Re: Re: mt-daapd #404640 introduces remote security hole
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote YOU MUST BE KIDDING. No, I'm actually serious about my concerns, however since the package maintainer quickly responded to my bug report, I think it might be better to discuss the issue on #404640 and stop discussion here. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=404640 Thanks Alexander Kurtz signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
mt-daapd #404640 introduces remote security hole
Hi, since it took more than half a year until someone responded to the initial mail of #404640 and there are still SERIOUS REMOTE SECURITY ISSUES UNFIXED, I thougt I'd just drop a link: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=404640 Alexander Kurtz signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Re: mt-daapd #404640 introduces remote security hole
Alexander Kurtz kurtz.a...@googlemail.com (01/04/2009): since it took more than half a year until someone responded to the initial mail of #404640 and there are still SERIOUS REMOTE SECURITY ISSUES UNFIXED, I thougt I'd just drop a link: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=404640 YOU MUST BE KIDDING. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature