DSA-2254-1 vs. tracker
Hello, while looking at DSA-2254-1 [1], I noticed that the CVE-2011-1760 tracker page [2] does not list oprofile versions for wheezy or sid. Maybe it's because the fixed version info for (unstable) is referred to the non-existent source package opcontrol? [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2011/msg00124.html [2] http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-1760 -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgpMYr0BzV21v.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: DSA-2254-1 vs. tracker
Francesco Poli wrote: Hello, while looking at DSA-2254-1 [1], I noticed that the CVE-2011-1760 tracker page [2] does not list oprofile versions for wheezy or sid. Maybe it's because the fixed version info for (unstable) is referred to the non-existent source package opcontrol? [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2011/msg00124.html [2] http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-1760 fixed. you can see in [2] that the source package name was entered incorrectly as opcontrol instead of oprofile. best wishes, mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-tracker-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110604162538.30b52425.michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com
Re: DSA-2254-1 vs. tracker
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:25:38 -0400 Michael Gilbert wrote: Francesco Poli wrote: Hello, while looking at DSA-2254-1 [1], I noticed that the CVE-2011-1760 tracker page [2] does not list oprofile versions for wheezy or sid. Maybe it's because the fixed version info for (unstable) is referred to the non-existent source package opcontrol? [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2011/msg00124.html [2] http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-1760 fixed. Perfect! Thanks a lot. you can see in [2] that the source package name was entered incorrectly as opcontrol instead of oprofile. Yes, that's exactly what I was suspecting (as I said). Thanks for confirming. Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgpGY9gEMIBZN.pgp Description: PGP signature
