Removal of email address from security announcement list
Pease remove the following address from any debian mail lists: jeff.lue...@nationalcity.com Thank you The contents of this email are the property of PNC. If it was not addressed to you, you have no legal right to read it. If you think you received it in error, please notify the sender. Do not forward or copy without permission of the sender. This message may contain an advertisement of a product or service and thus may constitute a commercial electronic mail message under US Law. The postal address for PNC is 249 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15222. If you do not wish to receive any additional advertising or promotional messages from PNC at this e-mail address, click here to unsubscribe. https://pnc.p.delivery.net/m/u/pnc/uni/p.asp By unsubscribing to this message, you will be unsubscribed from all advertising or promotional messages from PNC. Removing your e-mail address from this mailing list will not affect your subscription to alerts, e-newsletters or account servicing e-mails.
Re: Removal of email address from security announcement list
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:40 PM, jeff.lue...@pnc.com wrote: Pease remove the following address from any debian mail lists: You have the ability to do that yourself: http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/unsubscribe Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MMfiEURYK5QbmJ=vtvhjquczrzkmwyxfc57q17g9hy...@mail.gmail.com
Use of DSA number for general announcements (was: [DSA 2548-1] Debian Security Team PGP/GPG key change notice)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Le 13/09/2012 06:33, Nico Golde a écrit : - Debian Security Advisory DSA-2548-1 secur...@debian.org http://www.debian.org/security/Nico Golde September 13, 2012 http://www.debian.org/security/faq - This is a notice to inform you, that our previous PGP/GPG key expired. Thanks for notifying us on debian-security-announce@l.d.o, but I disagree that such an announcement deserves a DSA number. DSA-2360 was also a misuse of a DSA number IMHO, and would have deserved a copy on wider audience (e.g. on debian-announce@l.d.o). Please don't hesitate to get in touch with the press or publicity team next time you prepare a big announcement. Regards David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQUoguAAoJELgqIXr9/gny8xEP/jT7oCPsYppRuK5nsD5Mjg5K qPE8R6JZM/98okBQGmRE8X8kSC6Iz08+bwN11SfoBqw3j3mrZCEMUQG244oMnW3L I02Qq0s9ixwBCnPHGlLCn5R5tVjv9G5DcG4DkHNVBQb9BphL9hJxHSwAxBf5/yPH EW8sHJ/gSP8+ap0BUk6rMMD4Kuj2qukz7F22mZchf5Urto+N6vV9XiBPVXfL5qV4 tSLkXlcasVOrFWZsFNFnPl0bUxZuXh2A80usWLWb0JxGhSKAEa+k7C7m2YwUkLhv YdxxIP0mqkvmkQXL94f1bZtB353ni4lcBAsfRR84gG4Kr12+Oeq5jyuxhFlNNLrP eTlo2aEffbIOZYsCpWdD8gv2gJNt4bhH0fJNGHkJ1rUqdKWv7sQZ2CnYdzmBuikG 2v30CWEGAMWl6mkWrZ3cyST/T+EVm+pTI2blnodLASHpp7XM+ZW4pU1dskXUqSlH Tz9OE6dIvVPQpuwvjbQMSTlaj95RTlvPbRdSyLpT9/uxn+kkS/FeTp1jGCCHaOiu LbrPOe8hyOGoCcb9BwGIcqEZq1RBFtR5D35qStukKITfxpYjI1JSw8CWcUCCZe0s hxjvIeCwg4TdLUui8WM02eZWhz6DyGAlC3YuJdyjzE8q6uTv33RlNboS3CPkADMs atK9GNhQ9/Zw895dNdna =rnSD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5052882f.7060...@debian.org
Re: Use of DSA number for general announcements (was: [DSA 2548-1] Debian Security Team PGP/GPG key change notice)
Hi David, On Fri, September 14, 2012 03:28, David Prevot wrote: This is a notice to inform you, that our previous PGP/GPG key expired. Thanks for notifying us on debian-security-announce@l.d.o, but I disagree that such an announcement deserves a DSA number. DSA-2360 was also a misuse of a DSA number IMHO, and would have deserved a copy on wider audience (e.g. on debian-announce@l.d.o). Please don't hesitate to get in touch with the press or publicity team next time you prepare a big announcement. Well, this is of course how we 'always' do it. I'm not sure I understand: why is it a problem to use (even misuse?) a number? They are free and we have ample supply. I doubt a technicallity like a key rollover, which is only relevant for people actively conversing with the security team, is useful to post to debian-announce. Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/6a6d36035560b0b170b587b5751eecb0.squir...@wm.kinkhorst.nl
External check
CVE-2012-4414: RESERVED CVE-2012-4416: RESERVED -- The output might be a bit terse, but the above ids are known elsewhere, check the references in the tracker. The second part indicates the status of that id in the tracker at the moment the script was run. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-tracker-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5051804c.pjblbbvffyu1nrzv%atomo64+st...@gmail.com