Re: xautolock activation behaviour
Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > a user provided a convenience patch[1] for xautolock[2] preventing > xautolock from starting its configured executible (e.g. xlock) when the > computer just woke up from sleep. > > IMHO this would raise a security issue for people assuming xlock to be > started after wakeup, so I propose to reject the patch. Any opposition? > > Thanks. > > bye, > Roland > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241213 > [2] http://packages.debian.org/unstable/x11/xautolock (Let him) Make it a config option that defaults to locking. Its the users choice to compromise. MfG Goswin
Re: xautolock activation behaviour
Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > a user provided a convenience patch[1] for xautolock[2] preventing > xautolock from starting its configured executible (e.g. xlock) when the > computer just woke up from sleep. > > IMHO this would raise a security issue for people assuming xlock to be > started after wakeup, so I propose to reject the patch. Any opposition? > > Thanks. > > bye, > Roland > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241213 > [2] http://packages.debian.org/unstable/x11/xautolock (Let him) Make it a config option that defaults to locking. Its the users choice to compromise. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xautolock activation behaviour
Hi, a user provided a convenience patch[1] for xautolock[2] preventing xautolock from starting its configured executible (e.g. xlock) when the computer just woke up from sleep. IMHO this would raise a security issue for people assuming xlock to be started after wakeup, so I propose to reject the patch. Any opposition? Thanks. bye, Roland [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241213 [2] http://packages.debian.org/unstable/x11/xautolock
xautolock activation behaviour
Hi, a user provided a convenience patch[1] for xautolock[2] preventing xautolock from starting its configured executible (e.g. xlock) when the computer just woke up from sleep. IMHO this would raise a security issue for people assuming xlock to be started after wakeup, so I propose to reject the patch. Any opposition? Thanks. bye, Roland [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241213 [2] http://packages.debian.org/unstable/x11/xautolock -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]