Re: Debian LTS?
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 21:07:07 +0200 wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: And that's 2 years less for LTS ... especially in bigger Setup's LTS-Support is mandatory so there (because there is no Debian LTS's) Debian cannot be used due to the lack of Support. Instead - Redhat or Ubuntu or any other distribution with LTS-Support is used there. 3 years of direct support of stable and so 1-2 years of oldstable support mean a amount of 4-5 years, please define again what you mean for LTS... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111006001545.df36faf054596a48d1624...@sythos.net
Re: Debian LTS?
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:13:33 +0200 wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: Hi all, a Debian LTS-Version would be so welcome and is definitly something that's missing for Debian. in 18 years Debian released 6 stable, an avarage of 3 years between a stable and the next one, i think is already longer than others call LTS a distro. 3 years between stables is already (imho, maybe) too much, is already an overload of work for maintainers to backport patches and other on software often classified old if not obsolete too. The major benefit of opensource software is the darwin effect, good software evolve quickly, bad software die, force a maintainer to work on a software for 2 years more than usual may mean force a unusefull work, *imho* 3 years are already too much for a lot of enviroments (like development) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111006001345.e95cc727f5dafe6b07621...@sythos.net
Re: Unknown sevice runing on debian machin
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:05:37PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: plese help me stop this scrvice PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 2284 debuser 16 0 51144 10m 48m S 41.0 4.2 110:14.86 amor amor is a game for KDE :) uninstall it if you don't want any pet on your desktop -- Sythos - http://www.sythos.net () ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against html/rtf/vCard in mail /\- against M$ attachments -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hi
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 09:07:19PM +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote: I am having a problem in logging into my linux machine it is saying me that authentication failure Try putting in the correct username and password; that should solve that problem. More seriously: this isn't a bug report, or a problem, it is a statement of fact. We can't help you unless you tell us more about your problem. What are you trying to do, what is reporting the error, and how did you configure security on the machine? Do you have re-used old lan ip? If yes, delete entry about remote host from .sshd/know-host and retry. -- Sythos - http://www.sythos.net () ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against html/rtf/vCard in mail /\- against M$ attachments -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Will Bind9 in stable get patched?
Il Sat, 20 Sep 2003 11:13:35 -0700 Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] scrisse: Will Bind9 in stable get the delegation-only patch? I would consider it a security issue because mail now could be delivered to the wrong server. http://www.icann.org/announcements/advisory-19sep03.htm Probabli this situation change in few time Without patch bind9 (big work, packetize, upload to server, mirroring to other surce, updateupgrade=big time) imho is better filter mail blocking verisign cloaked IP (every mta support it, You can do it in few minutes) -- Sythos - http://www.sythos.net -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 - GE d- s+:+ a+ C++ U P! L+++ E-- W+++ N++ o K- w O-- M- V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP++ t++ 5 X+ R+ tv b++ DI++ D++ G++ e+++ h+ r y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Will Bind9 in stable get patched?
Il Sat, 20 Sep 2003 11:13:35 -0700 Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] scrisse: Will Bind9 in stable get the delegation-only patch? I would consider it a security issue because mail now could be delivered to the wrong server. http://www.icann.org/announcements/advisory-19sep03.htm Probabli this situation change in few time Without patch bind9 (big work, packetize, upload to server, mirroring to other surce, updateupgrade=big time) imho is better filter mail blocking verisign cloaked IP (every mta support it, You can do it in few minutes) -- Sythos - http://www.sythos.net -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 - GE d- s+:+ a+ C++ U P! L+++ E-- W+++ N++ o K- w O-- M- V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP++ t++ 5 X+ R+ tv b++ DI++ D++ G++ e+++ h+ r y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
Re: security updates for testing?
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 01:10:04AM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote: does a line deb http://security.debian.org testing/updates main non-free contrib in short: does Debian support security updates for testing? In short, no. Occasionally, though, the security team will quickly move a fix in for testing if it's something particularly horrendous, and they have the resources to do it. That's why the repository is there, but I wouldn't count on it for security. If someone has testing version on his machine should link stable or unstable for security update? -- Sythos - http://www.sythos.net -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 - GE d- s+:+ a+ C++ U P! L+++ E-- W+++ N++ o K- w O-- M- V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP++ t++ 5 X+ R+ tv b++ DI++ D++ G++ e+++ h+ r y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
