Re: Good Day - spamassin

2002-09-12 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Thursday, 2002-09-12 at 10:20:39 +0200, Marcel Hicking wrote:
 --On Mittwoch, 3. Juli 2002 14:04 +0300 Samuli Suonpaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:

 i would rather see that the spam senders see a bounce email that
 fills up their boxes with returned undeliverables..

 So if some spammes forged headers and puts, for instance,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] there you feel it's your job to mail-bomb me?

 Happend to me. ~6 mails in my inbox... I was quite
 amused... When mutt had finally managed to delete 5000 mails,
 during that time at least the same amount of new mails had
 arrived already. Stuffed my line quite a bit...

Same here. I had collected about 4500 when I started using procmail
filters. I had to add more subject lines almost every day because I
wanted to see legitimate bounces and filter only those the Spammer
caused.

The filter collected 17000 more bounces before the Spammer ceased using
my name. So I was more fortunate than you:

1) This ran over weeks, not in a few days.
2) There where only a quarter of your bounces.

I educated quite a few people who sent remove requests about the dangers
of doing that. The best one was this:

   REMOVE ME FROM YOUR MAILING LIST NOW OR ELSE I WILL HAVE TO REPORT
   YOU THE WEB ADMINISTRATOR

Oooohhh, I'm scared...

Luope Christoph
-- 
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   http://www.lupe-christoph.de/ |
| Big Misunderstandings #6398: The Titanic was not supposed to be|
| unsinkable. The designer had a speech impediment. He said: I have |
| thith great unthinkable conthept ...  |



Re: Good Day - spamassin

2002-07-03 Thread Samuli Suonpaa
Alvin Oga [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 a silly question ... if spamassassin caught the spam,
 i assume it still received the spam and dumped it into a rejected spam
 folder ???

 i would rather see that the spam senders see a bounce email that
 fills up their boxes with returned undeliverables..

So if some spammes forged headers and puts, for instance,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] there you feel it's your job to mail-bomb me?

Suonpää...


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Good Day - spamassin

2002-07-02 Thread Alvin Oga

hi ya 

a silly question ... if spamassassin caught the spam,
i assume it still received the spam and dumped it into a rejected spam
folder ???

i would rather see that the spam senders see a bounce email that
fills up their boxes with returned undeliverables..
- at least thats what i think is happening with my setup
( i only see a log from somebody that got rejected 
( but i have no idea of its content .. and dont care
( if i dont know who it was that sent it 


http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Mail   .. antispam filter stuff ..
( sorry, its not debian-centric )

c ya
alvin

-- oz.net sounds like a good domain name :-)


On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Bob Nielsen wrote:

 On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 02:18:16PM +0900, Howland, Curtis wrote:
   What bothers me in all of this is that Debian lists are 
   managed so poorly
   to let this happen.
  
  The Debian lists are deliberately not subscriber only may post on
  the theory that it's better to press DEL than to prevent someone from
  posting.
 
 apt-get install spamassassin
 
 It trapped that one for me as well as 99% of the spam I receive.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Good Day - spamassin

2002-07-02 Thread Rolf Kutz
* Quoting Alvin Oga ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

 
 hi ya 
 
 a silly question ... if spamassassin caught the spam,
 i assume it still received the spam and dumped it into a rejected spam
 folder ???
 
 i would rather see that the spam senders see a bounce email that
 fills up their boxes with returned undeliverables..

Their or someone elses inbox. Most spam is send
with faked From:-header.

- Rolf


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]