Re: Objections to enable salsa-ci in our packages?

2019-09-30 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi,

On Sun, 29 Sep 2019, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> If nobody objects, I will be enabling and pushing salsa-ci.yml to all of
> our packages soon.

I'm fine with it, but please make sure to skip the CI for the initial
push. Otherwise you will have grumpy salsa admins. They asked the python
team to not do this at all. (But python team has many more packages)

https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/#skipping-the-whole-pipeline-on-push

You should also update the configuration in
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/pkg-security-team to configure
the non default CI path to debian/salsa-ci.yml.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/get/



Re: Objections to enable salsa-ci in our packages?

2019-09-30 Thread 林上智
Hi Samuel,

Samuel Henrique  於 2019年9月30日 週一 上午6:02寫道:
>
> Hey team,
>
> If nobody objects, I will be enabling and pushing salsa-ci.yml to all of our 
> packages soon.

Thanks to Samuel, I think it makes sense to add this configuration to
ensure the quality of the packages. It would be better if we can use
the same format and process with this yml file. Would you update this
in the team's wiki?

SZ

>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Samuel Henrique