Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1249-1] New xfree86 packages fix privilege escalation

2007-01-16 Thread Neil McGovern
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 12:41:55PM +1300, Dale Allan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm afraid that spam has become such a problem that I have resorted to
> using Zerospam, and as a result, a recent email that you sent me has
> been quarantined.
> 

I'm afraid that backscatter from this sort of anti-spam problem has
become such a problem that I've resorted to asking
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to remove your subscription from
debian-security-announce. As a result, your emails won't even get to
quarantine.

> If you intended to send me this mail, then please click the link below
> to add yourself to my trusted address list.  It only takes a few
> seconds, and you only have to do this once.
> 

If you didn't intend to spam a large list of recipients, please don't
resubscribe, or put in a whitelist that obeys the Precedence header
properly.

> I'm sorry for any inconvenience caused.
> 

So am I. As a note to others who may see this: please make sure you're
careful when setting up things like this and automatic vacation notices.

Neil
-- 
 10 people enough for a Debconf?  If they were all Germans, maybe...


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Allow password auth for one user with sftp?

2007-01-16 Thread Michel Messerschmidt
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:23:31AM +0100, Maik Holtkamp wrote:
> > Public keys can be stolen too. If you consider this a risk, you should
> 
> [Typ|Brain]o?
> 
> s/Public/Private/

Okay, I had a long day, but this really sounds stupid ;)
Please read it as 
"The *private* key used for ssh public key authentication..."



Michel


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Allow password auth for one user with sftp?

2007-01-16 Thread Greg Folkert
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 09:23 +0100, Maik Holtkamp wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Michel Messerschmidt wrote/schrieb @ 15.01.2007 20:39:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Public keys can be stolen too. If you consider this a risk, you should
> 
> [Typ|Brain]o?
> 
> s/Public/Private/

My thoughts exactly... stealing and placing *MY* public key means *I*
get more access or they can communicate with me in encrypted format.

I guess, a stolen public key is like a "Free Information Brochure", only
good to those that will understand and use it to contact me or want to
have me do something for them.
-- 
greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The technology that is
Stronger, better, faster:  Linux


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Allow password auth for one user with sftp?

2007-01-16 Thread Maik Holtkamp
Hi,

Michel Messerschmidt wrote/schrieb @ 15.01.2007 20:39:

[...]

> Public keys can be stolen too. If you consider this a risk, you should

[Typ|Brain]o?

s/Public/Private/

or what problem should arise from spreading public keys?

-- 
- maik


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]