Re: New wifite repo?
Hi Sophie! El mar., 10 de dic. de 2019 a la(s) 05:24, Sophie Brun (sop...@freexian.com) escribió: > Hi Daniel, > > > Le 26/11/2019 à 16:14, Daniel Echeverry a écrit : > > Hi! > > [..] > > I wrote to the upstream, and he will make a new release this weekend, > once it's done, I will work in package this version. > > > > I had to update wifite for Kali even if upstream didn't make a new > release. I took a git snapshot. > I push the changes on Debian salsa. If you want to check it before we ask > for upload. > > Thanks, > Sophie > For me is ok, go ahead! Aditionality, I updated my email address. Regards. -- Daniel Echeverry Debian Developer https://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry Linux user: #477840 GPG Fingerprint: D0D0 85B1 69C3 BFD9 4048 58FA 21FC 2950 4B52 30DB
Re: RFS: unhide (fix #945864 and more changes)
Em qui., 12 de dez. de 2019 às 11:49, Thiago Marques escreveu: > > Hello, > I'm working on the unhide package and it would be interesting to upload a new > revision. > > https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/unhide/tree/unhide_20130526-4 > > I created a new branch (unhide_20130526-4) and after review and upload I will > do a merge.cd debi > > Thanks for review and upload or point out improvements. Hi Thiago, Thanks for your work. I migrated DH level to 12 and I did upload of the package. Considering my changes, I already merged the branch and set a tag. Cheers, Eriberto
Re: 2nd REMINDER: tomb 2.7+dfsg2-1~bpo10+1 ready for review and upload
Hi Sven, Sorry, sorry, sorry... I was a bit busy in last days and I didn't see your last message asking for an upload. I just uploaded tomb to bpo. Please, let me know if you need more uploads. Cheers, Eriberto Em sex., 13 de dez. de 2019 às 18:00, Sven Geuer escreveu: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi Team, > > I'd really appreciate if someone would do this review and upload. > > If there's anything I still can do about it, please let me know. > > Thanks, > Sven > > Am Montag, den 02.12.2019, 21:16 +0100 schrieb Sven Geuer: > > Hello Eriberto, > > > > may I ask you to do this review and upload? > > > > You already reviewed tomb 2.7+dfsg1-1 and 2.7+dfsg2-1, and there is > > only a small change to d/salsa-ci.yml for buster-backports. > > > > Regards, > > Sven > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 13.11.2019, 20:21 +0100 schrieb Sven Geuer: > > > Hello Team, > > > > > > I just learned how to control the distribution used to run the > > > tests, > > > piuparts test don't fail anymore. > > > > > > Please review and upload the tomb for buster-backports [1] > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Sven > > > > > > [1] > > > https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/tomb/tree/debian/buster-backports > > > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 13.11.2019, 20:00 +0100 schrieb Sven Geuer: > > > > Hello Team, > > > > > > > > I prepared version 2.7+dfsg2-1~bpo10+1 of the package [1]. Please > > > > review and upload it although it fails the piuparts test in > > > > salsa's > > > > CI. > > > > > > > > From what I can see the reason for failing the test is that it is > > > > run > > > > on the wrong distribution (sid) for buster-backports packages. > > > > > > > > Excerpts from the logs [2]: > > > > [...] > > > > 0m0.0s INFO: Command line arguments: /usr/sbin/piuparts --mirror > > > > ' > > > > http://deb.debian.org/debian main' --scriptsdir > > > > /etc/piuparts/scripts > > > > --allow-database --warn-on-leftovers-after-purge --hard-link -e > > > > /tmp/debian-chroot --distribution sid '/builds/pkg-security- > > > > team/tomb/debian/output/tomb-dbgsym_2.7+dfsg2- > > > > 1~bpo10+1_amd64.deb' > > > > [...] > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > > >tomb-dbgsym : Depends: tomb (= 2.7+dfsg2-1~bpo10+1) but > > > > 2.7+dfsg2- > > > > 1 > > > > is to be installed > > > > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Sven > > > > > > > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/tomb > > > > [2] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/tomb/-/jobs/411827 > > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > > iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEPfXoqkP8n9/QhvGVrfUO2vit1YUFAl3z++wACgkQrfUO2vit > 1YXC/g//ZL9KVy3HgQOf2SpXd2rJ+i6IeUkhdiaVXpwjQ5HuCA0LRLfBaMa6jH28 > arcEex05h2Whb9ZolT8KLmto3RgN+ulklZC06KWByzhVL279qXcYN8y1jOwJud6O > YLkQcVxnbfE42Ekp0Gv5oM26j+996VvrjSbadsnSsQl7YizbPGWncf8uzOtYBLir > aNkh7H8vpJyY65ZDGx0UuMTpF3hzAPPjQsu1gaKPmwoyAqPnUh3BKNAipqTl1HKF > BLUbz1JDqF9qu7O2uO9uBoHd+4HDEbxTtuJE62PGF0PcIJc85j3Nr/jB321+B0Jl > fI5t2XcahIWeS4X+XgPBRsFJdnLMds2dKSA5oPaDvWNgB0+RmlhCJhPu2stCcP1g > BP/U4hHF0b7Wq5/SceE18hZcQW27Jo6yO5xBx+77l/2CfRnvrlHB5TdMBdYouPgX > ZqkUDgDclBEFQlH8p2fd720STAD10ONlJEFRQ+p5YS+d3ixk5bAZgU4Kevx8w5+G > 6gNypHmbN4dPvgm3SzkSMU44L6x3uZ7JzVYvvagexQfVVH//mguBGNzgdKEDi2vA > EIJg92SQLcFdfsaG4m7k3jQ5SSTbDLvt/HOiQl4X/VxnzxoNtbYtRN5JXlSSEXmM > S/OlDRkCME/Ny+3xmIdHm6UZESq1fwBPZhehSrJr8AL4SUtw1bg= > =S1VH > -END PGP SIGNATURE- >
2nd REMINDER: tomb 2.7+dfsg2-1~bpo10+1 ready for review and upload
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Team, I'd really appreciate if someone would do this review and upload. If there's anything I still can do about it, please let me know. Thanks, Sven Am Montag, den 02.12.2019, 21:16 +0100 schrieb Sven Geuer: > Hello Eriberto, > > may I ask you to do this review and upload? > > You already reviewed tomb 2.7+dfsg1-1 and 2.7+dfsg2-1, and there is > only a small change to d/salsa-ci.yml for buster-backports. > > Regards, > Sven > > Am Mittwoch, den 13.11.2019, 20:21 +0100 schrieb Sven Geuer: > > Hello Team, > > > > I just learned how to control the distribution used to run the > > tests, > > piuparts test don't fail anymore. > > > > Please review and upload the tomb for buster-backports [1] > > > > Cheers, > > Sven > > > > [1] > > https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/tomb/tree/debian/buster-backports > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 13.11.2019, 20:00 +0100 schrieb Sven Geuer: > > > Hello Team, > > > > > > I prepared version 2.7+dfsg2-1~bpo10+1 of the package [1]. Please > > > review and upload it although it fails the piuparts test in > > > salsa's > > > CI. > > > > > > From what I can see the reason for failing the test is that it is > > > run > > > on the wrong distribution (sid) for buster-backports packages. > > > > > > Excerpts from the logs [2]: > > > [...] > > > 0m0.0s INFO: Command line arguments: /usr/sbin/piuparts --mirror > > > ' > > > http://deb.debian.org/debian main' --scriptsdir > > > /etc/piuparts/scripts > > > --allow-database --warn-on-leftovers-after-purge --hard-link -e > > > /tmp/debian-chroot --distribution sid '/builds/pkg-security- > > > team/tomb/debian/output/tomb-dbgsym_2.7+dfsg2- > > > 1~bpo10+1_amd64.deb' > > > [...] > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > >tomb-dbgsym : Depends: tomb (= 2.7+dfsg2-1~bpo10+1) but > > > 2.7+dfsg2- > > > 1 > > > is to be installed > > > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. > > > [...] > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Sven > > > > > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/tomb > > > [2] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/tomb/-/jobs/411827 > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEPfXoqkP8n9/QhvGVrfUO2vit1YUFAl3z++wACgkQrfUO2vit 1YXC/g//ZL9KVy3HgQOf2SpXd2rJ+i6IeUkhdiaVXpwjQ5HuCA0LRLfBaMa6jH28 arcEex05h2Whb9ZolT8KLmto3RgN+ulklZC06KWByzhVL279qXcYN8y1jOwJud6O YLkQcVxnbfE42Ekp0Gv5oM26j+996VvrjSbadsnSsQl7YizbPGWncf8uzOtYBLir aNkh7H8vpJyY65ZDGx0UuMTpF3hzAPPjQsu1gaKPmwoyAqPnUh3BKNAipqTl1HKF BLUbz1JDqF9qu7O2uO9uBoHd+4HDEbxTtuJE62PGF0PcIJc85j3Nr/jB321+B0Jl fI5t2XcahIWeS4X+XgPBRsFJdnLMds2dKSA5oPaDvWNgB0+RmlhCJhPu2stCcP1g BP/U4hHF0b7Wq5/SceE18hZcQW27Jo6yO5xBx+77l/2CfRnvrlHB5TdMBdYouPgX ZqkUDgDclBEFQlH8p2fd720STAD10ONlJEFRQ+p5YS+d3ixk5bAZgU4Kevx8w5+G 6gNypHmbN4dPvgm3SzkSMU44L6x3uZ7JzVYvvagexQfVVH//mguBGNzgdKEDi2vA EIJg92SQLcFdfsaG4m7k3jQ5SSTbDLvt/HOiQl4X/VxnzxoNtbYtRN5JXlSSEXmM S/OlDRkCME/Ny+3xmIdHm6UZESq1fwBPZhehSrJr8AL4SUtw1bg= =S1VH -END PGP SIGNATURE-
