Re: Request to review and upload librtr 0.6.3-2

2021-01-18 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote:
> That's right Peter, pkg-config was missing, thanks!
> 
> I think librtr[1] is now ready for review and upload.

Uploaded. Thank you!


-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀   Raphaël Hertzog 
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋The Debian Handbook: https://debian-handbook.info/get/
  ⠈⠳⣄   Debian Long Term Support: https://deb.li/LTS


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Request to review and upload librtr 0.6.3-2

2021-01-16 Thread Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro
Hi,
Sorry my late.

Peter Wienemann:
> Dear Francisco,
> 
> On 08.01.21 17:56, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote:
>> On 1/8/21 9:23 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>> He also pointed towards a possible upstream fix. Do you want to look into
>>> backporting this?
>>>
>> I tried to get the latest version (0.7.0+git20201012.93724e4), applied 
>> the patch
>> https://github.com/rtrlib/rtrlib/pull/260/commits/f81b70bf03a52b2e25f7154062c538dc050b3571
>>  
>> 
>> yet the bug continues.
>> Unfortunately I was not successful.
> 
> along with the mentioned patch you also have to add "pkg-config" to the 
> build deps. Have you considered this for your test?
> 
That's right Peter, pkg-config was missing, thanks!

I think librtr[1] is now ready for review and upload.

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/librtr

Best regards.
-- 
Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro 
4096R: 1B8C F656 EF3B 8447 2F48 F0E7 82FB F706 0B2F 7D00



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Request to review and upload librtr 0.6.3-2

2021-01-09 Thread Peter Wienemann

Dear Francisco,

On 08.01.21 17:56, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote:

On 1/8/21 9:23 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:

He also pointed towards a possible upstream fix. Do you want to look into
backporting this?

I tried to get the latest version (0.7.0+git20201012.93724e4), applied 
the patch
https://github.com/rtrlib/rtrlib/pull/260/commits/f81b70bf03a52b2e25f7154062c538dc050b3571 


yet the bug continues.
Unfortunately I was not successful.


along with the mentioned patch you also have to add "pkg-config" to the 
build deps. Have you considered this for your test?


Best regards,

Peter



Re: Request to review and upload librtr 0.6.3-2

2021-01-08 Thread Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro

Hello Raphael,

On 1/8/21 9:23 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:

Hi,

On Thu, 24 Dec 2020, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote:

I fixed an RC bug [0] in librtr [1].

Please, review and upload.


Adrian Bunk pointed out that your fix is clearly incorrect. Can you at
least revert your change please ?It would be nice if you tried to


Sure, it's done.


understand your changes before you are doing them. A symbol that
disappears is a big deal because it breaks users of the library
that are using this symbol. So it was relatively evident that the
correct fix was not to acknowledge the disparition of the symbol
(at least not without an explanation of why it's not important).


Thanks Raphael, I need to be more careful and pay attention before
any change, you're right, I need to understand better.



He also pointed towards a possible upstream fix. Do you want to look into
backporting this?


I tried to get the latest version (0.7.0+git20201012.93724e4), applied the patch
https://github.com/rtrlib/rtrlib/pull/260/commits/f81b70bf03a52b2e25f7154062c538dc050b3571
yet the bug continues.
Unfortunately I was not successful.

Regards,
--
Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro 
4096R: 1B8C F656 EF3B 8447 2F48 F0E7 82FB F706 0B2F 7D00



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Request to review and upload librtr 0.6.3-2

2021-01-08 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi,

On Thu, 24 Dec 2020, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote:
> I fixed an RC bug [0] in librtr [1].
> 
> Please, review and upload.

Adrian Bunk pointed out that your fix is clearly incorrect. Can you at
least revert your change please ? It would be nice if you tried to
understand your changes before you are doing them. A symbol that
disappears is a big deal because it breaks users of the library
that are using this symbol. So it was relatively evident that the
correct fix was not to acknowledge the disparition of the symbol
(at least not without an explanation of why it's not important).

He also pointed towards a possible upstream fix. Do you want to look into
backporting this?

Cheers,
-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀   Raphaël Hertzog 
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋The Debian Handbook: https://debian-handbook.info/get/
  ⠈⠳⣄   Debian Long Term Support: https://deb.li/LTS


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Request to review and upload librtr 0.6.3-2

2020-12-23 Thread Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro

Hello Team,

I fixed an RC bug [0] in librtr [1].

Please, review and upload.

[0] https://bugs.debian.org/975174
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/librtr

Regards,
--
Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro 
4096R: 1B8C F656 EF3B 8447 2F48 F0E7 82FB F706 0B2F 7D00



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature