Good Day - pls stop these mails
Hi, I've got more mails re this Spam mail than I've have actual spam in the last month (I use filters, maybe some of the complainers should ??). This mails had nothing to do with the list and are also therefore spam (in my book anyway). As a previous mail said, spam happens, get used to it, or stop using email. I cannot believe the number of mails I've deleted regarding this off-topic. 'nuff said Jon __ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: default security
I'd agree with your comments. I being looking at OpenBSD (for various reasons) and the default setup is reasonable secure (there are still some things left on , which supprised me). Not sure if Debian needs to go as far as OpenBSD but I think that it is a good referance base Jon --- Tarjei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Debian being what it is, are there any reasons why > the debian bind > package should not be chroot as the default > instalation? > > One thing that might be a good idea, would be a > security review of the > main debian packages. It's probably beeing done for > some already, but I > would guess a lot of debian packages could benefit > from even stricter > default setups. For example, maybe libsafe should be > default inn all > installs. > > I know this would take some time to implement, but I > think it would help > the image of debian and linux over time. I'm often > frustrated that the > big distros (rh, mandrake) doesn't do more to harden > their distros. For > example the default install of ssh in RH still > provides both ssh1 and > ssh2 & root login. > > Tarjei > __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
Re: default security
I'd agree with your comments. I being looking at OpenBSD (for various reasons) and the default setup is reasonable secure (there are still some things left on , which supprised me). Not sure if Debian needs to go as far as OpenBSD but I think that it is a good referance base Jon --- Tarjei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Debian being what it is, are there any reasons why > the debian bind > package should not be chroot as the default > instalation? > > One thing that might be a good idea, would be a > security review of the > main debian packages. It's probably beeing done for > some already, but I > would guess a lot of debian packages could benefit > from even stricter > default setups. For example, maybe libsafe should be > default inn all > installs. > > I know this would take some time to implement, but I > think it would help > the image of debian and linux over time. I'm often > frustrated that the > big distros (rh, mandrake) doesn't do more to harden > their distros. For > example the default install of ssh in RH still > provides both ssh1 and > ssh2 & root login. > > Tarjei > __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
