Problem with Spam Assassin

2004-06-06 Thread Dale Amon
Has anyone else been seeing this problem with spamassasin?

sa-learn --spam --mbox spambox

Argument "\008566332M-XM-yM-@@" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at 
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore.pm line 1267.
  |
  |
  for pages and pages and pages

The lines in question are:

# Make sure to check for either !defined or "" ...  Apparently
# sometimes the DB module doesn't return the value correctly. :(
my $oldmagic = $self->{db_toks}->{$OLDEST_TOKEN_AGE_MAGIC_TOKEN};
--> if (!defined ($oldmagic) || $oldmagic eq "" || $atime < $oldmagic) {
  $self->{db_toks}->{$OLDEST_TOKEN_AGE_MAGIC_TOKEN} = $atime;

-- 
--
   Dale Amon [EMAIL PROTECTED]+44-7802-188325
   International linux systems consultancy
 Hardware & software system design, security
and networking, systems programming and Admin
  "Have Laptop, Will Travel"
--



Problem with Spam Assassin

2004-06-06 Thread Dale Amon
Has anyone else been seeing this problem with spamassasin?

sa-learn --spam --mbox spambox

Argument "\008566332M-XM-yM-@@" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at 
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore.pm line 1267.
  |
  |
  for pages and pages and pages

The lines in question are:

# Make sure to check for either !defined or "" ...  Apparently
# sometimes the DB module doesn't return the value correctly. :(
my $oldmagic = $self->{db_toks}->{$OLDEST_TOKEN_AGE_MAGIC_TOKEN};
--> if (!defined ($oldmagic) || $oldmagic eq "" || $atime < $oldmagic) {
  $self->{db_toks}->{$OLDEST_TOKEN_AGE_MAGIC_TOKEN} = $atime;

-- 
--
   Dale Amon [EMAIL PROTECTED]+44-7802-188325
   International linux systems consultancy
 Hardware & software system design, security
and networking, systems programming and Admin
  "Have Laptop, Will Travel"
--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



We offer you a choice of original and generic medications Y3UomZ69rRoorBjBoq

2004-06-06 Thread Jessie Dugan
We take the risk out of finding a safe place to make your online medical decisions. your health, safety, and shopping experience are very important to us. 

%RND_AD_2 

Plus: %RND_ALL_OTHER_MEDS 

We use Fedex shipping to ensure that you will receive your order promptly. 

Buy online in the comfort of your home..

Use Microsoft Internet Explorer to view the following website: www.%RND_HOST.

Please copy and paste the URL on your browser's address field.

%RND_PHRASE 
%RND_PHRASE 
%RND_PHRASE 
%RND_PHRASE 


We offer you a choice of original and generic medications Y3UomZ69rRoorBjBoq

2004-06-06 Thread Jessie Dugan
We take the risk out of finding a safe place to make your online medical decisions. your health, safety, and shopping experience are very important to us. 

%RND_AD_2 

Plus: %RND_ALL_OTHER_MEDS 

We use Fedex shipping to ensure that you will receive your order promptly. 

Buy online in the comfort of your home..

Use Microsoft Internet Explorer to view the following website: www.%RND_HOST.

Please copy and paste the URL on your browser's address field.

%RND_PHRASE 
%RND_PHRASE 
%RND_PHRASE 
%RND_PHRASE 


Re: logging samba access

2004-06-06 Thread LeVA
2004. június 6. 13:16 dátummal Dariush Pietrzak ezt írta:
>
>  The problem is - in order to see file/dir accesses you need to
> increase log level in smb.conf.
>  This sounds innocent enough unless you actually do it - the level in
> which you see those accesses is one of 'DEBUG' ones, and you get GIGs
> of logfiles per day/hour, and then parsing this becomes a nightmare.
>
>  So simple task like finding who created this 'John Doe is f***ing
> faggot' with porn on your samba fileserver is not as easy as with ftp
> servers (this is party because of protocol nature, but not that much
> ).
>
> btw, I'd be very interested if someone knew solution to this that
> does not require modifying samba source and then maintaining your own
> packages...
I think increasing the log level is quite enough for me.


Thanks!


Daniel


-- 
LeVA



pgpaK13c71bwY.pgp
Description: signature


Re: logging samba access

2004-06-06 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## Dariush Pietrzak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> > > Is it possible to log the file/dir accesses to samba server? I.e. I got 
> > > a share, and when someone mounts (from win or unix) it and access file, 
> > > or write files I want samba to log it to the smb.log. Is this possible?
> > Ever had a look in /var/log/samba/? If you are missing something,
> > increase log level in smb.conf.
>  The problem is - in order to see file/dir accesses you need to increase
> log level in smb.conf. 

I said so. "log level = 2" does the job.

>  This sounds innocent enough unless you actually do it - the level in which
> you see those accesses is one of 'DEBUG' ones, and you get GIGs of logfiles
> per day/hour, and then parsing this becomes a nightmare.

Depends on your traffic. You might want to set "max log size".
Use perl to extract the relevant information, so you don't need to
keep the whole logfiles around.

Regrads,
Christoph

-- 
Spare Space



Re: logging samba access

2004-06-06 Thread Dariush Pietrzak
On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 12:30:58PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## LeVA ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> 
> > Is it possible to log the file/dir accesses to samba server? I.e. I got 
> > a share, and when someone mounts (from win or unix) it and access file, 
> > or write files I want samba to log it to the smb.log. Is this possible?
> 
> Ever had a look in /var/log/samba/? If you are missing something,
> increase log level in smb.conf.
 The problem is - in order to see file/dir accesses you need to increase
log level in smb.conf. 
 This sounds innocent enough unless you actually do it - the level in which
you see those accesses is one of 'DEBUG' ones, and you get GIGs of logfiles
per day/hour, and then parsing this becomes a nightmare.

 So simple task like finding who created this 'John Doe is f***ing faggot'
with porn on your samba fileserver is not as easy as with ftp servers (this
is party because of protocol nature, but not that much ).

btw, I'd be very interested if someone knew solution to this that does not
require modifying samba source and then maintaining your own packages...

-- 
Dariush Pietrzak,
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294  05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9



Re: logging samba access

2004-06-06 Thread Pascal Weller
Am Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 11:59:21AM +0200, LeVA sagte:
> Hi!
> 
> Is it possible to log the file/dir accesses to samba server? I.e. I got 
> a share, and when someone mounts (from win or unix) it and access file, 
> or write files I want samba to log it to the smb.log. Is this possible?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> Daniel

"log level = 2" in the global section of smb.conf will do the trick.

gruss pascal



Re: logging samba access

2004-06-06 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## LeVA ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> Is it possible to log the file/dir accesses to samba server? I.e. I got 
> a share, and when someone mounts (from win or unix) it and access file, 
> or write files I want samba to log it to the smb.log. Is this possible?

Ever had a look in /var/log/samba/? If you are missing something,
increase log level in smb.conf.

Regards,
Christoph

-- 
Spare Space



logging samba access

2004-06-06 Thread LeVA
Hi!

Is it possible to log the file/dir accesses to samba server? I.e. I got 
a share, and when someone mounts (from win or unix) it and access file, 
or write files I want samba to log it to the smb.log. Is this possible?

Thanks!


Daniel

-- 
LeVA



pgp1uiUEsQUo6.pgp
Description: signature


Re: logging samba access

2004-06-06 Thread LeVA
2004. június 6. 13:16 dátummal Dariush Pietrzak ezt írta:
>
>  The problem is - in order to see file/dir accesses you need to
> increase log level in smb.conf.
>  This sounds innocent enough unless you actually do it - the level in
> which you see those accesses is one of 'DEBUG' ones, and you get GIGs
> of logfiles per day/hour, and then parsing this becomes a nightmare.
>
>  So simple task like finding who created this 'John Doe is f***ing
> faggot' with porn on your samba fileserver is not as easy as with ftp
> servers (this is party because of protocol nature, but not that much
> ).
>
> btw, I'd be very interested if someone knew solution to this that
> does not require modifying samba source and then maintaining your own
> packages...
I think increasing the log level is quite enough for me.


Thanks!


Daniel


-- 
LeVA



pgpoeScU65KgD.pgp
Description: signature


Re: logging samba access

2004-06-06 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## Dariush Pietrzak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> > > Is it possible to log the file/dir accesses to samba server? I.e. I got 
> > > a share, and when someone mounts (from win or unix) it and access file, 
> > > or write files I want samba to log it to the smb.log. Is this possible?
> > Ever had a look in /var/log/samba/? If you are missing something,
> > increase log level in smb.conf.
>  The problem is - in order to see file/dir accesses you need to increase
> log level in smb.conf. 

I said so. "log level = 2" does the job.

>  This sounds innocent enough unless you actually do it - the level in which
> you see those accesses is one of 'DEBUG' ones, and you get GIGs of logfiles
> per day/hour, and then parsing this becomes a nightmare.

Depends on your traffic. You might want to set "max log size".
Use perl to extract the relevant information, so you don't need to
keep the whole logfiles around.

Regrads,
Christoph

-- 
Spare Space


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unusual spam recently - hummm - postprocess

2004-06-06 Thread Russell Coker
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 08:52, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >So, adding handling for SPF RRs in one's MTA yields significant
> >advantages today, despite the technology being new, because _all_ of the
> >forgemail claiming to be from aol.com, msn.com, hotmail.com, pobox.com,
> >etc. can be detected all in one step.
>
> Well, I guess the spammers will have to use different addresses. That
> shouldn't take long.

Which leads to more spam that uses addresses from small domains in the From: 
field, and thus more need for administrators of small servers to implement 
SPF records to counter it.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page



Re: logging samba access

2004-06-06 Thread Dariush Pietrzak
On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 12:30:58PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## LeVA ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> 
> > Is it possible to log the file/dir accesses to samba server? I.e. I got 
> > a share, and when someone mounts (from win or unix) it and access file, 
> > or write files I want samba to log it to the smb.log. Is this possible?
> 
> Ever had a look in /var/log/samba/? If you are missing something,
> increase log level in smb.conf.
 The problem is - in order to see file/dir accesses you need to increase
log level in smb.conf. 
 This sounds innocent enough unless you actually do it - the level in which
you see those accesses is one of 'DEBUG' ones, and you get GIGs of logfiles
per day/hour, and then parsing this becomes a nightmare.

 So simple task like finding who created this 'John Doe is f***ing faggot'
with porn on your samba fileserver is not as easy as with ftp servers (this
is party because of protocol nature, but not that much ).

btw, I'd be very interested if someone knew solution to this that does not
require modifying samba source and then maintaining your own packages...

-- 
Dariush Pietrzak,
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294  05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Strange bind error

2004-06-06 Thread Dariush Pietrzak
> > For the first time I saw those curious errors. I don't understand where
> > is the error, in my bind or in the remote client/server??
> >
> > Any idea?
> >
> > Apr 21 22:00:50 volubilis named[12517]: socket.c:1100: unexpected error:
> > Apr 21 22:00:50 volubilis named[12517]: internal_send: 203.147.0.49#0:
> > Invalid argument
> 
> DNS queries with source port 0 could cause this, I suppose.
 I don't think so. You shouldn't get an error binding to '0' port unless
all your resources are used (AFAIK). I think there might be some race
condition there, because I've seen similiar errors during peek load.

-- 
Dariush Pietrzak,
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294  05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9



Re: logging samba access

2004-06-06 Thread Pascal Weller
Am Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 11:59:21AM +0200, LeVA sagte:
> Hi!
> 
> Is it possible to log the file/dir accesses to samba server? I.e. I got 
> a share, and when someone mounts (from win or unix) it and access file, 
> or write files I want samba to log it to the smb.log. Is this possible?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> Daniel

"log level = 2" in the global section of smb.conf will do the trick.

gruss pascal


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: logging samba access

2004-06-06 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## LeVA ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> Is it possible to log the file/dir accesses to samba server? I.e. I got 
> a share, and when someone mounts (from win or unix) it and access file, 
> or write files I want samba to log it to the smb.log. Is this possible?

Ever had a look in /var/log/samba/? If you are missing something,
increase log level in smb.conf.

Regards,
Christoph

-- 
Spare Space


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



logging samba access

2004-06-06 Thread LeVA
Hi!

Is it possible to log the file/dir accesses to samba server? I.e. I got 
a share, and when someone mounts (from win or unix) it and access file, 
or write files I want samba to log it to the smb.log. Is this possible?

Thanks!


Daniel

-- 
LeVA



pgpvLB2l18Lxu.pgp
Description: signature


Re: Unusual spam recently - hummm - postprocess

2004-06-06 Thread Russell Coker
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 08:52, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >So, adding handling for SPF RRs in one's MTA yields significant
> >advantages today, despite the technology being new, because _all_ of the
> >forgemail claiming to be from aol.com, msn.com, hotmail.com, pobox.com,
> >etc. can be detected all in one step.
>
> Well, I guess the spammers will have to use different addresses. That
> shouldn't take long.

Which leads to more spam that uses addresses from small domains in the From: 
field, and thus more need for administrators of small servers to implement 
SPF records to counter it.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Strange bind error

2004-06-06 Thread Dariush Pietrzak
> > For the first time I saw those curious errors. I don't understand where
> > is the error, in my bind or in the remote client/server??
> >
> > Any idea?
> >
> > Apr 21 22:00:50 volubilis named[12517]: socket.c:1100: unexpected error:
> > Apr 21 22:00:50 volubilis named[12517]: internal_send: 203.147.0.49#0:
> > Invalid argument
> 
> DNS queries with source port 0 could cause this, I suppose.
 I don't think so. You shouldn't get an error binding to '0' port unless
all your resources are used (AFAIK). I think there might be some race
condition there, because I've seen similiar errors during peek load.

-- 
Dariush Pietrzak,
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294  05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]