Re: arno-iptables-firewall 2.0.3-1~rc4
Hello Sven, $gbp buildpackage --git-pbuilder --git-dist=stretch > > on branch debian/master fails with > > [...] > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: debhelper (>= 12) but it is > not going to be installed > Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... > [...] > > while > > $ gbp buildpackage --git-pbuilder --git-dist=sid > > builds successfully. > > This seems to convince me we have to roll back the DH level for > stretch. > I use sbuild instead of pbuilder, so I don't know which are the exact steps you have to follow, but you need to enable the backports repository on your build environment, debhelper 12 is available there and so the build works :) .. I would branch a debian/stretch-bpo from 2.0.3-1 and prepare > d/changelog accordingly. Or is this something I complete have to leave > to you? Yep, that's the steps, feel free to do it and ping me once you want me to review and sponsor, please note that we can only upload after 2.0.3-1 hits testing. Thanks for your work Sven, Regards, -- Samuel Henrique
Re: arno-iptables-firewall 2.0.3-1~rc4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Samuel, On Monday, 14.01.2019, 21:08 + Samuel Henrique wrote: > Hello Sven, > > 1. prepare a 2.0.3-1~bpo9+1. This would only require DH level to be > > rolled back to 11. > > > > I'm lost here, why do we need to roll back to DH 11? I believe so as DH on stretch does not support level 12 according to the manpage [1]. In case that's not relevant ... > > > > 2. prepare a 2.0.1.f-2 from 2.0.1.f-1.1 patched for Bug #824684. > > This > > could be a minimal change leaving all the older packaging flaws in > > place. > > > > Let's just backport 2.0.3-1. ... I would branch a debian/stretch-bpo from 2.0.3-1 and prepare d/changelog accordingly. Or is this something I complete have to leave to you? Best, Sven [1] https://manpages.debian.org/stretch/debhelper/debhelper.7.en.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEPfXoqkP8n9/QhvGVrfUO2vit1YUFAlw+KBgACgkQrfUO2vit 1YXPIA//Uxy1haWxmYcXcg1eVpYMxuG49XtmcfbV/Docl5961wYDaGooDBg74he6 TAZ9Qftp27aEMHQebxu/0qRMonq64K/HX9en8rGeJiXPQcWSx0nWMCHmxYDy+v7r hnUbuZzpHQrRGWxes+38JIoos1fCyP/N6zF2S9Zng3SVLKbECQpc6ZurWBaGk+2b qeXjpbjCl1zU4Hei3QW174mOHqqZJvZGT1H4Fk+M9q5dLmzKoXS0CuESKHS+l8R+ ZDQtZ5d33GciGcEgRrp8jqSy1XyWwF+qlzTsH27eFD06+CwmpCqqZkte5oEff63X /pkLsPFXn311W2FSA+NHSYlYdUbP3HG9jitk46daajUmSUZYc6EpSlXpFUOItqYh kND+7dlkJBapLnpsnuLvdNpu5WKuzAabLCXGkoZVpLmL7SrdJWoqZr3uG4W6t3ET NrIsOw4U+q+GRzyh8Lgd5q4vBZSFHmKpC5qYpXXywpXe7MyM3bzOdlerdETOs7e8 FTfhrozoFvbw6MB5+2axHmhAZ9eQFxEtCUxI6QXZu/N8pzubXl/edAr0ZLBZnDrk 0hdHIEoww5zWH47901y61cgjaRtNNDocSkmVf7CbHZGHWuGauOSYTqvBpk0myyZ0 ECPyuFDayvv002Txq+nTsIM3SWPvMrUSLXHYQvS25sicrVH3GTw= =0Q2z -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: arno-iptables-firewall 2.0.3-1~rc4
Hello Sven, 1. prepare a 2.0.3-1~bpo9+1. This would only require DH level to be > rolled back to 11. > I'm lost here, why do we need to roll back to DH 11? > 2. prepare a 2.0.1.f-2 from 2.0.1.f-1.1 patched for Bug #824684. This > could be a minimal change leaving all the older packaging flaws in > place. > Let's just backport 2.0.3-1. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique
Re: arno-iptables-firewall 2.0.3-1~rc4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Team, regarding the statement > Now it starts on system boot. and the question > Is it an idea to upload this new package to stretch-backports? I see two ways to go: 1. prepare a 2.0.3-1~bpo9+1. This would only require DH level to be rolled back to 11. 2. prepare a 2.0.1.f-2 from 2.0.1.f-1.1 patched for Bug #824684. This could be a minimal change leaving all the older packaging flaws in place. What is the preferred approach in your opinion? Best, Sven Am On Saturday, 12.01.2019, 18:54 +0100 Odd Martin Baanrud wrote: > Hello, > > Upgrading to the latest version of arno-iptables-firewall worked > fine. > Now it starts on system boot. > Thanks for a real cleanup! > > Is it an idea to upload this new package to stretch-backports? > It shouldn’t be a problem, since nothing has been changed in the > configuration area. > > Regards, Martin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEPfXoqkP8n9/QhvGVrfUO2vit1YUFAlw8+V0ACgkQrfUO2vit 1YVR1xAAgkJKdFxVTD2qopssSbPjfv0FvbioNnKfHDZKZpICSNGTePUcyYEWEVk5 yZeqpH9zhdW32L/RQVfPBG5lKK/B7wLxMGszhAvcH9vRcXh/u7fpTkhJf0WDAdOl 9WZGgKvlusPXcAkimV3gnGN20M2GLXks1oZvRv5bb3uxTAC2Fm04l6e3xd81FDOg AI0YwrBVb/pHShY9899WUrgWkqgZMcQ6X4/eEyH7Wh+CWQXHpf24XCVL1Q4rO9kM 9WuMlI8Julx3oD1Qklbe/drtvwBHYLGP/WFMUX0eq3sUEzoG+FpzA1l9lNXJuuBt M6N8252JbIYly4qqMkr3fR+VBRVsE6w6IGWDAaTb1Iat3zqLLv0hQm1waJrxjRXz ko3j6aWEo9Gm6fEvPacVuRMKpknREWF5nD3yZK4nEh1At69MtVlDK0Gkzg9Q7laW gTMNVdUTdAOBx6OFwS8bdaHKT2NCmpApwGeszL/Rf5eOaPc23LlXPXCvXv6XUkFX kkK7+ICWo8x+wCqx4uBo9HIynNHN7EdsbD7MrlzmtJALH645mAcXTphYqwHD+7Sg dLSDFd/ZPQzYrHFD8m/ZYRA0UOTse28s5L5131TkRVIoKuXaHJXpHF35LntWZdle 9XKfZ2dtRwGk1l4nvAQAbqaxwydUTiPCsxoXpS1q76J1jdkX6Js= =Y0P8 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: arno-iptables-firewall 2.0.3-1~rc4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Martin, thank you for testing and reporting. Regards, Sven On Saturday, 12.01.2019, 18:54 +0100 Odd Martin Baanrud wrote: > Hello, > > Upgrading to the latest version of arno-iptables-firewall worked > fine. > Now it starts on system boot. > Thanks for a real cleanup! > > Is it an idea to upload this new package to stretch-backports? > It shouldn’t be a problem, since nothing has been changed in the > configuration area. > > Regards, Martin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEPfXoqkP8n9/QhvGVrfUO2vit1YUFAlw89qEACgkQrfUO2vit 1YX5FA//YzHfmMYPoE08xtvAEnQJA0+l/2P+sUqSqqrWfn3z2eKiF/iqo6ubA0th 5MgI3TyJQl9ChXV99cC+Vbvzz3dCueDNDqidhn7MOelkjllT8p5dcGlJEjqz2BL0 LlEsHNWdDEg8WA1DYPiT139GCONRKZF1THXbLfMW7Z6IlW4e3OUgUTm+nrQ0Jj0q 05kszRh1Ws+8O47JHB6pspv1YPzlIYanU6lsaWKmy/2OakfXDqOw4j5Gu82Fxvnz +FbXcYVIezWfkzc+ie3G2bxqBWBq/I2ywasuECjI71o04/b+37YuzyLAsmt/ZAK1 7sBcRvbZR+98VG+RF7qJRZ8/4FvGD2wyb0MoyJ8l/sGGr9RKq2HiJZcL9R4/yKG3 kZbBb1/X2IL3JIRS6VtoegqYYD1jKSvQ12ZW1sD+x3nLgCR9iktg27k3HKLIaol5 Nhih0iDH9M2ePXEQNrQ5N+FmkSx69Vim6t2tkztrU1xMmcf3IGfd1rDcIaUOTpVP M98P+IQe3Amm5CZrZbYUziupZ5P8DGGewF1mgKUXkm5xYVhzv/KjB9lc17DQVeWe jbv2fNijPVLw6W6ZJ8W7XGPlmdQeK0657VIIOtKYEqXF7iGRUYVwiaLNVoRdOcKe n20oLde134HN+jUiNm2K01/GHc2NJN1tjM2DQ2j2oQBT9JmzEyE= =nz/X -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: arno-iptables-firewall 2.0.3-1~rc4
Hi Marcus, thanks a lot for your report. Sven Am Donnerstag, den 10.01.2019, 15:40 +0100 schrieb Marcus Frings: > Hi Sven, > > On Tue, 08 Jan 2019 19:33:43 +0100, Sven Geuer > > wrote: > > > Hi Marcus, > > arno-iptables-firewall has been accepted into experimental [1]. > > It would be of great help if you could test the new arno package > > and > > give feedback at debian-security-tools@lists.debian.org. > > Especially your experiences with upgrading from version 2.0.1.f or > > older is of interest. > > Thanks for contacting me, since I am the one who filed bug number > #862856 in 2017. Many thanks for your work on improving > arno-iptables-firewall in Debian and adopting it as new maintainer, > as > I had the impression that the package looked rather abandoned! I am > happy to give some feedback here. However, my feedback is purely > based > on my perspective as a regular user, and I did not investigate the > quality of the Debian packaging itself. > > After reading the changelog entry of your version, I upgraded from > version 2.0.1.f to yours on a couple of systems (all based on sid). > In > all cases the upgrade proceeded smoothly without problems. I am > running > your packaged version since two days now, and until now I have not > encountered any problem. > > Best regards, > Marcus > > PS: I am not subscribed to d-s-t@l.d.o, and unfortunately this > mailing > list is not available via the Gmane NNTP gateway, so please CC me in > future responses from the list (in case that there are any).
Re: arno-iptables-firewall 2.0.3-1~rc4
Hi Sven, On Tue, 08 Jan 2019 19:33:43 +0100, Sven Geuer wrote: > Hi Marcus, > arno-iptables-firewall has been accepted into experimental [1]. > It would be of great help if you could test the new arno package and > give feedback at debian-security-tools@lists.debian.org. > Especially your experiences with upgrading from version 2.0.1.f or > older is of interest. Thanks for contacting me, since I am the one who filed bug number #862856 in 2017. Many thanks for your work on improving arno-iptables-firewall in Debian and adopting it as new maintainer, as I had the impression that the package looked rather abandoned! I am happy to give some feedback here. However, my feedback is purely based on my perspective as a regular user, and I did not investigate the quality of the Debian packaging itself. After reading the changelog entry of your version, I upgraded from version 2.0.1.f to yours on a couple of systems (all based on sid). In all cases the upgrade proceeded smoothly without problems. I am running your packaged version since two days now, and until now I have not encountered any problem. Best regards, Marcus PS: I am not subscribed to d-s-t@l.d.o, and unfortunately this mailing list is not available via the Gmane NNTP gateway, so please CC me in future responses from the list (in case that there are any). -- RWTH Aachen University, Institute of Organic Chemistry, Landoltweg 1, 52074 Aachen, Germany. https://bolm.oc.rwth-aachen.de/ OpenPGP: 6C3458EE737CE22C0EF9FA3BE88FEBBE202CE599 (ed25519, preferred) OpenPGP: 0138DA92EDFFB27DD270F86DB475E207BAB58229 (dsa1024, disfavoured) pgpgiDEEHs1qk.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
