Re: Bad press again...
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 11:07:21AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > apart from unanswered email messages to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, there > are few complaints, AFAIK. The email part is very unfortunate indeed, I'm not entirely happy with the lack of redundance. Given the (not only commercial) significance of Debian, the size of the distribution, and the complexity of todays software combined with the openness of the net, a team of at least five, maybe ten people might not be unjustifiable. (testing security team: 19 people, right?) Cheers, WB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bad press again...
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 05:36:26PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > Heck, we *should* have a responsive and communicative security team. Do we have a security team for stable? I know, that we have a security team for testing consisting of nine DDs and ten non-DDs, but it seems to me, that stable is handled by Joey alone. Has this changed since the havoc a few months ago? Cheers, WB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bad press related to (missing) Debian security
Just FYI: The well-known German Heise Newsticker (IT related) has an article today with the title "Debian without security update for several weeks": http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/61076 Hm, bad reputation for us... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
