Re: LVM2 - pvcreate error
hi! First of all - I also think that this is nothing security related!!! > maybe ltrace it? Because I don't think the error message comes from > pvcreate: > strings `which pvcreate` | grep regex > (yields nothing) [EMAIL PROTECTED] roger # strings `which pvcreate` | grep regex regex_filter_create _Failed to create regex device filter_ devices/filter not found in config file: no regex filter installed invalid seperator at end of regex filters/filter-regex.c regex/matcher.c Couldn't parse regex regex/parse_rx.c Parse error in regex regex/ttree.c [EMAIL PROTECTED] roger # probably you got an old version of pvcreate? For my excuse - I'm doing this on a gentoo laptop cause I've no debian currently here but .. as you see the strin is in pvcreate .. alltough i don't know what it means. regards Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Checking what running program are using old libraries
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 12:31, Dale Amon wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 12:03:29PM +0100, Jan Dittberner wrote: > > Such a script exists in testing yep it does, but unfortunately with dependencies, and i don't want my stable system getting confused. allthough i think debian is managing that thing very fine i must remark that in the past a few things getting fu$%ed-up by mixing stable and testing. I'd like to see those deps cleaned out fast and wish the debian team good luck for the next release. regrets Werner -- Werner Macho - Zentraler Informatikdienst(ZID) BOKU/Wien [EMAIL PROTECTED] (phone) +43 1 47654 2136 (fax) +43 1 47654 2149 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Checking what running program are using old libraries
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 12:31, Dale Amon wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 12:03:29PM +0100, Jan Dittberner wrote: > > Such a script exists in testing yep it does, but unfortunately with dependencies, and i don't want my stable system getting confused. allthough i think debian is managing that thing very fine i must remark that in the past a few things getting fu$%ed-up by mixing stable and testing. I'd like to see those deps cleaned out fast and wish the debian team good luck for the next release. regrets Werner -- Werner Macho - Zentraler Informatikdienst(ZID) BOKU/Wien [EMAIL PROTECTED] (phone) +43 1 47654 2136 (fax) +43 1 47654 2149 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: chkrootkit and lkm
I'm not quite sure if i'm right .. but isn't there a kernel bug displaying some processes with PID 0 in ps or top. maybe lkm is using this.. just a thought greets Werner > > > Checking `lkm'... You have 4 process hidden for ps command > > > Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed I signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: chkrootkit and lkm
I'm not quite sure if i'm right .. but isn't there a kernel bug displaying some processes with PID 0 in ps or top. maybe lkm is using this.. just a thought greets Werner > > > Checking `lkm'... You have 4 process hidden for ps command > > > Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed I signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
