Permission changes with rsync

2007-11-26 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Dear security team,
I just discovered, that rsync to an encrypted filesystem seem to change owners 
and groups on some files. 

I used rsync -av from source to target. (O.k., I missed to 
add --numeric-ids, which resulted in getting some files with numeric owners), 
But other files on the target got wrong owners or groups ! So, this should 
not happen, IMO !

I still have the source available on another host. Is there a way, to correct 
all owners ansd groups at the target without changing the files ?

I tried rsync -rog --existing --ignore-existing with no sucess.

Tahbk you very much for your help !

Regards

Hans



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1400-1] New perl packages fix arbitrary code execution

2007-11-26 Thread UlisesVitulli - DECIDIR Argentina
Florian Weimer escribió:
 
 Debian Security Advisory DSA-1400-1  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.debian.org/security/   Florian Weimer
 November 6th, 2007http://www.debian.org/security/faq
 

 Package: perl
 Vulnerability  : heap overflow
 Problem type   : local (remote)
 Debian-specific: no
 CVE Id(s)  : CVE-2007-5116

Ahora si está aplicados en todos los equipos, y en Kayumari que era el
mas comprometido...





-- 
/UlisesVitulli
Operaciones. DECIDIR Argentina
Movil:  1568583603



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Permission changes with rsync

2007-11-26 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
 I used rsync -av from source to target. (O.k., I missed to 
 add --numeric-ids, which resulted in getting some files with numeric owners), 
 But other files on the target got wrong owners or groups ! So, this should 
 not happen, IMO !

1. are you root?
2. what is the numeric uid on source and target? (use ls -n)
3. on some? are those all belong to one user or dot files or existing/non 
existing=
4. can you manually change the ownership? (what is the filesystem type, does it 
allow userids?)

Gruss
Bernd


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1409-2] New samba packages fix several vulnerabilities

2007-11-26 Thread Ewen McNeill
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Kemp writes:
Package: samba
Vulnerability  : several
Problem type   : remote
Debian-specific: no
CVE Id(s)  : CVE-2007-4572, CVE-2007-5398
[...]
For the stable distribution (etch), these problems have been fixed in
version 3.0.24-6etch7.

There doesn't appear to be a i386 package for Samba version
3.0.24-6etch7 on any of the security.debian.org servers.  Only a
3.0.24-6etch6 package.  AMD64 and most other architectures seem to have
3.0.24-6etch7 and not 3.0.24-6etch6 packages.

According to the change log this means that one regression is missing
in the i386 packages (6etch6):

-=- cut here -=-
samba (3.0.24-6etch7) stable-security; urgency=low

  * Fix for one final regression related to the fix for CVE-2007-4572,
pulled from upstream.  Thanks to Santiago Garcia Mantinan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for catching this.

 -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sat, 24 Nov 2007 02:17:06 -0800
-=- cut here -=-

For example:

-=- cut here -=-
ftp cd debian-security/pool/updates/main/s/samba/
250 Directory successfully changed.
ftp ls samba-common*etch*i386*
227 Entering Passive Mode (128,31,0,36,95,228)
150 Here comes the directory listing.
-rw-rw-r--1 1176 1176  2381022 May 30 10:30 
samba-common_3.0.24-6etch4_i386.deb
-rw-rw-r--1 1176 1176  2381196 Nov 15 22:35 
samba-common_3.0.24-6etch5_i386.deb
-rw-rw-r--1 1176 1176  2381264 Nov 23 13:25 
samba-common_3.0.24-6etch6_i386.deb
226 Directory send OK.
ftp ls samba-common*etch*amd64*
227 Entering Passive Mode (128,31,0,36,172,122)
150 Here comes the directory listing.
-rw-rw-r--1 1176 1176  2596688 Jun 01 07:00 
samba-common_3.0.24-6etch4_amd64.deb
-rw-rw-r--1 1176 1176  2595582 Nov 22 20:45 
samba-common_3.0.24-6etch5_amd64.deb
-rw-rw-r--1 1176 1176  2597004 Nov 24 11:05 
samba-common_3.0.24-6etch7_amd64.deb
226 Directory send OK.
ftp 
-=- cut here -=-

(But the same thing seems to be true for the entire samba suite.)

Will new i386 packages be built?  Or does that regression not affect i386?

Ewen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]