might file a bug against tripwire for that build
dependency.

Thanks.

-- 
Phillip Hofmeister

PGP/GPG Key:
http://www.zionlth.org/~plhofmei/
wget -O - http://www.zionlth.org/~plhofmei/key.asc | gpg --import



Re: Woody Backport of tripwire

2004-04-23 Thread Giacomo Mulas
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:

 I did not realize 3.0+ was needed.  The build dependencies did not
 specify that.  I might file a bug against tripwire for that build
 dependency.

it is meant for sid, the default compiler in sid is 3.3. I suppose this is
the reason it does not need to be specified. This is what the maintainer
might tell you if you file such a bug.

Bye
Giacomo

-- 
_

Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI CAGLIARI
Str. 54, Loc. Poggio dei Pini * 09012 Capoterra (CA)

Tel. (OAC): +39 070 71180 248 Fax : +39 070 71180 222
Tel. (UNICA): +39 070 675 4916
_

When the storms are raging around you, stay right where you are
 (Freddy Mercury)
_



Re: Woody Backport of tripwire

2004-04-23 Thread Phillip Hofmeister
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 at 01:19:13PM -0400, Giacomo Mulas wrote:
 On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
 
  I did not realize 3.0+ was needed.  The build dependencies did not
  specify that.  I might file a bug against tripwire for that build
  dependency.
 
 it is meant for sid, the default compiler in sid is 3.3. I suppose this is
 the reason it does not need to be specified. This is what the maintainer
 might tell you if you file such a bug.

It is common for woody folk to backport packages from sid/sarge to woody
by compiling them use apt-get source --compile or dpkg-buildpackage.
I have seen packages with build depends of libxyz (=3.4).  With few
exceptions most packages that require a certain version of something to
build it list that something as a build dependency (maybe a developer
can help me out hereisn't it Debian policy to do so?)

Therefore, in my mind, it is mean for sid is not an excuse to omit a
build dependency.  What is to say there won't be a g++2 and g++3 package in
sarge when it is released?


-- 
Phillip Hofmeister

PGP/GPG Key:
http://www.zionlth.org/~plhofmei/
wget -O - http://www.zionlth.org/~plhofmei/key.asc | gpg --import



Re: Woody Backport of tripwire

2004-04-23 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 03:48:59PM -0400, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
 Therefore, in my mind, it is mean for sid is not an excuse to omit a
 build dependency.  What is to say there won't be a g++2 and g++3 package in
 sarge when it is released?

If the build dependency is part of build-essential then it doesn't
need to be explicitly stated by a given package.  apt-cache show
build-essential or see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-pkg-relations

noah



pgputVmdKkpzp.pgp
Description: PGP signature