Re: log analyze applications

2002-02-27 Thread Eric LeBlanc



On 27 Feb 2002, eim wrote:

   * logcheck  (System Log Analyzer)

[SNIP]
 network activity and so on... everything works quite well, the
 only problem is: they generate *REALLY* much mail traffic with
 lots of output which I can't read all.
 
 So my question is, has anyone a good solution for checking
 syslogs, netlogs, etc. in order to have a simple and strict
 overview of system activities ?
 
 Are there any tools which are smarter, faster and cleaner
 as my combination of log analyze apps. ?
 

The most smarter you can find is you brain.  Logcheck is very useful and
does not send many e-mails if you know how to configure correctly.  

In other words, if you don't want to see some messages, so add theses
messages in appropriate ignore file...

Here, each week, in one log file, I have approxymately 800 000 lines, and
I use logchecker to search some words (and discard other words) to put in
report and e-mail it to me, and (it's luck or it's a good configuration?)
each e-mail which I had recieved are useful for me.

Eric


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: log analyze applications

2002-02-27 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans

On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 04:22:31PM +0100, eim wrote:
 
 Are there any tools which are smarter, faster and cleaner
 as my combination of log analyze apps. ?

I saw a presentation at the LISA sysadmin conference a couple years ago
about something called SHARP, the syslog heuristic analysis and
response program.  It definitely sounded interesting, and was written
to address exactly this type of problem.  You can find the paper at
http://www.csis.gvsu.edu/sharp/.  I believe it contains the URL where
you can find the source to SHARP.

Note that I've never actually *run* SHARP, but the idea sounds very
good.  I'm not sure how developed the package is.  Depending on how much
effort you're willing to put into it, this could be an interesting
option to consider.

noah

-- 
 ___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html 



msg05812/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: log analyze applications

2002-02-27 Thread Moses Moore

eim wrote:
 * logcheck  (System Log Analyzer)
 * snort (Intrusion Detection System)
 * ippl  (IP protocols logger)

The only application of those three I use is logcheck, and it does
require tuning.

Here's what I've done (using logcheck/testing):

Made two new files, /etc/logcheck/ignore.local and
/etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.local.  Soft-linked them into
/etc/logcheck/ignore.d and /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d
respecitively.

As logcheck traffic comes in, if there's stuff I could go without being
notified about I'll add regexps to ignore.local or
violations.ignore.local to weed them out.  It's an ongoing/tuning
process, but within a couple of days I've pruned out the redundant
messages (like netsaint's monitors or ntpdate adjusting the clock in
increments of less than a second) and I get logcheck mail maybe once a
week even though I check every hour.  I've also tweaked logcheck to
change the subject line to differentiate between 'unusual', 'possible
violation' and 'possible attack', so I can defer reading the merely
unusual warnings.

I've been getting logcheck mail more ever since Pacific-Rim and East
European users have been trying to ftp to or nfs-mount from my machine
(even though I don't have these services running).  I considered pruning
that out, but I actually want to know so I can block the responsible
ISPs on my firewall -- yet another (t|pr)uning process.

I tried running portsentry, but see my above message about too many
false positives.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: log analyze applications

2002-02-27 Thread eim

Thanks folks, for all suggestions !

Well, I'm going to tune my logcheck now
and of course I'll keep eyes open, and brain smart,
for further solutions...

...anyway nothing is better than a good tuned application :)

Thanks again,
have a nice time,

 - Ivo

On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 16:22, eim wrote:
 log analyze applications
 
 
 Hallo to everyone on the debian-security list.
 
 I've got some questions related to log analyzing applications,
 actually on my debian server boxes I've installed and configured
 software like...
 
   * logcheck  (System Log Analyzer)
   * snort (Intrusion Detection System)
   * ippl  (IP protocols logger)
 
 
 All these apps. check my system for security alerts, malfunctions,
 network activity and so on... everything works quite well, the
 only problem is: they generate *REALLY* much mail traffic with
 lots of output which I can't read all.
 
 So my question is, has anyone a good solution for checking
 syslogs, netlogs, etc. in order to have a simple and strict
 overview of system activities ?
 
 Are there any tools which are smarter, faster and cleaner
 as my combination of log analyze apps. ?
 
 Thanks for any suggestions !
  
  - Ivo Marino
 
 -- 
 
  »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »«
  Ivo Marino[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  UN*X Developer, running Debian GNU/Linux
  irc.OpenProjects.net #debian
  http://eimbox.org/~eim http://eimbox.org
  »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »«
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
-- 

 »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »«
 Ivo Marino[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 UN*X Developer, running Debian GNU/Linux
 irc.OpenProjects.net #debian
 http://eimbox.org/~eim http://eimbox.org
 »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »«


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: log analyze applications

2002-02-27 Thread Eric LeBlanc


On 27 Feb 2002, eim wrote:

   * logcheck  (System Log Analyzer)

[SNIP]
 network activity and so on... everything works quite well, the
 only problem is: they generate *REALLY* much mail traffic with
 lots of output which I can't read all.
 
 So my question is, has anyone a good solution for checking
 syslogs, netlogs, etc. in order to have a simple and strict
 overview of system activities ?
 
 Are there any tools which are smarter, faster and cleaner
 as my combination of log analyze apps. ?
 

The most smarter you can find is you brain.  Logcheck is very useful and
does not send many e-mails if you know how to configure correctly.  

In other words, if you don't want to see some messages, so add theses
messages in appropriate ignore file...

Here, each week, in one log file, I have approxymately 800 000 lines, and
I use logchecker to search some words (and discard other words) to put in
report and e-mail it to me, and (it's luck or it's a good configuration?)
each e-mail which I had recieved are useful for me.

Eric



Re: log analyze applications

2002-02-27 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 04:22:31PM +0100, eim wrote:
 
 Are there any tools which are smarter, faster and cleaner
 as my combination of log analyze apps. ?

I saw a presentation at the LISA sysadmin conference a couple years ago
about something called SHARP, the syslog heuristic analysis and
response program.  It definitely sounded interesting, and was written
to address exactly this type of problem.  You can find the paper at
http://www.csis.gvsu.edu/sharp/.  I believe it contains the URL where
you can find the source to SHARP.

Note that I've never actually *run* SHARP, but the idea sounds very
good.  I'm not sure how developed the package is.  Depending on how much
effort you're willing to put into it, this could be an interesting
option to consider.

noah

-- 
 ___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html 


pgp4B5i4lIJ7R.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: log analyze applications

2002-02-27 Thread Moses Moore
eim wrote:
 * logcheck  (System Log Analyzer)
 * snort (Intrusion Detection System)
 * ippl  (IP protocols logger)

The only application of those three I use is logcheck, and it does
require tuning.

Here's what I've done (using logcheck/testing):

Made two new files, /etc/logcheck/ignore.local and
/etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.local.  Soft-linked them into
/etc/logcheck/ignore.d and /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d
respecitively.

As logcheck traffic comes in, if there's stuff I could go without being
notified about I'll add regexps to ignore.local or
violations.ignore.local to weed them out.  It's an ongoing/tuning
process, but within a couple of days I've pruned out the redundant
messages (like netsaint's monitors or ntpdate adjusting the clock in
increments of less than a second) and I get logcheck mail maybe once a
week even though I check every hour.  I've also tweaked logcheck to
change the subject line to differentiate between 'unusual', 'possible
violation' and 'possible attack', so I can defer reading the merely
unusual warnings.

I've been getting logcheck mail more ever since Pacific-Rim and East
European users have been trying to ftp to or nfs-mount from my machine
(even though I don't have these services running).  I considered pruning
that out, but I actually want to know so I can block the responsible
ISPs on my firewall -- yet another (t|pr)uning process.

I tried running portsentry, but see my above message about too many
false positives.



Re: log analyze applications

2002-02-27 Thread eim
Thanks folks, for all suggestions !

Well, I'm going to tune my logcheck now
and of course I'll keep eyes open, and brain smart,
for further solutions...

...anyway nothing is better than a good tuned application :)

Thanks again,
have a nice time,

 - Ivo

On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 16:22, eim wrote:
 log analyze applications
 
 
 Hallo to everyone on the debian-security list.
 
 I've got some questions related to log analyzing applications,
 actually on my debian server boxes I've installed and configured
 software like...
 
   * logcheck  (System Log Analyzer)
   * snort (Intrusion Detection System)
   * ippl  (IP protocols logger)
 
 
 All these apps. check my system for security alerts, malfunctions,
 network activity and so on... everything works quite well, the
 only problem is: they generate *REALLY* much mail traffic with
 lots of output which I can't read all.
 
 So my question is, has anyone a good solution for checking
 syslogs, netlogs, etc. in order to have a simple and strict
 overview of system activities ?
 
 Are there any tools which are smarter, faster and cleaner
 as my combination of log analyze apps. ?
 
 Thanks for any suggestions !
  
  - Ivo Marino
 
 -- 
 
  »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »«
  Ivo Marino[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  UN*X Developer, running Debian GNU/Linux
  irc.OpenProjects.net #debian
  http://eimbox.org/~eim http://eimbox.org
  »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »«
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
-- 

 »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »«
 Ivo Marino[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 UN*X Developer, running Debian GNU/Linux
 irc.OpenProjects.net #debian
 http://eimbox.org/~eim http://eimbox.org
 »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »«