Re: Hashcash - was re: Spam fights
In other news for Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:24:05PM +1000, Russell Coker has been seen typing: Besides, with an army of Windows Zombies you could generate those signatures anyway... Why bother, when said windows machines will have perfectly good signatures stored on them somewhere already? -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- Rens Houben |opinions are mine Resident linux guru and sysadmin | if my employers have one Systemec Internet Services. |they'll tell you themselves PGP key at http://swordbreaker.systemec.nl/~shadur/shadur.key.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hashcash - was re: Spam fights
In other news for Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:24:05PM +1000, Russell Coker has been seen typing: Besides, with an army of Windows Zombies you could generate those signatures anyway... Why bother, when said windows machines will have perfectly good signatures stored on them somewhere already? -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- Rens Houben |opinions are mine Resident linux guru and sysadmin | if my employers have one Systemec Internet Services. |they'll tell you themselves PGP key at http://swordbreaker.systemec.nl/~shadur/shadur.key.asc
Re:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Romor has it that on Wednesday 15 May 2002 08:16, Oki DZ wrote: Hi, I received an email with an .xml attachment; by sanitizer, the file name was mangled. What is the appropriate behavior for handling xml files? The nearest trash folder. Thanks in advance, Oki - -- Rens Houben |opinions are mine Resident linux guru and sysadmin | if my employers have one Systemec Internet Services. |they'll tell you themselves PGP public key at http://suzaku.systemec.nl/shadur.key.asc -- new Dec 12 2001 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE84g7mR5T92/AjF/gRAp7MAJ435fTdlrItzf09bveoKx6TWyOpUwCgl70T uhiNpmAyW4ovlIF690tJQ4A= =uhqc -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Romor has it that on Wednesday 15 May 2002 08:16, Oki DZ wrote: Hi, I received an email with an .xml attachment; by sanitizer, the file name was mangled. What is the appropriate behavior for handling xml files? The nearest trash folder. Thanks in advance, Oki - -- Rens Houben |opinions are mine Resident linux guru and sysadmin | if my employers have one Systemec Internet Services. |they'll tell you themselves PGP public key at http://suzaku.systemec.nl/shadur.key.asc -- new Dec 12 2001 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE84g7mR5T92/AjF/gRAp7MAJ435fTdlrItzf09bveoKx6TWyOpUwCgl70T uhiNpmAyW4ovlIF690tJQ4A= =uhqc -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: per IP billing
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 09:35, Marcel Welschbillig wrote: Hi all ! Know this is a bit off subject but dose anybody know any good programs to use for monitoring Megabytes per IP address. What i want to do is have a LAN and be able to get data on how many MB each host downloaded for billing purposes. If you know what you want to log beforehand, you might want to have a look at ipac. Otherwise, ulogd or trafstats may have what you need. Any help much appreciated Marcel -- Rens Houben |opinions are mine Resident linux guru and sysadmin | if my employers have one Systemec Internet Services. |they'll tell you themselves PGP public key at http://suzaku.systemec.nl/shadur.key.asc pgp5nPN48kYMa.pgp Description: PGP signature
snorting bridges? [ Was: Re: iptables with a linux bridge ]
On Sun, 2001-12-02 at 23:05, martin f krafft wrote: because it's filtering based on the IP information. brides speak no IP. They do if you marry a girl who knows her networking. *Ducks* Anyways, I've been following this thread and wondering: Is there any reason why snort would or would not work with a bridge? -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) -- Rens Houben |opinions are mine Resident linux guru and sysadmin | if my employers have one Systemec Internet Services. |they'll tell you themselves PGP public key at http://suzaku.systemec.nl/shadur.key.asc msg04567/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
snorting bridges? [ Was: Re: iptables with a linux bridge ]
On Sun, 2001-12-02 at 23:05, martin f krafft wrote: because it's filtering based on the IP information. brides speak no IP. They do if you marry a girl who knows her networking. *Ducks* Anyways, I've been following this thread and wondering: Is there any reason why snort would or would not work with a bridge? -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) -- Rens Houben |opinions are mine Resident linux guru and sysadmin | if my employers have one Systemec Internet Services. |they'll tell you themselves PGP public key at http://suzaku.systemec.nl/shadur.key.asc pgpnMRHUmv4Ml.pgp Description: PGP signature
