Re: DSA-1615-1 vs. tracker

2008-09-08 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:47:01 +0200 (CEST) Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:

> On Mon, September 8, 2008 13:31, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Anyway, please find attached a patch that should fix the issue. Most
> > xulrunner entries here were marked as , some were marked with the
> > icedove version number instead of the xulrunner one.
> 
> Thanks for your help. I've applied the patch.

Thanks to Gerfried for providing a patch and thanks to Thijs for
applying it.  I can now confirm that the inconsistencies seems to be
fixed.

Bye.

-- 
 http://frx.netsons.org/doc/index.html#nanodocs
 The nano-document series is here!
. Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4


pgpFz1x1T456G.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: DSA-1615-1 vs. tracker

2008-09-08 Thread Steffen Joeris
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 09:47:01 pm Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Mon, September 8, 2008 13:31, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Anyway, please find attached a patch that should fix the issue. Most
> > xulrunner entries here were marked as , some were marked with
> > the icedove version number instead of the xulrunner one.
>
> Thanks for your help. I've applied the patch. Can I add your account as a
> committer for the tracker?
I've already done this. :)

Cheers
Steffen


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: DSA-1615-1 vs. tracker

2008-09-08 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-08 13:47:01 CEST]:
> On Mon, September 8, 2008 13:31, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Anyway, please find attached a patch that should fix the issue. Most
> > xulrunner entries here were marked as , some were marked with the
> > icedove version number instead of the xulrunner one.
> 
> Thanks for your help. I've applied the patch.

 Thank you for being so fast. :)

> Can I add your account as a committer for the tracker?

 Propably not, Steffen did so already. ;)

 I guess as I haven't received any feedback about my patch to the
Makefile it is fine to commit that? I will try to dig into how to
produce outstanding issue pages for volatile and backports next then.

 So long,
Rhonda


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Secure-testing-commits] r9775 - data/CVE

2008-09-08 Thread Steffen Joeris
Hi Thijs

On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 09:14:28 pm Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Mon, September 8, 2008 13:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Regression fixed in wordnet
> >
> > -   - wordnet 1:3.0-12 (medium; bug #497441)
> > +   - wordnet 1:3.0-13 (medium; bug #497441)
>
> Since the regression doesn't have security implications, wouldn't it be
> more accurate to keep the fixed-version at 1:3.0-12?
I thought about it as well, but if I recall correctly, we have always treated 
regressions (also the ones that just introduced normal bugs) like this.
But I might be off here, so if you are sure go ahead and revert it.

Cheers
Steffen



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: DSA-1615-1 vs. tracker

2008-09-08 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Mon, September 8, 2008 13:31, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Anyway, please find attached a patch that should fix the issue. Most
> xulrunner entries here were marked as , some were marked with the
> icedove version number instead of the xulrunner one.

Thanks for your help. I've applied the patch. Can I add your account as a
committer for the tracker?


cheers,
Thijs


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DSA-1615-1 vs. tracker

2008-09-08 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-07 10:18:32 CEST]:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:38:32 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:15:31 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 07:45:42PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:25:16 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > Can someone please fix this?
> > > 
> > > It will be fixed in a few days.
> > 
> > It seems still unfixed: someone, please?
> 
> This seems to be *still unfixed* and has been so since July...
> Can someone please fix the reported inconsistencies?

 It would had been convenient if you wouldn't have stripped out all the
useful informations from the replies so I had to go dig in the archives
what you are so upset about...

 Anyway, please find attached a patch that should fix the issue. Most
xulrunner entries here were marked as , some were marked with
the icedove version number instead of the xulrunner one.

 Thanks in advance for applying,
Rhonda


dsa-1615-1-fix.diff.gz
Description: Binary data


Re: [Secure-testing-commits] r9775 - data/CVE

2008-09-08 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Mon, September 8, 2008 13:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Regression fixed in wordnet

> - - wordnet 1:3.0-12 (medium; bug #497441)
> + - wordnet 1:3.0-13 (medium; bug #497441)

Since the regression doesn't have security implications, wouldn't it be
more accurate to keep the fixed-version at 1:3.0-12?


Thijs


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]