Re: [SECURITY] [DSA-382-3] OpenSSH buffer management fix
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:17:14AM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > Which is it we are missing? I can try and convert this mipsel to a > mipseb (since it is theoretically switchable) and get it online, > although it won't be on a fast 'net connection, nor will it have much > hard drive space. mipseb, the 2 Lasats are keeping mipsel up to date just fine. We should have it at a place with a reasonable good net connection and preferably a local debian mirror. Ryan knows all the details. Should we move all this over from -security to -mips? -- Guido signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [SECURITY] [DSA-382-3] OpenSSH buffer management fix
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:17:14AM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > Which is it we are missing? I can try and convert this mipsel to a > mipseb (since it is theoretically switchable) and get it online, > although it won't be on a fast 'net connection, nor will it have much > hard drive space. mipseb, the 2 Lasats are keeping mipsel up to date just fine. We should have it at a place with a reasonable good net connection and preferably a local debian mirror. Ryan knows all the details. Should we move all this over from -security to -mips? -- Guido signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: OT: frequent accesses to port 563[456]
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 12:03:38AM +1100, Mostyn Bramley-Moore wrote: > > ippl shows frequent access attempts to ports 563[456] tcp in our > > subnet originating from machines all over the world. netstat and > > lsof show no programs listening on these ports. A websearch didn't > > reveal any usefull information regarding these port numbers. Any ideas? > > >From the FreeBSD /etc/services :- > > macon-tcp 456/tcp > macon-udp 456/udp > > nntps 563/tcpsnntp#nntp protocol over TLS/SSL > nntps 563/udpsnntp#nntp protocol over TLS/SSL I was referring to ports 5634, 5635 and 5636. Sorry for causing confusion. Thanks, -- Guido
OT: frequent accesses to port 563[456]
Hi, ippl shows frequent access attempts to ports 563[456] tcp in our subnet originating from machines all over the world. netstat and lsof show no programs listening on these ports. A websearch didn't reveal any usefull information regarding these port numbers. Any ideas? -- Guido
Re: OT: frequent accesses to port 563[456]
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 12:03:38AM +1100, Mostyn Bramley-Moore wrote: > > ippl shows frequent access attempts to ports 563[456] tcp in our > > subnet originating from machines all over the world. netstat and > > lsof show no programs listening on these ports. A websearch didn't > > reveal any usefull information regarding these port numbers. Any ideas? > > >From the FreeBSD /etc/services :- > > macon-tcp 456/tcp > macon-udp 456/udp > > nntps 563/tcpsnntp#nntp protocol over TLS/SSL > nntps 563/udpsnntp#nntp protocol over TLS/SSL I was referring to ports 5634, 5635 and 5636. Sorry for causing confusion. Thanks, -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: frequent accesses to port 563[456]
Hi, ippl shows frequent access attempts to ports 563[456] tcp in our subnet originating from machines all over the world. netstat and lsof show no programs listening on these ports. A websearch didn't reveal any usefull information regarding these port numbers. Any ideas? -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How can I help ?
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 02:43:07PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Thomas Guettler wrote: > > I am in the same position. I have got some time left which > > I could spent in an opensource project. Nearly all > > things I dream of are already working. > > A good free reimplementation of portsentry is something I would really > like to see. Right now portsentry works reasonably, but it could really > use a bunch of extra features. According to upstream we can't hope that he will put portsentry under a license which debian considers as free in the near future so a free reimplementation would be great. Portsentry is a nice peace of software but it's missing some crucial features such as a pid file or more flexible syntax in the hosts.ignore file (such as ignore host:port1,port2). -- GPG-Public Key: http://honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de/~agx/guenther.gpg.asc
Re: How can I help ?
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 02:43:07PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Thomas Guettler wrote: > > I am in the same position. I have got some time left which > > I could spent in an opensource project. Nearly all > > things I dream of are already working. > > A good free reimplementation of portsentry is something I would really > like to see. Right now portsentry works reasonably, but it could really > use a bunch of extra features. According to upstream we can't hope that he will put portsentry under a license which debian considers as free in the near future so a free reimplementation would be great. Portsentry is a nice peace of software but it's missing some crucial features such as a pid file or more flexible syntax in the hosts.ignore file (such as ignore host:port1,port2). -- GPG-Public Key: http://honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de/~agx/guenther.gpg.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
