Re: Checking for services to be restarted on a default Debian installation

2014-09-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:

 I think it would help the security of the average Debian system if some tool
 to restart services after package upgrades was installed by default. There's
 checkrestart from debian-goodies, but since Jessie also the a bit more
 modern needrestart in its own package. I've been running the latter on a few
 systems for a while now and am satisfied with how it works.

In jessie there is also whatmaps. The results from checkrestart seem
to be different to needrestart in many cases, since the latter ignores
some services that are problematic/impossible to restart (like
gdm/dbus or any programs running in user sessions).

 My questions to this list:
 - Do people agree that this would be something that's good to have in a
 default installation? Are there drawbacks?

Yes please.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6GRzn2_a3+8TQiKjdby6UHCepjW1L-=mptnstzcu7t...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Checking for services to be restarted on a default Debian installation

2014-09-07 Thread David Prévot
Le 07/09/2014 02:07, Paul Wise a écrit :
 On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:

 In jessie there is also whatmaps. The results from checkrestart seem
 to be different to needrestart in many cases, since the latter ignores
 some services that are problematic/impossible to restart (like
 gdm/dbus or any programs running in user sessions).

It doesn’t seem to work as expected: it defaults to restart gdm3 where I
stand.

 My questions to this list:
 - Do people agree that this would be something that's good to have in a
 default installation? Are there drawbacks?

Not restarting by default the DM seems to be nice thing to have.
How does it work if the upgrade run in the background? Will all needed
service be restarted without asking? (If so, the gdm3 restart issue may
be a blocker).

Regards

David



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Checking for services to be restarted on a default Debian installation

2014-09-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 9:30 PM, David Prévot wrote:

 It doesn’t seem to work as expected: it defaults to restart gdm3 where I
 stand.

Could you file a bug about that? The default needrestart blacklist
contains /usr/sbin/gdm3 so that shouldn't happen.

 Not restarting by default the DM seems to be nice thing to have.

Seems like a bug in the DMs to me, OpenSSH manages to be able to be
restarted without killing user sessions.

 How does it work if the upgrade run in the background? Will all needed
 service be restarted without asking? (If so, the gdm3 restart issue may
 be a blocker).

Not sure what you mean by 'in the background' but there is an option
to automatically restart services, the default is to ask (via debconf)
for each service, defaulting each package to restart.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/caktje6gpqfkya5soyheqeciq4b6ioho5xebea7ehjyejvms...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Checking for services to be restarted on a default Debian installation

2014-09-07 Thread Eirik Schwenke
On 7 September 2014 15:30:22 CEST, David Prévot taf...@debian.org wrote:
Le 07/09/2014 02:07, Paul Wise a écrit :
 On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:

 My questions to this list:
 - Do people agree that this would be something that's good to have
in a
 default installation? Are there drawbacks?

Not restarting by default the DM seems to be nice thing to have.
How does it work if the upgrade run in the background? Will all needed
service be restarted without asking? (If so, the gdm3 restart issue may
be a blocker).


As a long time user and system administrator I agree that notification and 
*optional* automatic restarts have a place in the default install (with 
appropriate notes in the changelog for Jessie, obviously!).

For a server, there should be some easy to adjust setting, choosing between 
automatic restarts and simply notifying of restart of x, y, z needed due to 
upgrade b and c (with comment from changelog: is this a security issue?).

Do we have a framework for persistent gui notifications on the desktop? Eg: 
next time someone in the sudo group logs in; show request for system 
restart/kexec and/or subsystem restarts? I know Ubuntu has a default software 
center thing for that -- is there something like it in tasksel-desktop? (I 
generally run a lean xmonad-only setup - a notification in my xmobar would be 
nice, though)

On a server I'm generally happy with an email to root - but do we have 
somewhere we could put notifications? Eg: service names in 
/var/run/restart-pending or something along those lines?

The idea being that apt/dpgk/checkrestart could append package names here, and 
a do-pending-restarts-script could remove them (probably better just to run 
checkrestarts again and verify start time/loaded libraries vs latest installed 
version and update the needs-restart queue as appropriate?).

The more I think about, the better I like the idea of having a text-file as a 
job queue of pending restarts, and a script that checks running processes for 
open dlls that updates such a file (can be put in cron for generatoøing gui 
alerts w fallback to console alerts on systems w/o xorg).

Alerting for restarts amounts to checking for the presence of such a file and 
re-running the checkrestart script to regenerate it, or remove it if all needed 
restarts are done (seperate file for kernel, or use service name kexec? For 
servers it might nice to notify on updated inintrd/grub.cfg as there is no 
*guarantee* the system will boot after such changes -- until they've been 
verified by a successful reboot).

Thoughts? Is this overboard for getting into Jessie?

Best regards, 

Eirik

-- 
Via phone - please excuse quoting and spelling


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/6ce482b6-9de9-4c7f-9c59-1178dc87d...@email.android.com



Re: Checking for services to be restarted on a default Debian installation

2014-09-07 Thread David Prévot
Le 07/09/2014 10:54, Paul Wise a écrit :
 On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 9:30 PM, David Prévot wrote:

 How does it work if the upgrade run in the background? Will all needed
 service be restarted without asking? (If so, the gdm3 restart issue may
 be a blocker).
 
 Not sure what you mean by 'in the background'

I meant if a tool that take care of upgrading automatically packages in
the background (e.g., unattended-upgrades) is installed and running.

 but there is an option
 to automatically restart services, the default is to ask (via debconf)
 for each service, defaulting each package to restart.

That’s another annoying thing: even if it looks like a debconf screen,
it doesn’t seem to offer it’s advantages, and doesn’t seem translated
nor translatable (which is a must according to policy 3.9.1). That
package seems pretty young, not much used (comparing its popcon with the
unattended-upgrades’ one), and even if its goal is valuable, I’m not
convinced that pushing it into the default install less than two months
before the freeze is really a good idea.

Maybe the maintainers could have shed some light, but maybe they’re not
even aware of this thread.

Regards

David



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Checking for services to be restarted on a default Debian installation

2014-09-07 Thread Riku Valli
On 08.09.2014 07:33, David Prévot wrote:
 Le 07/09/2014 10:54, Paul Wise a écrit :
 On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 9:30 PM, David Prévot wrote:
 
 How does it work if the upgrade run in the background? Will all
 needed service be restarted without asking? (If so, the gdm3
 restart issue may be a blocker).
 
 Not sure what you mean by 'in the background'
 
 I meant if a tool that take care of upgrading automatically
 packages in the background (e.g., unattended-upgrades) is installed
 and running.
 

You can use cron-apt, unattended-upgrades and made your own.
I like this unattended-upgrades.

-- Riku


 but there is an option to automatically restart services, the
 default is to ask (via debconf) for each service, defaulting each
 package to restart.
 
 That’s another annoying thing: even if it looks like a debconf
 screen, it doesn’t seem to offer it’s advantages, and doesn’t seem
 translated nor translatable (which is a must according to policy
 3.9.1). That package seems pretty young, not much used (comparing
 its popcon with the unattended-upgrades’ one), and even if its goal
 is valuable, I’m not convinced that pushing it into the default
 install less than two months before the freeze is really a good
 idea.
 
 Maybe the maintainers could have shed some light, but maybe they’re
 not even aware of this thread.
 
 Regards
 
 David
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/540d41e1.3090...@vallit.fi



External check

2014-09-07 Thread Raphael Geissert
CVE-2014-3578: RESERVED
--
The output might be a bit terse, but the above ids are known elsewhere,
check the references in the tracker. The second part indicates the status
of that id in the tracker at the moment the script was run.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-tracker-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/540bff7b.pyfalgh73wyujmug%atomo64+st...@gmail.com